that incentivize lower income people. millennials are cautious.: they know that government is stepping? >> there are government incentives to help build new housing in new hampshire for example, rental housing is huge. but the problem, people your age, my daughter's age, they have a amount of student debt, as a result of that debt they are waiting longer and longer to buy a home, and by the way, parents are moving back in with kids, your parents move in with kids. charles: a sandwich thing. >> students who can't afford, they are back with me, and parents like me, we need traditional homes and affordable housing opportunities, rental homes, market is -- i think you saw uptick today is cyclical depends on where you live. charles: we know, real estate is local but steve moore, to that point, we've seen amazing growth in rentals, every time housing data comes out permits for multifamily through the roof. but, from a an economic point of view, this millennial generation that prefers to rent, are hey boxing themselves in, the rent is through the roof, y

but some think the only way to get the donations we need is to incentivize with tense of thousands ofollars. >> they're nearly 6,000 people in pennsylvania in need of organ donation and they've been trying to reduce that number for years. but now a controversial proposal by an actual kidney recipient dr. sally is a tell we incentivize people by paying them as much as $50,000 to be living donors. >> something on the order of attack credit, a contribution to a retirement account, anyone who is intereste interested in giviy while alive would be able to be rewarded in that way. >> reporter: doctor is a tell proposed a government funded program that would incentivize people to donate their organs, and help close that need. but donor programs like gift of life here in pennsylvania say that paying people for their organs that's just wrong. >> to give, you know, large sums of money and some people propose $50,000 to donate a kidney to someone we think is really out of line because the idea is that, you know, we're supposed to care for our fellow man and our family members. >> reporter: curren

to that, might have a high batting average but not incentivized whether the team wind. would you pay people at the end of you for. other times just culture will put them in a mode of operating that is different or harder for other element to interact with. that's what leadership is got to break that down. we created shared consciousness around that they do conference but there will we have 15 chat rooms operate all the time. as we are doing this video teleconference people are chatting across the entire command with more information, asking questions. i heard this. we will try to great this lateral arterial flow of information all the time that gives them the sense that this is what entity. not only one entity from a shared mission but one entity from a shared capability. you can learn from other parts like that, and you get over that hesitation to do that. you share resources and so. >> we are going to opened up for questions and the second. chris, i appointed you find decisions been made faster and better, or did it take longer to reach the decision because it is a in

we can do a lot more to incentivize competition and the private sector. i am currently writing a type of process that has been buying a lot of equipment that may be obsolete shortly after i bought it. i have to adapt continuously to a changing threat. i look at the way the department of defense has periodically incentivized competition in the private sector to come up with new ideas. i think there's ways to do that. i would love to more conversations with this committee on ways we can do that, ways we can use or modify some of our acquisition practices and policies to allow us to do that. >> i look forward to working with you on that, and thank you for your testimony. the chair recognizes the ranking member. >> thank you very much. mr. neffenger you are clearly a breath of fresh air and i think the chairman will agree with me on that. we passed a modernization of acquisition legislation to kind of give the department a freer rein. one of the challenges we have is to -- is the culture but we've always done it this way. so we buy technology in tsa that we a

i think we can do more to incentivize competition in the private sector. i am currently right now tied to a process that has me buying a lot of equipment that may be obsolete shortly after i buy it. i have to adapt continuously to a changing threat. i looked at the way the department of defense has periodically incentivized competition in the private sector to come up with new ideas. i think there's ways to do that. i would love to have -- more conversations with this committee on ways that we can do that. ways that we can use or modify some of our acquisition practices and policies to allow us to do that. chairman mccaul: well, i look forward to working with you on that. and thank you for your testimony. the chair recognizes the ranking member. ranking member thompson: thank you very much, mr. neffenger your comments clearly are a breath of fresh air. and i think the chairman will agree with me on that. we've passed a modernization of acquisition, legislation to kind of give the department of -- the department a freer rein. one of the challenges we have i

