ihora congratulations. i am glad to see. i hear . i sincerely congratulate mr.y. to the audience and me, this situation, which now consists of publications with initiatives, real or not, regarding the conclusion of such a new agreement between the united states and iran, because at first part of the publication wrote that such an agreement is being prepared, it involves certain concessions from both sides, then iran in the material for bloomberg e denied that such negotiations with the united states are taking place. what is the meaning of these secret negotiations? because there was one such thing that interested me, that in the form of concessions, iran can conditionally speaking abandon plans to supply ballistic missiles to the russian federation, but this is such an additional touch, but in general, what does this agreement have to do with it or not, where is the relationship between the united states and iran moving? in the year when president trump made the decision to withdraw from this and the nuclear agreement, the other partners of this agreement were

ihora's glory to ukraine opened good day. what are we talking about the security formula about the unwavering guarantees that the west is ready and willing to provide to ukraine and right now, the main question is that it should not be so that we will receive some security guarantees not before joining nato, but instead of joining nato, in your opinion, according to your analysis , is there no such threat now with our country? we will not exchange no no no security and membership in nato nato membership is uh the only and main position that you are talking about now and the president and our government and parliament at all levels a-and security guarantees can be provided exclusively on uh- it's time for us not to we will be in nato after the end of this war until we join let's say so until the ratification process is against well and so on, but definitely not a substitute for our membership , the middle is between what finland and israel have , it is being specified what it actually is, what it can be about, you know. now it

excuse me, ihora, i have the impression that there are simply no people in the ministry of sports withof diplomacy knowledge as an understanding of what needs to be said, it is necessary to call, it is necessary to impose oneself, to contact, it is necessary to invite, in the end, to invite to ukraine, to show the stadiums destroyed by the russians, the sports grounds are destroyed while he is the only one to say well, who did it and what kind of person has the right to come to international competitions i am supporting you, mr. igor, i am saying that you have logic, in previous broadcasts about this very thing, they said that it is necessary not to sit down in kyiv to the minister of gutsaite and at the same time the head of the national olympic committee committee and go to negotiations go to geneva to the international olympic committee arrange a press conference video conference with our friendly countries regarding your question about 35 countries , the sports system is based on decisions, first of all, in national federations regarding the admission or non-admission of athletes t