igt has a casino-style game on facebook. no actual gambling is involved. of course, they make the machines for real world casinos. they just had an annual investor day today. why don't we check in with patti hart, ceo of international game technology to hear more about its companies and prospects, and by the way, she was on remote last time. this time she's in the studio of new jersey, where the online gambling capital of the world may be. welcome back to "mad money." you must be thrilled to be in a state forward enough to think about raising revenues by using igt. >> we actually have an enormous appreciation for the boldness of the state here in new jersey for their real willingness to go first because it takes courage, as we all know, to go first in these kinds of markets. and it's been about a month now. i would say we're very happy with the early things that we're learning. the market's telling us there's great demand for online gaming that it is an infrastructure play. >> right. >> right. you have to get payments proces

folks check in on their flight, but then they have to leave from their flight igt here at terminal a. we have sound from san jose police. >> the mess it caused is pretty extensive as far as the water being dispersed you can check in here at terminal a, go to terminal b, for security, and then catch your flight at terminal a. >> sounds like a mess out there right now. >>> here's a look at traffic with liz. >> reporter: we can tell you gotetting there, no big delays. but obviously with a flooded baggage claim security, that is a big headache for passengers this morning. the main lines the guadeloupe parkway and 880 all free and clear. all your drive times from the south bay are moving at the speed limit. fortunately, getting out of okay london and the drive time up to 20 minutes between there and pleasanton. that is your latest. >>> high clouds this morning, combs all over the map just a bit. that is usually what you see with an offshore wind. that is what we are getting this morning. that means a very nice day ahead. 30s in the valley, 40s inside the basin even out toward the coastline

that help, but there's been a lag for pushing for economic rights and minimum wage and expanded union igt roos. we had strong unions. there's a way in which our good intentions in terms of creating a better safety net, still not enough. has had created this situation where one in four workers now makes so little that they are eligible for welfare. our ideas about the welfare poor versus the working poor, often they're the same thing. >> what we're talking about when you put all this together, ryan, is when the president was talking about when he called income inequality the defining challenge of our time. and here's the kind of thing he means. since 1960, the bottom of the 90% of earners have seen their increase increase by 22%. in the same period of time, the top 1% has had an income increase of 271%. this kind of gap, top 1% of 271% since 1960, bottom 90% only increase of 22%. this uneven gap, this uneven growth is all part of the challenge of our time. and as joan said when you look at labor, when you look at what's gone on with minimum wage, unemployment extension, all of this compoun

unless we know the administration basis for igts sarngsing a program, it's very hard to oversee it.and we have been all during -- and i was going to ask this question -- i mean, olc attorney jay biby wrote congress may no more regular late to maintain and interrogate than it may regulate its ability to troop movements. >>> well, where am i going with this? where i'm going is we have to know what regulations enable a president to move and say yes, do this. and if we don't see it, it's very hard to exercise oversight. now, an administration might want that. they may not want us to exercise it. i know that up close and personal because you are going to encounter some heat from us in that regard. i think most of us have been here a very long time. and we know that we need this information. and not just well, we can give them that but we can't give them that. that's why holding um things that this committee has asked for, specifically with respect to the detention and interrogation report, is so very sensitive with us. i have been after the staff, complete the c.i.a. reviews. it's approp

unless we know the administration basis for igts sarngsing a program, it's very hard to oversee it. and we have been all during -- and i was going to ask this question -- i mean, olc attorney jay biby wrote congress may no more regular late to maintain and interrogate than it may regulate its ability to troop movements. >>> well, where am i going with this? where i'm going is we have to know what regulations enable a president to move and say yes, do this. and if we don't see it, it's very hard to exercise oversight. now, an administration might want that. they may not want us to exercise it. i know that up close and personal because you are going to encounter some heat from us in that regard. i think most of us have been here a very long time. and we know that we need this information. and not just well, we can give them that but we can't give them that. that's why holding um things that this committee has asked for, specifically with respect to the detention and interrogation report, is so very sensitive with us. i have been after the staff, complete the c.i.a. reviews. it's appro

he tells the story to the igt building. quote, most of the people i met inside i.g.t. they never played slot machines on their own time. even one corporate p.r. staff member couldn't resist shaking her head in disbelief as she described scenes of people lining up to play a new machine. quote, it was unbelievable to me, she told me. and when i asked when i.g.t. if he ever plays, he acted as if i insulted him. slots are for losers, he spat. and then coming to his senses, begged me to consider that an off-the-record commept. to a "new york times" reporter, slots are for losers, he said, and many of these losers are your constituents. government's partnership with gambling, there's one kind of loser who is the most lucrative of all, the problem gambler. we refer these people as the expendable americans because everyone else is going to benefit from the public dollars that comes in from people's gambling losses, but millions of people are expendable, the addicts. they spend millions of dollars in research to create the public impression they're exnot exploiting american cit