these missiles, like imad and kata , have increased the range and accuracy of their hits by changing the structure of the warhead. if we do not make ourselves strong , as we saw around us , different countries will trample them. zionist regime today. we must be careful in these situations, and we are taking this necessary care. the target of these missiles is the simulator of the palmachim air base, the main location of the f-35 fighter jets of the zionist regime . iran he used it and said, "who said we will not attack iran? palmakhim base is about 15 kilometers long, between 5 and 6 kilometers wide, but the target of irgc missiles is a third of this scale, and the fighter hangar and now in less than 7 minutes, the simulator is the largest the air base of the zionist regime in the occupied territories will be under the rain of irgc point missiles. in this operation, emad missiles reach targets with an accuracy of less than 4 meters with reinforced explosive warheads, and this is the situation of what the irgc can do in case of an invasion of iranian territory in a conduct combined se

one year at the hamas office in tehran as an assistant to the representative of hamas at the time, imad al-elami. after that, he became the official representative of hamas in iran for 4 years. a year later, hamdan was appointed as the senior representative of hamas in lebanon. in lebanon in the list. from lebanon in international media for interviews and commenting on various issues related to the gaza war appeared. hamedan has traveled to iran many times and his most recent trip is to attend the iranian media exhibition. media activity is part of the battle that we are doing today in the battle against the zionist regime. the importance of the media battle is less than the importance of the battle in. it is not clear the conversation with mr. osama hamdan, a member of the political office of the spokesman of the palestinian islamic resistance movement, hamas. i'll start, mr. hamdan , welcome to the world of today , welcome to the program of today's world, i am very grateful for your existence , it is a pleasure for me personally to meet and talk with you. during these years, you were

these missiles, like imad and qat , increase the range and accuracy by changing the body and structurewarhead they have been hit. if we do not make ourselves strong , as we saw around us , different countries will trample them. the zionist regime is very weak today. in these situations, you have to be careful and we are doing this necessary care. the target of these missiles is the simulator of the palmakhim air base, the main location of the fighter. not long ago, netanyahu again used the word attack on iran at this base and said, "who said we will not attack iran? palmachim base is about 15 kilometers long, between 5 and 6 kilometers wide, but the target of irgc missiles is a third of this scale. and the fighter hangar and now, in less than 7 minutes , the simulator of the largest air base of the zionist regime in the occupied territories will be under the rain of irgc point missiles. in this operation, emad missiles reach targets with an accuracy of less than 4 meters with reinforced explosive warheads. and this is a situation of what the revolutionary guards can do against any targ

qualifications in order to carry out their responsibility and would be worthy hints of their people, the imad may peace be upon his soul manifested, in his stance of responsibility, the responsibility which he took, he manifested the identity of his people, the identity of faith, and he pursued his approach from there, from his affiliation of his people and the um, he brought together between political vigilance and a cultural understanding, cultural knowledge, and also as a social person in his social spirit, his social, spread social bonds and ties and his spirit of faith and jihad and he also, enjoyed very high ethics and behaved well, he had good relations with people, and also respected people in the way he dealt with them, and was humble, he was known for this, he was also interested and serious in his job and him doing his responsibilities, he worked day and night, and he also exerted efforts in the areas which he was focused on, with a tangible, sensive seriousness, clear, tangible efforts, and as part of his jihadi and practical journey, he took his responsibility as a president in v

these missiles, like imad and qad , have increased their range and accuracy by changing the body and structure of the warhead. if we do not make ourselves strong , as we saw around us , different countries will trample them. sinus diet is very weak today. in these situations, you have to be careful and we are doing this necessary care. the aim of these missiles is the simulator of the air base palmachim, the main settlement. f-35 fighter jets belong to the zionist regime, and netanyahu used the word "attack on iran" at the same base a few days ago and said: "who said we will not attack iran?" the palmakhim base is about 15 kilometers long, between 5 and 6 kilometers wide, but the target of irgc missiles is a third of this scale, and the fighter hangar, and now in less than 7 minutes, the simulator of the regime's largest air base. the zionists in the occupied territories will be under the rain of irgc point missiles. imamad missiles in this operation they reach the targets with an accuracy of less than four meters with explosive reinforced warheads. and this is the situation of what

and his imad moderation for vladimir putin. i'm sorry to go on a track and it's all related we can do this. i think you would ask most senior american military and policymakers, commanders and policy if it would they support continuing to help ukraine and they would say, yes we are an amazing nation, briana, we all know it and we can make it happen. >> they give up things general like barracks, repair, much, much needed. >> why would why would >> that be a calculation where they would say this would make sense? we need to give up recruiting incentives. we need to shift those funds for now, this is actually more important. can you explain as you would to the american people? that calculation? >> i think we're on, i think we're looking at this as an existential issue. what is remarkable at this time is that nato, just had its ministerial. you've had the munich security conference. we have a huge nato exercise revolve i'm involved in god bless navalny was was killed just a few days ago. all of this should play in our domestic deba

imad to lay and what he hasn't his heart empathetic, empathetically for the american people? >> you see a difference in his >> public presentation from what you see when you sit across the table from him or in a meeting with him? i did a podcast interview with them for about 30 minutes and again, it was on emotional subject was about grief. >> but he was >> very involved. i mean, he was fully present, fully cognizant, and sharp, and that really made an impression on me. his public presentation is very different than what is it. i mean, does that what you're saying it's very different than what you see in meetings yeah. but i think is public presentation is okay. i think in meetings you see firsthand that he he's on top of the situation. he knows what's going on and why we've been having this conversation. we're talking about joe biden, the president of the united states, compared to but it isn't just the comparison. it's about what he brings to the table years of experience depth of knowledge that is, again, very deep, breadth of experience that serves us well beauty of his,

i thi imade the point to justiceag that they don't elinate muchpeech but didn't we deal with that in hurley as well and say that the mere fact thathe organizer took most all comers was irrelevt the first amendment interest in editorial controov who participated in the parade? >> i think hurley turned more on the fact that what w the activityhe was a st. patrick's day parade with a particular expresse rpose so perhaps it could still beat expressive and be a little bit more lenient but this court in hurley did rely on the fact that there was front and isection of members of the parade. the pade committee responsible for it was doing front and selection so i think hurley fits our theory but i also think selectivity is totally relevant w is the speaker. we analogize in r ief to the government speech cases where the court has made that point in a variety of cases what youav said is that if the government is not exercising a ton of control over the speech at comes into a forum, it is not speaking. it can't censor that and that's >> thank you.rt held. >> i have a question about this editori