and for more on this libya deadline earlier i spoke with ivan eland senior fellow the independent institute and here is what he had to say. yes it's illegal and unconstitutional and it's not the first president to have done it but it's clearly a move in the direction of more executive power and more. executive you're so patient in the. congressional war making power which is clearly in our in the united states the constitution the founders spent a lot of time on this that the original convention is probably the most important issue they've addressed and it's very important to the republic and they want to make sure that executive branch. because they had an experience that experience of the kings of europe taking their countries to war and all the costs falling on the . average person in blood and treasure so they put the requirements in the most important requirement of the constitution is declaring war and we don't do that anymore and so yes so why doesn't anyone care is my question i mean congress you have a few members you have six republican senators that sent a letter to obama saying

you know after world war two that was ivan eland senior fellow at the independent institute and i did want to mention that the professor from yale that i interviewed in the report that i did put a really interesting editorial about all this that appeared in the washington post and all tweet that if you haven't read it already it's definitely worth a read and if you haven't heard other big news the end of the world begins tomorrow may twenty first two thousand and eleven at the least a group of devout christian radio listeners believe that you may have seen the headlines it's kind of been everywhere but i would want to wager a bet that you haven't seen them this up close and personal anywhere else artie's don't deal in florida long on family radio's caravan and tells us more about the end of the world as we know. have you heard the awesome news watch watch watch one the world of sending death destruction that's all you can see tomorrow. morning nine months ago eddie and jessica ramos hit the road to tell people just that so what i did is i shop a business now i. got the. tag you know b

you so much for giving us that perspective on this that with ivan eland senior fellow at the independent institute and that is going to do it for now for more on the stories we covered go to our t.v. dot com slash usa and we will be back for so much more news at i.p.m. . you didn't start all of a sudden. it's a long story of destroying the living and their habitats. there are constantly. something leaks down here when they get done with it it's just something if you took every fisherman out of the water and he tell you something about that water. protecting the habitat to this roost means it's going to be nature's steps making waves are the consequences are you look around and see a little of the solar. obviously everybody humans think well lost income and speak road systems to great number that's true. and yet billions of dollars oil and gas state. real baby drill. from there to cut some so. my frustration with consider potential areas for development in south atlantic in the gulf of mexico live . wealthy british scientists i took some time to cut. the to. market dynamics. find out what's really

political analyst and senior fellow at the independent institute in washington d.c. . to libya now with the bodies of gadhafi son and three grandchildren reportedly killed in a nato air strike could be shown on state t.v. says they intercepted military communications from the target site before launching the attack in some of those calls outrage among pro get off the supporters with angry mob storming foreign embassies in the capital tripoli and british and italian offices of the most with the u.n. deciding to withdraw from libya after its buildings were also attacked run back here from the group now to stop war and racism told us to stop the coalition campaign in libya people in nato countries south to take to the streets in protest disease seize it. the u.s. is escalating the military pressure on gadhafi because they're now winning the civil war and their side is not yet winning the war and so they're using aerial terror against the khadafi administration and against his family with the hope that he will cry uncle be intimidated or be so afraid that he will quit the

he is a professor at the university of mississippi and associated with the independent institute in oakland. he wrote while public investments in -- technological innovation sound like a good idea, the danger is that the funds will be directed toward politically popular projects rather than those with the highest economic value. remember jimmy carter's quest for a new synthetic fuel >> guest: that is one point of view. at intel we would disagree with that and as for the science foundation the national institute of standards and the department of energy they do crucial work. they produce the seed corn for great companies like intel so we collaborate with them and when president obama raised his spending levels for these types of agencies and departments departments 70% consistently since he came into office, that is a real plus for silicon valley and tech companies like intel. >> host: gautham nagesh. >> guest: we have seen a very political discussion over increasing the amount of r&d funding available from the federal government. >> host: how do you view the president's fiscal 2002 budget r

