appointees who comes from the outside and don't know the environments they need to operate in. , and illenge is to have would expect would agree with this, is every one of those acting individuals would say they would be better off if they were the named person confirmed by the senate. they don't know that they are going to be in office for years and years. they don't know if they are going to be there three months, six months, or two to four years. they will not make decisions with the expectations that they will see them through to that time horizon, or perceived by those around them by having a longer-term authority. and it is the nature of the beast that people will not invest in the same way with somebody they expect to be around for a longer period of time. there is no question that wonderful person who was serving person, but they would be more better off if they were in a permanent position. the second thing you talked about is the difficulty of filling a job. i personally think the whole notion of the deep state is a bad one. there are people who don't do to pushbs well, and try a p