or do we want to keep and incentivize our states? so, my fight, which is an every day fight, i said we have to cut 4,000 classes. they didn't budge. i told them, i'm going to take the "s" off the football helmet. that got their attention. [laughter] the state and our name is what we're fighting to keep. to be those institutions that our mission says we were founded to be. >> you get the last word. >> i started talking about a set of assumptions that were in place in the early states. what i worry a lot about is, we're going to build policies assuming the way things are now, that the way they'll have to be. that tuition has to go up a certain rate every year, that states have to spend money on a lot of high-income students. that the institutions, too, are going to continue their shift away from funding need-based aid towards funding, you know, highly academically capable students. none of those have to be the way the system works. if the federal government can use its leverage to change the way states and institutions are behaving, th

larger question was not just the effects that it has and the cost that it has put the fact that we incentivized some companies to take away the freedoms of some americans is there something inherently problematic with that and legislators should be held accountable for that? there may be a model that saves taxpayers dollars and does appropriately administer a prison system and if there's one thathere isone that works we sht preclude it. >> we are going to the voting rights next. so what would you do to improve the voting not just in florida that nationwide the continues to see the effect break havoc in

. >> i think it's important that the government puts out policies that either incentivize or disincentivize the type of behavior we want to see with these vehicles. >> reporter: there was an hour- long symposium about the cars. research shows driverless cars

it's time to incentivize our states to do the right thing. when our medical center chancellor told our legislators, in a special session a couple weeks ago, that for every dollar they cut from him, in medical education, he'll lose three federal dollars. that changed the entire dialogue of our legislature. in louisiana, we actually raised taxes to make sure that we didn't lose the federal money. now it's time, we know it works, ssig was a federal matching program, to encourage states to do the right things. the stimulus package, the reason it worked for education was, we put a maintenance of effort provision from the federal government that said, you can't collect educational resources, if you cut your budgets below the 2006 funding level. esca did it, we did it in esca. it's time we use new federal dollars. any new federal dollars to encourage and incentivize states to get back in the public college affordable game. otherwise, we won't have public colleges and universities. starting in the next eight years, when states drop off the map. >> gr

these are the ones that are going away so what do you do to incentivize?bring more jobs into the country. you don't vilify it. >> i would say you have to talk to bernie sanders in your favorite republican candidate donald trump. >> why do you think that donald trump is my favorite republican candidate? it is one of my top three, there you go. >> more women are voting for him than ever before. >> what does that have to do what we are are talking about? >> it's not just bernie sanders huizenga. the leading republican running for president right now. >> is that your democratic talking point? >> here's what i'd understand why conservative media hasn't hit trumpauer dryness economics. he's pro-trade war. >> they have taken him to task. >> and then he just asked if that was the democratic talking point. i think the point is the mainstream point in a resonate very well and the numbers i've read people -- ge is a good sign. then ge has been able to dip into the public coffers. anthony: who is the best corporate candidate? corporate america the best presidential ca

to incentivize those developments, we will let contracts that will fund the development of new enginesnd new rockets so that we can have the ability to launch all of our payloads. the air force doesn't buy rockets or engines. we contract for launch services with american companies. >> it brings you were an interesting point because there has been a lot of talk about the commercialization of space and that there is this commercial boom. can you talk about what is appropriate for the commercial side to take on versus what needs to stay in government? >> sure. for most of the last 50 years the government has been the driving force in innovation in space both through its requirements and through its investment. over the past decade and a half or so, more and more of that investment is co commercial industry as they have seen opportunities to profit from operations in space, in communications, in remote sensing, and more recently in launch. we are taking advantage of those capabilities wherever possible. there are always going to be some missions that are inherently governmental. missile wa

time to incentivize our states to do right things. when our medical center chancellor told our legislators in special session couple weeks ago, every dollar we cut from him in medical education, he will lose three federal dollars. that changed entire dialogue in our legislature. in louisiana we raised taxes to make sure we didn't lose the federal money. now it is time. we know it works, ssig was a federal matching program to encourage states to do the right things. the stimulus package is the reason it worked for education was, we put maintenance of effort provision from the federal government that said you can't collect educational resources if you cut your budgets before the 2006 funding level. sea did it. we do it in sea, time to use new federal dollars, any new federal dollars to get states back in the public keg affordability game. otherwise we won't have public colleges and universities in the next eight years when states drop off the map. >> operate, thank you. in 2013 the new america education policy program made impassioned c

