ift s to aeistih,ront.thisnt early. the united states will see about 260,000 cases of breast cancer per year. 42,0 second elitist -- second leading cause of cancer. >> are there some who think it will do more harm than good? when they raised the age, they said it was because there were too many. -- too many people >> how would we prevent, versus how much -- how many cases of cancer would we prevent, versus how many false positives? for all of these different types of cancer screening tests. given the fact that we have seen a rise in breast cancer cases especially among lack women, who are more lately to get an aggressive form of breast cancer. we will learn more in june when they put forth the data. >> i wonder, are there worries with radiation? >> we get asked about this all the time. mammograms are a form of an x-ray. or is a small amount of x-rays you are subjected to. according to johns hopkins, the amount of radiation would get from a mammogram is equivalent to the amount of background radiation, from living on pla

the formula ifts. margaret: in 20 you voted for joe biden. in 20 24, if it is joe biden versus not donald trump, do you know who you would vote for? charlie: i don't know. i'd be pretty certain i would vote for joe biden so in order to get that republican nomination, you will have had to make so many compromises, so many moral compromises with a republican party that has become so extreme. the problem republicans have is not just donald trump. when donald trump leaves, the dysfunction of the party does not go away, and the extremism of the republican party, its willingness to accept conspiracy theories and the authoritarian will be ongoing. margaret: you don't think any candidate who gets the republican another nation will have the ability to break the fever? charlie: i'd sure like to think they would. i don't think this fever will break for a very long time. margaret: this week, to members of representative connolly's staff were attacked with a metal bat. the attacker was reportedly looking for the congressman. political violence is a very r

yo should be allowed to engage in this behavior even ift is like t confuse consumers about the source o your goods or about the sponsorship o approval and i thinkha if you just can't be squared away with the lanham act itself and isn't compelled by the first amendment. i welcome any questions. >> so wt exactly would you do with rogers. >> it incorrectly decided and the standard is inconsistent with of the text of the act a i think you can see that for ast three reasons. first as applied by the ninth circuit, it is a tha infringement has to satisfy. u have to get over rogers and and that is plainly inconton with the way the statute was design operate. second it is substantively it requires showing either a completek of artistic relevance or that the use of the trademark is explicitly ding but of course as ned, you can have confusing marks that are misleao rogers currently operating to protect a lot of behaviorst could cause, likely to cause confusion to consumers and the act makes that kind of trademark use actionable as infringemt. and of the third point rogers ul't conceive of as an

right at game time, we'll see showers approaching san francisco, and ift's going to continue off and on through the overnight and into early tomorrow morning, even tomorrow there will be times when we take a break from the rain and other areas are going to see some showers moving through. it's not until thursday when that rain completely tapers off. between now and then, we're looking at mostly about a half inch of rainfall, but it could be over an inch of rain for the coastline and parts of the santa cruz mountains. and then our temperatures only reach into the upper 50s and low 60s for today. this is much cooler than normal, and it only gets lightly warmer over the next few days as we continue with those rain chances. laura and marcus? >>> happening now, still no agreement for oakland teachers to negotiate late into the night to try to avert a potential strike. plans for thursday, teachers announced a new deadline announced a new deadline accusing the district ♪ the babybel snack heroes are here to save the day. ♪ anand restore e the goodnene. babybybel join t the goodnesess. inner

. ~ ., ., g clyde realised teach her a .ift, ~ ., ., _ gift.reat c] as a . human being. human being. gift. i like to treat c] as a - human being. human being. to treat— human being. human being. to treat him— human being. human being. to treat him like a decent person, to show— treat him like a decent person, to show interest in him, because _ to show interest in him, because in every direction we take, — because in every direction we take, there's an awful lot of apathv _ take, there's an awful lot of a ath . ., , take, there's an awful lot of aath . ., , ., take, there's an awful lot of aath _ ., ., apathy. people often overlook, i sot apathy. people often overlook, l spot things — apathy. people often overlook, i spot things that _ apathy. people often overlook, i spot things that people - apathy. people often overlook, i spot things that people don'tl i spot things that people don't normally see. {j i spot things that people don't normally see.— normally see. c] is now recognised _ normally see. c] is now recognised for - normally see. c] i

