so, yeah, it seems inconsistent. the jury felt they had 11-1 on one count that he was lying, so i think the government takes from that that they did put on a fairly strong case. but it just doesn't seem to fit right when you say that it's internally inconsistent and i think the judge is going to hear a lot from the defense lawyers in the upcoming weeks about that issue. >> steven clark, thank you very much for your insight. you've been with us since 2003 we started covering this case. a lot of people interested. and like we said at the beginning of the news cast, this is not just a story for the giants but all of major league baseball is watching intently what's happening in san francisco. now let's get not giants' reaction to all of this. the san francisco giants very aware of the public reaction to this. they issued this statement about 60 minutes ago and it reads, this case is ongoing and we expect that it will proceed in a fair and orderly manner, accordingly we have no comment at this time. so that's the giants'

diane sawyer rather than confronting obama over his inconsistencies and incoherent policy. is what she does. >> what about the famous quote from another beleaguered president, lincoln. who said he had been driven many times to his knees because his own wisdom and that around him was insufficient for the day. >> i to a lot of praying absolutely every night before i go to the bed. >> a final question. how much do you think kentucky will win by? >> the president: diane, i will make this point. a lot of folks focused on the fact that i filled out my bracket. obviously i hadn't spent that much time studying it since i don't have anybody in the final four. >> i don't suck up to obama. he's not coming on this program, i can believe it! >> why don't they hold his hand while they are doing these comforting -- [ laughing ] >> realize she had not 30 seconds, not 60 seconds, she had 10 minutes with him. and we watched this. there's not one single tough question. what you've got is controversies swirling all over this administration. not one tough question. the toughest question was who

with the national aspirations of the palestinian people it's inconsistent with a massive political program according to which they won the elections of two thousand and six but in reality to answer your question i learned i didn't want to see unity based on the guidelines of hamas or fact that i want unity that is based on the national aspiration of the palestinian people at home and india are spread those aspirations are validated and are consistent with international law that says the behavior of israel in the west bank and is jerusalem and gaza illegal this is what i would like to see and that's what i think is our top priority unfortunately every time palestinians get even close to achieving that unity you know what happens immediately hillary clinton and prior to that condit is our eyes would twist a bus's arms would threaten that they would withhold funds from the palestinians if they actually achieve that unity the same behavior is in israel so i worry in the midst of a slightly is upset i wish larry what are you going to israel and the u.s. right now you give you some of the reason

they said she could not be trusted and there was a lot of inconsistency with her testimony . teave hods who had recordings. the jury said there was inconsistencies there, too. >> the evidence that he used steroids might have been there. but did he knowingly do steroids was the question. we couldn't prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. >> none of the jury wanted to give their full name. this is what the foreman said if bond were to be tried again. what would prosecutors need to do next time around? >> it costs the citizens a lot of money to bring him to court. it is up to the court if they can prove their case, they will have to do more homework than they already did. >>> and we'll give you more information about how it went with the members of the jury and why some of them agreed and disagreed with the verdict. i am live from the federal building in san francisco, lean an melendez. abc news. >> and jaunce jaunce is following this case can you heard what the jurors had to say, what about this? >> the verdict was a surprise. this had earmarks of acquittal through 99 percent of

we will straighten that inconsistently at -- inconsistency out. thank you. >> my understanding that the code out -- kodak plants are closed. there is no film or development of methods to be used. perhaps we need to update our language to digital or whatever the right one is. this is funny because just a few weeks ago, this plant closed. >> i think that they still require film, do they not? >> you are raising a point that we will need to resolve. this will involve confiscation -- consultation with our staff. >> i think that the plant that closed was kodachrome. black and white is pretty much still available. if kodak is not making it, i think the europeans and japanese are still producing it. this is coming back, don't worry. >> the intent is still there that we don't want this to be manipulated. >> that's right. >> move to certify. >> second. >> commissioners, on the motion to certify the final environmental impact report, -- >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> thank you, commissioners. >> if i might say, miss borden

