who said for imperial college ? who's the imperial college?ual spokesman for imperial college? i don't believe it. if there are some scientists who don't believe it, who say something that doesn't mean that that's the truth . that's the truth. >> well, tom, i suppose as human beings, we all tend to believe the science we want to believe. but imperial college, we're perfectly clear in a ulez made little difference. you and i will go on agree to disagree on this one. >> i do believe because it was said by a coroner and a coroner said by a coroner and a coroner said it was air pollution in inner london that killed the baby. emma and i do believe that because it was said by a current. >> no, look, i think if you live ininner >> no, look, i think if you live in inner london next to a major and major 24 over seven roadway, clearly , clearly that amount of clearly, clearly that amount of pollution is going to have an impact. my point is there are parts of outer london that are quite rural. it's going to make no difference at all. but we'll talk to yo

who said for imperial college ? who's the imperial college?ual spokesman for imperial college? i don't believe it. if there are some scientists who don't believe it, who say something that doesn't mean that that's the truth . that's the truth. >> well, tom, i suppose as human beings, we all tend to believe the science we want to believe. but imperial college, we're perfectly clear in a ulez made little difference. you and i will go on agree to disagree on this one. >> i do believe because it was said by a coroner and a coroner said by a coroner and a coroner said it was air pollution in inner london that killed the baby. emma and i do believe that because it was said by a current. >> no, look, i think if you live ininner >> no, look, i think if you live in inner london next to a major and major 24 over seven roadway, clearly , clearly that amount of clearly, clearly that amount of pollution is going to have an impact. my point is there are parts of outer london that are quite rural. it's going to make no difference at all. but we'll talk to yo

imperial college and in places and king's college in places like yeah the imperial college. >> you, wrong when it came to the pandemic and pretty much everything wrong . but mind you, everything wrong. but mind you, you know, they were told, of course, to rewrite the report, but the deputy mayor of london and that is the science this is based on and that makes me very, very angry. final question very angry. the final question goes , it's going to be a corker. goes, it's going to be a corker. it goes to jacqui. yay >> hey, guys, do you think the current government and not opposing the ulez scheme more vigorously at the moment because they they wish to use this with their manifesto in the next general election. >> jacqui, you are so cynical, cynical about politicians, political figures . do you know? political figures. do you know? i actually think that is absolutely i believe that is absolutely i believe that is absolutely right that the tory party will try and use this at the mayoral election when you'll be told that susan hall was opposed to all of this. right from the word go that

imperial college and in places and king's college in places like yeah the imperial college. >> you, wrong when it came to the pandemic and pretty much everything wrong . but mind you, everything wrong. but mind you, you know, they were told, of course, to rewrite the report, but the deputy mayor of london and that is the science this is based on and that makes me very, very angry. final question very angry. the final question goes , it's going to be a corker. goes, it's going to be a corker. it goes to jacqui. yay >> hey, guys, do you think the current government and not opposing the ulez scheme more vigorously at the moment because they they wish to use this with their manifesto in the next general election. >> jacqui, you are so cynical, cynical about politicians, political figures . do you know? political figures. do you know? i actually think that is absolutely i believe that is absolutely i believe that is absolutely right that the tory party will try and use this at the mayoral election when you'll be told that susan hall was opposed to all of this. right from the word go that

-ii you mentioned that imperial college study — thatjust looked after the first few weeks when it waser studies that looked at a longer period, another group that found 26% reduction in nitrogen dioxide over the year following its introduction. so it's clear that the ultra low emission zone that was established in april 2019 has now been expanded and has reduced air pollution in london. and it's important to note that the air quality in london is still way above the levels recommended by the world health organization, so the air, although it's better than it has been, is still not safe. fin although it's better than it has been, is still not safe.- been, is still not safe. on that issue, been, is still not safe. on that issue. what — been, is still not safe. on that issue, what about _ been, is still not safe. on that issue, what about this - been, is still not safe. on that issue, what about this figure | been, is still not safe. on that i issue, what about this figure that 4000 londoners are dying of air pollution every year? many experts have looked at that and raise concerns about

no buy imperial college.ing. >> well , i lying. >> well, i think misrepresentation of the truth is how i'd put it. and that information came out of our office. you know, he pays . office. you know, he pays. £800,000 to the imperial college for certain results. and yet another part of that particular body wrote a report claiming that that the ulez really doesn't make that much difference. his own tfl assessments that he got done independently have shown that the ulez expansion will make virtually no difference at all. which just shows you this is nothing but a tax grab . and of nothing but a tax grab. and of course he hates he hates car drivers anyway, despite the fact apart from his driver. yes. there you go . there you go. >> he's a he's in his big. well, absolutely he can you pledge 100% that your first day as mayor it's gone the extension is scrapped . scrapped. >> absolutely. i did when i was last here and i stand 100% by that when i'm there of london on may the 2nd, the first full day, which will be in m