a human being with -ifts as a human being. a human being with gifts that— as a human being.t got. to treat him like a — gifts that i haven't got. to treat him like a decent person, to show interest— him like a decent person, to show interest in— him like a decent person, to show interest in him, because in every direction — interest in him, because in every direction we take, there is an awful lot of— direction we take, there is an awful lot of apathy. | direction we take, there is an awful lot of apathy-— lot of apathy. i spot things that eo - le lot of apathy. i spot things that people normally _ lot of apathy. i spot things that people normally overlook. i lot of apathy. i spot things that people normally overlook. this| people normally overlook. this relationship — people normally overlook. this relationship spanning 30 years has now seen cj recognised for his work by the royal photographic society. you are live with bbc news. let's turn to another story that has been making the headlines here in the uk today. we wa nt we want to talk about coronation day and the police

okay, study your chemistry from the engine, and the second donut there, we will take a smear under uh, ift uh it's all sent to the ground, there are chemists with engines. uh, figured out what they have there with fuel, what kind of sediment do they have there. and here is this experiment that we took pdft, he, when we started to explore here on earth. it turned out that in these samples there are viable organisms, bacteria, bacteria, yes, that is, uh, so after all, in our school there, we study that we have a biosphere. that is, this is what is alive, what lives on earth, it is a sphere, it is limited by a height, well, about 80 km. yes, there embroider above 80 km. we used to think that nothing lives, and the international space station is a vacuum, yes, a vacuum, there solar radiation. it's the temperature drop. plus 150 minus 150. yes, it’s clear that nothing should be alive there and everyone thought, but there can’t be anything alive, but it turned out that this was an experiment. we are this experiment. i say it again, but we are still doing it, that is, we take these from different

. >> ift's broader than that we worry about what others have if it's broader than that we start being concerned about impairing a who are referencing the mark from doing thatn their work. i guess my thought was, all right, we have these artist with first amendment rights or parody or whatever. the way we prevent infringing thr rights is by making sure that trademark holders are able to come in and acc them of problem if they, the artist, are trying to designate the source of their products by usin mark. >> i think tt' a reasonable policy. is my response to congress. when you regardless of what the e was trying to do that's the point of confusion. that's the area of confusion you say the statute is a >> roger wasn't until 2003. we had a vibrant film and artistic community. the arts have flourished. >> all right, one l question. all right, let say that's my view if i think the laham act only kicks in if we have an item passed off as you say or an item that creating confusion as to the source oren begin or sponsorship,ight. do you have an argument in this case with rpect to this item? >>

is court's commercial speech, ncmercial speech distinction andha teaches that it's only commercial ift does no more than propose a transaction. in thisas that. he isn't proposing a transaction cause there is no pduct. it's simply making a joke and it noncommercial. that is what the struggle was in the ninth cirit records case looking back at the legislative history and also the commentary we've submitted to the court analyzing what this exclusion was supposed to serve and what the reference was and how it fits with not only this urt's doctrine on the noncommercial speech but also how it fits with of the other exclusions. >> i still don't know what that means, but to giv me an example of something that is commercia then. >>nd advertisement. >> no, something that is commercial. >> i think an advertisement woulbe commercial speech that proposes a transaction. so if we were to have something is advertid a product,et's say bad daniels whiskey that advertisemenwould be commercialpeech, you're proposing a transaction but that isn't what we're doing here. we are not selling a bottle of diluted

and it reeks, sean , o and ift k retaliator. >> that's forbidden by law. john's right. that's not all it has the stench of obstruction of o a congressional investigation. and that's also illegal. it's a felony. >> but, you know, is anybody surprised by this? this is a patter n of conduct, a cover up of biden corruption, you know, use all means forward to punish people who come forward with legitimat we evidence. the law be . it's meant to frighten and intimate. >> eight and there's ample evidence the president's son pocketed millions and didn't pay taxes on it. that's tax evasion.x ev that's taxasio fraud. >> anybody else would have been prosecuted long ago. be prosecubut as joe biden famoo boasted, no one f'uslys with a b biden. i guess that meansen the irs as well. i guess you're probably right, john . >> let me ask you this. the bottom line question is how much money did the biden family do in business? with countries like china and russia and kazakhstan? how ukraine? how much money did they profit in all of these ventures? how come it's taken so long to get to the b

