, botunian publishes information that igor fedotov, in what year 2002, in the 99th year, a member of the military judge of the biloghirsky garrison of the far eastern military district, on 16.08.2002, was released early from the military from military service to the reserve and excluded from the personnel list in 2002 accepted for military service under a contract in the armed forces of ukraine, activists pay attention to this and ask a logical question and is it possible for us to actually be in the judicial corps because you are a person with military experience of the russian federation ? you know, i don’t know how it is here. let the bodies sort it out. write that this person does not work for the interests of the russian federation, but the question arose first because he is not even in court. i i absolutely don't want to defend him, let him be his own lawyer if he can do it, i'm talking about something else, about the fact that the commission did not want to appoint the winner of the competition to this position and the question of the court has already arisen in the repeated f

and here is the judge of the sixth appellate administrative judge of the court igor fedotov. in his hands is the fate of several strategically important cases for the country together with colleagues yevgeny sorochka and nataliya yehorova. he has to decide the appeal regarding the competition to the sap e for now this whole story is blocked very big questions in fact about his russian citizenship and the fact that he was not a military judge as i understand it in russia vitaly shabonin told us about this to the federation. and to be honest, you just give up when you see the staffing of the ukrainian courts. and when you realize that, well, actually, we don't have enough judges, that's what they're talking about. he has those who do not want to take bribes. comment on this, please. well, you know, historically , there has been a situation where the judicial corps is a certain caste of the chosen ones, and we very often meet when, in fact, relatives are appointed as judges. nephews, children, brothers of acting judges. that is, it is a fairly closed system that was formed in uk

for the security service of ukraine to pay attention specifically to this judge, his name is eh igor fedotovh and well, how would you see what is happening? what kind of people do you see around this whole korean osk tatorov yarmak and there is a question about what viktoria sparks says when he asks the administration of baydun to provide information about the connections of the yharmak a-a from the russian federation a-a i warned er-e on the airwaves er-e when before that we talked about the amount of reforms in ukraine that we will do will affect the military assistance a-a what we now see - this is probably one of the worst scenarios that we have we can theoretically do it in general. and we take a-a man who was fired from nabu because he sold himself to kolomoisky a-a and this man is taking eh to court and who is purely accused of bribery nabu a person who now refuses to be suspected nabu down the solution the first instance and it is that the presiding judge, who is a former citizen of russian farmers, mark, we understand that this story is extremely serious and that it directly concern

now it is in the appeal, and it is a very interesting fact that the presiding judge of the case, igor fedotovrmer a citizen of the russian federation a person who served in the russian army and here i am now if i'm honest i wonder where the sbu is looking and don't they think that it's a little strange that we have a former citizen of the russian federation at the time when we have a war like the federation зашлюшает дело а комјо может выполневепробыть решаться будущесь наш страны. i think this is the concert. let me remind you that oleg tatarov's case was actually transferred to the sbu and it was already buried there. well , that means the case where he was suspected of corruption. you say what you said. i am one of the reasons why the election of the head of sap is so important because it very strongly reduces the power of the prosecutor general of sap and nabu will be completely independent from any decision of the prosecutor general of the presidential administration of anyone and to save the tatars figuratively speaking the following will be impossible and that is why the government is