parenthood of indiana dissentucky, you joined in the seventh circuit. the supreme court later agreed with you in a 7-2 decision with respect to the indiana law requiring fetal remains to be following anmated abortion. the decision that garners a days on of 7-2 these the supreme court, a decision that includes justice breyer and justice kagan does not seem radical to me. do you disagree? courtbarrett: the supreme summarily reversed which means without argument and briefing the panels holding in that case. and the fetal remains disposition of fetal remains portion of the statute was not rational. >> i will note for the record that i don't think i have ever aard anyone characterize as radical act of conservative activism 7-2 decision joined by justice kagan and justice breyer. judge barrett, in addition to being able to set aside your personal convictions when deciding a case, you have toonstrated the ability expertly determine what the law requires. i believe this stems from a fundamental and correct view that a judge needs to start from the premise that t

parenthood of indiana dissentucky, you joined in the seventh circuit. supreme court later agreed with you in a 7-2 decision with respect to the indiana law requiring fetal remains to be following anmated abortion. the decision that garners a days on of 7-2 these the supreme court, a decision that includes justice breyer and justice kagan does not seem radical to me. do you disagree? courtbarrett: the supreme summarily reversed which means without argument and briefing the panels holding in that case. and the fetal remains disposition of fetal remains portion of the statute was not rational. >> i will note for the record that i don't think i have ever aard anyone characterize as radical act of conservative activism 7-2 decision joined by justice kagan and justice breyer. judge barrett, in addition to being able to set aside your personal convictions when deciding a case, you have toonstrated the ability expertly determine what the law requires. i believe this stems from a fundamental and correct view that a judge needs to start from the premise that the l

parenthood of indiana dissentucky, you joined in the seventh circuit. the supreme court later agreed with you in a 7-2 decision with respect to the indiana law requiring fetal remains to be following anmated abortion. the decision that garners a days on of 7-2 these the supreme court, a decision that includes justice breyer and justice kagan does not seem radical to me. do you disagree? courtbarrett: the supreme summarily reversed which means without argument and briefing the panels holding in that case. and the fetal remains disposition of fetal remains portion of the statute was not rational. >> i will note for the record that i don't think i have ever aard anyone characterize as radical act of conservative activism 7-2 decision joined by justice kagan and justice breyer. judge barrett, in addition to being able to set aside your personal convictions when deciding a case, you have toonstrated the ability expertly determine what the law requires. i believe this stems from a fundamental and correct view that a judge needs to start from the premise that t