no buy imperial college.ing. >> well , i lying. >> well, i think misrepresentation of the truth is how i'd put it. and that information came out of our office. you know, he pays . office. you know, he pays. £800,000 to the imperial college for certain results. and yet another part of that particular body wrote a report claiming that that the ulez really doesn't make that much difference. his own tfl assessments that he got done independently have shown that the ulez expansion will make virtually no difference at all. which just shows you this is nothing but a tax grab . and of nothing but a tax grab. and of course he hates he hates car drivers anyway, despite the fact apart from his driver. yes. there you go . there you go. >> he's a he's in his big. well, absolutely he can you pledge 100% that your first day as mayor it's gone the extension is scrapped . scrapped. >> absolutely. i did when i was last here and i stand 100% by that when i'm there of london on may the 2nd, the first full day, which will be in m

show where they're wrong. it and show where they're wrong. >> the imperial >> that's where the imperial collegethe imperial colle actually in. there >> that's where the imperial colle actually two in. there >> that's where the imperial colle actually two studies|ere >> that's where the imperial colle actually two studies which were actually two studies which complicates rather, and complicates things rather, and the scientists disagreed with each other much as the same as they covm, each other much as the same as they covid, so that is they did over covid, so that is it's scientists. >> pressure was put on imperial because they were getting £800,000 from the met. no. £800,000 from the met. well, no. >> fact happened there >> what in fact happened there was deputy was was that the deputy mayor was obviously went went for the for the report that she most liked . the report that she most liked. so it wasn't a question of putting pressure on. it was there were two reports there and there were two reports there and the argument now is a scientific one over over the data and the way it was collected.

it's been claimed that an imperial college study has college london study has suggested that centralz, which is already in place , reduced nitrogen oxides by 29. but an academic from the college's environmental research group, which received £80,000 worth of funding from the mayor's office, simply reviewed the methodology of the report, which came from city hall in the first place. when a team of imperial college scientists look at actual data here, they at the actual data here, they suggested ulez had reduced nitrogen by just 3% and nitrogen dioxide by just 3% and that it had had a negligible effect on particulate pollution . mr khan has claimed that pollution related deaths, as i mentioned earlier, much higher in outer london, which is why ulez is needed to expand . he ulez is needed to expand. he failed to explain. this is largely because outer london's population much older than population is much older than that central london, mr khan that in central london, mr khan and his team have claimed that 90% of cars in outer london already ulez compliant. but the racs figures suggest t

and it has emerged that imperial college , sadiq khan's mayor's college, sadiq khan's mayor's office00,000 over the last couple of years to imperial college for research on the environmental impact. now it's emerged that they published a couple of years ago research indicating that the original ulez scheme had had very little effect on reducing emissions. in fact, it had cut nitrogen dioxide by less than 3. and so . dioxide by less than 3. and so. the mayor's office had then got in touch with imperial college, say they were very disappointed that this had been published . that this had been published. and of course, the concern of councils around the edge of london that have been trying to get the expansion stopped get the ulez expansion stopped has that this is proof has said that this is proof that, you know, this relationship between the scientists and the mayor's office and that sadiq khan is trying to suppress science information that is not his advantage. and they personally think that this stinks . think that this stinks. >> yes, it all sounds a little bit too cosy, i'd say. t

according to the imperial college london website report , this new leaf-like technology using it converts solar energy into electricity from low-cost materials and can inspire the next generation of renewable energy technology, producing more than 10% more electricity than memory solar panels. this new technology can also be used without the need for control wind pump and porous materials gharnimat produces more than 40 million cubic meters of fresh water and thermal energy annually, and nasa plans to add some solar panels to the saiki spacecraft in order to provide the power required by this spacecraft. according to nasa, these large solar arrays, which are similar to balas , include the fifth part of the solar panel and when the spacecraft leaves the earth . it also leaves the kilowatt of power for it provides a 6-year journey. thank you for your attention and companionship , dear ones. god bless you. the silk carpet completes your arrangement, but the simpler series are fond of memories and the patterns are old, but anyone with any style and taste can have one. from modern and classic

