initiay, the sject's back wasoward thdeputies. when the deputy shouted the subct, heegan to rn toward hisight inhe direcon of thdeputy and so doin he movedhe gunoward thty diction ofhe deput and so doin and the dety's minet was he movedhe gunoward thty diction ofhe deput thate wafearful at heas goingo be sho - [ptestors]e want justice,e want jtice! and the dety's minet was (proteors channg) [narrato the rgest denstratio ever seein sona coty start immedialy ancontinuefor mohs. ever seein sona coty start immedialy - rotestor justiceor andy, juice for dy! - [narrar] tn took three months to complete. one central question was, did it look like andy was carrying toy gun or a real gun? here are witness account (contemplative ambientusic) thremonthsfter dy was kled, nished i inveigation port. the charge? brandishing a firearm replica. the offender? andy lopez. the victims? michael schemmel and erick gelhaus. police did not release the report to the public. the santa rosa police department forwarded the report to district attorney jill rav

initiay,t was tied to prohibiting the entry of assisting the entry ofonact laborers. then congress took away the limitaonn contract labor, it was assisting anyone's entry but still in 1952 it used the verb solicit and assist and it required the willfully or knowingly standard. then congress mod the men's rea requirement and required only kwlge or reckless diegd again, an expansion and congress removed the verbs solicit and assist to leave only the broader terms, encoura a induce and expanded to remaining in the country unlawfully in 1986, that was its final expansion. so over time, congress has constely shown its intent as evenced by the plain text to cover much more than solicitation or aiding in a i -- aiding and abetting. >> council, let us jusasme you are wrong about congress's intent. would you concede that if we acce t government's narrowing construction, let's sume the underlying offense is criminal, not civil, would you concede that you would lose your challenge if the government right about the narrower solicitation? >> if you were limiting it just to crimes