> it was done in a way that would have made it inconsistent with the way that they should be inconsistentonomy, with normal engineering practices, inconsistent with how any other company has been doing this. ashley point is i am not claiming you had knowledge at what point and time but the program is that it was not set up as it should be and as a result of that it ended with fuel economy standards that allow vehicles to be certified. >> did that mean you are ruling out criminal charges? settlement deals entirely with civil liability. we have nothing in the settlement dealing with criminal liability nor can we comment on any ongoing law-enforcement. let me point out more specifically what kinds of problems. talking about. one was the use of not the average data from the test but the best data. 2 was testing the cars where there fuel economy was best. using the wrong tire sizes. turning around the other direction and testing a headwind. that speaks to the kinds of problems that we saw with hyundai and kia that resulted in the ms. measurement. this ms. measurement. >> can you talk about, are the