place had in legislation is fundamentally as a matter of policy designed to do to encourage and incentivizes developers to build their affordable housing onsite and that is why you see the large dealt continue onsite and offsite slash in lui we're saying to the developers we want you to build our air force onsite that's the kind of city that we want to be. >> all right. seeing no other questions let's go ahead and open up for public comment i only have 5 public comment cards in front of me but if anyone wants to speak first (calling names) >> sure. >> good afternoon supervisors. thank you for holding this hearing i'm alex a research from with the northern california carpenters union i dependent a few folks to speak ahead of me just a couple of points as we're walking through and discussing this grandfathering legislation a couple of things i want to make sure you remember and understand first of all, construction workers the people that are building the housing we're talking about are not part of the affordable housing sclaugs the way the nexus study is performed we lower the was this we ess

companies were incentivized to get together.in general has underperformed, and you will start to see some of the slowdown in that sector. tom: the idea of a fair day, a fair moment, it screams of financial engineer pittyo. every time the minnesota wild -- are they going to the playoffs? you look behind the goal and theirs tim hortons. this is warren buffett and he is murdering burger king to big tim hortons in canada, the coffee shop. it is all a shell game. that is how the public thinks. the half of the minnesota wild, we are asking canadian teams to root for minnesota. i think it is a real issue. i think from the campaign issue, you're going to hear more about that with respect to try to grab tax revenue with these companies trying to leave. trend is to bext incentivizing companies to come back to america. the majority of this engineering is over. within look at pharmaceuticals. like it the broader calls -- we just did disney. growtheuticals were assured 20 years ago. is that true now? wean: 20 years ago when learned the marke

as long as institutions are strongly incentivized to use own funds to fund low income students. as long as tuition increases are moderate to what families afford to pay. for instance, i don't think tuition should increase more than median family income increased for state that year. that seems reasonable. between the state and institutions then you have to figure out without that tuition how will you make it work? some combination of increased state funding, efficiency. but we can't just keep on assuming we'll figure out a way to cover these prices every time. that is not going to work. >> so affordability and completion very much tied. question for both sides, start with you guys work. how would you use state directed aid to increase completion rates and quality of higher education? >> it's not one thing. it is about 100 things. it is campus culture. i've been at two campuses. we're working at third one right now where our graduation was 20 points above our predicted graduation rate. at call stat long beach 50% and 20% undocumented students tell us they're undocumented we're ed

it will allow us to incentivize products. improvements are p.r.v. program would be one important step toward ensuring we have effective strategies to incentivize both research and development for n.t.d.'s. broader changes are urgently needed to ensure r&d system delivers new vaccines, diagnostics and treatments to patients presenting exposed to n.t.d.'s and resistant infections. i look forward to working with my colleagues on additional mechanisms to ensure r&d for these emerging threats, to successfully and properlient sit -- incentivize. i fully agree with the bill's sponsor well, need to do all we can to respond to the zika virus by facilitating the development of an access to medical products as quickly as possible. the administration asked congress for $1.9 billion in emergency funding to enhance efforts to prepare and respond to the outbreak both here at home and in the world. i again thank the sponsors for their commitment and leadership. however, this bill will -- far from ronders the emergency supplemental funding request unnecessary. dedic

and consnsumed in the u.s., on a consumerer level, we can do a lot to incentivize the--the industry. never before have we been so farar from ththe sources of our fofood, so i t think onone of our o objectives,s, onf our goals with this film was to educate viewers, to educate an a american audience about one source of our food, and the value chain or the supply chain behind that, which is, in this case, lobster. >> people often ask us, you know, what--- do--what do w we want the film to achieve, ultimately? what's the--the bigger message? i--i think it's a complicated question. i think, wh--when i go back and i think about my experiences on the coast and working with these people and being on the boats and--and seeing the level of suffering, uh, that some of the men experiencnce and thehe families s that exexperience i it, i thinknk the several ideas at----at play. one is a more--creating a more didiverse economy on thehe coas. i thinknk there can be a tourism industry within the--within that area, whether it's divinng, whether it's, uh, deep sea fishing, something that can be brought