i am not sure what the unlawful policy is. >> there is no inconsistency no more than it is inconsistent in walmart's own personnel procedures. the company provides managers with this discretion. it is not a broad kind of -- they are not attacking every tactic in the pay and promotion decisions. there were parts of the process that are totally discretionary. there is no guidance whatsoever about how to make those decisions. with respect to the discretion, and restore the district court found that the managers were provided -- with respect to this question, at every store, the district court found that the managers were provided with discretion. they called it the walmart way. the purpose of that was to ensure that in these various stores, the decisions of managers would be informed by the values the company provided to managers in the training. it is a form of disparate treatment. they are making these decisions because of sex. we have stereotypical evidence and statistical results. >> on the one hand you say the problem is they were uttered its objective. on the other hand you say there

and this time the pilot, flying a medical flight with an emergency patient onboard became inconsistent. as the pilot then circled the airport, he reached the faa in california, which advised he was on his own. >>landing will be at your own risk. >> reporter: the pilot took that risk, and all was well in the end. >> at no time, and i want to stress, at no time was safety compromised. >> reporter: but the safety of the skies is very much in question. the faa has now disclosed seven instances of sleeping controllers, including last night in reno. two instances in lubbock, texas. one caught napping three times in seattle. in knoxville, the controller had made a bed in the tower while on duty. in washington, two passenger jets landed unassisted as the controller slept at reagan national, just across the potomac from the white house. >> i'm outraged. i'm disappointed, i'm disturbed. >> reporter: cbs news transportation safety analyst, mark rosenkerr says seven sleeping controllers is a sign the public is at risk. >> i believe, with no pun intended, this clearly is a wake up call and the faa

funding is very constrained and inconsistent. a lot of great work going on in terms of pedestrian programs is inconsistent because of grant funding. we're happy to receive the funds, but it makes it difficult to make long-term progress on goals. the third thing is data. it was eliminating in terms of our research to find out what data was available and what was not. my background is an urban planning. you want to have tools and information to tackle the problem. for a lot of different modes of transportation, we know how many vehicles are crossing a threshold at any given time. this level of detail is not available for pedestrians. we have a general idea based on models about where people are going and how they're getting there. we could not provide the same level of detail and specificity at a certain location at a given time of day. to get the information is resource intensive. this is starting to change. the better markets street plan was able to get volunteers to go out and count. some members of psac were part of the effort

we make a determination that a city policy against demolition of existing housing is arguably inconsistent with the housing element, among other city policies, that would be a finding you would make in conjunction with the entitlement action. so we deal with in this -- and this hearing deals with properly physical impacts associated with the general planning and consistency, but the question of inconsistency per se. supervisor campos: i don't know i fully understand or agree with the point. but i get it. thank you. president chiu: i have one follow-up on that and want to recognize supervisor mirkarimi. there's been discussion whether the planning considered nondemolition alternatives and in section g of section 4, you talk about a couple alternatives that you considered and rejected, one of them being the infill development within the historic district which would have retained the majority of the existing buildings, and what you state is that you didn't evaluate this because it would have required the demolition of carports within the garden apartment courtyards and the construction of ne

the cftc rule proposal specifically states, and i'll quote, the inconsistencies between these two reporting provisions must be reconciled in order to eliminate uncertainty with respect to the actual reporting requirements for the reenactment swaps. in other words, our regulators and forced to undertake additional rulemaking in an effort to correct the inconsistencies and errors in the dodd-frank act. although i'm not sure how rules can alter statutory requirements, it's clear that dodd-frank has fundamental flaws and should be revisited. today, i look forward to hearing of the regulators plan to improve this broken regulatory process, particularly how they will consider and incorporate comments from the public. make no mistake, the unprecedented scale and scope of agency rulemaking mandated by the dodd-frank derivatives title make it impossible for regulars to engage in deliberative and rational rulemaking and still meet the unrealistic deadlines imposed by the act. i'm also concerned that the regulators are not fully considered the cost and benefits of the rules and the effect that these r

