with that, ildr to my friend an colleague senator mike johanns of nebraska. >> thank you, senator. i think the leader's this are right on target, but i was watching justice kennedy c. everybody was. he came right out very quickly in arguments and asked some very, very fundamental questions. e pointed out is that if this really is going farthe case, which i believe all sides there's a substantial burden, a heavy burden on the part ofth t actions, to find the autho what they're doins to be right heart of what you're talking about today. the second observoin out came f justice kennedy. he said, you know, this understood fundamentally changes the relationship between the people and that's one of the points that we have been making all along. this notion that somehow congress believes it has the power under the commerce clause to force people into commerce for whatever reason, choose not to be in commerce is a stretch beyond anything that our country has ever done. so these arguments are asking questions to try to figure out where they're going to settle in here in terms of case. but i