and the keyword to this is illegal aliens. these are illegal aliens. if you start with the world illegal you got nowhere to go. that's indefensible. >> okay. so john han, i'm scratching my head. i'm trying to figure out how homicide convicts, sexual assault convicts, kidnappers have quote, unquote, served their time alrey. is that possible? >> well, do you -- do you believe that an american who commits a crime can serve his or her time, eric? these individuals served their time and immigrants whether you want to call them illegal or not are good for the economy. criminals are not good for the economy but immigrants are good for the economy. they expand the economy. they produce, they buy, they shop, they work, we benefit from immigratn. criminals ho destructive and that's why these people did their time. many of them, by the way, had traffic violations and eric, to say you want to round them up and deport them i don't think is just totalitarian but also bad for the bottom line that we all want to see go up. >> they're here illegally. >> you suggest we

their habitat is cleared by legal and illegal loggers to make room for palm oil plantations. we sent our u.k. field producer jim wickens to the aceh region of north sumatra. here the leuser ecosystem is one of the last remaining strongholds for indonesian wildlife. it's a 6-million-acre protected park, but it's being illegally cut down to make room for palm oil. >> we've driven into the leuser ecosystem. this is a place of tigers, elephants, rhinos, and orangutans. it's supposed to be protected. but we've been tipped off by rangers here that there is illegal deforestation going on as we speak. we're going to go and try to film them and get right up close to the destruction. keep going. we've been hiking for hours to get here, right on the edge of where the trees are being cut down. i'm standing just meters from where the chainsaws are operating. i'm whispering because we've been told by our guides that these people are highly dangerous. [chainsaws in background] and it's likely to get violent if we move any closer. [man shouts in distance] you can hear the trees falling throu

by being for illegal -- amnesty for illegals. the hardest hit community in hardest hithaps the but certainly minority communities, including mexican americans, they know where their jobs are going. they know when they have a job and an illegal comes across the border from whatever country, asia or mexico or honduras or ireland or wherer they are coming from, if they are taking a job of an american, the mexican american community is the hardest hit. their education funds are the heartest hit. their neighborhoods are the hardest hit. and that's why i believe that americans of mexican descent are patriots. they are part of the american family. and that's why i do not believe that they want to legalize the status of every illegal that's poured into our country. it hurts their families more than anyone. what we need to do now is make sure that as we discuss legalizing the status of illegals, of amnesty, they want to call it comprehensive immigration reform, that we keep in mind these things could have dramatic negative impacts on the

. >> you're right, all illegal unit cases are not created equal. one of the biggest things for us is is that unit occupied and does it have a imminent hazard. what we're looking at right now, if somebody files under that legislation to try to legalize a unit, that action is hild in advance, unless there is a substantial problem. therefore, one of the things we're looking at and i started doing on letters to property owners where we're asking them for permission to look at an illegal unit is to say you don't let us in you need to understand that it's your sole responsible to deal with hazardous conditions so that if you have a fossil fuel appliance in a sleeping area or if you don't have smoke detectors, it's on you, if you don't want -- that is one of the things we're doing, realizing we have open cases and cases that will be open as people come through this process, but those are the two keys. is that unit occupied and secondly, is there some kind of imminent hazard. those are the two things we're looking at. >> commissioner walker. >> it opens up

of those cases where we wrote notices of violation for illegal units, how many of those property owners are going to avail themselves of legalizing a [inaudible] or a challenge for them. in that situation one of the things that's happening is the director, which was a fantastic idea, i really commend him for this, is asked to ask late last week, a list of all the open cases that have notices of violation that we issued in housing and the ones that were recently abated within the timeframe specified if supervisor's chiu's legislation. we will be doing a mailing to them directly of that legislation. it's my understanding that his code committee is looking at the information package, which bill talked about earlier right now to get that finalized so we will have a package going forward. concurrent with that, the rent board -- this is again, something that the director asked for in the meeting on the mayor's directive, has asked the rent board to send us notices of cancellation and notices of intent to withdraw so that we can look at those notices and see whether or not we have the unit vio

we could have one set of criteria for illegal units. people have built beyond a scope of a permit and it has to go back to planning and remains illegal for the entire time it's being evaluated. it's not illegal units, it's building beyond the scopes, it's the envelope, all of that. i think it's a good ming to thing to have a policy about it rather than have it be case by case because it weakness or argument when we let things linger. >> the thing we need direction from the commission on is if we have an order of abatement and we categorize them, the question is going to be do -- what do you want to do with those once an order has been issued? are those cases you want to send to the city attorney? what we're going to do is hone those down and categorize them for you. that's part of the process we should have for you by the end of the year. >> thank you for that. we're going the right direction here. just a question though, do we -- and this is to the director, should we set up and ad hoc committee on this or -- i mean, we kind of have so

