kennedy: ilya shapiro, cato institute, thank you so much.tay here. ♪ ♪ [ drum roll ] ...emily lapier from ames, iowa. this is emily's third nomination and first win. um...so, just...wow! um, first of all, to my fellow nominees, it is an honor sharing the road with you. and of course, to the progressive snapshot app for giving good drivers the discounts -- no, i have to say it -- for giving good drivers the discounts they deserve. safe driving! for giving good drivers the discounts they deserve. that's the same things i want to do with you. it's an emotional thing to watch your child grow up and especially get behind the wheel. i want to keep you know, stacking up the memories and the miles and the years. he's gonna get mine -but i'm gonna get a new one. -oh yeah when it's time for your old chevy truck to become their new chevy truck, there's truck month. get 18% of msrp cash back on all silverado 1500 crew cab lt pickups when you finance with gm financial. that's $9,000 on this silverado. plus, during truck month make no monthly payments for

what did it look like from your side ilya captured it quite perfectly and making the point that you can see it just from the way the reporters during the press conference handled question time the only two questions to come from the american press gaggle had to do with collusion the fact the meeting went on and the fact that it went on long made the washington press corps that i was traveling with quite distraught if you can imagine waiting around for the press conference i could hear many reporters from the american side making jokes about what could possibly be taking so long with these two world leaders of two very powerful countries of course. we can imagine there'd be many things for them discussed but only crude jokes coming from the american side i heard one colleague on a major network describe the press conference that was held between trump and putin as a wedding that was on live television i don't know which side is the bride and which side of it is the groom anderson but it is sort of feels like we're in a wedding you have been watching perhaps one of the most disgraceful pe

from this harsh trade policy in the trump administration announced tuesday he will provide up to 12 ilyaollars in aid to farmers -- billion dollars in aid to pharmasset by these tariffs. -- alexandra: you're right that at the moment he is feeling a lot of pressure in criticism from manufacturers here, from farmers, as you said, and also within his own republican party. especially talking about farmers, they say they are already really suffering to the measures imposed by u.s. trade partners in response to u.s. tariffs. they say they have lost about 13 alien -- $13 billion u.s. so far. the trump administration has announced aid up to $12 billion in emergency help. however, many farmer organizations are complaining is not enough. deal not be enough to help the farmers to survive, to continue to run their bususinesses. sarah: thank you so much to both of you. as we mentioned, those two leaders will be holding a press conference a short while from now. we are monitoring developments and we will bring you that conference live as we get it. in the meantime, the white house announced it will pr

it is an eye watering figure, 345 ilya dollars, that is how $345 billion, that is how much this spacendustry is worth. but there is no official government space agency here, and they are hoping to create one here and create up to 20,000 new jobs. >> what is in the budget for investing in the civil space industry? as australians would know, the tribal government is crating a stronger economy, that is what we are about. it ensures we can guarantee the essential services that australians rely on, providing tax relief, and bring the budget back to balance. mr. president, since we were elected in 2013, the economy under this government has created in excess of one million jobs. we know there is still more to do. that is why the turnbull government is focused on the creation of new industries. for the first time in australia's history, the government is establishing a national space agency, which will officially commence in less than two weeks. the global space economy is worth around $345 billion u.s. australia has immense capabilities when it comes to space related features. we made the w

your team pick up also told me that ilya has an e.u. visa and is looking for trials and shit and that he doesn't have an agent yet. so what if he also changes my life completely by having me as is the agent in. this now wealthy and glamorous future ahead of me. back down to them half it's instead of the expected he brain. two and a half years later we meet again during our traditional job in reaching i noticed a change. it seems that he has hit in the gym quite often the last year i would go to germany. i really see professional clubs have to fight to be professional player deficit official out there for ethiopia. when it comes to football if your peers a strange country although they have the second largest population in africa they're ready qualified for the africa cup now famous for the ramos but also mad about football. no homegrown player has ever made it to professional you please ask bynum is being watched by many clubs who are offering serious money but the final match day he couldn't showcase his skills. sapping willing. to. li

the cato institute's ilya shapiro, editor-in-chief of the cato supreme court review joins us now.ur judges that scotus watchers believe and it's pretty much leaked that people believe are the final four. as we look at these, number one, how important from a business or investor standpoint is the next supreme court justice pick that will be announced tonight? >> well, very few cases, business cases generate headlines or even generate some of the 5-4, left-right splits that everyone talks about. this court has, the roberts court has become known as one of the most business-friendly or market-friendly courts, and that's because often they're simply correcting lower courts that are interpreting statutes that are tightly drawn in a way that they simply won't allow. so a lot of what the supreme court is doing, a lot of the significant cases seem to be pro-business, but they're not controversial. of course, that doesn't describe, that doesn't describe all of them. one could expect that any of the four or, indeed, anyone on the broader list that president trump had -- liz: okay, let me in

