because of the secrecy they can organize behind closed doors in compartmentalise areas that's why the illuminati and seven hundred seventy six that it will start university in various germany was founded inside of masonic lodges and then spread to france and engineer of the french revolution there they want to overthrow all the monarchies but set themselves out as absolute monarchs and albert pike have a supreme commander of all global masonry in eight hundred seventy seven wrote that they would have three world wars world war one between europe and the united states and. world war two would be a larger global war the third war would be christendom against islam that would be invoked by their masonic operatives that would bring in world war three and out of that they would destroy every existing order and even the finance capitalist and set themselves up as world rulers in the worship of the true one god in their words lucifer and then he that made ellison this is what we're seeing that this is you know the start of world war three or a tiny portion of what could lead to world war three. well ye

features you have the police ninety minutes on getting there you have a facebook being altered from illuminati stuff to saying it's a question a conservative that's confirmed all of this is a one in four got complicated here trying to say allies that there's a lot of the pieces here that we're not being told about this specific attack let me let me switch gears because i want to get into more questions i think you bring up a really important point it seems to me at least like for the last ten years both here in the u.s. and across europe authorities and investigators have focused only on the threat of al qaida when we think about more right wing extremist groups that seems to me at least you know they're often dismissed as sort of being on the friends and you know not very great in numbers i'm wondering if you think that this was simply a case of a man acting alone and it seems to me that you think it wasn't or if this is a window into a much larger problem. it's a window into a larger problem but but it's not what the script writers are telling us this is invoking a clash of civilizations he'

wouldn't be the kind of normal man that would be terrified of federal agents or part of some giant illuminati conspiracy they were just normal americans so were there any specific facts your revelation has as hands down or was it just sort of like the narrative you had isn't as strong as the narrative the b.b.c. presented you with. us a very loaded question i don't offer sleep it wasn't a revelation also. i can't accept it's evil options you've given me there ok it wasn't it wasn't a revelation it was just it and i guess i spent four or five years looking at you conspiratorial view of nine eleven and then before i went to america i started my doubts thing wait a minute what if those buildings still pretty much as we've been explained what if building seven are so strange only there which we don't know because we're not engineered what if i'm wrong basically i went to america and the main one i was grilling the engineers on the controlled demolition expert guy was how come one of the tower starts at the trip took over it and when it corrected itself and fell through but when you actually study

skeptical about the conspiracy theory if it involves world domination by 12 guys that i read called the illuminati, probably not true. watergate was a conspiracy. that makes sense. lincoln was assassinated by here's a. jfk probably not. almost certainly not. although he did have a moment of pause. i have to study watching the hbo film too big to fail based on the today to go hasn't seen

. >> not the illuminati, manning marijuana bl wrote the book -- marable wrote the book. >> what's your name? >> my name is whereas min brody, i'm a writer, and i want to say i feel blessed to be in the presence of sonia sanchez. and dr. ben. my question is, do you feel some books have to put a little tinge of sensationalism in the book just to be able to sell the books? >> well, i, i would say in terms of this book i don't think that, and zaheer would be an even better source. i don't think that anything manning put in the book was for sensationalism or to sell books. he was not that kind of author, he was not that kind of man. he had a lot of integrity. i do think that the publisher is going to take the two instances where he raises question and suggests that there may have been same-sex -- not to say that he was gay, but this happened in the 1940s, and then to also talk about alleged infidelity, i think, when they're sending out press packets and they want to get some publicity and get some newspaper interviews and sell some books, they're going to take ahold and say, hey, what's the