then two, once they come here understand about illegal?ey do not automatically earn full benefits of u.s. citizens. on those that com%áqat least part of their family at home come here legally or illegally. when somebody raises a rowel about it, we get blamed for separating the families. nobody forcing them to come here. once they come here to work illegally, i can understand that but they should not be given the rights that all u.s. citizens get and the right to stay here indefinitely. once they're here illegally, they're here eillegally. host: i think we got most of your points. mr.rosenblum. guest: on the number. it's actually a pretty broad consensus. most of the groups that look at this issue from an enforcement perspective, they tend to agree with the dha sin the pew hispanic center. everybody agrees that it's about 12 million. what part of illegal don't you understand, i think that the caller get to a huge issue and the debate -- there are sort of two ways to look at the question should we do legalization. what are the practical solu

that a discretionary review because denying the over the counter permit is intended for being for illegal 3 unit or more this property didn't apply there's have been tenants are trevor with the landlords plans to rely on the city records it is a that's a single-family house she's paid the fees and i have nothing more but to submitted on the papers thank you >> counselor somewhere in the briefs. >> please stay at the podium. >> it says something about a lot split are they part of the same lot. >> it's a building open the lot they're built at separate times. >> is it a single lot and it's a single lot and i have a question too counselor so your client purchased it as a single-family residence what was the discloser. >> it was advertised as if several unit and during the escrow it was disclosed it was a single-family house with a separate 5 unit building on the same parcel after the report came out so is he bought it as a 5 unit building with a single-family house on the same lot. >> but he purchased the building understanding it was used a is a 5 unit building. >> it's a 5 unit building and

>> say it again. >> that the illegals here -- i'm not sure if you use the word illegal, but people hereundocumented, deserve to become citizens because a lot of children grew up here. to recall that statement? >> i don't think that's what i said. no. >> it was in the media and i take with a pound of salt what i read in the media. my question is though, what type of illegals that are here -- and i want you to do a broad category, should go back. can you give me an example of people that we do not -- they should not be here if they are here illegally? >> well, under existing enforcement priorities, those who are here undocumented who work with it a felony is, convicted of serious misdemeanors, convicted of multiple misdemeanors, who are repeat reinsurance, who are fugitives from a final immigration order or consider priorities for removal. and that is where we devote our resources in the removal process. so in general, what we say is those who represents threats to border security, national security. there's a lot of dubliners details obviously anything exact date asking this, but there d

gonzales, what part of illegal don't you understand?hat the the points concept of the legality in terms of immigration is actually a relatively new term in american history, and also has changed over time. -- hass use has become always been racialized. could you talk about that? >> absolutely. i think it is part of the same system i was describing before that restricted immigration to white people and citizenship to white people and then started to cut off immigration. but as immigration started to be restricted for groups, including asians and eventually for europeans were considered to be , mexicaneuropeans border crossing was never restricted. mexican border crossing was never restricted because mexican labor was so utterly necessary in the southwest of the united states and because mexicans were not considered immigrants from a therefore, there immigration did not have to be restricted. they were considered to be workers, legally is committed against for what were considered racial grounds. that was perfectly legal. to deprive them

/mexico illegal border conversation. my job as a film maker is how do i unpack that and make it about people's stories. we'll be working with the writers guild of america in l.a. and try to figure out how can we better integrate immigrants in television and films. that's really the goal. how do we help people do that. >> and change the conversation through pop culture. >> pop culture, media, absolutely. >> okay. thank you, your film opens in bay area theaters may 15th in san francisco. thanks so much for joining us. >> thank you so much for having me. >>> california air national guards man ed drew's job as a gunner on combat search and rescue help k079ers is one of -- help continuers is one of the most dangerous in the mail tear. he was inspired to make something lasting while he was there in case he didn't return. by reviving a long lost art, he would end up making history. scott shafer narrates our story. >> when i grew up, my life wasn't easy. my mother worked all the time. i really had to learn on my own how to hold