i think we can do more to incentivize competition in the private sector. i am currently right now tied to a process that has me buying a lot of equipment that may be obsolete shortly after i buy it. i have to adapt continuously to a changing threat. i looked at the way the department of defense has periodically incentivized competition in the private sector to come up with new ideas. i think there's ways to do that. i would love to have -- more conversations with this committee on ways that we can do that. ways that we can use or modify some of our acquisition practices and policies to allow us to do that. chairman mccaul: well, i look forward to working with you on that. and thank you for your testimony. the chair recognizes the ranking member. ranking member thompson: thank you very much, mr. neffenger your comments clearly are a breath of fresh air. and i think the chairman will agree with me on that. we've passed a modernization of acquisition, legislation to kind of give the department of -- the department a freer rein. one of the challenges we have i

we cut it dramatically and costs much less than anyone expected because businesses once incentivize wereble to figure it out. cancer-causing chemicals and plastics. did not and the oil industry, industry.c american chemist came up with better substitutes. the fuel standards we put in place a couple of years ago did not cripple automakers. the american auto industry retool. today they are selling the best cars in the world at a faster pace than in almost a decade. more hybrid and plug-ins and more high if -- high fuel efficient cars, giving consumers more choice than ever before and saving families of the pump. we can get us, as long as we're not crazy about it. as we don't take the path of least resistance to your, citizens, workers, entrepreneurs, together as americans. we disrupt the stale old old ways ofthe end thinking. right now we're inventing whole new technologies, industries. not looking backwards but forwards. if we don't do it, nobody will. china is nowon looking at getting serious about omissions is because they saw we were going to do it, too. the world faces its toughest ch

in some ways banks are not incentivized. in some ways banks are not incentivized to give your mortgage because they won't learn anything on it. >> and they don't know what the real price of the loan will be. the early part of the last decade people have these teaser mortgages. cannot afford to many more. and regulators are counting on banks to raise more capital, document loans more. loans dry up and the economy lumbers along. >> as you watch through all of this, and it has been 6+ years, isix plus years, i wonder, and we will talk about this with steve as to whether or not we need some kind of mechanism, perhaps, perhaps a return to the gold standard to keep everything in check. we will talk about that. thank you so much. good to have you. coming up every one, $2 gas going to quickly vanish as oil prices suddenly shoot higher. is the fed tying its own hands? tracy: okay. oil poised to snap his longest losing streak since 1986. up nearly 10 percent for the week. in the pits of the cme talking about what's going on and why su

vickers: we are certainly trying 2-d incentivize it by dlling as many -- to de-incentivizeto it by killing as many of them as we can. on theow, we are focused west. he didn't pay attention to that kerry did isis makes war on anything, and it has been -- he didn't pay attention to that. isis makes war on anything. at some point, it is going to backfire on them as well. -- if sunni areas of iraq you try to look at it in straight military terms and say -- guys2000 vehicles and vehicles defeat an army of 50,000 that we had spent training, itollars was because of politics, frustration to the state, loyalty to the central state, etc., and that will turn at some point on isis as well. >> jennifer griffin, fox news. i have a question for admiral olson. do you see a time when women can serve in special operations forces, delta force, rangers, navy seals, and if you think you be asking for an extension sometime this year? for the panel as a whole, do you bynk the u.s. created isis invading iraq in 2003? mr. vickers: i will answer the first question and let the panel get the rest of it. [laughter] ha

and it's because we don't incentivize working enough. >> i want to turn to bo and get his view.president, who is our first african-american president, we're talking about in baltimore, a city that has been run by democrats for a half century that has an arch american power structure, african-american police officials, top officials. how in the world is it that this president has done nothing positive to reverse what is -- what you're describing? >> well, i think we have a big bureaucratic mess -- >> no. no. no. we had a big bureaucratic miss before, we'll have one later. why in your judgment -- if this is the case, this president has not responded rather than carry out a campaign versus law enforcement. >> i do think that the president needs to make a strong message that harming police officers is not acceptable. here the nypd, two of them were innocently shot for doing nothing wrong. you can't have a society where we allow this occur. >> well, as a former policeman, and we've talked about this issue, this president just does not step up for law enforcement, nor has the he stepp