no, i would not be on this journey, you know, i would not be on this journey that on ift a it was secured y to >> what do you want everyone inu the country to know tonight about your daughter and about your righteous anger? atoward our government that is refusing to shut this border down from these fraudulent asylum seekers and other criminals that ares? actually coming across? >>o all they had to do was makd one phone call.e one ph if they would have madone one phone call to el salvador, they would have known that he was a known gang member. >> local police found out that he was a known gang member. why couldn't they made that one call? >> and it would have savedhter's my daughter's life. right now in the united states , there's a huge debate about whether we should be welcoming to more refugees into the unite td states . and the problem is , in many cases, not this many cases. it's impossiblee to vet these people. they don't have papershey're. ea they say they're fromy one country, but you can't really tell where they're fromdh because they ditcheir pa their e at the border. >> given th

ift were not for t fda's approval, they would be engaging in other activities, such as protecting the value of life, advocating for greater protections and arguing against surgicalbortions. >> does anythingo kate what activities your clients were unable to do because of the version of resources? >> yes, your honor. this court's decision says it was not required to identify specific products. that is one way to sw organizational harm. the courts partly which talked about specific projects. as long as you have a diversion resources that suffices. >> do you have anything further? >> i wouldike to mention the specific problem with the 2016 approval. the fdstpped away nearly every safeguard. they did not have a reasoned explanation for doing so. they did not have a single study that looked at allf ese changes. the fda --. what is certainly required is an explanation for w tt does not exist. that is completely absent from the rerd here. in additn, it requires a few things. it requires adequate testing, and a require substantial evidence. the fda aired in 2000 and 2016 by relying on studies

is ai going to make companies more efficient, make ift cheape or easier to do these things or just increase day? he thinks this is just a situation where all this technology in the past has been used to make the product better. it's not going to be cheaper or increase margins, but it will make the product better. what do you think? >> i think it's absolutely going to make the product better we're focused on how do we make all of our customers more productive if you think about you can spend less time on tasks like meeting summaries and more time with your team, that makes us all better and that improve human connection that's really what we're focused on i think in the near term what you're going to see are significant investments across all companies as we're looking to leverage our approaches, take a sfed rated approach to ai. you're going to benefit from the earnings from our language models as well as some of these key collaborations we put in place and, of course, our customers' models as well. in the future i think we're going to see a very different time where we don't have to spend

well, on this whole thing . ift�*rtcc c“ttttt : themselves.vidual will be there stored . r— individual will be there stored . r tte— individual will be there stored . r tte tte— individual will be there stored . i like the idea— individual will be there stored . i like the idea of- individual will be there stored . i like the idea of this. i know isabelle's got a reservations with this, but i mean, i've been to see loads of elvis concert on stage where he's not there, but their visuals of him. frank sinatra's not there, but there's visuals of him. and i look forward to when they do it for johnny cash, for instance , or anybody pulling for instance, or anybody pulling those brands who's in charge of which bits that he features in and how they feature what they endorse. the elvis case, it's trtscttta— endorse. the elvis case, it's trtscttta ts— endorse. the elvis case, it's priscilla is yeah.— endorse. the elvis case, it's priscilla is yeah. - rt: the elvis case, it's priscilla is yeah. '“r: priscilla is yeah. and that's tne.— priscilla is yeah.

�*ift�*vi; ”vi; a heavy dose of opinion. we're on e nnteettn— a heavy dose of opinion. the slide risk making that a self—fulfilling tntne.— making that a self—fulfilling tntneev. ne— making that a self—fulfilling prophecy. he made the intervention— prophecy. he made the intervention after tories voiced concerns at a national conservatism - concerns at a national conservatism conference this neet— conservatism conference this neet etett— conservatism conference this week about the _ conservatism conference this week about the state of britain. nntet— week about the state of britain. wnttet tnet— week about the state of britain. whilst nigel farage of this penen— whilst nigel farage of this tenen eett— whilst nigel farage of this parish said brexit had failed ent— parish said brexit had failed ent vett— parish said brexit had failed and keir starmer, the labour teeter— and keir starmer, the labour teetet ,— and keir starmer, the labour leader , vowed— and keir starmer, the labour leader , vowed to— and keir starmer, the labour leader , vowed to rework the eu leader, vowed