lewis: one of the researchers from that study is a professor from imperial college london.nk you for coming on the program. how significant, how important do you think this could be? >> we know that everyone ages at different rates. that's an important risk factor for many diseases. we are adept at looking at someone and being able to assess if they are old for their age, but our organs also age. that's important for predicting future outcomes, varies a lot between indivis. this new ai tool uses the same approaches that the human eye uses for recognizing agent meone's appearance, but uses images of the heart instead. it can produce an aurate prediction of someone's biological age actually is. lewis: is this something that simply couldn't be done by humans, however long they studied, however good they were, something that is quantifiably different? >> it is difficult to judge by eye someone's age. it affects different organs, cardiovascular system differently. that is where the ai comes in. we have used 126 different features of the heart, blood vessels, ecg traces for it to

gary fuller, a senior lecturer at imperial college, who quote independently peer reviewed a paper used justify the ulez expansion is part of the ulez expansion is part of the environmental research group at imperial , the environmental research group at imperial, which was awarded over £800,000 in just two years by sadiq khan at city hall. this bloke is a full on leftie by the way, even writing for the guardian pollutionwatch column . guardian pollutionwatch column. gosh, no wonder that paper's sales are plummeting and surprise , surprise, fuller was surprise, surprise, fuller was the only reviewer of khan's so—called landmark report suggesting ulez had dramatically reduced pollution in london. let me be clear that was a lie. khan's 49% figure was actually closer to a negligible 3. it's not the only lie given the mayor claimed thousands of londoners die each year from air pollution when it's only showing up on one death certificate . btw, khan has death certificate. btw, khan has been found out the introduction of ulez is based on flawed science. it's a national disgrace and an embarra

i mean, how can a professor imperial college professor at imperial college actually put their name tohe person who then says, no, hang you haven't hang on a moment, you haven't got can we change it? >> you know, you'll it? you know, you'll have >> oh, you know, you'll have collected and collected data before and evidence before. and we're not seeing the of the report. seeing the whole of the report. some of it might have caveats, but when you look at it in its entirety, it say, but you know what? majority decision was what? the majority decision was actually it would be better in the air. isn't that clean, therefore ? but there would have therefore? but there would have been dissenting views . it been dissenting views. it doesn't the dissenting doesn't mean that the dissenting views major views. doesn't mean that the dissenting vieithat's major views. doesn't mean that the dissenting vieithat's the major views. doesn't mean that the dissenting vieithat's the life ajor views. doesn't mean that the dissenting vieithat's the life is r views. doesn't mean that the dissenting vieithat's th

she is a physicist and research fellow at imperial college london, highlighted jazz and baltimore in the west care with an s k executive director of the group out at munition. i you that kierra names thing up for rosie stevenson. good night for trustee of the wicked media foundation, co founder of which of project women in read. so good to have you o. c. all right, so this is a major issue. it's really quite stock. guess what happened? why is it so many guy is who does that with a pdf making decisions. booking out who is important and then writing about them have a weekend i think there's kind of 2 reasons. i mean, it's a fantastic issue and i'm see if a grateful that you've taken on, but i guess one not the issue is that society doesn't do enough to recognize and celebrate women. and wikipedia is the general interest encyclopedia and content on wikipedia reflects the sites. so general interest is, society isn't doing enough to say there are amazing women, artists, or amazing women scientists or amazing women musicians that in the notes have been se criteria on wikipedia. i'm going t

one of the researchers from that study is professor declan o'regan from imperial college london, andficant, how important do you think this could be?— you think this could be? we know that everyone _ you think this could be? we know that everyone ages _ you think this could be? we know that everyone ages at _ you think this could be? we know that everyone ages at different i that everyone ages at different rates, and that's really important risk factor for many different diseases, and for instance we know we are quite adept at being able to look at someone and be able to assess whether they look younger or older for their age, assess whether they look younger or olderfortheirage, but assess whether they look younger or olderfor their age, but our assess whether they look younger or older for their age, but our organs are also age at different rates, and it is important for predicting future outcomes, and varies a lot between individuals, so this new ai tool uses the same sort approaches that the human eye uses four recognises someone's age or physical appearance, but it produces an a

