have ongoing pension obligations contributing to those out year deficit growth, again e escalating ihss costs and revenue constraints. changing from the december report highlighted in our march numbers and driving kind of that two year decrease, the largest is the addition of over $60 million of one-time fund balance as reported in the controller's six month report for the current year fiscal year '17-'18. additionally when the controller's office put out the current year -- we say savings, but it could also be additional revenue, 'cause that contributes to that, they also revised their revenue projections for the next four years, given current year actuals. they've revised it for the current year outputs. they've also received information from financial experts in the city to drive these assumptions? so there's higher than anticipated projected ongoing revenue, driven by property tax, business tax, and hotel tax offset by some weakness in sales tax and parking tax? in emergency roterms of salary benefits, our average of moody's and department of finance has been revised down modestly,

additionally for ihss we have received more concrete, and i believe in january correction correction -- direction from the state about how that will be implemented, so that's growing our ihss cost bringing just the two year increase in 18-19 and 19-20 to nearly $100 million more than we had anticipated last december at our five-year ---ed words the words are escaping me the title of this entire word -- five year financial plan. and then finally we do incorporate the annualization of current year models that have passed since december so that includes federal funding for dph that were funded through the federal, as well as $5.5 million of annual cost that went both to the public defender as well as the mayor's office of community housing and development to fund cbo legal defense? and just some reminders what's still really present on our minds and what we think about, we look at these numbers from a financial perspective the one time sources bringing down that $137 million deficit? you know we still have significant structural deficit in those out years. again these numbers are predic

i talked about the ihss projected increase costs. the state allocations in cal works, cal fresh, and ihss, as well. and then, of course continued uncertainty around the federal budget, just given sort of the -- the first budget out of the trump administration and the blueprint as -- as you know mr. wagner for department of public health said, it's really more of a policy statement than actual budget proposals that will go anywhere, but the cues from the administration really show, for example, cuts to the federal snap which used to be called food stamps, work requirements for medi-cal, reductions in medicaid funding, significant changes to tanf, which supports our cal rich program. so really an undercutting of most of the safety net programs that we administer through the human services agency were proposed for reductions in the president's budget, which again was pretty much dead on arrival in congress. it does however indicate the direction that the white house would like to go towards entitlement and safety net programs as well as

the coalition being ihss workers and nonprofit workers. i want it clear this body is not the one that prevented your pay increase. that is the matter of fact. it is a decision for the union and labor business. second, i want to bring to your attention that in april 20, 2017 -- 25, 2017, substituted legislation was introduced to deal with airport workers. may 4, 2017. supervisor sheehy, a member of the committee made a motion to amend and add nonprofit workers, public entities and the file was duplicated. that means he made the motion to add nonprofit workers from 10 to 1 coupling airport workers. it is all one piece of legislation. in the file it was duplicated. the airport only file was sent to the full board with a positive recommendation. that means the legislation that allowed the airport workers to move forward with the pay raise was sent with a positive recommendation with three ayes and two excused. i voted for it. supervisor tang voted for it and supervisors yee and kim were excused. supervisor sheehy amended to the momon nonprofit

the first is the cost shift in the inhome supportive services program or ihss, implemented through state senate bill 90, which was passed last year. it's an extremely complicate, very complex cost sharing formula that sb-90 implemented. i'm not going to go through that, but the upshot is that through sb-90, the state shifted about $592 million of cost from the state to the counties to fund the ihss program. san francisco's share in the current fiscal year is about 20 million. this is a combination of our increased minimum wage and increase costs or increased wages for ihss workers due to the minimum wage locally, and other factors that we've incurred including caseload management in 2012. the $20 million each year will increase next year for the a couple of reasons. one, the seent includ-- county reduced the state offset, and i'm quickly getted complicated, but it reduced the state offset to the county costs 170 next year, and 350 million, after that. so reduced state support and increased costs locally is going to result in what we anticipate 80 million by about 2022. this was largely d

full-time equivalent workers raising the wage from the min to the proposed wage and in the case of ihss workers, there is an additional item we add which is that under the current minimum ordinance the value of paid time off counts toward the mvo wage. the time we are discussing at this moment 170538 would require the value of paid time off be in addition to the hourly wage. a $15 minimum wage plus the value per hour value of the paid time off. that is a little bit of detail underneath for i hss workers. for other noncontract workers we assume the hourly wage. we think that is about approximately $2,200 ftes. we have included a small adjustment for wage compaction. if you increase wages for the lowest paid workers, you tend to want to maintain a wage differential for the next level up. we included a small differential to account for the cost of that that nonprofits would be under contract or in order to retain workers maintain the differential. it does not include any wage related benefit costs that the employers themselves would have to pay such as social security taxes. this is just e

i am an ihss worker and sieu local 2015 member. that is close to the workers in san francisco. the majority, 98% live in san francisco. we rent a house in san francisco and we ride the muni bus in san francisco. we shop in san francisco, and we use the medical facility in san francisco. therefore, the one that actually we are th the real code to move forward. so it is time to amend the living wage that is outdated, not catching up with the cost of living. we are calling here to all of the supervisors. to adopt and pass the amendment to give us $1.86 above the minimum wage. thank you. >> come on down next speaker. good morning. my name is [ inaudible ] i am a member of union scau local 2015. i am working as a care provider more than 0 years. -- more than 10 years. san francisco is one of the most expensive cities to live in u.s. we are living here and work. our work is as much important as any other work in the healthcare system but paid at least at lowest level. we want and deserve to live with dignity. we have obligation to pay rent and other bills. we want our client to have

, helping people get ids, benefits advocacy, credit repair, legal aid, helping people enroll in ir ihss. this is $1 million in fiscal year '18, '19 and another in '19, '20. so you're asking for over $2 million. >> yes. that is right for year one, year two? yeah. that's for ongoing. you're right, supervisor. thank you. the next piece is in year one, $1.1 million that would help other transitional aged youth with emergency housing flexible funding. there's an additional ask for lgbtq transitional aged youth street outreach. this is $321,000 that back fills cuts to this program that affects street outreach for 450lgbtq youth throughout the city. the last is $500,000 ask in year one for expanding the pit stop program which are staffed bathrooms. with this amount, we estimate that an additional 300 people could be served by pit stops. thank you. >> thank you. next. >> i'm the executive -- director of hospitality. i'm here to talk about initiatives. first and foremost, the cornerstone of the eviction ask is the need for eviction attorneys to help tenants facing eviction in that process. absen