illegally. obama, meanwhile, tried to increase pressure on house republicans to pass immigration legislation that would let most of those 11.5 million people stay in the country. the developments highlighted a split among democrats and immigration advocates. some want immediate executive action by obama, others say the focus should stay on house republicans while there's still a chance. however slim, to pass an immigration bill. at the white house, obama addressed law enforcement officers, exhorting them to lobby speaker john boehner and house republicans ahead of the november midterm elections. want to play you a little bit about what the president had to say on that now. >> public opinion is on our side on this. unfortunately, wove got a handful of house republicans right now who are blocking going ahead and letting legislation get to the floor. to their credit, i think speaker boehner and some of the other leaders there do believe that immigration reform is the right thing, but they've got to

illegally as children to gain legal status while serving in the military. young people with a work history and a pardon under mr. obama's earlier efforts to defer deportation of immigrant children. >> that's the right thing to do. >> moves like this are an example of the president working his levers of power. the question is what more can he do and what will he do to keep his immigration reform agenda moving forward without action in congress. republican house speaker john boehner said he wants immigration reform. he rejected the sweeping overall passed in the senate and favors a step by step approach. >> we've talked about this literally every week for the last 18 months. i made it clear over the last several months that until the president gives us some reason that--some confidence that we can trust him to implement an immigration reform bill we really don't have much to talk about. the ball is in the president's court. >> some members of boehner's caucus are clearly frustrated by the lack of movement. congressman jeff denim in california put forward an a

and 2000 were there not illegal, but there for other crimes they were, also, here illegally they returned over into ice. and guess what? about 35% to 0% have come back to jails many times. sometimes, 10, 15 times. so what is this? are they letting the illegals out the back door? are they being deported? they keep coming back? so that is a question. wrote to the secretary of homeland security. i just wrote another letter to ice. i'm not getting any answers they're violating their own policy i'm not deporting these vicious criminals. >> let me ask ryed. you don't seem to have a problem with this. how do you respond to this sheriff? >> well, i think all of you fell for the stunt of mr. elliott and miss, what was it? and mr. aaron klein with the book "impeerable defenses" >> no. ryed, i'm not here to -- woah, i'm not here to promote a book. we're having a discussion. >> well, apparently you fell for it this, is what it is. it's a publicity stunt. this group, center for immigration studies we know what they are. it's a quasi, nonprofit organization behind bush's failed attempt -- >> i can tell

she was an illegal air liam -- illegal alien him she was really nice. she said she just wanted to become a u.s. citizen. host: was the conclusion to your story? caller: i told her to find somebody else. host: how common is that to have green card marriage is? guest: that is a typical story. a lot of marriage fraud -- it is a fuzzy line. it is not like you're marrying a stranger. it is like a friend like that. certainly the part of dhs that would authorize a spouse visa in that case, they do a lot of anti-fraud investigation. i don't have a number in my head of how common it is. it is something they are tuned into and it is a series of investigations that took place before a green card would be issued in a case like that. host: herald calling from georgia on the republican line. caller: i would like you to comment on recent reports of the release of convicted felons, illegal aliens, from the custody of ice. children of minor coming to the border as amnesty discussions are increased. guest: on the first one the callers commenting on this report that was r

even though dealing with an illegal operation. dea administrator recently told a congressional hearing that cash is the driving force for these drug trafficking organizations, and dea has already seen signs, they say, that gangs are attempting to exploit the new banking rules. the issuance of a green light for banking institutions to do business with these illegal marijuana shops and subsequent action by the treasury department to in effect rubber stamp that gives me some pause. because this is still an illegal product in practically every state. is it wise to offer regulatory guidance from the federal government on illegal activity? >>> congressman this is a very complicated area. obviously when two states pass a law making an activity legal in the state there's going to be an increase in activity in that area. obviously the justice department guidance provided guidelines for how prosecution matters would be considered. we believed it was important for there to be clarity in terms of the consistency between the prosecutorial guid