scientist and i _ i am a scientist and i co—founded the company together with my supervisor, from imperial colleget is battery for a consumer electronics, mobile phone or electric vehicle, and ljy phone or electric vehicle, and by changing the structure, we can make the battery more powerful and reduce the cost of the battery and to accelerate it. ., ., , . it. how does it reduce the demand _ it. how does it reduce the demand for _ it. how does it reduce the demand for copper? i it. how does it reduce the l demand for copper? copper it. how does it reduce the i demand for copper? copper is the new goal _ demand for copper? copper is the new goal in _ demand for copper? copper is the new goal in electric i the new goal in electric vehicles, three times more copper than conventional vehicles. in our solution, copper than conventional vehicles. in oursolution, by changing the metal structure and reducing the consumptions of copper by 60%, allows it to reduce cost and improve performance, and this is fully recycled copper, can be used, and saves around 60%. if we translate it to the ev, to say five ki

he's a senior lecturer in public health at imperial college london, and he did a review of the globals to speaking to us. let me ask first, how does one go about analysing the health impacts of these kinds of the emission zones in cities? it’s a emission zones in cities? it's a aood emission zones in cities? it's a good question- _ emission zones in cities? it's a good question. there - emission zones in cities? it's a good question. there are - emission zones in cities? it�*s —. good question. there are different ways you can do it, but what we did is we searched through all of the published evidence on globally, if you look at schemes that have measured health impacts before, after similar schemes have been implemented, so we really read all that evidence, to get the combined picture, up to date, what the global evidence says and really, what we find is, we find pretty consistent evidence that cardiovascular disease come down when these schemes are in fermented and pretty consistent evidence that road traffic injuries go down. so i think putting that together with what we know from

>> can i just say as well he paid imperial college or his his office paid imperial college 800 grandon't know. yeah. >> i think this is a total scandal. much more to come on this. benjamin butterworth, you and my union jackass prince and my union jackass is prince william sexist prince who william the sexist prince who did absolute salute because a big it's a big word and it's true because he refused to go and watch the lionesses. >> you can't call the guy sexist. i can it's the first world cup final we've made in however many years. that gap is that we all don't know. and if it had been the men who made it to the world cup final, do you really think he would have refused to go? there's not a chance in hell. >> andrea jenkins, your nominee. >> andrea jenkins, your nominee. >> it to be, wolf. i'm >> it has to be, wolf. i'm sorry. wilfred emanuel jones it was amazing achievement for was an amazing achievement for the women's lioness is to get into the final make it all about race, didn't he? >> absolutely. look, i'm going to go with karen malone, though, and sadiq khan, because carol's

>> can i just say as well he paid imperial college or his his office paid imperial college 800 grandanted. i don't know. yeah. >> i think this is a total scandal. much more to come on this. benjamin butterworth, you and my union jackass prince and my union jackass is prince william sexist prince who william the sexist prince who did absolute salute because a big it's a big word and it's true because he refused to go and watch the lionesses. >> you can't call the guy sexist. i can it's the first world cup final we've made in however many years. that gap is that we all don't know. and if it had been the men who made it to the world cup final, do you really think he would have refused to go? there's not a chance in hell. >> andrea jenkins, your nominee. >> andrea jenkins, your nominee. >> it to be, wolf. i'm >> it has to be, wolf. i'm sorry. wilfred emanuel jones it was amazing achievement for was an amazing achievement for the women's lioness is to get into the final make it all about race, didn't he? >> absolutely. look, i'm going to go with karen malone, though, and sadiq khan, becau

but what imperial college what about the imperial college report? you here's khan report? khan trying to sell to the public. oh it reduced the emissions by 49. no imperial found it was only 3. that's not just a small lie, jim. that's a whopper. that's one of the biggest lies the british public have ever been told in the history of politics. >> should we just go back to basics and just say what comes out of back of car engines, out of the back of car engines, car exhaust is poisonous and you know, it's getting colder and cleaner. it does not matter. it's why did khan need to lie ? it's why did khan need to lie? >> let's address the lie. why would it? >> it's put out by by others on the other side that says it was a lie . sometimes academics do a lie. sometimes academics do scientists. i think that was between two scientists. two students. scientific bodies that were that were having a debate, having an argument about certain figures . so having an argument about certain figures. so we you having an argument about certain figures . so we you know what figures. so we you know

but what imperial college what about the imperial college report? you here's khan report? khan trying to sell to the public. oh it reduced the emissions by 49. no imperial found it was only 3. that's not just a small lie, jim. that's a whopper. that's one of the biggest lies the british public have ever been told in the history of politics. >> should we just go back to basics and just say what comes out of back of car engines, out of the back of car engines, car exhaust is poisonous and you know, it's getting colder and cleaner. it does not matter. it's why did khan need to lie ? it's why did khan need to lie? >> let's address the lie. why would it? >> it's put out by by others on the other side that says it was a lie . sometimes academics do a lie. sometimes academics do scientists. i think that was between two scientists. two students. scientific bodies that were that were having a debate, having an argument about certain figures . so having an argument about certain figures. so we you having an argument about certain figures . so we you know what figures. so we you know