because it's a landmark i think a lot of people come to barcelona just to see the cigarette of him ilya. views among the locals about the project differ the crowds of tourists who come to see the church have changed the neighborhood souvenir shops and kiosks have forced out businesses from around the church and there's another thing that worries the residents back when the building started the construction site was in the middle of the field now the surrounding area is completely built up and some of the buildings will have to be torn down to implement county's original plans for the problem not in front of the main facade. you david is almost if you want a few group with the building is so well known that of course people have differing opinions about it or. just the finished church with its eighteen spires would be a fantastic overall eye catcher just by virtue of its different visual axes to be. the target date for finishing the project is twenty twenty six just in time for the one hundredth anniversary of county's death but even in its unfinished state the church is already one of t

what did it look like from your side ilya captured it quite perfectly and making the point that you can see it just from the way the reporters during the press conference handled question time the only two questions to come from the american press gaggle had to do with collusion the fact the meeting went on and the fact that it went on long made the washington press corps that i was traveling with quite distraught if you can imagine waiting around for the press conference i could hear many reporters from the american side making jokes about what could possibly be taking so long with these two world leaders of two very powerful countries of course. we can imagine there'd be many things for them discussed but only crude jokes coming from the american side i heard one colleague on a major network describe the press conference that was held between trump and as a wedding that was on live television i don't know which side is the bride and which side of it is the groom anderson but it sort of feels like we're in a wedding this is without any sort of anything as much as a joint statement from

rt tv is ilya petrenko, channel. mr. president, would you please go into the details of possibly any specific arrangements for the u.s. to work together with russia and syria if any of these kinds of of -- of arrangements ere made today or discussed. and now my question to president putin. mr. pompeo mentioned that when we talk about the syrian cooperation, the ball is in the syrian court. mr. putin , in russian court is it true and how would you use this fact? president trump: i guess i'll answer the first part of the question. we've worked with israel long and hard for many years, many decades. i think we've -- never has anyone in any country been closer than we are. president putin also is helping srael and we both spoke with netanyahu and they would like to do certain things with respect to syria, having to do with the safety of israel. so in that respect we absolutely would like to work in order to help israel and israel will be working with us. so both countries would work jointly. and i think that when you look at

china us plans for industry and how they fit into the current global trade scenario i'm joined by ilya norton argo foreign trade expert at the association of german chambers of commerce and industry good to have you with us let me stop asking you where do you see opportunities for german industry to cooperate with china and want it be a win win situation for both. well industry four point zero is the leading topic in the next decade china's the biggest market the biggest trading partner of germany so of course we have to talk about the question how do we call borate how do we do innovation together because as we see right now in that fragmenting trade world it is very important in new topics to build up a level playing field all along the globe in germany and china together with europe very very important partners in that ok now this meeting of course today comes at a time when the united states is pushing towards a trade war with china how is the brow impacting german chinese economic relations . well it's impacting german businesses in china in the u.s. and in germany the interlinked

hi nicky well ilya captured it quite perfectly and making the point that you can see it just from the way the reporters during the press conference handled question time the only two questions to come from the american press gaggle had to do with collusion as you just saw ilia playing those two questions for you earlier that's because in the u.s. in washington all the talk has been over the last few days not about issues like syria ukraine nuclear disarmament north korea it's been about the indictment handed down by special counsel robert mueller concerning these twelve allegedly members of russian intelligence services which mueller suggests hacked the d.n.c. e-mails now apparently for the press corps and political establishment in washington and indictment is good enough as a court proven or a case proven in court because all the way up to the meeting today the very last moment nikki you had a mainstream networks in the united states calling for trying to cancel the meeting not even make an effort at diplomacy purely based off this indictment again not even ruling in court now the f

ilya patrenko. >> mr. president, would you please go into the details of possibly any specific arrangements for the u.s. to work together with russia in any of these kinds of arrangements were made today or discussed? russian]g ing in pompeo mentioned that when we talk about the syrian cooperation, the ball is in the syrian court. and hown, is it true would you use this fact of them having the ball? president trump: we have worked for israel long and hard many years, many decades. anyone in any country been closer than we are. president clinton is also helping israel, and -- president putin also is helping israel, and we have spoken with netanyahu and they are wanting to do things having to do with the safety of israel. in that respect, we absolutely would like to work in order to help israel, and israel will be working with us. so both countries would be working jointly. i think when you look at all of the progress that has been made today in certain sections, with the eradication of isis, about 98%, 99%

my name is ilya petrenko, rt tv channel. in english. mr. president, would you please go into the details of possibly any specific arrangements for the u.s. to work together with russia in syria, if any of these kind of arrangements were made today or discussed? and my question to president putin in russian. since we brought up the issue of football several times, i ask -- use the football language. mr. pompeo mentioned that when we talk about the syrian cooperation, the ball is in the syrian court. mr. putin -- in the russian court -- is it true? and how would you use this fact, the having the ball? president trump: well, i guess i'll answer the first part of the question. we've worked with israel long and hard for many years, many decades. i think we've never -- never has anyone, any country been closer than we are. president putin also is helping israel. and we both spoke with bibi netanyahu, and they would like to do certain things with respect to syria, having to do with the safety of israel. to do certain things with respect to syria,