people at low level now realized they were incentivized to get ahead because i've been given all these authorities. it's up to me now to create the relationships and suddenly i'm coming to senior leadership with complex solutions. you are obviously a student of military history. you go back to admiral nelson and you have a great example there. you have drawn on a lot of business and the entire manufacturing process and how that was revolutionized. then you find yourself as your reading about the revolutionary war in the minutemen and the redcoats who were hanging out with trees and they're going after them and they are sitting ducks. you sort of felt like we were sitting ducks. the game had changed and we weren't ahead. now we have better technology and better this and better that and better this but boy there's a heck of a piece and it catches you differently and you're not feeling like you're not you need to be. >> this challenge was always to get a people trained and outfitted properly at the right point in time. you had to get this armoring from point a to point b which meant you h

[inaudible] so in terms of incentivizing everyone has thought about this and we have more incentives for them to join at that point. and perhaps we will see what is working with that. and we will continue to see what occurs in that specific channel. but clearly it is all part of this and the afghans will increase pressure as well. >> i will just make two footnotes. the president was very interesting. i had lunch with him in a short meeting. he says, you know, afghanistan is fighting terrorists from central asia and the middle east. we are fighting global tarot in terror and the global community and we are not getting much help. and the only other thing that i would say is i would agree with you -- the time is on their side and they can certainly get what they want. and the afghans continue to stay in the game, that is going to require a presence much better than what we are contemplating. and that's the irony that at this moment at the time that we are in we have the prospect for peace, and it has both gone up. and that is because our adversaries fits that here both talking and also

american utilities are showing leadership going solar and this will incentivize them to go faster into solar. we are an american company and we have been doing it for 30 years. we think partnering with american utilities to deliver what president obama has committed to. emily: what about in terms of technology? what do these new policies present? >> the knock on salaries to be it's not economic. that doesn't exist anymore. now the question is how do you get solar energy and be able to use it when there isn't sunshine? what we need to do is have a two way grid and have some form of storage so we can use sunshine when we want to use it. this will spur a bunch of innovation. how do you you use solar energy all the time? his tesla battery is causing people to say, hey, this is real . we think there is going to be a lot of great technology and it is helping mainstream storage -- it will take a few years but as we mainstream storage you can use of solar energy when you want combine it with an energy management in new get a great solution because you control how you use energy in how to produ

is the baby a cannot support an organization to place a dollar amount on body parts that would incentivizes and that is why i will vote for this bill and it will be a vote for women's health it will not touch $0.1 of funding for women's health not $0.1 that means it is for one thing only if we will vote for women and children and i would urge my colleagues with this approach for children and vote yes. >> these ongoing conversations of what we are up against talk about women's health is the accusation this is cutting off access to women's health that all of planned parenthood licensor aerogram facilities if you look to close you would see it there is not a single one but the accusation is to have been anagrams they have to go to planned parenthood but they refer to other locations they recommend it you get one but they don't do any of that. ad of the 8,000 and facilities which could potentially get a mammogram so we're taking funding from a location that refers to wit to a location that actually does it this is about women's health but also the health of children and have a very difficult ti

did that incentivize you? >> the next speaker. sorry. >> the united nations treaty and disability rights never mated to the united states senate. have the politics of the disability rights change in the last 25 years? something that looks pretty straight forward? >> for sure. i asked a number of politicians if the ada was on the floor of the senate would pass and almost without exception i would say without exception they all said no. if it came up now it wouldn't pass. i don't have to explain what is going on now. heidi get anything through but particularly all of the objections that have been raised, the cost, the effect on business, increase of regulation, unfunded mandate, all of that would have killed it. the issue, the un, americans with a disability act -- every country has followed it. this treaty, every country in the world, basically the ada for the world. has been signed but not ratified by the u.s. so for the last two years people have been trying to get the late u.s. to ratify it. two years ago bob dole came out of wa