and imperial college has been given £800,000.sean , by the gla so there's just sean, by the gla so there's just a lot of jiggery pokery going on here and by the way, a study from the department of civil and environmental engineering found that the introduction of ulez in 2019 cut nitrogen dioxide by less than 3% and had insignificant effects on ozone and particulate matter . now, and particulate matter. now, that's the science. he doesn't want, of course, supported because it completely contradicts well, he also said it was going to save thousands of people. >> and he also said, by the way, that thousands of people had died of pollution in london over the years. it turned out it was only one. so this guy will swindle the science. i mean, really, it should be sean bailey sitting there and city hall, shouldn't it? you came so close, sean. for folk who sean. of course, for folk who don't know, sean ran very close against khan . what do you make against khan. what do you make of him using this conspiracy theorist to now because he's

and imperial college has been given £800,000.sean , by the gla so there's just sean, by the gla so there's just a lot of jiggery pokery going on here and by the way, a study from the department of civil and environmental engineering found that the introduction of ulez in 2019 cut nitrogen dioxide by less than 3% and had insignificant effects on ozone and particulate matter . now, and particulate matter. now, that's the science. he doesn't want, of course, supported because it completely contradicts well, he also said it was going to save thousands of people. >> and he also said, by the way, that thousands of people had died of pollution in london over the years. it turned out it was only one. so this guy will swindle the science. i mean, really, it should be sean bailey sitting there and city hall, shouldn't it? you came so close, sean. for folk who sean. of course, for folk who don't know, sean ran very close against khan . what do you make against khan. what do you make of him using this conspiracy theorist to now because he's

let's talk now tojim skea, professor of sustainable energy at imperial college, who's just been appointedtergovernmental panel on climate change, which is the world's foremost authority on climate science. welcome and i suppose congratulations are in order for getting the chairmanship let's start with the basic question kate gave us the history of the 1.5 degrees target but is it achievable? it is still possible _ target but is it achievable? it 3 still possible to achieve that target in principle but as we have emphasised frequently, it needs really radical action to cut emissions substantially. kate mentioned nearly cutting emissions by half by 2030 and we need to start on it really quickly because we have been giving this message for five years now. fast and rapid and deep is really what we need to go to if we are going to keep 1.5 within reach. d0 we are going to keep 1.5 within reach. ,, ~ _ , reach. do you think the urgency is there, in western _ reach. do you think the urgency is there, in western europe - reach. do you think the urgency is there, in western europe for- there, in w

well, the from the evidence that we were reading from the university college london college, imperial collegeeard from many people, there are other ways of tackling air pollution in london in terms of looking at the underground, and that's not just my view. many people have commented on it. this is only one form of tackling air pollution. yes, it's important our lungs looking at air pollution and its effect on people's health. but i don't think the evidence is there to support sadiq khan, unfortunately. well i couldn't have said it better myself. >> doctor szczesny mudaliar there in milton keynes, thank you very much for being part of our gp voices. now on to a story that caught my eye today. brace yourself. are you ready ? the yourself. are you ready? the duchess of sussex , meghan duchess of sussex, meghan markle, is reportedly set to return to social media. apparently, meghan is ready to relaunch herself on instagram. the poor dear for the first time since her and prince harry stopped using the platform in 2020. and get this, according to some experts, it's predicted that meghan could pote

he extrapolated from the imperial previous imperial college research and did what they said don't do.uez , tried to get them to rodriguez, tried to get them to squash fact that the reports squash the fact that the reports did not say that it damages children's lungs and that it was looking badly on them and they tried to get it suffocated both from imperial and queen mary university. there's some facts. there's also some facts about the green billionaires that are funding some of these things. now, might call it now, you might call it a conspiracy for people to try and suffocate and shut down scientific evidence . but you scientific evidence. but you see, rather than giving out platitudes, which jim does and others do, i'd much more argue the merit and the content of the points . ulez the merit and the content of the points. ulez is going to do nothing whatsoever to improve health. actually, if he was really serious about that, he'd get underground with transport for london to sort out some things down there and when you start calling the public names, a whole range of diverse people,

imperial college london scientists to spin the narrative when research suggested ulez has made no discernible pc groupthink continues in

