this is the inclusionary city and that beauty in itself is really about the people and public and the diversity or regardless of the class you're from. thank you >> thank you. any additional public comment on item 4? >> good afternoon, supervisors brooke turner with the coalition of better houser. i'm here to support the idea of allowing people to come to the front of the list from the ellis eviction. it's a way to address an issue in a thoughtful manner that we can get behind so thank you very much >> thank you. is there any additional public comment on item 4. seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues the item is back in the hands of the committee >> president chiu. >> thank you all for being part of this legislation i want to thank mrs. lee and her family for stepping up and your encourage talking about all the stories that are happening around the city. thank you for all who stood with the lee families and all families facing eviction. i speak for my colleagues, we're hearing way two many stories like beverly upton and the stories thought the decide. we know during the aff

sheet contemplates that the development will be following all of the city's applicable, affordable housing rules. and the inclusionary number, i believe is 15 percent, where there is public ownership of a site. and the private market, rate is below that at 12 percent. sxh so we are going to be at that 15 percent mark. and there is also a jobs housing linkage fee requirement, for new, commercial, development, and to the presentation, and that is where the fee credits will go, and so we will be able to bring the fee credits either to the water front site or one of these adjacent sites in pier 70 to fulfill that obligation for the sea wall lot, 322-1. >> and then this is probably over my pay grade. but, in terms of some of the proposed affordable self-storage, i guess, and i may not understand, their use for it, but my understanding is that this will be a relatively short term. the lease at the site or what is the contemplated timing for something like that? >> so, most of the other leases that we talked about, the yellow cab lease, and you know, the honda lease are very short term agreements, three years or less. and a

inclusionary there. apparently no good deed goes unpunished in this town. there is going to be a lot more zoning tool which is for dense cities. the traffic is bad and we know mament mta has trouble and we have to get in particular more projects like this. the message i would like to leave is lending institutions has projects? san francisco. we have many examples of successful car free projects to give institutions the confidence to lend to these projects. this is a great example of what we've told the developed we say you should do this type of project. they are doing it in years later here we are. i would ask to you turn down appeal. thank you. >> thank you, neck speaker? good evening, board. thank you for having us and for staying so late with us. my name is nicole shrader and i'm here on behalf of walk san francisco to support zero parking project, zero parking projects directly support live ability, health and environmental and economic goals of our city. pointing to a fact sheet by mtc regarding senate bill 743 analysis under ceqa new changes to ceqa allow changes to parking in aesthetics to parking areas that are trans

4 unit in the inclusionary review it takes it down to 2 more than 2 unit i believe require conditional use. it puts the responsibility on the person doing the merger rather than the city findings it to be an unusual extraordinaire. this lengths removes or modifies decent and zoning considerations which are very important when you looked at a merger if it brings it more into conformity of the area or the prominence of the number of units. there are two separate educates it brings it to conformity with the number of units that are allotted. another thing the supervisors is proposing so to count the number of bedrooms. we're much better off to have 3 bedroom units rather than 10 one barroom units. all of those policies particularly the mergers go in the wrong direction. 20 percent of our housing units have 3 bedrooms or more we should encourage for unit with more bedrooms. only 31 percent of the building are owned will i owner coupled. we should encourage people to buy their units. if we were a situation where we had a huge prepare dalmatian of ownership i could see argument for preserving units, however, we're building thousands of units all the time wore mixing upland