and the heat pump decides what's going on. ift�*iccc what's going on.y worked that have not necessarily worked to tetin— that have not necessarily worked to tetin witn— that have not necessarily worked to begin with or— that have not necessarily worked to begin with or worked in the way— to begin with or worked in the not tntt— to begin with or worked in the toy tnct tnet— to begin with or worked in the way that they should. they're nottint — working very well in europe, ite— working very well in europe, toe-sot,— working very well in europe, i've say, scandinavian i've got to say, in scandinavian countie— i've got to say, in scandinavian countries particularly. but teon— countries particularly. but teon, tnete— countries particularly. but yeah, there are hurdles we've got— yeah, there are hurdles we've tot-over— yeah, there are hurdles we've tot-ovet-tntl got to get over those. and i'm sure .technologies- got to get over those. and i'm sure technologies that sure the technologies that operate— sure the technologies that operate these _ sure the technol

~ift . “ . well, he doesn't lives in it. well, he doesn't the— lives in it.e anything but you want tt ott— don't give anything but you want tt ott hoot— don't give anything but you want tt ott hook to— don't give anything but you want it all back to you,— don't give anything but you want it all back to you, you're out in it all back to you, you're out tn the— it all back to you, you're out tn the cote.— it all back to you, you're out in the cold. and— it all back to you, you're out in the cold. and the whole nonsense of— in the cold. and the whole nonsense of going back, rushing hoot— nonsense of going back, rushing hook to— nonsense of going back, rushing hook to he— nonsense of going back, rushing back to be with— nonsense of going back, rushing back to be with archie for his httthtow— back to be with archie for his httthoow .— back to be with archie for his htnhoow . wou— back to be with archie for his birthday , you got there at 8:30 birthday, you got there at 8:30 at birthday, you got there at 8:30 ot ntghte— birthday, you got there at 8:30 ot ntghte ho—

~ift . “ . well, he doesn't lives in it. well, he doesn't the— lives in it.ve anything but you want tt ott— don't give anything but you want tt ott hoot— don't give anything but you want tt ott hook to— don't give anything but you want it all back to you,— don't give anything but you want it all back to you, you're out in it all back to you, you're out tn the— it all back to you, you're out tn the cote.— it all back to you, you're out in the cold. and— it all back to you, you're out in the cold. and the whole nonsense of— in the cold. and the whole nonsense of going back, rushing hoot— nonsense of going back, rushing hook to— nonsense of going back, rushing hook to he— nonsense of going back, rushing back to be with— nonsense of going back, rushing back to be with archie for his httthtow— back to be with archie for his httthoow .— back to be with archie for his htnhoow . wou— back to be with archie for his birthday , you got there at 8:30 birthday, you got there at 8:30 at birthday, you got there at 8:30 ot ntghte— birthday, you got there at 8:30 ot ntghte ho

it's still a petrol— but it's still a petrol engine. c cc ift: so it's still a petrol engine. need to build these gigafactories. we're told as we because you you build the electric cars near to the batteries because the batteries are very, very heavy and very, very expensive to transport and even to import the hard stuff to make them as well. the lithium, the make them as well. the lithium, tne cotoit— make them as well. the lithium, the cobalt, all— make them as well. the lithium, the cobalt, all the— make them as well. the lithium, the cobalt, all the rare- the lithium, the cobalt, all the rare earths ont— the cobalt, all the rare earths ont eo— the cobalt, all the rare earths and so on. and— the cobalt, all the rare earths and so on. and i— the cobalt, all the rare earths and so on. '“t3 and so on. and i think with all this energy security being highlighted after the war in ukraine, all this new emphasis on energy security , a lot of on energy security, a lot of people are now questioning whether or not evs really are the answer, that this is the way we should be going. and

are they playin heartless , ift does appear i find this bonkers.llowing the teens just before their deaths— following the teens just before their deaths .— following the teens just before their deaths . two— following the teens just before their deaths . two cars were set their deaths. two cars were set attent— their deaths. two cars were set attdnt .— their deaths. two cars were set alight , windows— their deaths. two cars were set alight, windows were smashed in the alight, windows were smashed in tne vtetence— alight, windows were smashed in the violence with— alight, windows were smashed in the violence with nine people anected— the violence with nine people arrested following the disorder . pence— arrested following the disorder . tettce tn— arrested following the disorder . police in northern ireland nave— . police in northern ireland have released— . police in northern ireland have released new footage of cevet— have released new footage of several vehicles— have released new footage of several vehicles used by the gunman— several vehicles u