we think it is totally inconsistent and yes, i would bet you a lot of it is fear. that is why we have all of the little mouse traps, and everything else. because we have fear of litigation and fear being fined by the regulars. we do everything we can to promote products that are beneficial to the consumer, to the customer. but at the same time with one eye looking at our regular and at civil lawsuits going forward. we have to make sure that there provision issues correctly since this is a new addition to the entire dodd-frank bill and in addition to deception. >> are you concerned that your small bank and other financial institutions will eventually find themselves caught in a trap with one federal agency trying to restrict the profits on certain products, and another agency telling them to increase their capital base? >> absolutely. we have found some coming up there real soon which will take effect in a couple of years. quite frankly we're concerned about everything these days. for instance, look at overdrive. you have the fdic come out with their guideline. you

. >> so is that an inconsistency that's a problem for the u.s. administration, u.s. policy?, look, there's going to be a lot of inconvenient inconsistencies as this region of the world goes through this process of political transformation. and i think it's going to take not months, perhaps more than years, and perhaps the rest of this decade. but i think the saudi government, other governments in the region are fooling themselves if they can actually feel like they can hunker down and oppose this tide. because the region is facing crushing demographic, political and economic concerns. they've got a generation that's coming of age. and simply hunkering down might work for a couple of months or maybe even a couple of years in these places but i think pragmatically getting them to open up their political systemses is going to be one of our strategic interests. >> woodruff: we will leave it there, brian katulis, maria mcfarland, we thank you both. >> thank you. >> thanks. >> lehrer: and to the analysis of shields and brooks-- syndicated columnist mark shields, "new york times" c

we also found that when we started working with the district and school staff, there were inconsistent messages coming from different people that was leading to an escalation of issues and a lot of ilan will on all sides. we're hoping that this will help resolve some of those issues. the tools that are included in the tool kits include a parent concerns that is a slow start that talk about how parents will go through this. that helps parents make sure they are documenting all of their efforts a parent's guide to the process, parents know when to bring concerns here and what types of concerns to bring. we will work with the district more on this. >> we have been calling ourselves the current token team. people that have been volunteering, we have many of our personal volunteers, so we are really excited to see something that started as a parent initiative finally get to become a district initiative. we have attended the last two cabinet meetings. i am really excited about how the district was they're moving it forward. there has not the way for parents to take their concerns. they have

hoskins testimony was inconsistent. also that kimberly bell admitted lying before the grand jury so none of them can be trusted. the prosecution has been trying to demonize. becker. with untested theories of as head of growing. you can see barry bonds is leaving the court right now. the court has gone to the jury in the case has gone to juries. eight women, four men. we do not know how long this will take but we will be here to cover this for you as it happens. that is the latest, dan kerman kron 4 news. continuing coverage. >>pam: at 4:20 attorney ivan gold with legal analysis. if (music) >> jacqueline: a live look with the bay bridge toll plaza puffy clouds over the mountains. isolated thunderstorms through the bay area. it looks like mostly clear through the bay area but fairfield and new the delta. pretty intense storms running through right now! intense rrainfall over fairfield with a one- inch per hour. monterey is one-half inch per hour and even hail with this particular weather cell. this is heavier he held that

we think it's totally inconsistent. that is why there have been mouse traps set and everything else. because we have fear of litigation and fear of being fined by regulators. we do everything we can to promote products that are beneficial to the consumer to the customer. but at the same time, we have one eye look at the regulator, and that's civil lawsuits going forward. so we have to make sure the provision is used correctly because it's a new addition to the dodd-frank bill. >> are you concerned that your small bank and other financial institutions will eventually find themselves caught in a trap with one federal agency trying to restrict their profits on certain products and another agency telling them to increase their capital base? >> absolutely. we have three coming up real soon, it's going to take effect in a couple of years. quite frankly, sir, we're concerned about everything these days. for instance, look at overdraft. you had the fdic come out with guidelines, the fed came out with their guidelines. and what'