republicans and democrats alike here in congress as probably the single biggest tax provision to incentivize work. we think the 3 1/2 million american citizens in puerto rico deserve the same opportunity. we believe that they also deserve access to the child tax credit to help them raise their families in puerto rico. we also believe that the healthcare system in puerto rico is treated unfairly in medicare and medicaid compared to those who live in the united states, and a flight to florida changes the whole dynamic for you. that shouldn't have to be the reality for puerto ricans living in puerto rico. >> all right, senator. sit tight. a few more questions for you. when we come back from this break, we'll get the senator's thoughts on bipartisan support to make his plan a reality, and also, the president's trip to the senator's ancestral homeland -- cuba -- and the presidential election, as well. special visas for undocumented immigrant victims of crime in new york city. we'll tell you who qualifies and how they work when we come >> welcome back to "tiempo." senate democrats led by robert me

let's incentivize working. if you are making $35,000, you don't need to be in that tax bracket. we don't need to punish those doing well. >> there's a sense those doing well are cheating. instead of saying the stats don't lie, the top 1% pay an average of 23%. that's 7% higher than anybody else. if you make $2.1 million, 43% of your income is going to the gompbment. if you are productive, making $2 million and giving almost half of it away, where is the incentive to double that? you are making them feel guilty for having a nice car, a big house and nice suit. it's a mine pit that has changed and i don't get it. >> i do think that republicans have an obligation to put forward plans to lift all those. you want all people to be able to have the economic mobility. the three conditioneds have all spoken about taxes in the past couple months. we have a montage for you. >> the biggest tax cut there is of all of them, we have a tax cut for the middle class and business. our business, our middle class are paying the highest taxes in the world. we are cutting tax to bring the 2.5 trilli$2

know -- they, you know, give -- >> incentivize.ting way of putting it. >> you know, invite people to the white house if you have a sitting president. do all sorts of things. because, you know, we -- the nominating process as a completely democratic process. it is not. it is not constitutionally protected. it's not part of that system. >> because private organizations -- >> it's a private organization, and they have opened it up to give voters a voice in it. but they are not necessarily bound by what those voters say. and that is the hard truth that america is -- >> hang on, though. listen to reince priebus and i'll let you respond. here's reince priebus and he fired back. listen. >> i believe this is some frustration that has bubbled up, and, look, the rules are there. i know people get frustrated, and they're disappointed when things don't go exactly the right way. i think when people are frustrated and upset, they say things that they regret. >> so he's downplaying trump's threats a little bit. should he be taking them more serio

the policy ideas that get put forward tend to be punitive and burdensome with the goal not of incentivizing companies to stay in the u.s. but to forcibly prevent them from leaving. over the past year or so of political campaigning, we've heard a lot of talk about building walls and who will be made to pay for them. some are proposing that we build a literal physical wall to keep certain people from coming into the united states with a supposedly clever plan to force other countries to pay for it. while at the same time most of the proposals we've seen to deal with inversions would amount to building a virtual wall, a wall forged in regulation and punitive tax treatment around the country to keep companies from leaving and making every business in america and all of their employees and their individual customers pay the cost. the latest wall building exercise came earlier this month with treasury's temporary antiinversion regulations and proposed regulations aimed at earnings stripping. of course the administration's antiinverse approach was essentially the regulatory equivalent of a doctor

that is a big part of work we're able to help to identify for other multiples to push and even incentivizes that type of development thank you. >> colleagues, any other questions or comments seeing none, move to public comment any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed this is an information item thank you for your presentations. >> item 11. >> item 11 update on the rail yard alternative in the boulevard feasibility study an information item. >> okay. i'll recognize director rahaim from the planning department. >> good morning, commissioners director rahaim pleased to present to you the results of first phase of a multiple phase study to look at major transportation systems in the southeast quadrant of the city particularly around the rail yards. >> and the i 280 corridor this is a clunky name i prefer to call it the transportation sued study so it is called the rabbi want to thank the staff of the mta for their work with us an important multi faceted study that looks at multiple transportation systems it converge in one part of the city to get the bang for the b