american utilities are showing leadership going solar and this will incentivize them to go faster into solar. we are an american companies -- we are american company and we have been doing it for 30 years. we think partnering with american utilities to deliver what president obama has committed to. emily: what about in terms of technology? what do these new policies present? >> the knock on salaries to be it's not economic. that doesn't exist anymore. now the question is how do you get solar energy and be able to use it when there isn't sunshine? what we need to do is have a two way grid and have some sore -- cap some form of storage so we can use sunshine when we want to use it. this will spur a bunch of innovation. how do you you use solar energy all the time? emily: you have a partnership with solar city but you are also competitors. what sort of immediate impact have you seen from the joint venture with solar city? tom: the joint venture is 8.3 with first solar. that gives us a predictable place to sell projects which gives us an economic cost of capital. essentially, it lowers the

did i incentivize you? >> i think this is the next speaker? okay sorry. >> the united nations disability act has not been able to make it to the united states senate. have the politics of the disability rights change the last 25 years to something that looks pretty straightforward you just can't get it through? >> for sure. i asked a number of politicians that i interviewed if the ada was on the floor of the senate would it have passed, and almost without exception, i would say without exception they all say no. if ada come up now it wouldn't pass. i don't have to explain to you what's going on now. it's all hard to get things through. all of the objections that have been raised about it, the cost, the cost, the effect on business, the increase of regulation, unfunded mandate, all of that, they would have killed it now. the issue and i don't know i don't know if you're familiar with this, view and, the reason it's so important as it became the template for every other, all other legislation around the world. other every other country has follo

because people were really incentivized here to do it.e so than if they were living in a conventional country with a conventional economy, and they had a better job that paid better. here you're incentivized to rent out a room in your neoclassical decaying mansion because you need the money. you have a lot of supply. how do you solve the fact that there's very little internet? one person told us, airbnb did not solve that, the cubans did. >> airbnb is based on the internet. this is a country with hardly any internet. how do you overcome that hurdle? >> cubans are really entrepreneurs and they have fixed the issue for those. for those that don't have internet they have ways to leverage local connections to represent many. they are hosting partners that represent connectivity of many homes that don't have internet. >> so there's a gray market/black market, reselling of internet. the other issue is that you can pay for your airbnb with a credit card. you can't pay for your hotel with an american credit card. that's also a crucial reason why

note, and the elected officials that run them, that you should not set up a scheme, because it incentivizesoing out and writing tickets, which is not the way you want to the operate. >> the other issues they had, they were targeted by police, they were treated brutally, as said in the previous segment. they looked at that as less than human, they want to be respected and not targeted. >> one of the things about what was said, all police officers were painted with a broad brush. he didn't specify - i'm talking about the ferguson police department. if you are a policeman and you worked in ferguson, and are not engaged in any activity, god help you. you are a racist. we have to be careful of language used when we describe people. imagine if we were talking about women and blacks or some other minority or using the language that they use. language is important. we have to make sure that we talk about everybody fairly and can be fair to everyone. >> we talk a lot - especially in the wake of incidents like michael brown and eric garner and freddie gray, the mistrust between communities and police

at the fact that most of these people will not have been adjudged ill, and, yes, they've been incentivized the state to make sure those that are in judgment. at least we get that information. >> can i ask you a question - are you convinced the fourth presidential term is over, that we'll see gun control legislation? >> it's the most difficult of all the bills, even health care, because even though most n.r.a. members afford background checks, that hasn't moved n.r.a., it moves them insofar as it's discussed today. >> thank you for being with us. >> when we come back, we'll look at the broader issue of gun control. why nothing has been done on the federal level and we'll talk about what, if anything, pam ale can get done -- president obama can get done in that remaining time in office, and we'll talk about the need to keep them away from those posing a threat to themselves and others. armed and mentally ill, it is "inside story". >>> welcome back to "inside story". i'm del walters in for ray suarez, our topic, armed and mentally ill, and how our lawmakers will keep guns away from those with