for my outfit and joining me now for more ivan eland senior fellow at the independent institute with some analysis here so i've been it's been sixty days of work powers act gives a deadline i haven't heard the president running to congress asking for any kind of approval or declaration of war or sense that the nato mission is ending is this breaking a law yes it's illegal and unconstitutional and it's not the first president to do to have done it but it's clearly a move in the direction of more executive power and more executive your soup ation of the. you know congressional war making power which is clearly in our in the united states the constitution the founders spent a lot of time on this that the original convention is probably the most important issue they've addressed and it's very important to the republic and they want to make sure that executive branch or because they had an expert had experience of the kings of europe taking their countries to war and all the costs falling on the. average person in blood and treasure so they put the requirement then the most important requ

biological principle to have children it would not have the moral authority to become the independent institution furthermore at that point* all bishops were appointed by the emperor. the church did not have control over its own personal policy. says he appoints the bishops and then all priests and bishops have to be celibate and this becomes a surprise. they do not like it an even bigger struggle with the emperor who wants to keep the church as his legitimate source of authority they fight but to generation war the allies of the pope versus the emperor and at the end of the period the church receives independence. at that point* day established a separate ecclesiastical law presided by the ship -- bishops and priests only over the lawyers and the whole idea of bureaucratic government by legal specialist doesn't happen first in the church than is transferred to the secular realm then divides church and state and the legal authorities have the separate hierarchy completely independent if european rulers and this is extremely important because many european rulers who was to be a chinese emperor ha

biological principle of being able to have children it would not have moral authority to become an independent institution. furthermore at that point all the bishops in the church were being appointed by the emperor so the church did not have control over its own personnel policy basically. so he declared the church independent and they will appoint bishops and all the priests and bishops have to be celibate. they cannot marry or have children. this is something of a surprise to all these married priests. they don't like it. is a huge struggle within the church and a bigger struggle with the emperor because the emperor wants to keep the church has his legitimate source of authority. they fight a two generation war. the allies of the pope offers is the allies of the emperor and at the end of this period the church achieves independence. at that point they establish a separate ecclesiastical law presided over by bishops and priests appointed only by the church. the first lawyers are all ecclesiastical lawyers. the idea of bureaucratic government by legal specialists is the creation that happens first in the

logical principle of having children, it would not have the moral authority to become an independent institution. furthermore, all bishoped at that point were appointed by the emperor, so the church did not have control over its own personnel policy basically; right? he declares the church is inexcellent, they appoint the bishops, and all of the priests and bishops cannot marry or have children. this comes as a surprise. they do not like it. it's a struggle in the church and bigger struggle for the emperor. he wants to keep the church as his source of authority. they fight a two generation war, the allies of the pope versus the allies of the emperor, and at the end of this period, the church achieves independence, and at that point, they can establish a second law presided over by bishops and priests appointed only by the church, the first lawyers are e close yatic lawyers. it's really a creation that happens first in the church and then gets transferred todd secular realm and also divides church and state at this very early point and the legal authorities have legit legitimacies and a separate

principle of being able to have children than it would not have moral authority to becoming independent institution furthermore, at that point all the bishops in the church of england pointed by the emperor so the church did not have control over its own personnel policy basically. so he declared that the church is independent, they're going to a point of bishops and all the priests and bishops have to be celibate. they cannot marry, they cannot have children. this, of course, comes as something of a surprise to all of these married priests. they don't like it is a huge struggle within the church. and it's an even bigger struggle with the emperor is emperor wants to keep the church as his legitimating source of authority. they fight a two generation were. the allies and the pope versus the allies of the emperor. and at the end of this period the church achieved independence. and at that point they can establish a separate ecclesiastical law presided over by bishops and priests appointed only by the church, and first floors are all ecclesiastical floaters. the whole idea of bureaucratic government b

