like not only dismissal, we would actually like the law enforcement officers to investigate where ilya vityukhe property, whether he acquired it legally or illegal, well, accordingly, for him to bear responsibility, if all this real estate in kyiv was illegally acquired, yes, an extremely interesting point, well, and in general, this applies not only to mr. evityuk, we understand that a lot of our law enforcement officers, well, representatives various other law enforcement agencies, and those who can... not work directly with what is called the protection of ukrainian legislation and so on, well , that is, somehow they have become very rich, this is an extremely big challenge, yes, that's why that it requires not only a formal, formal analysis of these or other things, well, but relevant personnel conclusions, and, that is, some kind of dismissals or official investigations, which would be conducted, well, not just like that, you know, at the level of unhooking, unhooking, yes, but with certain specific... results, well, iryna fedoriv is in touch with us , journalist and teacher, leader of t

general, information has just appeared that ilya vityuk has been dismissed from the post of chief department of counterintelligence protection of the state's interests in the field of information security of the sbu, but not because he had any problems with his work or with the performance of his official duties, because in early april the info investigation published an investigation that the vityuk family owns real estate at least for 25 million hryvnias according to the market. cost, and then he was simply suspended from performing his duties, but today a decree appeared, as soon as the presidential decree appeared on the dismissal of vityuk from this position, you were the deputy the head of the security service of ukraine, and obviously such issues are completely controlled, and the security service can monitor its employees, how could it happen that what... vityuk had was not noticed by the internal security service of the sbu? well, you know, my position is very categorical, i try not to comment on things related to personnel appointments and the definition of such things. i think tha

closing of the criminal proceedings against. ex-head of the cyber police department of the sbu ilya vityuk. the sbi investigator did not appear at the meeting, and the materials of the already closed proceedings were not provided, so the next attempt is an appeal. will take place in june, let me remind you that yulia vityuk accused the national security agency of wrongdoing and initiated investigative actions against its employees. the union is convinced that the pressure was provoked by the principled position of architects against draft law number 5655. this is called such nonsense, where the investigator, investigating a criminal proceeding, does not comply with the court's decision, he will be prosecuted for this. does not provide materials for criminal proceedings, in every possible way committing actions that do not directly violate the law, they take advantage of such opportunities, commit such procedural sabotage, it can be called, it is correct in their own words, such, and are looking for grounds for the next one. detailed consideration of the case already on the merits. he was d