this is an article by the bbc‘s m ilyas khan, saying many candidates from mr sharif‘s pml—n were coercedy and eitherjoin the pti or stand as independents. he calls it a ‘creeping coup‘. imran khan has also aligned the pti party with some hardline islamist groups in pakistan, and this brings with it a number of concerns, as the washington post‘s bharka dutt explains. during the campaign, he supported pakistan‘s contentious blasphemy lords. this law does not recognise the aim of muslims in pakistan is fully muslim. khan may not personally believe this but politically, to get the support of hardline groups at the more conservative voters, those positions he took. how much will he be able to manoeuvre himself out of those sort of hardline orthodoxy, now that he is controlling the government. i think that is what i really wait to look out for and the other thing i would be interested to see is that this is a candidate who has, for 20 years or more, then barely again american presence in afghanistan. he has in fact called liberals in pakistan in support of american presence, s###, and fascists

. >> my name is ilya. [inaudible] i'm from columbia journalism school and the -- [inaudible] >> great. >> great, thank you. so if you go to my wikipedia page today, you will see a controversy from 2014, right? and so that controversy is that i'm a terrorist supporter, right? >> you would like me to confirm your claims? [laughter] i mean, itcl was -- >> just wondering. so it's interesting because that was the first time i got into the russian disinfo space. people always wonder how to you go from extremist to russian disinfo. well, that's how it was. i wrote an article with two colleagues. i'll leave their name out of it so i can just be the one that the focus is on. but the idea was we were talking about soft power in syria at the time, if you remember. this was the obama administration. we were not deploying troops to syria. so we offered, hey, if we are not going to do anything here, why don'tti we try and use more diplomacy or negotiation with islamist groupse to try and pel them awayma from al-qaeda. .

ilya thing i did that i thought -- the way ing would do my hearings, let's say we were doing something, reforms would travel from all over the united states to testify, as well as the head of dot and the federal rail and administration and the way things were supposed to be done was the head of dot would testify first, the room would be packed and that half the room would leave and by the time these people who gave up their and left their jobs and did not get paid to come testify. peoplel would ring, 27 would go and i felt awful so whoever came the furthest and had put the most effort in testified first and so the federal rail of a straighter or the secretary of dot had to hear them and i thought that was important but it was constantly frustrating my friends in the federal government that i was not within -- with them. it was like you are doing your job when you are testifying and they are not. >> was there any one particular issue before the subcommittee that you remember from that time? how molinari: it shows you slow the wheels turn. amtrak reform. when i chaired it, i was dealing

my name is ilya. rt tv channel. >> in english. mr.ibly any specific arrangements for the u.s. to work together with russia in syria? if any of these kinds of arrangements were made today or discussed? [ speaking foreign language ] >> translator: my question to president puten in in russian. we brought up the issue of football several times. i asked -- use the football language. mr. pompeo mentioned that when we talk about the syrian cooperation, the ball is in the syrian court. mr. putin, in russian court, is it true? and how would you use this fact, of having the ball? >> well, i guess i'll answer the first part of the question. we have worked with israel long and hard for many years. many decades. think we have mefr -- never has anyone being been closer than we are. president putin also is helping israel. and we both spoke with bibi netanyahu. they would like to do certain things with respect to syria having to do with the safety of israel. we would like to work to help israel. israel will be working with us. so both countries would

anti-profit, are and bernie with his millionaires and ilya and air stuff. i am excited.ost: are you at all concerned about the tariffs -- the tariff moves by the president and what ripple effect could that have? the financial times out of london, full stare -- scale trade at war -- trade war looms larger. are you concerned about that? caller: somewhat, yes. i do not know. i am not smart enough, i will admit that, to know whether or not the world we have it to it was the same as it was a when tariffs were evil. let us get one thing straight. president trump did not start a trade war, and i do not think we are in one. we are in ongoing negotiations with our allies and friends me's frenemies. that china is a current same and if you later. it has cost american companies and cost this country hundreds of aliens of dollars. we did not start this -- dollars.of billions of we did not start this. i get really tired of hearing president trump that he fired the first shot. host: however, some are saying a trade midterm threats war smacking voters. they warned that the economic fall

what did it look like from your side ilya captured it quite perfectly and making the point that you can see it just from the way the reporters during the press conference handled question time the only two questions to come from the american press gaggle had to do with collusion the fact the meeting went on and the fact that it went on long made the washington press corps that i was traveling with quite distraught if you can imagine waiting around for the press conference i could hear many reporters from the american side making jokes about what could possibly be taking so long with these two world leaders of two very powerful countries of course. we can imagine there'd be many things for them discussed but only crude jokes coming from the american side i heard one colleague on a major network describe the press conference that was held between trump and putin as a wedding that was on live television i don't know which side is the bride and which side of it is the groom in. there's a bit of sort of feels like we're at a wedding you have been watching perhaps one of the most disgraceful