lineup tonight on cbs -- [the captioning on this program is provided as an independent service of the national captioning institutec., which is solely responsible for the accurate and complete transcription of program content. cbs, its parent and affiliated companies, and their respective agents and divisions are not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of any transcription or for any errors in transcription.] [captioning made possible by cbs sports, a division of cbs broadcasting, inc.] jim: farmers insurance airship providing the aerial coverage. this was the first time that bubba played 18. just 20 minutes ago. nick: actually got a nice kick. if that had kicked straightforward it would have been stuck behind the tree and this time it's literally one, maybe two yards closer. jim: i think his distance is pretty much the same. he's playing first, right, peter? >> he is. he's got 257 yards and even though he's farther away i have to give the advantage to bubba here. he has a good lie in the rough and a fairly level stance. web simpson, overwhelmed -- webb simpson has a very downhill awkward lie. nick: reall

i want an institutional inquiry, independent inquiry. this military does not want that inquiry. this military has done everything to stall such an inquiry, which is why they asked us to conduct an inquiry. first this said that they should be no inquiry. only a review. but then under pressure from the media they succumbed to the notion to the idea of an inquiry. and then they went to parliament to ensure that the inquiry would be not terribly embarrassing to read again it was the opposition and put pressure on parliament on the other members to go through the motions of a more serious inquiry. we still have to see where that will go. so there is a good news. this of all military is now under discussion. the military budget is now the focus of attention. when the other area on which i'd like to just make a brief remark is relations. of course it's not enough for into said that india is no longer the enemy in for him not to be branded as an indicator because it can be more patriotic. so what is the state? going on a trip with former prime minister in 2004. just when the diplomacy w

i want an institution inquiry, an independent inquiry. and this military does not want that inquiry. this military has been everything to stall such an inquiry. which is why the ask the general to conduct an inquiry, first to say that they should be no inquiry, we only had a review. but then under pressure from the media, they have succumbed to the notion of the idea of an inquiry. and then they went to parliament to ensure that the inquiry would be not terribly embarrassing. and again, it was the opposition to put pressure on parliament on the other members of government to go through the motions of a more serious and cori. and we still have to see where that would go. so there is good news. the civil military is under discussion. militaries budgets are now the focus of attention. the other area i wish i would like to just make a brief remark is, of course it's not enough for nawaz sharif to say that india is no longer be any pickup for him not to be branded as in any nation because you cannot be more patriotic than the son of nawaz shar

institutions or the economy. the third major factor and this was an ideological -- with other prudential regulators there were sexually a conflict of interest. they weren't independent of the institutions they regulated. with other regulators we shot a chart jumping to avoid tougher regulation. we saw assessments of the industry being used to take funding for the agency elsewhere. with the fed it was primarily an ideological bias against regulation. the over focus on macroeconomics just ignoring consumer protection so what do we have under dodd-frank? given those lessons we have a single agency with authority taken away from the seven agencies. over 20 existing consumer financial protection and fair lending laws, and some new authority -- this is not new. some new authority for unfair and abusive practices. we also have massive new authority over large non banks and some specific categories of non banks usable is to regulate these players similarly. doesn't matter -- whether you are a threat or a small institution regulated by fed or the fdic, the goal is one standard and hopefully a similar approach to enforcement and supervision. as i will mention in a minute, it

independence. governments are instituted amongst us to secure these rights. and those are the rights, life, liberty, and a pursuit of happiness. >> dr. machan, tiger -- tibor machan, send e-mails and tweets via twitter at booktv. lots of ways to connect with us. we have lots of time to do that as well. we look forward to hearing from you and engaging in your questions and comments. we're going to look at a number of the columns and books. great time for a three-hour conversation about essential ideas in american political philosophy on the beautiful sunday morning. the first of may. i little ironic it's may day. >> guest: labor day. >> host: what does that mean to you? >> guest: young, i was born in hungary and lived under the stalinist regime there until 1953 when i was smuggled out what "time" magazine referred toss a flesh peddler. nasty comment. and their may 1 was a major holiday. this was the holiday of the workers movement throughout the world, okay? and it represented a form of a scary thing to many of us because there was a lot of talk about the dict