companies to bring cash back, whatever, isn't the carrot just lowering tax rates, not forcing, just incentivize that's right, david. trump understands fully that the corporate tax rate should be 0. it's a a pass through tax. cost burden goes on to workers. to lower the rate as much as possible, sorry, bill, you think i'm delusional, but you will actually get a stronger economy, and companies want to stay in the united states. >> okay. we got to go, but we sure need something. this is worth a try. coming up, nearly two in three americans enjoy saving money more than spending it, but our informers have the picks you might not mind splurging on to boost savings a little more later. >>> we're back with the picks you're going to want to splurge on. mike, you short the market? >> that's right, dave. the investment goes up when the market is down. >> he owns a lot of stock in the 401k. st. joe, lots on dry land. >> what do you think? >> i like it. land portfolios are undervalued. >> dry land, folks, please. that's all for forbes on fox. thank you for watching. keep it here, the number one business blo

it's time to incentivize our states to do the right thing. when our medical center chancellor told our legislators in a special session a couple weeks ago that for every dollar they cut from him in medical education, he'll lose three federal dollars, that changed the entire dialogue of our legislature. in louisiana, we actually raised taxes to make sure that we didn't lose the federal money. now, it's time. we know it works. ffsig was a federal matching program to encourage states to do the right thing. the stimulus packages, the reason it worked for education was, we put a maintenance of effort provision from the federal government that said you can't collect educational resources if you cut your budgets below the 2006 funding level. they did it, we do it in the eca, it's time that we use new federal dollars, any new federal dollars to encourage and incentivize states to get back in the public college affordability game. otherwise, we won't have public colleges and universities. starting in the next eight years, when states drop off the map.

>> i think if the intention is to incentivize individuals to come forward if they are aware of wrongdoing and the calculus that individuals go through to decide whether they can report something to the regulator is complicated and has a lot of factors. amongst them is how much is enough for me or could be and if it is true that when a person should approach a regulator, one of the outcomes could be that they get zero. that could change and affect negatively their incentive than enthusiasm about coming forward. i think it's appropriate to not have zero is the baseline so that individuals who may otherwise be reluctant to come forward know that there is a possibility of some monetary award. >> what is the current value of the whistleblower? >> just over $400 million. >> what kind of internal controls do you have with respect to that fund? that's a pretty sizable amount of money. >> we can only make payments when the commission approves that. there is a process by which we pay only against what we can confirm husband collect it. we have internal controls to make sure that the cases that have

but can we acknowledge -- >> they're not incentivizing cheating. >>, no but they're incentivizing a lothavior that is uneconomic. this is the fallout. >> that's why you need strong leaders at ford. they would stand in there and get it right. he brought the small cars back. previous generation said -- >> but they don't make that much money. they wouldn't do it unless the government insisted on it, right? >> can you make money if you do the right thing from a productivity and from an employee standpoint. can you make money. you know, you're choosing the price of those cars. you don't have to give them away. can you set a good price for your cars, create value like toyota has done with the lexus. >> intel doing a large number of layoffs. 10% of the workforce. what is the problem there? they're not growing enough, are they? >> they're not growing. and they had, you know, they had the sweet spot with, you know, the ramp up of pcs. the customers are not growing. they didn't move fast enough to put growth vehicles in place a long time ago. that's where they failed. and, you know, there is like

the program incentivized insurance companies to tinseling plans through healthcare.gov and state exchanges because it compensates them for enrolling high risk individuals. final payments for the three-year program will end in 2017. for each enrollee insurance companies contribute a set dollar amount to the program and the funds are distributed to insurers who enroll the highest risk individuals. built into this program was a deficit reduction measure, a proportion of each individual contribution is allocated to the treasury. the statute estimates that approximately $5 billion would be designated to the treasury through this program. with $20 billion going to insherrers. on march 11, 2014, cms issued a rule that spelled out how to divide the fund between treasury, insurance companies and administrative costs. cms wrote the treasury would receive about 25% of the fund in 2015. but while ensurers have received billions of dollars from program, the treasury has still received nothing. that is because cms changed its mind ten days later after issuing its final rule. ten days later cms published

can play a large role the states and localities need to change but like in the 1990's when it incentivized incarceration it could use federal grants. today there are 3.$8 billion going from the federal government most run on autopilot. all of that should be taken in given to states to reward the states to reduce crime and incarceration. see you give them the right incentives how to get there so we run the numbers of the reverse mass incarceration act which is the reverse of the '94 crime bill this could cut the prison population by 20 percent save $40 billion and keep crime down that is just one example. >> it seems to me the overarching theme what is going on he will not get the country to completely abandon its goals is to deter crime and punish people but the current system wasn't chosen the happened by accident but then you see the consequences with the policy so explain why economics is useful to cut through the partisan politics we can have those same conditions it is the smarter policy? >> for someone like me as a criminal justice expert it shows up in all the things people say they

