the code says private information shall mean any information that could be used identify an individual including without limitation name, address , social security number, medical information, financial information, date and location of birth, and names of relatives , basically that this ordinance forbids the disclosing of. the ordinance, whoever gives an exception for much of this information as it relates to law enforcement, as there are state and federal laws that direct the department to provide some of these things. so in talking about information typically released by the police department, obviously copies of police reports that are requested by members of the public, victims, and media. the sfpd media release to the public regarding investigations can be limited based on certain factors. we also are responsible for releasing mugshots as well. the procedure for releasing police reports is covered -- the easiest access to police reports is through the sfpd website, and the gov qa system which blogs these releases, creates a reference number, and a history of the release. police r

grand jury information, classified information, information related to ongoing prosecutions and "information that unduly infringe on the may personal privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties." the department is wrong to try to withhold that information from this committee. congress is entitled to all of the evidence. this isn't just my opinion. it is also a matter of law for a precedent of three of the four categories, we need look no further than the summer of 2016 when, pursuant to a congressional subpoena the , department and the fbi began to transfer more than 880,000 documents related to the clinton investigation to the house of representatives. that production included classified information which we held in our secure facility and which we handle every day. it -- every day. it included information related to ongoing investigations and related to numerous third parties. this committee later interviewed as part of the republican investigation into the investigation. the other category of information the attorney general proposes to redact his grand jury information

he wasn't releasing that information to the public. the only reason we the public ever got to see all that grand jury information about nixon is because last year, 2018 there was litigation on the nixon case asking to open that material up to the public for the first time, 45 years down the road. open it up in the interest of the historical record. the judge who ruled last year to allow the nixon grand jury evidence to release to the public for if first time 45 years down the road, that was judge beryl howell, the same judge who is now the chief judge in d.c. who will likely field any legislation about whether trump grand jury information can be released to this congress this year in 2019. so if you think that the grand jury information in mueller's report that pertains to potential criminal behavior about this president, if you think that information is going to be key to us understanding as a country what happened in this scandal and the president's potential liability here, you're in sort of a glass half full, glass half empty situa

they need to inform us. whether the implementation of -- to make it a condition of transfer of technology depends totally on each state. some countries do not make it a condition. other countries make it a condition. and it is up to the country to decide. bottom line is that saudi arabia has safeguard with us, a small quantity protocol. they should move on the safeguard agreement before they import nuclear material on their territory. it is not the condition for the transfer of technology as far as the iaea is concerned but each country, again, operates on the condition so this is where we stand. >> thank you. it's very informative, very helpfu helpful. slightly more challenging topic, because it is more challenging out of iran, iranian implementation, there the biggest item in the news of late, and of which there has been great controversy inside the u.s. nonproliferation community has to do with the, quote, unquote, atomic archive, the trove of information disclo disclosed by the israelis and the debate an

and the information from g. mail is then put into one's personal profile and becomes another source of information they have for sending people targeted ads tech giants are increasingly under scrutiny from politicians regulators and experts on the left and the right some are concerned about their growing power even calling the monopolies and the tension keeps building yet their wall in contempt. life certainly isn't shrinking we two at the news hour have worked in collaborated with facebook google and many other new media businesses and journalists who might communicate with regularly about these issues including journalists at time magazine the guardian the hill i could go on and on very using e-mail not only that their companies are using a form of g. mail their emails are running through google servers all of their incoming and outgoing communications are being monitored by google this is happening also major universities if you enter the university of california after a certain date guess what you're using g

with information, people can make informed decisions. out an want to take additional loan to go to graduate school, they can do that. be informed about it. you are responsible for this decision. debt and1.5 trillion growing. in many cases, they don't know. that is the biggest travesty. paul is right. trillion $1.6 trillion in student debt. a lot of people are behind the eight ball right out of college because they did not know the information we are trying to provide, what is the outcome of investing so much money in education you end up as a barista at the local coffee bar and spent $60,000 to get your education. you will not be able to finance your debt. you may have to stay at home. themay have to delay all economic decisions that power our economy, such as getting married, having children, buying a home. that is bad for our economy. the other point is there is this huge skills gap. we have 7.3 million unfilled jobs according to the latest report from the bls. that means employers cannot hire the right people. unless we get those posi