we will incentivize that money to calm into country. we will have repatriation. instead of depreciation, incentivize manufacturing. mr. heath: [indiscernible] mr. santorum: you also have the flat tax. income tax, corporate tax, all 20%. mr. heath: in new hampshire, if someone maxes out on public assistance, that is $14 an hour if they are out on the the, they may need that. massachusetts, $20. how do you subsidize americans who are on public assistance to go back to work? mr. santorum: i managed a bill on the senate. we work with governors to. we put time limit and a work hard. we eliminated the only program that was eliminated. i was the leader. we should have done that for snap the other programs we did. governor lepa hasg done that. we got to create jobs. ewe got to create jobs for her to want to work but do not have a good enough paying job and benefits to motivate them to get off welfare program. a combination of manufacturing and putting time limits and work requirements on welfare. mr. heath: do you believe this president and administration want real borde

we will incentivize that money to calm into country. we will have repatriation. instead of depreciation, incentivize manufacturing. mr. heath: [indiscernible] mr. santorum: you also have the flat tax. income tax, corporate tax, all 20%. mr. heath: in new hampshire, if someone maxes out on public assistance, that is $14 an hour if they are out on the the, they may need that. massachusetts, $20. how do you subsidize americans who are on public assistance to go back to work? mr. santorum: i managed a bill on the senate. we work with governors to. we put time limit and a work hard. we eliminated the only program that was eliminated. i was the leader. we should have done that for snap the other programs we did. governor lepa hasg done that. we got to create jobs. ewe got to create jobs for her to want to work but do not have a good enough paying job and benefits to motivate them to get off welfare program. a combination of manufacturing and putting time limits and work requirements on welfare. mr. heath: do you believe this president and administration want real borde

we country medic rain rapidly and it cost less than anyone expected because businesses, once incentivized, were able to figure it out. when we restricted leaded fuel in our cars, cancer-causing chemicals and plastics come it did not end the oil or plastics industry. american chemists came up with better substitutes. the fuel standards we put in place a couple years ago did not cripple automakers. the american auto industry retooled. today, american automakers are selling the best cars in the world at a faster pace than they have in decades. more hybrids, plug-ins, fuel-efficient cars, giving consumers more choice than ever before and saving families at the pump. we can figure this stuff out, as long as we are not lazy about it. as long as we do not take the path of least resistance. scientists, citizens, workers, entrepreneurs, together as americans, we disrupt, hold debates, up-end old ways of thinking. right now, we are inventing new technologies, new industries. we are not looking backwards but looking forward to. if we do not do it, nobody will. the only reason that china is now looki

the idea to incentivized to get cost under control give them a little bit of money upfront and then -- everyone is honky dory didn't work that way with obamacare you "don't ask, don't don't think it will here. >> this is democratic socialist mo. vote bying but having two negative impacts. number one it is going to cause college costs to sky rocket increasing at a race three times of inflation largely because of the wealth of federal loan it is that have been offer in the past and pell grants. secondly, it is beginning to mean a one size fits all college education. that was the impact of obamacare when the government pays the government dictates and in this case it dictated what was in your health plan, what your doctor could do, and in the case of college education, it is going to mean all of a those college plans or programs or curriculum of the same full of political correctness. >> wufnts things that has been pushed to hillary clinton folks is for states, to get state college and university toe reign in their cost. much of the state's aid comes if they can do this and doesn't if th

of incentivizing the taliban, i think everyone has thought about this as a parallel for quite a while. --re would be hoping fighting and talking at the same time. when they come to the end of their fighting season, and it is at a relative impasse, but this there is a fragile government gradually strengthening. that would be more of the incentive for them to join at this point. we will see. , they havestani side done quite a bit in terms of pressuring the telegraph -- taliban and facilitating first nation efforts. we will see what continues to occur in that specific channel. but a core part of this for us will be continuing to increase pressure on those networks and others. stephen j. hadley: i will just make two footnotes. interesting.ni was we had lunch with him and a short meeting. he said, afghanistan is fighting terrorists from central asia, the middle east. we are fighting global terror and we are not getting much help. think there is some truth to that and explains why china has an interest in helping afghanistan stabilize. some of those areas are coming for china, and china rea