learned so much over the last few days, including the £800,000 in research that was paid to imperial collegeice that basically said that even in the inner areas , ulez had made practically areas, ulez had made practically no different difference to particulate emissions . although particulate emissions. although nitrous oxide levels were down. but that may be because of slightly newer cars being on the road, believe you me, on the outer ring of london, it'll make no difference to air quality. what so ever. so we are doing and you know, it's a tax on the poon and you know, it's a tax on the poor. it's all well and good. him saying there's £2,000 worth of scrappage, but to get rid of a car and buy a new car cost a sight more than £2,000. it's a tax on the poorest in society. it's a tax on the self employed. and we will be in camden down on the borders of bromley and kent next tuesday evening, the 29th of august, for a live show. if you want to come along . gb news you want to come along. gb news dot com. go there now . i think dot com. go there now. i think we're going to sell out pretty quick

learned so much over the last few days, including the £800,000 in research that was paid to imperial collegeice that basically said that even in the inner areas , ulez had made practically areas, ulez had made practically no different difference to particulate emissions . although particulate emissions. although nitrous oxide levels were down. but that may be because of slightly newer cars being on the road, believe you me, on the outer ring of london, it'll make no difference to air quality. what so ever. so we are doing and you know, it's a tax on the poon and you know, it's a tax on the poor. it's all well and good. him saying there's £2,000 worth of scrappage, but to get rid of a car and buy a new car cost a sight more than £2,000. it's a tax on the poorest in society. it's a tax on the self employed. and we will be in camden down on the borders of bromley and kent next tuesday evening, the 29th of august, for a live show. if you want to come along . gb news you want to come along. gb news dot com. go there now . i think dot com. go there now. i think we're going to sell out pretty quick

it's based on a model by imperial college. >> and we come on to that in a minute. >> but what they'vetly. >> but fundamentally, it's a lie. it's not true. there's only one person who's actually died due to low or poor emissions one person who's actually died due tcars.' or poor emissions one person who's actually died due tcars. so poor emissions one person who's actually died due tcars. so we)r emissions one person who's actually died due tcars. so we understand . from cars. so we understand. >> and that was 8 9 >> and that was about 8 or 9 years ago. >> since then, believe it or >> and since then, believe it or not, emissions have actually improved. college improved. but imperial college recently published that recently published a report that to that there will no to show that there will be no demonstrable difference to the air we breathe or the quality of the if ulez is the air we breathe. if ulez is expanded. >> so . so why is that? he can't. >> so. so why is that? he can't. saying it's going to save lives. >> well, if i knew that answer, i think i'd be. for every time i've actua

is khan's deputy for environment and energy, and professor frank kelly, who is a director for imperial collegegroup have been exposed during which rodriguez says that she was really disappointed at the findings of this report, which questioned the effectiveness of ulez . there were basically, in ulez. there were basically, in a nutshell, told to change it of course, they were paid £800,000 by mr carr's office since 2021, and professor kelly's colleagues said that they stood by their research 100. but it is understood that the fallout had a chilling effect, leaving them unwilling to publish further data. basically did it? was it the old time old classic of a politician going to a group and saying, look, we need to find something here? can you find it for us? and i'm saying, well, we can't really, but we'll just about find it for you. and then i'm that's not good i'm saying, that's not good enough. and then i'm saying, well, that's what you're getting. public has getting. and now the public has to starkey you feel to pay david starkey do you feel as pubucis to pay david starkey do you feel as pu

tfl and even recently the imperial college, which they tried to, he's deputy mayor, tried to manipulateults. be no results. there will be no demonstrable or benefit demonstrable increase or benefit to quality by moving the to air quality by moving the ulez all the way up to the m25. it's a complete sham. it's a con from a very dishonest mayor >> he would of course say that it is time . um and there are it is time. um and there are global influences which are very much pushing this agenda and it isfime much pushing this agenda and it is time for us to accept that the car is no longer a luxury that we can afford from a planetary environmental point of view. particular older diesel and petrol cars. what would you say to that? howard well, try telling 37 million voters who own cars and some of them two cars, three cars and there's trucks and vans . trucks and vans. >> this is an essential part of our life. it's a it's the very fabnc our life. it's a it's the very fabric of our commercial and the heartbeat of our economy. it's madness what's happening, what we need to do is incentivise people