are those holding our personal information exercising enough care to protect that information?o we need more accountability and more legal responsibility when things go wrong. i think when it comes to privacy, i don't think we are in a wild west, think we are in a still immature and somewhat confused conversation. i do think regulators are trying to figure out what projections do individuals need, policy makers the hill are trying to figure that out. and companies are trying to figure out what their users expect from them. as you have more government engagement, think those conversations will become more focused? host: you teach internet public policy at m.i.t. what do you want your students to leave with? daniel: great question. first of all, i really want our students to lead with the understanding that the internet and all this the energy that we use is a work in progress, and that we can shape it to me to human needs. that is number one. our students are great engineers still we teach them how to build things. and i want them to know that they can build things which meet hu

and with that, we can store other information, all types of information, and we can retrieve the information and we can analyze it much more quickly and much more systematically. this is the basis for the use of i.t. now for the agency. we are also using, based on this system collaborative analytical platform, which enables us to collect open source information and the number of pieces of information that we collect is incredible. millions of pieces of information, and we can analyze it very, very quickly. what we are doing now is different to what we were doing ten years ago, fifteen years ago. we also use some satellite imagery and they are very, very helpful. especially when our experts are familiar with the facility and ground. the satellite imagery is important, but human knowledge is also very important. we are using these advanced technologies, but human eyes are indispensable. human eyes cannot be replaced by technology. that is why i am saying that losing the experienced inspectors because of lack of funds will give negative, very serious problems to the i have aea activities. setti

is there any information? i know no identification of who might be responsible, but any information about the seven individuals who were told have been arrested? >> reporter: so far not. what we do know is during one of the raids for arrests, the police special forces team seemed to be targeted by a suicide bombing or a bomb left attached to a trip wire or something as they went into one of the premises they were searching. clearly this group knew the police would come after them and the police had a pretty good idea where they were. precisely from the government, who these people are, this is not a typical type of attack from the separatists who ended their 25-year civil war with the government there ten years ago. this is not the type of attack they would perpetrate. they were more of a secular-type organization. it has the hallmarks of isis. isis was already crowing about it in its propaganda, as it always does. there's no indication confirmed that this is isis. obviously concern is high and we know the sri

we analyze the information. we do not take any piece of information at its face value. we need to analyze and evaluate and once the information is found to be critical, we take action. that means you can get verification or request access. the third-party information is sometimes correct and other occasions is not correct. the best way is to analyze and evaluate and when needed take action. is that we are bound by the certified agreement and we cannot disclose confidential safeguard information. when we have problems or possible violations, then we can bring it to the board of governors. but member states are share.nting but i cannot the fact that i cannot share that doesn't mean that we are not working. we take action and analyze and when everything is fine, we keep quiet. that is our legal obligation. the next is an organization issue. confidentsue we are that we have the mandate because the basic function is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. if there are activities related to weaponize asian -- weapon

into the information age laying the groundwork for unlimited innovation at the dawn of the twenty first century there would be a new revolution a new generation of young genius of this made a new promise beyond our wildest dream use the ideas that we take all the world's information and make a ducks. useful to everyone limitless information artificial intelligence machines that would know what we wanted and would tend to our every need the technology would be beyond our imaginations almost like magic yet the concept would be as simple as a single word search. this was the beginning of google and less than a decade later facebook they would make a new promise to humanity what i think so interesting about google and facebook is they were founded at american universities stanford university you had two students larry page and sergey brin decide they wanted to create the ultimate search engine for the internet across the country you had in the case of facebook mark zuckerberg who was a student at harvard decided he wanted to create a social media platform basically to meet girls and to make

to court to try to get an order to release that information, he says he's also cutting information that could impact ongoing investigations. he says he's also cutting information that could impact the privacy or the reparations of peripheral third parties. and he says he's cutting information that the intelligence community wants cut out for its own reasons. that list of four categories of information, that -- that stuff that all has to be cut out of robert mueller's report before any of mueller's report gets shown to congress, that is something that appeared, like, fully formed in the sky as if it were a rainbow ending in the attorney general's head. you know? this list of stuff that has to be cut out of the report, it's not from the special counsel regulations. this is, like, a miracle of spring. this isn't even the initial list of things that attorney general barr said he'd cut. it's just now what he says he is currently doing. we're supposed to assume there's a quasi legal framework under which he's made the decisions that this is what he has to cut but we take his word for it. toda