were tempted by the money, then you're part of the target for a proposed pilot program that would incentivizeeople to donate their organs. >> something on the order of attacks credit, a contribution to retirement account. anyone who is interested in giving a kidney while alive would be able to be rewarded in that way. >> reporter: dr. satel is pushing the pilot program because not only was she in need of an organ donation herself before a friend stepped up donated to her, but she also feels like some people are hidinhiding behind alleged moray while other people are dying. >> you can't sacrifice people on the altar of ideology. we've got to be practical and what we're proposing is a way to improve public health, and save lives that are needlessly loft. >> reporter: howard nathan of gift of life pennsylvania acknowledges the 6,000 person waiting list. but he also is very concerned about paying people for their organs. he says that could cause a lot of problems. >> the big fear is that our poor people going to be taken advantage of in some way? and, um, and then on the other hand are people mot

kennedy: to a former employees have come forward to say the plan socks because it is incentivizes peopleing hard. my husband is a small-business owner and started his career in seattle. if he called people who invested in the company for those who have been there since the beginning to say i will pay a guy who mops the floors 70 grand a year they would quit as well. >> i have spoken to both recently and i respect and support what they have to say and i think their criticism is valid and. i wanted to have a floor because we don't have any low performers we have people who were dedicated and smart and work hard but the market would allow me to pay them 30 or $305,000 per year which is not very livable in seattle. so the folks that i am working with are so dedicated to make such great progress but we were not keeping up in certain types of positions. wide is somebody stay in the position of a software default -- developer to make five times as summoned was a great customer service representative? kennedy: because that person is not easily replaceable. it is really hard to find a good ceo. i

but with the tight end energy should be to challenge the system if we do those three things to incentivize frozen government with a tax policy but that would have a greater chance of a sustained economic growth and with that great divide that might begin to narrow. but all this will require us. id is and osmosis you don't change your path without public leadership changing directions. to follow the polls then to roorback that is not leadership to change the direction it is on. but the mayor cut pretty much gets it when they see it. what does the nation need to do? the politics personal pride, a financial success sometimes leaders to their best work in christ's but we'll see the results. we have seen that time and time again and it is a lot to remember with the challenges we face in the near future effected leadership comes in many forms president kennedy led us to land a man on the moon johnson quit and forceful leadership with a 25 percent across the board income-tax cut in just six weeks after the assassination president kennedy he hugged and beguin threatened and praised what a hands-on

former member of congress mark gorton, we are very aware of the role of government to a can either incentivizend lower the barriers or stifle industry growth and hold back, rain back those advances that science has out there and can be made possible if we get rid of those barriers. in a sentence, i think the easiest way to think of it is we can't rely today on 20th century technologies, technologies of the 1900s, the time when the fda was put in place. when the world is changing so fast, and when the world really is on a cutting edge of new health technologies, including health science and information technology we fundamentally have to modernize, bring up to date the way drugs and devices are developed and delivered in this country. it is time to act now. we will talk about the global implications. the time to act is now because we do have millions of patients out there waiting for cures that are on the shelf and ready to go. congress, i legislative branch of government, plays a fundamental role in removing barriers, stripping them away, and creating an environment that fosters dynamism, crea

perhaps, but we'll see what incentivizes them.and on the pakistani side, as i noted in my remarks, they've done quite a bit in terms of pressuring taliban and helping to facilitate these first efforts at a reconciliation process. we'll continue to see what will occur in that specific channel, but clearly a core part of this for us and the afghans will be continued and increased pressure on the haqqani networks and others. >> steve. >> i think dan's answer to the question. i'll just make two footnotes. president ghani was very interesting. we had lunch with him and then short meeting. and he said, you know, he said afghanistan is fighting terrorists from central asia, the middle east and the caucasus. we're fighting global terror on behalf of the global community and we're not getting much help. and i think there's some, i think, truth to that. and i think that explains why china is now decide it has an interest in trying to help afghanistan stabilize. because some of those terrorists in afghanistan are coming for china. and i thin

