ilona musk and her long-time adversary, the down project organization, which fights for security in thetechnologies, in fact , the anti-advertising video was all built on frames of errors in the performance of what tesla calls an autopilot, downed mannequins , ignoring prohibition signs, sticking out in the forehead of an oncoming car . in general, it all comes down to the fact that advertising a driver assistant as a full-fledged autopilot misleads people is dangerous and the authorities should not allow such experiments on public roads. this is not the first high-profile down project action against tesla and its autopilot in the newspaper last year. new york times. daunt prozhit urged people not to be crash test dummies and offered $10,000 to anyone who could name another commercial product that crashes every 8 minutes. well it the electric car maker threatened to sue. this weakened published a letter demanding to stop defamation of the company, and called the advertisement for the house of sale disinformation. how the mask will react this time is unknown. well, other than a rather em

ilona musk and her opponent is not even the organization daunt project who are fighting for safety inpplication of new technologies, in fact , the anti-advertising video was all built on frames of errors in the execution of what tesla calls the autopilot, downed dummies , ignoring prohibition signs. standing in the forehead of an oncoming car, in general, everything comes down, because advertising a driver's assistant as a full-fledged autopilot misleads people , this is dangerous and the authorities should not allow such experiments on public roads. this is not the first high-profile down project action against tesla and its autopilot last year in the new york times down project urged people not to be crash test dummies and offered $10,000 to anyone who could name another commercial product that crashes every 8 minutes. well, this electric car manufacturer threatened to file a day. tesla published a letter demanding to stop defamation of the company, and called the advertisement for the sale house disinformation. how the mask will react this time is unknown, well, except for a rather

belongs to elon musk, began to provide ukraine with free access to its internet service starlink, ilona musk'smilitary's use of its satellite communications service, starling, it is clear that ukraine is using these technologies to control drone attacks against russian troops. but the question is why now spacex sent thousands of terminals, starling, to ukraine last year to provide internet connectivity. now the concern says that the starling was never intended to be used as a weapon and now the company has taken steps to limit its use in conjunction with drones. reaction from soldiers because everyone is only claiming that starling is only used for communication but starlink itself has clearly stated that the technology cannot be used for attacks against another power against russia so now everyone will coordinate their drones i think it needs to be highlighted here a few important points. let's start with the fact that ukraine defends itself and according to any international law. ukraine is free to strike any target in ukraine to protect the country. that is why it is so important that ukrai