-- >> you're not daca, you're here illegally. >> okay. ones that were released that are undocumented that are now illegally in the united states again, did they get work permits? >> did they have what? i'm sorry? >> did they get work permits when they're released there custody, being released from custody and are now illegally in the united states again -- >> i couldn't say categorically one way or another. i'd have to know each individual case. >> of the 36,000, kid any of them -- did any of them get work permits? >> i don't know the answer to that question. >> just roughly. percentage wise, i'd like to know that. so let's take the ones that were illegally -- undocumented, they were released. if they are rearrested for something, some other crime, then they are back in the same status, they're back in jail again, and they go through the process again, is that correct? in other words, they're not given some kind of stay out of jail free card that they, now that they've been released? i'm talking about the undocumented ones. >> i agree gen

illegal walk. into one thing you -- one thing you talk about is practice. you talk about it in regard to juggling. >> i reveal, it's a secret, to the reader, how i do something. a blind threat. maybe i should demont. it's the most difficult thing, you juggle and you have a bowl you catch in your back. the reason you link the trick to creativity. to focus, you have to no before i throw it that i'll be successful. the first step is a point of no return. this is the point of no return. happened in my life, in all level of creativity. i don't have to juggle. it's nice to work. >> you are a spiritual person. i believe gods are everywhere. >> you walk the back and fourthate times. >> it was not just walking. the policemen who were waiting for me to give myself up said "he's not walking, he's dancing". >> then you laid down? >> yes, to rest, salute the sky and dialogue. i was interests passing - pun intended - in the territory of the birds. when i saw a seagull, i started a friendly dialogue. i didn't want them to come back and eat my liver. >> you were thinking a

it seems to be illegal. but still, the bahamas is a bit behind some other countries in terms of rigorous standards. with respect to u.s. law, under , which therder 12333 nsa and cia uses to conduct surveillance abroad, there is a lot that analysts and agents can do. this could very well, under executive order, be illegal for the nsa to be doing. the more important question about what this means for u.s. cooperation with foreign law enforcement agencies and the dea's operations abroad, this essential. intercept, lawful the very thing that allows the nsa access to these networks, is premised on the idea that you have a specific person that you are targeting who is under

when you say an illegal recording, she says, v.ano, that he authorized her to record things for archival purse purposes and we're told that she was not alone during that conversation. her sister was there as well. it wasn't simply a private conversation between donald sterling and v. stiviano. that's the argument on the other side. >> as far as other recordings, yes, they did make recordings for business purposes. this was a purely personal conversation. i describe it and i think correctly as a lover's quarrel between v. -- >> was her sister there during some of those recordings? >> her sister was on the premises but not in the room when the conversation took place. as far as we know. there is no evidence that the sister overheard or participated in the conversation and mrs. stiviano has not said that nor has the sister come forward. so as far as we're concerned, it was a lover's quarrel. >> let me play a clip of what he was recorded saying because it is awful. everybody who heard it was grimacing when they heard it. i'll play this

now, we learned that about 60,000 children, illegal immigrants, are to this year be dumped at our so you were border with mexico. already creating a huge burden. the prospect that that number will double. and ecuador diplomat saying recently the reason it is occurring is because president obama has made it clear that amnesty will follow, no matter what. >> right. well this is the historical record on every amnesty, both after the fact and before the fact. it brings more people in. not surprisingly, because you're sending the message that illegal crossing carries no penalties and it will allow to you stay in the country. so this is precisely what we should expect to be happening. we also have seen, i mean the interior enforcement is absolutely decimated. it was very interesting when the secretary of dhs testified -- lou: jeh johnson. >> jeh johnson this week, he ducked the question completely whether he supports one of i think the most significant bellwethers of immigration enforcement, secure communities, which merely alerts dhs when there is an illegal alien criminal booked into jai

in rhode island it's illegal to wear transparent clothing and in texas, it's illegal for children with bad hair cuts. >> is this legal to do that? >> this is barely legal, baby. who makes up these laws? like i should be making up some awesome laws. these aren't that good because there are things that need to be illegal for sure. do not get me started. i don't understand transparent, the bad hair cut thing. >> there are so few women that can wear form fitting skirts and shorts, you shouldn't take them off the streets the one that can, a lot of them ain't nothing to good look at. the other thing about do you do about strip clubs? does that mean you can't go to a strip club in rhode island? >> i think it's transparent clothing. you can be nude. >> i think it's in public, you can't wear transparent clothing. >> bob, your transparent cat suit that you wear on friday night is okay. >> your disco -- he was a disco champion. >> i thought you were a -- >> no, disco, statten island. the toughest competition in the world. >> i would pay money for a picture of bob in his disco suit. i will pay for

