now we do, which is why i laid this out in the long piece for infowars, and why i have reported on it for the last week. i think you have real evidence, unlike the collusion investigation, of what could be the largest financial crime in history. >> just following up on the uranium one story, it is complicated. but as i understand it, part of what is new here is the focus on the investigation of bribery and corruption by an employee in the united states. the theory of your case is that mueller news that and should have alerted senior people in the justice department and the obama administration about it so that they could have pulled the plug on the uranium one deal, because it was being done by corrupt people in the russian government. the guy in charge of that case was ron rosenstein. the man who donald trump selected as the deputy attorney general, the number two man in his justice department. do you have evidence that rod concealing information in order to promote a cover-up of a russian takeover of uranium in the united states? stone: i think this was bumped to him by mr. mueller.