recently, you had a robust backend of the curve, a very robust options market predict which all incentivized future production. now that the back end of the barrel, around $58 a i'm sure we will now finally start to see this pullback in production. i don't think it will be can cement or -- be commensurate to overcome the pullback and demand --t i suspect because of the what we are seeing out of china and the rest of the world. betty: i want to get back to this notion that the 30 handle means there is something very wrong here. you, if weee with are at $30 oil, something is very wrong in the entire world. i'm not feeling it right now, other than china. like a $30 oil situation. what is going on? is oil like a leading indicator right now of what's to come? all commodity prices are your best leading indicator of what is about to turn around the corner. if we look at the industrial production numbers, factory order numbers, the smokestack economy is in recession. the lower gasoline prices have started price elasticity for demand -- that is going to go by the wayside. on the industrial side, we d

you saw the rebound from january into june, relatively modest on a long-term basis but enough to incentivize morers to come in and pump oil. how we get it is a balance, she'll is will likely -- shell is a likely contender. if prices remain here,-ish and started cutting back. rishaad: let's have a look of what else. gold has done all right as a haven. everything else, base metals, numeral, aluminum, all of that fell. what gives? ivan szpakowski: a lot of it comes back to china. real demand and positioning. and the chinese investors have been the largest sellers especially industrial metals complex and pushing the market aggressively lower and using it as a proxy. globallylso seeing weak demand, copper demand flat in the first half of the year. rishaad: slumping to 16 years low. about things shooting on the upside, overshooting on the upside. is that the general feeling? ivan szpakowski: commodities are incredibly structured asset classes. the height of the peak into the trough. you mention the index the lowest since 1999. if you adjusted for inflation, even worse. we are certainly looking at

vickers: we are certainly trying 2-d incentivize it by dlling as many -- to de-incentivizeto it by killing as many of them as we can. on theow, we are focused west. he didn't pay attention to that kerry did isis makes war on anything, and it has been -- he didn't pay attention to that. isis makes war on anything. at some point, it is going to backfire on them as well. -- if sunni areas of iraq you try to look at it in straight military terms and say -- guys2000 vehicles and vehicles defeat an army of 50,000 that we had spent training, itollars was because of politics, frustration to the state, loyalty to the central state, etc., and that will turn at some point on isis as well. >> jennifer griffin, fox news. i have a question for admiral olson. do you see a time when women can serve in special operations forces, delta force, rangers, navy seals, and if you think you be asking for an extension sometime this year? for the panel as a whole, do you bynk the u.s. created isis invading iraq in 2003? mr. vickers: i will answer the first question and let the panel get the rest of it. [laughter] ha

>> we are certainly have to the incentivize that by killing as many of them as we can. [laughter] mr. vickers: but, you know, i so has a were -- isil has a war against everybody. we will do with them in a future day. right now, we're focused on the west. and he didn't pay attention to that. isil makes war on anybody. and it has been successful to some extent. it's brutality backfired. that is what led to the awakening. and at some point, it is going to backfire on isil. the sunni areas of iraq, if you tie to look at it in straight military terms and see how do 2000 guys in vehicles defeat an army of 50,000 that we spend $25 billion training, it doesn't -- is because of the politics, the frustration with the central state, etc. and that will turn on isis at some point. ms. dozier: jennifer. >> thank you. jennifer with fox news. i have a question. do you see a time when women conserve and special operations forces, delta force, rangers, navy seals, and if you were still commander, do think you would be asking for an exemption later this year? and for the panel as a whole,

