i think that the important part of 67.26 reads as follows, informatn th is exempt from disclosured shall be masked in order that the non-exempt portion of the record may be released and keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the appropriate justification for withholding the required by section 67.27 of this article. i think that is pretty clear. and i like to point out another thing and nowhere in the sunshine ordinance task hearings, have we actually received anything to show what the city attorney said about this matter. is there any possibility that maybe the discussion was held and was very convoluted and miss patterson misunderstand what the city attorney said and or any possibility that someone might come over and to cover their back side and said that the attorney said it. nowhere have you got anything to show what the city attorney said about this matter. and you are going on and on and on about the city at attorney said this or that and you have no idea and you just have a bunch of here say and the people with request in this and saying this is what i was told. and that i

given this access but they're not saying if the government has actually asked for that password informatncould be used to long sought -- log onto the account or set up the correspondence or impersonate the user some details are not clear including when and at the request bbn and if it is targeted at individuals or is the entire database dumped? palace section to do 15 does allow them to get private information that is what these two data mind of those calls and senators are crying foul will. >> when the american people find out how their government has interpreted the pageedact, they will be stunned and they will be angry. from my position of the senate intellince committee i have seen government activity conducted under the umbrella of the pager attacked that i knew would aonish most of our people. lori: the oregon democrat asserts on the senate intelligence committee also id this week at any event the government's authority to collect information on law abiding citizens is essentially limitless under the law. know if that company has been accessing your password is set to the internet c

your behalf of the remains to be seen to be obligated the information they're getting your password informatneveloping story we will follow it closely. >> internet passwords? privacy is so in question in. one day care acher is claiming she was fired for putting out a nearby fire to save their lives by her boss said she broke a safety rule should she have been fired? here to duke and out is our panel. does the teacher deserved to lose her job? >> no question she did not deserve to lose her job but when you get into law that is not the same way but the at will employee does not have a contractual rights and who did be terminated for any reason and less discriminatory should have to bring the case as a whistle-blower she did try to protect their children in the workplace tn allegedly fired for that. know whether the law covers that is datable but unfortunately this is the case she cou pursue this to see if legislation could be brought'' to find a cause of action. >> the reason there are safety procedures in place when she went to see what was going on she could have beennjured. there is a classf

they don't say i have insider informatn. what we believe is they have conversations, they talk about things and he doesn't take the next step like how did you get that. how do you know for sure in his case how do you know for sure that the two stocks heot information that they were going to probably tank because they had unfavorable res, hodid you know it was going to tank? that is an obvious question. what is fascining is just how mu power the sec has even without a fraud charge they can take you out on failure to supervise and that is what they're going to do here. gerr is it surprising in this case? >> they think, this is them talking not me, they think he runs a criminal organization th a mpliance all ththese op doad stuff. gerri: there has been no crimal charge, correct? >> they believe they do all of these bad stuff, the compliance is to protect the man in the middle. there may be a charge against the firm. still a potential for a charge against steve cohen. i don't think this is the last straw here. i think there is m

but they started to short the deal and then with cherry pick the assets that would shorted so that informatn to investors. but he faces a lifetime day and as well as sec finds the judges already saying he said chile to keep it tight and short the sec will also introduce a lot of e-mail's and gogol's. one of the e-mail's the century says if he is joking he does not feel glty about said deal the lucky to capitalize it also choking -- and joking selling it to widows but there is one with no sitting on the jury. >> just put the $550 million fi into perspective they paid to go to the case go away that is less than one month's ofit. both the medical industry doesn't make it easy for you to get a new doctor know jama in annual card for your primary care physician. they don't get as a user's manual. sure family and friends can help with the doctors that they like that can get you in and out under five hours did have a friendly staff and the ones that will get on line or on the phone with you if you have questions. but they cannot tell you if the doctor is credentialed or has kept up with post gradua

. >> i'm not against collecting informatn if it helps the government agencies be more efficient, carryut their missions, and spend less money in the pcess, but i don't understand what we're going to glean from this study in particular. they are giving gps devices to people who elect to be part of the study to see where they eat and, you know, in general, this is targeting ffst food establishment, and i think the conclusions should be fairly straightforward using common sense. peopleat where it's convenient. why do we need a study for this? >> well, ron, why do you think we need a study for this? something nefarious going on here? >> it's not nefarious, but i think it's enough is enough. the government's trying to regulate what we eat, what size toilets to have, the type of lights we have, reading our e-mails, seizing our phone records, and at some point, it breaks down the ethos of american freedom, and people, especially young people are saying enough is enough, we h it the the government has to stay within the proper roles, and, frankly, where's the study on government obesity? gao,

. >>> we're back now at 7:41 with potentially life-saving informatn.n an emergency, would you know how to get out alive? nbc's tom costello is with us now from san francisco once again. tom, good morning again. >> reporter: matt, you know, it has been a remarkable 11 years of aviation safety in this country. that's the last time that we had a mainline american u.s. carrier crash in this country. november 2001. since then, yes, we've had some regional crashes. otherwise this has been a remarkable period of safety. so the question now is, what exactly happened here in san francisco, and what would you do if you were involved in a crash? the images of the broken, burned-out shell of flight 214 are haunting. how is it possible so many people, more than 300, got out alive? is today's worldwide accident rate, only 1 out of 1.2 million flights will crash, and most of the passengers on board will survive. like the american airlines flight that crashed in jamaica in twi2009. everybody got out. everyone survived the continental flight that went off the runway an