i want accountability, an institution by an independent inquiry. this military does not want that.tary has done everything to stall what is required. we only had a review. they're under the pressure of the media. then it went to parliament. we still have to see where we go. that is good news. the civil-military is now under discussion. the military's budget are now the focus of attention. the other area on which i would like to make a brief remark is -- of course, it is not enough to say that india is no longer the enemy and not to be branded as an indian agent. what is the status of india- pakistan relations? i remember going on a trip but the former prime minister, just with the diplomacy -- this was a solemn occasion. the indian said, we will talk about the pipeline. what about other issues? pakistan was not ready to talk trade. today, the situation is that pakistan is ready to talk trade. the foreign secretary's, the secretaries of various departments, interior, commerce, parliament office, everyone is on their way to india to talk. this is a very good development. it has the s

independence. governments are instituted among stuffs to secure life liberal middle liberty and pursuit of happiness. >> it tibor machan will be with us for three hours. text in your telephone calls and message by e-mail at booktv@c-span.org. send us tweets by twitter@booktv. lots of ways to connect with a sad lot of time to do it. we look forward to hearing from you and engaging in questions and comments and look at a number of his columns and books over our time together. it three our conversation about central ideas in american political philosophy on this beautiful sunday morning, the first of may. it is made a, labor day. what does that mean to you? >> guest: i was born in budapest, hungry living under the stalinist regime until 1953 when i was smuggled out by what time magazine referred to as a flesh peddlers. nasty comment. may 1st was a major holiday just like a holiday of the workers for about the world. it represented a form of a scary thing to many of us because there was a lot of talk of the dictatorship of the proletariat. lot of talk about how the bourgeoisie were reactionary pigs and

institutions or the economy. third major factor, and this was an ideological bias with other provincial regulators there was a conflict of interest. they were not independentf the institutions they regulated. with other regulators we saw the charter jumping to avoid tough regulations and we saw assessments of the industry being used to take funding for the agency and go elsewhere. but the fed does lisa mentioned was an ideological bias against regulation and an over focus on macroeconomics and ignoring the consumer protection. what we have under dodd-frank? given those lessons we have a single agency with authority that has been taken away from the seven agencies. over 20 existing if protection and fair lending all these to become law and some new authority. most of it is not new by the way, it is some new authority curved unfair abusive and deceptive practices. we also have massive new authority over large long banks and some specific categories of non-banks that could be any side. mortgage lenders, pay lenders. so the goal is to regulate lesson learned all of these players similarly. it doesn't matter whether you are a thrift or small institution regulat

he is currently the chairman, ceo, and president of sri international, an independent, nonprofit research instituteointed dr. carlson to the presidential task force on the research and development of the institutes. darker coulson advises government leaders around the world on innovation, competitiveness, and educational reform. his book, "innovation, the five disciplines for creating what customers want" was published in 2006. it made the top 10 books of that year in "business week." in addition, he is the founding member of the innovation leadership council of the world economic forum. he holds honorary degrees from three universities. he received professional achievement awards from two. dr. carlson has served on numerous corporate and government boards of directors and advisory councils. he was a member of the original team that helped create the army federated laboratories. this passion for innovation and education is something we admire. with the world changing every day technologically, politically, and socially, we are reminded of the importance of education, leadership, and constant innova

i want institutional inquiry, and an independent inquiry. and this military does not want that inquiry. the military has done everything to stall such an inquiry this is what they asked the general to conduct an inquiry. first they told him to say that there should be no inquiry. but then under pressure from the media, they succumb to the notion of an idea of an inquiry. and then they went to parliament to ensure that the inquiry would be not terribly embarrassing. and again, it was the leader of the opposition who put press

companies and is currently chairman, ceo and president of sri international, an independent nonprofit research institute in fact, president barack obama appointed dr. carlson to the presidential task force on the research and development of the institute. dr. carlson advises government leaders around the world on innovation, competitiveness and educational reform. his book, with william wilmont, innovation, the five disciplines for creating what customers want, was published in 2006 and made "businessweek"'s top 10 books of that year. in addition, dr. carlson is a sound -- founding member of the innovation leadership council of the world economic forum. he holds degrees from worcester polytechnic institute, stevens institute of technology, in kettering university and he receive professional achievement award from worcester polytechnic and rutgers university school of engineering. dr. carlson has served on numerous corporate and government boards of directors and advisory councils, and he was a member of the original team that helped create the army's federated laboratories. his passion for innovation an