and those central banks are pushing as hard as they can to incentivize companies to lever up. and it's not really following through. borrowing is that can make sense for a short time. carol: does it make you nervous? >> it does. we have a pretty cautious stance. we're telling people to be cautious. lend to companies with pretty stable cash flows. we haven't gotten too excited about commodities just yet. and we still like the banks. the banks of been pretty consistent from a credit standpoint. it's interesting that you bring up banks. as the outlook going some negative on bank? expectations have come down dramatically. banksk if you look at from a credit perspective, i like to say it is good enough for credit. decelerating because of the global backdrop. speaking, there's plenty of capital. it's plenty to pay bondholders and that's what we're trying to focus on. we are in an interesting environment, looking or any help we can. what would you want to leave and -- investors with? >> we are in that cycle. it can go on for a while longer but we're focused on return of capital. retu

.>> because social media posts can be warning signs, the federal government must incentivize the republicnline signs of terror. we want to write a law that is strong. we want to make sure the government does its best to publicize that a reward is available. i'll be asking that the federal government offer a minimum $25,000 reward for any terror related social media tip that actually supports terrorism.>>> here is something you don't see, prices coming down, paying less for male. why the post office is being forced to lower the price of a postage stamp.>>> something out of the movies, 20,000 bins in this room, some of the contents are old newsreel footage from the 60s and 70s. wait till you see what they are doing with this. coming up on tran one 4 news >>> the naacp is the latest group taking a stand against north carolina so-called, bathroom law. the state is taking fire over its house bill 2.>> the naacp is telling lawmakers to scrap the law. >> we are the laughing stock of the nation.>>reporter: william barber says the nation is watching to see what the state will do about house bill 2

how can you actually have a tax code that incentivizes investment in human capital? we need to make capitalism work for a broader group of people or the anger that bernie is tapping into on the left and that mr. trump is tapping into on the right could undermine a system that has worked pretty well for us. >> do you want the budget? >> i will take on the budget the best i can. i think what we are hearing the senate -- mitch mcconnell says he's going to move forward with a appropriation bills despite the fact that they can't necessarily get to a budget resolution this year. but do you think that that can get done, that the appropriations process can actually work in an election year and more broadly, you've been involved in these broader fiscal discussions over many years now, what do you think it's going to take? is there any hope of any of that with however the presidential elections turnout this year? >> some of the biggest disappointment since i've been in the senate is that we didn't put our balance sheet back in order. we didn't do a variation of the plan that t

we just want to be able to really incentivize people to be able to make their first-time purchase. >> there is one catch. you'll have to pay taxes if you withdraw the money and don't use it to buy a home. >>> nba commissioner adam silver said today north carolina must change its new bathroom law in order to keep the league's all-star game in charlotte next season. that law requires people to use restrooms that match the gender listed on their birth certificate rather than the one corresponding to their gender identity. silver emphasized the nba is not setting a time line, but he wants to work toward changing the law with elected leaders in north carolina. >>> now to the golden state warriors. the team tweeted out these pictures of the players at work today. the team had a full day. >> and rest of their day is just getting started as we bring in mike shumann live in houston tonight. hs shu, we just got the word on steph curry. >> reporter: no question, larry. steve kerr just announced that steph curry will not play tonight against the rockets in game three. they felt like there wasn't

. >> i've read about carrier, and i've got a set of plans that will incentivize companies to treat workers like the assets they are. >> we're going to see carrier's jobs coming back to indiana. >> i believe it's all political b.s. >> reporter: frank staples has worked here for 11 years. vicky burrus for 20. what are you going to do? >> pray that i can get another thb somewhere until my time, retirement time. >> reporter: does carrier represent something more? >> yeah, they're a good symbol of corporate greed and running for the border. >> reporter: this plant will close for good in three years, and, scott, while the company says it will pay up to four rears' college tuition for laid off workers, vicky burrus told me nine members of her family will lose carrier paychecks. le pelley: mark strassmann for us tonight. mark, thank you. well, today we learned how the u.s. air force mistook a hospital in afghanistan last october for a enemy hideout. eo people were killed in an air strike on the charity hospital that's run by doctors without borders. bevid martin reports 16 service members are bein

