prident obama welcomed the news aa sign that the economy is impving, but cautioned that more work needs to be ne to reach full recovery. >> as far as i'm concernedwe will not hav a true recovery long as wee losing jobs, and we w't rest until every ameran that is looking for work can find a job. have nooubt that we canake these chans. >> susie: here in neyork, we talked wh people still waiting for the change the presint is promising. scott gurveyet with some new yorkers today to find ouabout their job huntg efforts. >> rorter: in spite of today's employment rort, there wasn't much in the way of exuberanc irrational or otherwise, at e offices of h.rspecialist adecco group. jobseeker julisantana says not much has changed. >> it's still hard to y to find a job. even to get an interviewt's hard. i had interviews and, u know, i've hadeople, human resources departments,ell me out of 200 remes, they've only chosen five. >> repter: julios looking for wo in the hospitality sector, which habeen hard hit as consumers cut bk on diretionary spending. but adecco c.e.o. tigilliam says there are jobs to

as those margins impve over time here it' goingto increase profitability and raise the dividends and buyack shares. for the paent minded instor we think there's potenal here. >> paul: now you saw silar emes at jm smker when you recommended it in may. let's look at that chart. it's up3% nce then. i have to congratute you on that a some o your otr recent calls. for instance in mid july you liked discount retailer dollar thre and t thivery dayith very strong earnings, the stock is up almost 14% from the time of your recommendation. on march 25th you said the spieders were the best to play the recover and you're right on. you still like these securities as lonterm investments. >> sure, i think ty are all still attractive as long term investments. i shod putthe caveat they had tremendous ns at a pace that's not sustained. we would ue investors to te them off the tle. they're t going to connue like we've sn in the past several months. >> paul: all right. but do you feel that we are in bull market or i it stine of these rallies in bear market that a lot of people still think. >> we're in th

>> the discussion hasmoved, essentily, from impving quality and improving access and decreasing costs, to one th is really about iurance rerm and increasing acss, and if we add 40 million more peop to the health care sysm in the unid states, you're going to e costs go up, and we need to take costs outf the system by decreang the total cost of providing care, by integrating, and sendly by reducing the diseaseurden in the united states, and by at imeanight now we have an epidemic going on arnd obety, weave a ot of people smoking. obesity, now, accounts for 10% of the alth care costs ithe unitestates, and $147 llion, and oking accounts for $100 biion. wecould provide a l of heal care ife didn'tave those two big problems. >> woodrf: what is esstial, as far a you're concerned, in anyealth care reform proposal that is passed into law? >> well, i think whatwe need to do -- clearly weneed to have accesfor everybody -- don't ink disagrees with that. we want to have people covered for their health care, and then, think need to put the impetus anthe incentives i place soe begin to develop the so

other programs that have made broadband high value in other comunities such as improved education, impvedtraining for social skills, a wide variety of things -- so if all we did would provide broadband to underserved communities, it would probably not provide many benefits at all. >> but i think the broadband would open up additional opportunities, whether that is education and other things that you get through broadband by not having broadband, you wouldn't have access to those types of things. >> but the evidence does not support that. >> we have to do a study. >> the studies that we've heard from today -- not mine, i will point how the >> right. >> but the benefits in terms of wages have come to communities that are highly educated. >> so there is a variation on this theme? the point that i was trying to make is that you can't force demand is supply. first you got to have demand. and a national broadband policy needs to worry about how am i going to create demand? and when i put demand into that impacted area for this purpose, lo and behold, guess what happens? people start hanging thi