that, if you took that money and put it in independent media and future in independent activism by which i mean, institutions that don't take their direction from either political party, instead of putting it into elections, who's an example of that? certainly much of the peace moment. go to my website, war is a crime.org and a group roots action, endless endless organizations that are free of partisan subserviens and then you will be doing so much more because you're not going to get a good president out of next year's election. no matter how much money you waste on it. and you're not going to get a republic-backed from any president. so, you know, empires end. they end horribly or they end gently. and the homeland is usually better off once they've ended. if you want to help come to the white house at noon tomorrow to end these wars. and come to quantico, which is even closer at 2:00 pm on sunday to end the open torture of a man who has not been put on trial. [applause] >> there were a lot of articles and commentaries on bradley manning and all these issues i'd recommend rutherford.org to keep up with the

he is currently chairman, ceo, of sriesident p international, an independent, nonprofit research institute. president barack obama appointed him to the presidential task force on research and development of the institute. dr. cross and advises government leaders around the world on innovation, competitiveness, and educational reform. his book of " innovation: the five disciplines for creating what customers want" was published in 2006. it made the top 10 books of that year in "business week." in addition, dr. carlson is a founding member of the leadership council of the world economic forum. he holds honorary degrees from three universities. he received professional achievement awards from two. he has served on numerous corporate and governmental boards and advisory councils. he was a member of the original team that helped create the army federated laboratories. his passion for innovation and education is something that we admire. the world is changing every day technologically, politically, and socially. we are reminded of the importance of education, leadership, and constant innovation

independence there is my understanding. it does allow for a separate uses on the property. what we have here is the institutional use of the residential care facility combined with the residential use. it sounds like commissioner moore has concerns about the connection between the two. commissioner sugaya: there is a basis for recommendation in the project that it adds affordable housing to the city's affordable housing stock. >> we have no conditions about affordable housing or anything in the conditions or the motion. >> it is not recognized as affordable housing, but it is a smaller dwelling unit that is generally more affordable. commissioner sugaya: and i am not comfortable as having it as a reason for approving it. commissioner moore: there is somewhat of a contradiction for me here. what is the request for a conditional use authorization, it means that adding another use his request for an authorization and it is not automatically imply. the next one is a request for a variance. this is not as clear-cut as we are allowed to leave. i don't want to make it complicated, but i think this is not as easy a thin

institutions. it is going to be made independent. it is not card-carrying members of any party. nobody is asking them to negotiate. we remain the political address for political negotiations. it has not changed. it is best for anybody knows anything about this situation -- you would know this is just a very flimsy pretext, an excuse that is baseless, actually. it is a non argument and i do not see why it was presented or even believe it. so, palestinian unity was another pretext he used. and of course, he entered into -- i don't know, maybe in our society we tend to be much more polite, but it was a very rude confrontation with the u.s. administration. i do not know if you can go to of the white house and keep insulting the american president and get away with it. of course, he has always worked on this issue as having tactical gains at the expense of long-term strategic goals. he may have scored another point against president obama but i doubt whether this is going to bode well for the future relationship or even for his own standing in israel. because he thought this was one

mass they are inherently independent of moral law of the words jefferson is saying here this is just so wrong at the supreme court would take this power and away from the institutions elected by the people the presidency and the congress if you want to say my construction because intuition is very different from what you quote it is that each department is truly independent of the others and has an equal right to decide for itself what is the meaning of the constitution in the cases submitted to its action and especially where it is to act ultimately and with the appeal which is what the supreme court does it acts ultimately without appeal and frankly if we roll back a supreme court decision we should start with no three marbury decision and take from the court this incredible power on the other hand given that the court is holding this power it's really important starting in two thousand and twelve as the core source of change we have a democrat in the white house. it's time for a daily poll your chance to tell us what you think here's today's question what banks are only go to jail nowadays if he tries to rape a hotel maid your choices are yes now he has to be do