plunder of the housing resources by the city by the aa u that is operating every housing project illegal i sent a letter asking on the commission to have a hearing on the 6 housing resources at the time 3 of you were on the commission 4 of you were not you've been since postponed it was to clooith alexander and at that time, i pleaded with the commission to set hearings i can't take action on an informational item i'm asking please set an action item for thetively of juan june for the purposes of setting and hearing in december if the eir is released in a timing manner within the quote/unquote deadline manner there's been so many deadlines it's ridiculous if they have a eir it will be harder on december 4th and simultaneously the commission shouldn't have the public e power and the public should have the power to look at the buildings to be sclaeltd they're out of compliance by the planning code i forward to you the letter i submitted in 2008. i also have the scope of work for the 2010 eir which was being supervised it was being done. we now have chelsea on it the academy of art has had

the second point we've clarified when the illegal units are being when people are seeking to remove allegal unit in the directive they can feasibly be legalized we're working on a policy to deny legal and at the last hearing the units remain a live ability we're structuring our approach to determine the legalization on the report we counter have in place for residential occasion they're looking things from two lens their analyzed within a given you are talking about and actually, we have our first case filed with the planning department you'll see that in the next two months. lastly in the directors bullet we're hoping to clarify the point before your accident a few weeks mergers of twel unit monst monsterable unaffordable and this isn't a reverse even if course but we heard you guys want to continue down the path. the late update on the mrechlgs of the mayors project is task 3 our cooperation with the rent board i want to give you guys we've established a policy whereby the department wants the cost of the rental unit when we receive those our enforcement division is are you aware of

not all stolen or illegal guns, not all illegal guns are stolen. a lot are acquired illegally in the first place through the black market. >> to pick up on what craig just said, it is not in line with the facts that the overwhelming majority of guns on the market are stolen. prisoner surveys when you ask how they got their gun 10% said they stole it, others got it on the black market. we don't know exactly again the path that those guns took. we know that some firearms are purchased illegally, and purchased from legitimate retail outlet so there is a variety of has the guns take from the factory into the hands -- >> precisely. i've published several studies that showed proper regulations on gun sales prevent the diversion into that illicit market where criminals get guns. to the very specific point of more gun ownership meaning more guns to the illicit market, there is a positive correlation you can see in a number of studies that back up your general point but i agree with craig said that is not how we are going to make a big impact on crime, we a

they say it's illegal. they say it's nothing more than the actions of what they call terroris terrorists. in doing so, they are using the people of donetsk and luhansk. we are told the prosecutor general has warned people across the east they will be criminally responsible for their actions around this refer endsum. mean kwhooil we are told the anti-terrorism operation in the east is in its final stages. at the same time, though, talks to try to stabilize the country are ongoing. eu council president is in town tomorrow in kiev. he will be speaking to both interim president alexander turchynof and yatsenyuk. they are to be held between all political sides, to be held later this week. this is all happening as authorities prepare for the presidential elections which are two weeks today. >> there are fears a fragile he's fire could be on the verge of collapse. the south sudan easy army is accusing rebels of breaking the dealsese army is accusing rebels of breaking the dea deals. they say they have come from at

federally, it's still illegal.ou can't use it, even though the state of colorado says, "yes, you can, from a medical standpoint." they are making quite a bit of money, and it is a big tax revenue, but at whose expense? >> one of the big fears that i keep hearing over and over again is, "what kind of signal are we sending to our young people?" >> what kind of signal does it send to your children when you have a fully stocked refrigerator with coors light or with, you know, budweiser in it, and then the campaigns that are behind those alcohol products have the half-naked women? i mean, what kind of signal is that? we're not talking about some reggae concert or you being stoned in your dorm room. we're talking about a whole emerging business here, with responsible people. >> people like 23-year-old samantha sandt. >> how have you been? >> great. how have you been? >> she jumped at the chance to get in on the ground floor of the pot boom, selling seeds. >> we have a new strain out for you. we're a new enterprise. there

all are calling this referendum illegal. they say it's illegitimate and it's nothing more than an attempt by terrorists to cover up their crimes, and they're using the people of donetsk and huhansk. we heard from the e.u. saying that they will not recognize the vote. because this is illegitimate they will not recognize any outcome, they're saying that the outcome has been determined by the self-appointed leaders in these regions. i think it's fair when people in the east do come out with their so-called results this will put pressure on the authorities and two weeks from today elections will be held. >> reporting from donetsk. >>> 20 bodies have been recovered off the coast of libya after two boats sank. we have more from tripoli. >> reporter: we are getting two different versions of the incident from libyan authorities. a spokesperson for the libyan army said 20 bodies have been recovered. now a spokesperson for the ministry of interior said around 40 bodies were recovered. this incident started on friday when a body carryi