to incentivize farmers with mixed success. it is a real challenge to me when you have poppy fields for miles and miles but war is still the economies of having huge force it to be difficult to undermine and nobody has figured out to undermine the poppy trade in afghanistan. >> but to treat the symptoms >> we tried that with fast and serious. >> i think the united states supplies of spare amount of drugs so those are pretty big supporters of the poppy field but you haven't mentioned end civilians that is the hardest thing is to read about the civilian deaths kindu comment on that? >> with both this war and the iraq war many characters are civilians and frequently they are rendered almost invisible he think of us and i assure you that it is like an atom bomb in those two countries like cannot -- that cannot be estimated that seems more like a distraction. >> is there any way? >> it is very difficult it is not a pretty thing. have less wars. >> what about the fighters? >> no more fighters and civilians have been killed. >> we wil

but with the tight end energy should be to challenge the system if we do those three things to incentivize frozen government with a tax policy but that would have a greater chance of a sustained economic growth and with that great divide that might begin to narrow. but all this will require us. id is and osmosis you don't change your path without public leadership changing directions. to follow the polls then to roorback that is not leadership to change the direction it is on. but the mayor cut pretty much gets it when they see it. what does the nation need to do? the politics personal pride, a financial success sometimes leaders to their best work in christ's but we'll see the results. we have seen that time and time again and it is a lot to remember with the challenges we face in the near future effected leadership comes in many forms president kennedy led us to land a man on the moon johnson quit and forceful leadership with a 25 percent across the board income-tax cut in just six weeks after the assassination president kennedy he hugged and beguin threatened and praised what a hands-on

a program to incentivize our talented people. they are the most valuable asset in the company. we will continue to do so. announced a share buyback program. the purpose of this is anti-dilution. spend $4baba will billion in that stock buyback program. it just signed a venture with macy's, making macy's the first u.s. department store to join alley bulbous -- alibaba. cost-cutting kicking -- the food giant announcing the elimination of 2500 jobs in north america, 5% of its workforce. the merger earlier this year was driven by warren buffett's berkshire hathaway and 3g capital of brazil. fears of legionnaires disease forcing a drugmaker to shut down a plan. glaxosmithkline cutting down -- shutting down a north carolina facility. the plant makes inhaled drugs. -- bernie sanders's campaign is gaining traction. in a statistical tie with hillary clinton in new hampshire. the vermont senator has a lead of 7%. mark: another legal hurdle today calais huddle in the tom brady -- meeting with roger goodell in a new york courthouse. the judges telling them to work out their differences abou

>> no, i'm against it, it's the wrong way to incentivize them.ou have to have them appreciate how important it is to learn. if they think they are doing it for money, it's the wrong way to insint vice them. focus. >> how different is it to me telling my kids if you do well i'll take you to see inside out or buy you are an iphone. >> first of all, i'd like to be one of your children. >> me too. >> you settle for what you can get, when you get it. i think it's different. >> you have to create values as well as irn sent vis children. if they have the right values, and how important it is to learn, they'll do this and learn to do it from the earliest ages. to get that kind of reward is not consistent with the way i understand what you want to do when you are a teacher. i couldn't imagine doing that. >> is there somethingicy about the fact na federal funds are used for this? >> yes, i think so. i think that we have seen a significant cuts at the state level. at a federal level too. we saw cuts to investments and early childhood education, and i think

isn't the industry incentivized to claim ownership over the data? >> it is true that a lot is going on vertically. we have our own wireless had company group focusing on creating rules everyone can live by, in part because it's the right thing to do and in part because congress -- there are already free market solutions which are happening quick he. -- quickly. in the automobile, hundreds of thousands if not millions of consumers are already choosing to give up their data to insurance companies in exchange for a lower insurance rates. the insurance companies are monitoring how fast they drive because the consumers feel it is valuable to give up that information. that is informed consent. it is a free market decision. there are solutions coming up for parents, if they want to give the kid the keys to the car, they have the ability to monitor their children. my point was that this is not a legitimate -- it is not a legitimate area for government conversation. there is so much happening from an innovation point of view there are different directions we