>> that, i don't have that information. i'm sorry. >> so did the guy flee in his car and then he was detained? >> he was not on scene when we arrived. he was detained a short distance from the scene. >> did he run, did he -- >> that, i don't know. again, we're in the very early stages. i'm sorry, guys, i don't have any other information. >> do you know if a weapon was recovered? >> i don't know. >> do you know how many people were in the synagogue? is there a large amount of people in the back right now? >> there's a large group gathered behind the temple but i don't have any estimates on numbers. >> are they still there? >> yes. >> how many witnesses would you say? >> there's, again, i couldn't give an estimate to how many people were in the temple at the time and how many people we still have. >> was this a prayer or just business as usual? do you know what was going on inside the synagogue at the time? >> i don't know what was going on at the time. >> sir, if you could say your name again and spell it. >> aaron ma lien,

the consumer about what information is collected and how that information is going to be used so we need to have meaningful and said so a consumer can make a decision about using a product. >> what about the confusion that 50 separate state laws and then created? >> i understand that but i don't think there would have been a law in california and we not had this initiative . we were in the hammer that got everybody to the table and truthfully it was past due so we'll see. maybe california can be the hammer to get washington to agree to something and put a national standardtogether . >> mary stone ross, you are here in washington, are you protected under california law ? >> i am because i'm seen as california consumer so if my information was collected here, because i am californian, it just now when the law is in effect i will be protected. >> what have you heard from the new congress as a democratic house and a republican senate? >> there's so many different bills flying around there right now so we will see her all the pieces sort out in the end. >> senator marsha blackburn has be

they need to know the information because that is part of being an informed citizen. but i can remember a couple of stories where he just had little appetite for some of the very minute details, that he thought we were blowing secrets needlessly that didn't help inform readers. mrs. graham said you have to talk to people, and ben said you have to tell the truth, hold people accountable, but you don't have to put in the wiring diagram. suzanne: i couldn't say it better. andrea and david have already hit the, would it be in the public interest and are lives in danger? what worries me is we now live in an age where so many people call themselves journalists, and they are not traditional journalists with institutions that follow these rules and have these morals and have internal boards where they discuss the right and wrong of something. the thing that i worry about is the question, is it in the public interest now being replaced by, is it a sexy headline and is it going to give me a lot of clicks and followers? and sadly, i don't think people on the receiving end of tha

i don't have any information from the public information officer as to how many official requests were made at a later date. >> supervisor fewer: captain, i think what i'm trying to say, if the media has it in hand, and we saw it, and you're telling me that it is through these channels that they get it, then there would be a record, if it were released to the media via your protocols, there would be a record. my question to you, sir, is this is part of your investigation, i'm assuming. >> i apologize, i misunderstood the question. no, this release was not done through the -- we are investigating. it was not done through the official channels through the p.i.o. >> supervisor fewer: so what you're telling me today, you're taking this very seriously, as is the rest of the public, and many of the things you cannot tell us today because it's confidential information and the investigation is ongoing, is that correct? >> that is correct. >> supervisor fewer: and then, i think -- commander, did you want to add something? i'm so sorry. >> no, he answered the question exactly as you -- >> superv

some information that i think is going to be very informative to all of us. i know the mayor is very much looking forward to a report back. so i look forward to the meeting, look forward to learning from all of you and sharing what i learned with her. so, again, thank you for your work. >> thank you, sean, and thanks to mayor breed for both of your leadership and commitment to the prepared and resilient san francisco. i'm really humbled, as i look around the room, with all of the people that are here, who are also committed to that goal. and in today's meeting, we will be beginning with reports on our air quality initiatives, and we have new technology at 9-1-1 that we're going to share information about. we're going to talk about fleet week training and exercise program, which is coming up in the fall. fire will report on the fort funstin landslide incident. and we'll talk about the healthy streets operation center, and we'll be talking about the local business recovery efforts from the garian parker fire and gas line explosion. we've been very busy since ou

they didn't steal the information or conspire to steal the information. assange says he didn't. these were sources given to him. would that apply in this particular case in your view? >> yes, in fact i just wrote a column called "is this the next pentagon papers case?" i represented a mike covell. if they indicted him for merely publishes classified materials, this would be the pentagon paper's case modern version. but they were clever. they indicted him on a questionable basis for encouraging manning to try to get information for asking manning for the first part of a pass word into a computer. it factually is a very weak indictment but it doesn't indict him for publishing classified materials. one of the reasons, great britain wouldn't extradite someone for publishing information. if the allegation is conspiracy to try to essentially hack a government computer by getting into the password, then that might pass the level for extradition. this is going to take a long time. he's going to fight it. one question is, where does he stay while he's fighting it if he's in prison all th

