off, and the locally, and my day job is helping to supervise immigration attorneys at the immigration clinic at davis. i see a range of clients that have pressing needs. while we all hope and wish for compehensive immigration reform, i have got to tell you from what i've heard the last several months, the question we all have to ask ourselves is at what price? if we get an immigration bill introduced that a serious blow for the spring, i'll tell you right now the provisions i will not be happy with. i know they're going to be in there. you should be aware of these provisions. first of all, the price that the estimated 10 million to 12 million undocumented immigrants in the country may be to pay is they may all be forced to plead guilty to a crime before they can file their application. that is before they actually have to pay a fine that is attached. right now what is seriously being discussed is what level of crime should they have to plead guilty to before they apply for legalization. should it be a misdemeanor or in a fraction? that is going on right now. the second thing is an attack on

immigrant workers. we hold five weekly worker rights clinics, provide legal advice and referrals to over 2,3500 workers a year. in addition we have several telephone hot lines. for example, work and family hotline already so far in 2011 we have received over 1,000 calls. we see widespread abuse in low wage and immigrant-dominated industries, like rampant wage theft in industries we serve, the current loophole allows employers to steal employee benefits. we have heard stories from workers who are impacted by the loophole. workers who don't know they have these benefits and incentive for employees to hide these benefits from the employees. we heard from workers prevented from using accounts and can't get the most basic and routine medical services. employers are incentivized to limit employee access to the funds. it's particularly pernicious among the low wage, often nonenglish speaking workers we serve. the employment law center officially endorsed the campos's amendment and to close the loophole because it's a straightforward and common sense approach to remove that powerful financial incentive to prot

give you some ideas that get at the immigration issue and the potential and the need for reform in a way that is a little bit less traditional in that it's almost clinical. i'm going to try to present some economic arguments. i'm going to present some kind of structural social arguments and i'm going to worry you a little because to have the economist law professor opening with an analogy to a science fiction film. don't worry, it works out ok. some may have not seen this film. it's one of my favorites. it starred uma thurman and jude law. it's a near future in which individuals are gentically engineered and it's the story of two brothers. one is enneared to be terrific and great and wonderful and one is not. it's a story about their efforts to succeed. there is one part of the story that resonates so well and is a strong metaphor for immigration and it's the following -- they would have a contest as adolescents and as adults they would swim out in the ocean, and the first one to turn back would lose. it was a simple contest. and in theory, in every possible way in theory, the engineered brother should have won. he was stronger, bigger, better, more fit

clinical strength... helping you to bounce back. ensure! nutrition in charge! megyn: well, day one for enforcing america's toughest new immigration law.up in a moment. hold on a second. hold on. getting something else in my ear. [laughter] all right, it's a different story. this is the story that we told you about before the break, and you need to hear about it. down in mexico there is a woman who wound up with a live grenade lodged in the her mouth. look at this. she's sitting in a cafÉ down in mexico when all hell broke loose. trace gallagher picks up the story from there. trace? >> reporter: because really it's the story of the week, megyn. she was actually selling seafood in the northern part of mexico, and she hears a loud bang, and then something hits her in the face. it knocks her down, and she reaches up, and she feels blood, and then she passes out. she's rushed to the hospital, and then she gets there and tells doctors she believes that a rock hit her in the face. they take a closer look, they take an x-ray, it's not a rock, it's a grenade lodged between her upper and lower jaw. she was shot by a grenade launcher. it embedde

team or is it more immigration related to what seems to be the big issue orders employment discrimination kind of the hot an issue? what is the hot an issue in your community clinicsso many actually. i don't know where to begin. i don't know what to tell you. honestly we don't get a lot of antiques relating to immigration in the context of national security, we do get quite a lot of reports of racial and religious profiling. people who visited sikh shrines in pakistan are often questioned in a very brusque way by officials at a has-been to pass through pakistan. with respect to profiling, more generally, the majority of reports that we received come from airports, particularly at tsa chat points, sikhs are subject 100 times, even after her whole body image machines without incident. the explanation that has been proffered by tsa for this is that sikh turbans are inherently bulky. they are inherently low-key and therefore incapable of being penetrated by the crack aat machines that have been deployed nationwide at a cost of billions of dollars. but honestly with respect to immigration issues more generally, we don't receive -- we are not receiving reports. if i had