when a whole woman with no vote because she conceived immaculate, and a good baby daddy was something even got to be, where we could heal the sick and make the blind see. we believe in believing, so i believe in believe, and i believe they can come in the night like a thief and knocked out each of uncertainty's teeth and take away all your disbelief because the fate that lived through leprosy is a fate that will live through a chevy, a fate that can make amounting get out of bed is a phase i believe that i believe can spread fish and a few loaves of bread. i believe i can make wine out of tap water, and i believe i can go break dancing and walk on water. i believe i can fly. i believe i can soar. i never thought i could be so free, but i believe on flying away on a wing and a prayer, and who could it be? believe it or not, it is just me. believe it or not, the fish that we got and the bread i just said is all that we got, is all that we need for us to get fed and for us to feed a whole lot of folks in need. thank you. [applause] >> let me ask the audience to thank our two guests on st

the debate is an immaculate outlet for students to learn public speaking, critical thinking, urban politics and the things that affect them daily. we are talking about what is going on now. debate takes you there, and the students of san francisco need that in their curriculum. on top of that, what better to do with b -- it then public speaking? when i left washington and i went downtown, it is what got me back into education. learning this type of language and going through my humanities class in history, it really helps me make those connections to well as learning in class and how to make it in the real world. i would not have made my career path in public policies with a minor in urban studies. i think that is something that the school board needs to support. we are a well diverse group of people that believe in something. we are not just chanting for this or that, we are chanting for something that can unite people as a whole. support us whether it is through funding or services that they do something that is powerful. it takes them there. we want to be the people arguing for what stud

there are all of these penetrations, so it must be kept immaculately clean. hardwood floors? here is what you do not do. you do not wash the floors with water. they get warped and water gets underneath the finnish and so on. there are special product. but the worst thing you can do is wash them with water. wipe them up. >> at most stores there is a system called bona. it comes with a mop and a spray , and we recommend for all of the installation we do. >> good. we also talked about carpet cleaning, that is straightforward. but one thing wall-to-wall carpet can have done is have it restretched, and if it starts to fold and bubble and so on, you can't have people, and they can knock it back in and restart the carpet and get more time out of it. also, i have this done every few years, go round with blue tape, and every place you see a thing or death, you take this tape and say it needs a touch up there. just walk around and figure out where it goes and have a touch up paint day or two, and then the house look so much nicer after you do that. use blue tape, because it does not us

that aside, the plaintiffs need to come forward with something that shows that there was this for immaculateccurrence and every decision in every store simply does not sure that. the other problem on the cohesion analysis, the to fatality inquiry, they each had a very different story. one was promoted to managerial precision and one was terminated. one was promoted and then had a disciplinary problem and was demoted. in each case, they would have to show that they were treated differently than people who were situated just like them, the same supervisor, the same department, the same situation. >> would you think is the difference between the standard they were required to apply and the certification stage on the question whether or not there was a companywide policy? what would the standard be applied on the merits? >> just as a leader, they did not have to apply that there's a actual policy of discrimination. the at least needed to point to a policy in that was common and that a land of these different individuals, locations, and people together. their argument is that the common policy is

they're cutting the lawn, getting the dirt ready for an immaculate home opener.the first time the giants are opening the season here at at&t park as well as in san francisco as the defending world series champions. they have a poll that has been waiting for some time now, they will raise the banner there. there will be activity going on here. they won't tell us exactly what they will do what that banner is being raised, but they said that it will be a pleasant surprise we talked about the activity inside and outside. the crews are looking at the flight getting it ready to go to put an over center field before the first pitch happens. i can tell you, before the game there will be a moment of reflection for bryanbrian sdtow. they are not g donations here that won't happen until monday. they want you to do so on line were many things are set up. a lot going on here we will send it back to you if you're headed down here the traffic is picking up, they will let people into the ballpark starting at 10:35 a.m.. >> mark: tickets sold out but you can buy standing room onl

every saturday, you look immaculate and professional. any time a person comes from poverty up to a little well, he goes to their head. not everybody, but i'm trying to say the people on wall street, most of them came from street level and now they are up there in the higher echelon. they do -- that forget about the little people. it is just about them. i do not see how they could perform their jobs without remembering them. it is a case of give-and-take, and for them is always taken never give. thank you for having me on. host: from twitter -- fayetteville, ark., co-head, james on the democrat line. caller: how would like to call to a return for social utility on wall street. they are paid more money than nearly anyone in america. supposedly they know have allocate capital better than anyone else. but the recent mortgage crisis shows that they do not know how to do their job. they are -- this is regardless to glass-stegal. in the 1980's, it was the same problem. the invested money they should not have. we need of liquidation of these peo

that aside, the plaintiffs need to come forward with something that shows that there was this for immaculate occurrence and every decision in every store simply does not sure that. the other problem on the cohesion analysis, the to fatality inquiry, they each had a very different story. one was promoted to managerial precision and one was terminated. one was promoted and then had a disciplinary problem and was demoted. in each case, they would have to show that they were treated differently than people who were situated just like them, the same supervisor, the same department, the same situation. >> would you think is the difference between the standard they were required to apply and the certification stage on the question whether or not there was a companywide policy? what would the standard be applied on the merits? >> just as a leader, they did not have to apply that there's a actual policy of discrimination. the at least needed to point to a policy in that was common and that a land of these different individuals, locations, and people together. their argument is that the common policy