to do and what i think it's added value as an international institution is is that it can be there to serve as a neutral arbiter an independent voice on economic policies particularly in rich countries don't have to spent much too long focusing on developing countries and telling them how to run their fiscal and monetary policies and should be spending more time thinking about what's going wrong in the u.s. or in germany or in china and what's creating global imbalances and the i.m.f. singularly failed to do that in the last ten years it should have been out there saying look what's happening on this financial deregulation agenda is really dangerous you shouldn't be doing it and we need to stop these kind of policies otherwise it's going to blow up in our faces in the i'm a failed to do that because it's been in hock to rich countries and it's been in hock a special interest on wall street and instead we need to have an i.m.f. with an independent head who doesn't have any ties to be kind of special interest and you can be out there doing what's called an i.m.f. speak surveillance but can do really rigorously on the most syste

and basically says that the american petroleum institution is quite capable of doing this. well, the commission, the independent, bipartisan commission said the american petroleum industry is culturally ill-suited to drive the safety revolution in the industry. for this reason, it is essential that a safety enterprise operate apart from the american petroleum industry, and i could not agree more. and my amendment would require that the secretary, in determining whether a permit application meets the critical safety requirements, that he must consult with an independent safety organization and that organization must not be affiliated with the american petroleum institute. now the institute said no problem, we'll create our own. i'm sorry. but that's not the way to provide the appropriate safety standard. we don't need to have more deaths or more blowouts. we need to do the drilling safely and that it be done in a manner that assures that lives will not be lost and oil will not be spilled in the ocean. that's what this amendment does, by providing an outside, independent organization with the requirement that the

it's not the ballot box it's an independent judiciary and the rule of law so i'm worried that if we urge countries to have elections before they have any kind of institutions that are ready to do so it will be one election undone it's interesting again and i mean how do we marriage too because people are actually people are looking for change is ok and the west while i guess their knee jerk response is elections maybe elections are not going to really start solving a lot of these problems right here and i go to you daniel on that one first i go i'd go further than professor longer and say not only as a rule of law but it's all the other aspects of civil society it is freedom of speech freedom of movement and loyal opposition and these are the two all of this very subtle concepts which we in the west which we exactly which we in the west or in a sense born with are very alien much of the world and so it's a long process of developing civil society and then topping it off with marcus and by the way democracy should begin with voting for dog catcher voting for municipal councils and then building up towards voting for the head of head of government it's a lon

independent -- the overall well-being, the overall health of the people we are serving. i want to thank you for the chance to share support and we look forward to having your support for the institutional master plan for chinese hospital. >> good afternoon. i am the executive director of the chinese health coalition. i am here to talk in the half -- on behalf of the health coalition in support of the chinese hospital and i urge you to support this as well. for those of you are not familiar with us, we are a partnership of 30 health and human services organizations. since 1985, we have provided advocacy and training, research and community programs both for the benefit of the community in the innovations that are part of the coalition. chinese hospital is a fine -- founding member and we have a very active partner on the board as well as in the program. chinese hospital is unique in that we are very important part of the community. they not just where this label, the actually live this. they have been collaborating with many members, and have supported the efforts by hosting our meetings and providing monetary support and other support as necessary. for more than a century -- they have

as you know, for over 40 years the manhattan institute has been a national leader in advancing the idea is of greater economic independence and choice and individual responsibility. we have our roots as you all know in the cities having led the movement from welfare to work and from broken windows to see for cities. during the coming weeks you will be hearing a lot about our center for state and local leadership. whether it is examining public employees and the relationships with the government's for which they work, detention systems, the retiree health benefits, whether it's talking about new public safety strategies with its working on issues as diverse as prisoner reentry in places like newark new jersey and the assimilation into the cities and states the manhattan institute is at the core of the policy debate. i urge you to visit our web site, manhattaninstitute dhaka.org, and also to visit a new site that we've put it recently called publicsectorinc.org that focuses on the union issues, pension reform, it is a go to site for lawmakers all around the country and hopefully it will be for you as well. as the mayors and