the committee already had all that information, including the grand jury information and -- >> brennan it was an independent council which was structured differently. >> that's irrelevant. that's irrelevant. >> brennan: are you arguing that the information if it's shared with the committee would not leak publicly? can you guarantee that? >> certainly. some of it would not leak publicly. some of it would be decided. some grand jury information would -- you know, first of all, some grand jury information would presumably be decided must be released by court order to the public because the public interest would outweigh the privacy interest. that's happened in the past. it might happen again in the future, but again, the committee has a very good record of protecting information which it decides to protect. no -- >> brennan: lastly -- >> the president's former personal attorney michael cohen has released a memo, or his lawyers did, saying that he has 14 million files that have damaging information about the president. he's asking for help in getting his sentence reduced or at least delaye

to protect that information? so we need more accountability there, or legal responsibility when things go wrong. when it comes to privacy think we are in a wild west, i think we're in a immature and somewhat confused conversation. i do think regulars are trying to figure what the individuals need, policy makers, people on the hill are trying to figure that out. think companies are trying to figure out what their users expect of them. as we have more government engagement, i think those conversations will become more focused. >> you teach internet public policy at committee. what you want your students to leave with? >> for us all, i really want our students to leave with the understanding that the internet and all this technology we use is a work in progress. we can shape it to meet human needs. and all students are great engineers. we teach them how to build things. i went them to know they can build things that meet human needs. number two, i want them to have an understanding of the law and public policy envir

financial information, for example, maybe information about an extramarital affair.d. maybe a lawyer. inserts it into the campaign by telling a democratic republican, here is information we got legitimately. why encourage a foreign security service in the play ground of america to steal a bunch of stuff, pretend it is legitimate and influence an american election? why do you want to do that? when rudy says it depends on where it comes from and we ask the dnc and the rnc to conduct counter-intelligence operations to determine whether the information they receive is legitimate or not, i can't wait to see that. >> can i jump in here? president trump and his team are on the double standard diet here. don't forget september 2018 when the president had a cow because the chinese paid for content in the des moines register that he deemed was unflattering to him. the president talked about chinese foreign election interference, how wrong it was based on the unsponsored content in the u.s. newspaper. we didn't hear rudy giuliani saying there is nothing wrong with this and pres

the redactions everything from grand jury information to ongoing information. classified information and then information on peripheral third parties will all be redacted. how exactly this will all go down on thursday remains to be seen and how much will be redacted remains to be seen. as the attorney general has said we'll see more than the gist and we'll see it on thursday morning, john. >> thursday morning. laura jarrett, stay with us for the hour. joining me now manu raju, jackie kucinich and jackie cordero and shimon prokupecz. the barr testimony last week was testy at times and it will be as transparent as he believes he can be. help us what that means. >> the transparency issue is going to be on uncharged crimes, derogatory information, other investigations that, as we know, were started by mueller and then farmed out basically to other u.s. attorneys, grand jury information, classified information. so anything along those lines. everything that i just listed that the department of justice could view as essentially they don't want to violate their guidel

fisher calls regularly so you stay informed.e advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. >>> for 22 months we fought crickets from special counsel robert mueller's team. no updates, no documents, no leaks, no comment, never, nothing. that phase has apparently ended. a few hours after "the new york times" reported last night on mueller's investigators being frustrated with attorney general barr's summary of their findings saying their report is actually more damaging that the attorney general has made it sound. on the heels of that news "the washington post" had a significant advance in the story. among their revelations, quote mueller's team has complained the evidence they gathered on obstruction was alarming and significant. joining us now is carol, pulitzer prizewinning investigator at "the post." carol, it's

with that, we can store other information -- all information and retrieve the information and analyze it much more quickly and much more systematically. this is the basis for the use for i.t. now. we are also using, based on this system, and analytical platform which enables us to collect open source information. the numbers of pieces of information that we collect is incredible. billions of pieces of information, and we can analyze it very quickly. what we are doing now is different than what we were doing two years ago and 15 years ago. we also use imagery, and they are very helpful, especially when we are on the ground. satellite imagery is important but human knowledge is also important. we are using advanced technologies, but human eyes are indispensable and cannot be replaced by technology. that is why i am saying that using the experience inspectors -- losing the experienced inspectors would seriously hamper the activities. we have introduced a new approach. now we are focusing on countries as a whole and that makes it more effective. we also established highly specialized expe

are right now it's easier to get information as i said before it's easier to get information by simply asking a person for that access and you do that by social engineering talking about phone calls for example i can bypass every piece of internet security that a company or government has simply by picking up a phone spoofing a phone number which is when i call in and it will appear on the opposite side as someone else's number so i can spoof the phone call make it appear as if i'm a customer or a boss or anything else and convince that person that hey send me the money or give me access to your system and when that happens again it's game over the weakest link is always always the human being behind the software that's using. but i mean how do you deal with that you can't really fix the human error can you know you cannot fix the human error one of the things i say in a lot of presentations is that there's no patch for human stupidity now that being said you can do a lot of training for people so i advise companies to do simulated phishing attacks companies to have people come in and