implemented when cars with -- if that cut continues toward the end of this year, that is going to incentivizeakers as well. that is something the chinese government is going to have to look at. francine: tom mackenzie in beijing. up next, the obama effect. the u.s. president weighs in on the brexit debate. thiel.back with scott ♪ show me movies with explosions. show me more like this. show me "previously watched." what's recommended for me. x1 makes it easy to find what blows you away. call or go online and switch to x1. only with xfinity. e.t. phone home. when you find something you love, you can never get enough of it. change the way you experience tv with xfinity x1. francine: welcome to the polls, life from bloomberg european headquarters. let's get straight to the bloomberg first word news. nejra: the bank of japan has become a top 10 shareholder and about 90% of nikkei companies according to estimates compiled by bloomberg. it is now a major owner of more chinese blue chips than black hawk and vanguard. isics say the boj distorting valuation. an increasing number of bank of japan offici

goodw dropped reading what people want to do to incentivize bonuses.on't think they have any understanding at all of how profits are created in the street. do you see any future that will create bonuses down the income statement off operating income profit or will it still be revenue based at the top? >> i don't know, tom. i think the problem here is that banks do want to show shareholders they can be a safe proposition, but they want to do it by saying, let's transfer the risk. let's ask bondholders to help out. let's stop crushing the shareholders to try and pay for losses that may be out of their control. it is that question of risk transfer. is that giving away too much? is it going to crush the revenue side and the profit side at the same time? francine: thank you so much. larry stays with us. coming up next, we talk with that,n kanji on apple google, and microsoft earnings. alphabet was down some 6% in after-hours trading. we spoke to an analyst who said wall street was expecting too much. that is next. ♪ you shouldn't have to go far to get the h

place had in legislation is fundamentally as a matter of policy designed to do to encourage and incentivizeselopers to build their affordable housing onsite and that is why you see the large dealt continue onsite and offsite slash in lui we're saying to the developers we want you to build our air force onsite that's the kind of city that we want to be. >> all right. seeing no other questions let's go ahead and open up for public comment i only have 5 public comment cards in front of me but if anyone wants to speak first (calling names) >> sure. >> good afternoon supervisors. thank you for holding this hearing i'm alex a research from with the northern california carpenters union i dependent a few folks to speak ahead of me just a couple of points as we're walking through and discussing this grandfathering legislation a couple of things i want to make sure you remember and understand first of all, construction workers the people that are building the housing we're talking about are not part of the affordable housing sclaugs the way the nexus study is performed we lower the was this we essenti

so when confronted with the fact more than any other rich democracy at all right again once incentivize work and also a to recognize party is not just in, but also extractive markets. we need to address this from multiple angles but without addressing this housing crisis will fall flat. >> i find it amazing. it just staggers me but you obviously went to a certain level with the people you interviewed and looked at. did you think to move on to the next level of politicians are members of the state legislature? because i see them as able to influence only if this kind of federation is really polished into their faces using that expression. i really think there are no easy answers. but what forceful methods can be used to make the population aware. but with these elections and all the nonsense that are talked about i don't hear the word poverty mentioned very much. we will hear it. >> one thing i am doing is writing a book and having conversations. i think we are a bit more hopeful and having a conversation that is going on both sides said the ideal of various political persuasions i encou

to profit up, a program created to provide financial assistance to companies through obama care incentivizing companies to continue selling plans because it compensates them for enrolling high risk individuals. final payments will end in 2017. for each enrollee insurance companies contribute a set dollar amount, and those funds are distributed to insurers who enroll the highest risk individuals. the portion of each is allocated to the treasury. approximately $5 billion would be designated to the treasury with 20 million going to insurers. march 112014 cms issued a role that spelled out how to divide the fund between treasury, insurance companies, and administrative costs. treasury would receive 25 percent of the fund, but while insurers have received billions of the treasury has received nothing. that is because cms changed its mind ten days later. ten days later the rule was published completely reversing policy position. in the new rule cms prioritized payments to insurers overpayment to the treasury. cms finalized this rule in may of 2014. why did cms dramatically reverse its own policy to