sadiq khan's environment deputy said that she was, quote, really disappointed at the imperial collegeshe was. which claims that ulez cuts nitrogen dioxide by less than 3% and has in significant effects on the ozone. it says the ulez scrappage scheme has been opened up to all londoners today, giving drivers with a non ulez compliant vehicle the chance to apply compliant vehicle the chance to apply for up to £2,000 to replace their car, despite the fact that, of course in a lot of cases their cars will indeed be worth a lot more than £2,000. lisa hartle our london reporter has more this good has more on this story. good afternoon, lisa. yes, very controversial, this idea of some form of alleged cover up anyway , what's going on? well so the emails that are being discussed, as you said, are between the mayor's deputy and a scientist at imperial college london. >> they were discussing some research was carried out in research that was carried out in 2021, published in 2021, and that was a 12 period of that was a 12 week period of monitoring the air quality before you les started. and then

you mention that number, 4000 early deaths per year, that number i believe is from an imperial collegequality team of experts was commissioned by - accurate? the same air-quality team of experts was commissioned by the | of experts was commissioned by the government, paid for by the government, paid for by the government, to do a report, and this report for the government show that around the country, there are between 20000 and 36,000 premature deaths, whether it is king's college, imperial college, queen mary's university, whether it is the chief medical officer, whether it is the world health organization, they all agree that air pollution as a public health crisis. we now have a very effective policy to reduce air pollution, shown to be effective in central london and inner london, but i think clean air is a right, not a privilege. what about outer london? why shouldn't they breathe clean air? why should they carry on dying prematurely in numbers that could be reversed? and the key thing is this, we need to make sure that we do other things as well, so that is why in london we have

but i was to talking a scientist who's studying at the imperial college london months ago now, and hed thing. he said they're often debating what equipment should be used, what pollutant in the air should be measured . so and that's actually measured. so and that's actually a point that the that the mayor's office made as well , mayor's office made as well, that it's often commonplace for scientists, for academic professions to be questioning each other's research on things like this . but obviously, at the like this. but obviously, at the heart of all this at the moment, this ulez expansion is due to come into place on the 29th of august. today is the scrappage scheme that mayor introduced scheme that the mayor introduced . is expanded out to . it is being expanded out to all those greater all of those greater london boroughs, but i've been speaking to a lot of people recently who have that they're so have said that they're just so worried when the 29th of worried about when the 29th of august comes they don't august comes around, they don't know what they're to going do despite scra

through 10 years leading surgeon, professor richard smith surgeon, gynecologist, consultant of the imperial college technical possibility. no , we are well aware that the 2010 gender equality act provides for equal treatment of gender and transgender women. he said, but this assumes technical feasibility, and in this case at present, there is no technical feasibility. there is a risk that we will rush this because we have patients who are very interested. i tell them we haven't done enough research. but i think it will, perhaps in the future. i would say it could take 5 to 10 years. it is believed that in the future these plantations can be made not only for women who have lost their uterus or were born without it, but also for men who have made the gender transition as a woman and would like to have a child for years we've heard news about men who got pregnant, but it was actually biological women who got pregnant. so can it be used to give men a womb to bear a child , and is that ethically acceptable? of course , in order to solve this, it is necessary to discuss the safety and effectiveness of t

but an imperial college report said actually it was 3. favour. you also counts all of know two, but only a third maximum come from vehicles. he also claimed only 10% of vehicles will pay the rac said actually it's 25. most of all, an independent report commissioned and paid for by khan only found five positive impacts of ulez out of 38 exams and 22 negative of the most of all is that ulez would have a disproportionate financial impact on people with low incomes, the disabled and young families. with all of that evidence in hand, john, can we just agree that this isn't about clean air, it's about cleaning out people's wallets ? the this out people's wallets? the this is about a last ditch attempt of trying to push back against the society that's engineered for cars and it should be accepted that cars are not benign. >> nobody would want to sit in a car in an unventilated room. >> they produce pollution. the challenge , of course, is what challenge, of course, is what you've just outlined is that it is viciously hard to apply the emissions

imperial college's environmental research group has been paid more than £800,000 by khan to evaluatey and it turns out it buys the scientific results you want . when the scientists want. when the scientists published results showing siddiqui's ultra low emission zone policy had little impact on pollution, the mayor's office were furious. a deputy to the mayor got in touch and told the scientists she was really disappointed that they hadn't come up with the results. the mayor's office wanted. after some arm twisting, the scientists then issued a statement saying ulez had helped to dramatically reduce air pollution. the twist this statement was partly written by the deputy mayor. listen. we're told to follow the science, but half the time the science is bought and paid for what others ? science can't be trusted. just this week , government covid this week, government covid adviser van—tam , who adviser jonathan van—tam, who convinced us all of the scientific benefits of vaccines, just took a lucrative job with moderna , who made billions off moderna, who made billions off the vaccines