cool it was all about promise it was all about the shiny future was all about the free flow of information but there was also a certain idealism behind it i think that a company like google we have the potential to make very big differences and big positive differences in the world and i think we also have an obligation as a consequence of facebook and google started with a great idea and great ideals unfortunately there was also a very dark side the goal though which or was it should make it our lives ferdy's but certainly there is a real community that existed realized. google handles sixty five percent of all internet search in the u.s. and even more overseas. in the early days google was just a search engine all the search engine was initially was an index to what's on the internet the internet was pretty small back then they had a better index than other indexes they were around theirs was not the first search engine page famously said that the point of google to get people on to google and off of google out into the open web as quickly as possible and largely they were really success

information that would impair the investigation and prosecution of other cases that are underway and finally information that implicates the privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties as you will see most of the redactions were compelled by the need to prevent harm to ongoing matters and to comply with court orders prohibiting the public disclosure of information bearing on ongoing investigations and criminal cases such as the ira case and the roger stone case. these redactions were applied by department of justice attorneys working closely together with attorneys from the special counsel's office as well as the a teligent community and prosecutors are handling the ongoing cases the redactions are very work product no redactions done by anybody outside this group there were no redactions done by anybody outside this group no one outside this group proposed any redactions and no one outside the department has seen the unredacted report with the exception of certain sections that were made available to i say the intelligence community for their advice on protecting

know information. there are stories for me the took years. but you work at them slowly. one nice thing about being a journalist is you don't get dropped around in different spots. i try to stay in touch with in the middleet east. trydevelop the sources, you to maintain a relationship of trust with them, you certainly try to protect them. you try to avoid being manipulated by them and their agendas as much as intelligence officers should, although i've seen many cases where they are prisoners of their information rather than masters of it. and then the responsibility we combine with the journalists both the collector and analyst. we collect the information and try to make sense. we write a story that tries to organize the facts with the lee -- with the lead and clarity. our job is to tell the truth. i've always thought there was a between ourus obligation to our readers. i always think i work for my readers, that's how i should judge with the right thing to do is. in truth we work for publishers. publis

because there will be could be targeted this information and information and government has rightly. taken off the social media just like last year it happened in march. targeted again it's a nation can use information campaign. on the buddhist and these individual groups of individuals who are doing these activities of terrorism so. that sir duncan. has the capacity. to take action against them and we need the cash. yes so they will catch him as well as bring them to the launch of. what is a cotton lease to. strengthen the. protected minority. from colombo thank you very much. let me bring you up to speed on the story we've been following for you this hour more than one hundred thirty people have been killed and four hundred injured in explosions of churches and hotels in sri lanka more blasts have been reported in the hours after an initial wave of attacks the first six explosions hit colombo as well as the town of not going well and in the east of the country a major church in colombo was one of the buildings hit other targets were five star hotels police have ordered an immediate

the to give specific information. they told him if he actually asked the question for 22.2 billion people for whom no administrative records, he would have got actual answers at 90% accuracy in the alternative was to use a statistical model to estimate citizenship, not for the 22,000,035,000,000 but they had not yet constructed that model and didn't know what the error rate in the model would be. >> i think, 90% sounds high. i think it's kind of irrelevant, too. the question is whether if you use the model, it would be greater than 98%. because then, secretary would have no basis for saying you should here's the question rather than the model. as for that, i think my colleagues are suggesting, there's a bottom line conclusion from the census bureau. the bottom line conclusion is that alternatives, the proposal that the secretary eventually took what still have all the negative cost and quality implications for alternative b which was adding question allowed and would result in order quality citizenship status density.

even if they come out with damaging information or embarrassing information, they are going against a that's been established. >>> everybody stick around. we're monitoring the breaking news for a woman that police are describing armed and dangerous after what they are calling a credible threat to schools in the denver area. new tattoo brow pomade from maybelline new york. ♪ for up to 24-hour sculpted brows. new tattoo brow pomade. only from maybelline new york. you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. flonase. who's already won three cars, two motorcycles, a boat, and an r.v. i would not want to pay that insurance bill. [ ding ] -oh, i have progressive, so i just bundled everything with my home insurance. saved me a ton of money. -love you, gary! -you don't have to buzz in. it's not a question, gary. on march 1, 1810 -- [ ding ] -frédéric chopin. -collapsing in 226 -- [ ding ] -the co