increasingly, we are also consulting other databases to spot inconsistencies on a return. as a result, we bought billions of dollars of returns that could be going out the door fraudulently and verify the accuracy of those returns. in some cases, the taxpayer simply forgot to attach the required documentation. in that instance, once sufficient information is given to us, we get the refund out to them. in other places, the claims are fraudulent. often part of the rings of tax cheats. sometimes even run out of prison. our success rate in blocking these schemes is very high. it is only getting better as we improve our capabilities. as we think about the future and ways we can more aggressively move to resolve issues up front at the time of filing, a number of complicated issues are rise. many of them involves information returns that we receive every filing season. you probably know these returns by their form number. the most ubiquitous r d w-2 and the 1099. to give you some perspective, 40 years ago received about three and 60 million information return documents. today, we

i find it inconsistent that we are proving one and then asking for a more significant look back. >> we don't have jurisdiction over a lot of areas in the city. there are many areas where these types of businesses are. if you notice, you will see one pharmacy on one block and many go to the next one and you see five more. there is an extreme situation that is created by the competitive market. i am not sure that san francisco needs all of these pharmacies. i know that cbs is opening a couple of blocks down and then there is a walgreen's. i think that this is excessive and the city needs to evaluate how many of these establishments we need it. i know that is now really in our jurisdiction and this is not what some of the criteria used tear but i think this is becoming successive. this is another for another time. i think that this building, there needs to be some use their obviously. this is an eyesore that has been sitting there for a while but i think it is unfortunate in a way that there is not more that we could do with these underutilized space is at this time. i am hoping that we h

we have found a little will -- a little bit of inconsistencies. whatever you should decide which way to go on the parking, we will make sure that the motion accurately reflects the parking count. >> there has been some some confusion. >> may be the city attorney to give us some elimination on this. whatever the commission's decision is, both of those will be consistent and will correct whichever one is necessary. the planning commission can give direction and it is fairly simple corrections. >> if i am interpreting that correctly, i went to separate the 8 key. >> there's a lot of confusion. >> if they were split, my motion which was made before they stand, i don't know. this is described up to 37 units. i think that building a garages not cheap. having fewer parking places and not necessarily diminish the amount of loss per unit. the excavation has to happen with the space will be virtually the same, no matter how many parking spaces you put in it. because you provide residential parking, this is not require everyone to have and use a car. we cann

meet the health department's code, in order to avoid health risks, you can clearly see the inconsistency in the system. the second fact that we learned is that the cell phone antennas tend to override each other depending on their proximity to each other and directional wavelengths. this affect contributes to put cellphone reception and the number of drop calls. and other words, as far as connectivity is concerned, and selling more antenna is not necessarily in the best interest of the consumer depending on which company is the carrier. the current rush to install as many antenna as possible can best be described as a wild west style land grab an order to achieve market dominance. eventually, the bigger company with most money will buy out the competition and eliminate the diversity of business and service options for the consumer. supervisors, in order to make sure that the cell phone companies are in fact measuring cumulative a facts and levels, especially in consideration of a new an increasing number of rf- emitting devices, it is the responsibility of our government to take a second

. >> so, really, what we saw is enough inconsistencies in the story telling that led us to wonder. >>eporter: the jury deliberating for four days. it was tough going. >> there were two outbursts of crying. actually, three and hen -- >> over what? >> i couldn't sit down. >> reporter: baseball fans at tonight's dodger's game were forgiving. >> it is kind of disappointing that he was doing steroids. >> he didn't say that he was doing steroids, but guilty of obstruction of justice. >> yeah. that he was lying. >> is he still a hoar or -- hero. >> yes. but not as much. >> reporter: here at the ballgame, the giant organization would not comment, but expect the case to move forward and the prosecutors respect the juror's decision and they will decide where or not to prosecute barry bonds on the remaining permary charges and ken, if he does move forward with in charges and doesn't get dropped. he faces up to 10 years of prison, but more likely 10 months of home detention. >> and $20 million to prosecute barry bonds. >> $20 million from what? >> the prosecution that they spent on the case. >> t