imperial college's environmental research group has been paid more than £800,000 by khan to evaluatey and it turns out it buys the scientific results you want . when the scientists want. when the scientists published results showing siddiqui's ultra low emission zone policy had little impact on pollution, the mayor's office were furious. a deputy to the mayor got in touch and told the scientists she was really disappointed that they hadn't come up with the results. the mayor's office wanted. after some arm twisting, the scientists then issued a statement saying ulez had helped to dramatically reduce air pollution. the twist this statement was partly written by the deputy mayor. listen. we're told to follow the science, but half the time the science is bought and paid for what others ? science can't be trusted. just this week , government covid this week, government covid adviser van—tam , who adviser jonathan van—tam, who convinced us all of the scientific benefits of vaccines, just took a lucrative job with moderna , who made billions off moderna, who made billions off the vaccines

there was a report by imperial college that's been called into question. report that was paid for. >> it was paid. it was paid for by the mayor of london, £800,000. he basically paid for a report that he was hoping would give him the results that they wanted. and the quote they wanted. and then the quote was, disappointed was, we're very disappointed with the findings and they've decided to. decided they don't want to. i mean, ridiculous. mean, that's ridiculous. >> it is ridiculous. >> you yes, it is ridiculous. >> you yes, it is ridiculous. >> but my point is, it's hard >> but my point is, it's so hard to get to the truth of anything . it's very, very difficult. you have to be so politically. yes you have to be really careful where you look for your information . okay. information. okay. >> but it's raising taxes, isn't it? that's what it's about. >> it is. >> it is. >> it's raising taxes. it's getting money, not to help the kids with lung problems. >> exactly. but this is see, this is exactly it, isn't it? and then this is how they get you, right? and t

there was a report by imperial college that's been called into question. a report that was paid for. >> it was paid. it was paid for by the mayor of london, £800,000. he basically paid for a report that he was hoping would give him the results that they wanted. and the quote they wanted. and then the quote was, disappointed was, we're very disappointed with the findings and they've decided to. decided they don't want to. i mean, ridiculous. mean, that's ridiculous. >> it is ridiculous. >> you yes, it is ridiculous. >> you yes, it is ridiculous. >> but my point is, it's hard >> but my point is, it's so hard to get to the truth of anything . it's very, very difficult. you have to be so politically. yes you have to be really careful where you look for your information . okay. information. okay. >> but it's raising taxes, isn't it? that's what it's about. >> it is. >> it is. >> it's raising taxes. it's getting money, not to help the kids with lung problems. >> exactly. but this is see, this is exactly it, isn't it? and then this is how they get you, right? and

the first time was over the college over the imperial college report.ight into the ulez data, showed that ulez data, which showed that actually, what? no actually, guess what? no difference whatsoever. so small , it was less 3, frankly , , it was less than 3, frankly, barely measurable. these people are lying to londoners. they're lying to the british people. and it's got to be called out. >> so if the basis of their pushing this out is public health, if that is gone and lots of people have been trying to get that point across, how can they it ? do they? they justify it? do they? >> it's all about the money. and if you don't understand something, follow the something, always follow the money. a stealth tax. it's money. it's a stealth tax. it's a robin, it's literally it's a tax on the poor. it's the sheriff of nottingham called sadiq khan. he's the sheriff of london. and he's he's robbing the least well—off, the lowest paid the most vulnerable in and around london. >> white van man is going to find this very difficult. and women and women , of course. a

this this study is tosh because the real study the important study is the one that was done by imperial collegee by 3. now this, this, this review that khan is quoting , it's the guy who's it's quoting, it's the guy who's it's one guy who's he's a guy called gary fuller. he's not a scientist. he's a member of the environmental research group. and that's received 891 grand from khan's office since 2020. so what it means is and he's not supposed he's supposed to be impartial . supposed he's supposed to be impartial. no, he's not. he writes a he writes a climate column for the guardian, and he works for the environmental research group . so this guy is research group. so this guy is not impartial. research group. so this guy is not impartial . but yet khan has not impartial. but yet khan has been allowed to quote this thing, this it's reduced by 29. and surely rodriguez, the deputy, actually put out that statement. she adopted this. she did. and said that the report had that ulez had dramatically reduced pollution and it has not 20s samuel, your readers, a fan of ulez or not? >> absolutely not. i