be getting reaction to sajid javid's spending announcements from ben zaranko from the institute for fiscal studies and paul waugh from huffpost uk. and at 10.40 and 11.30 we'll be looking at tomorrow's front pages with the brexit commissioning editor at the telegraph, asa bennett and political writier and acedemic, maya goodfellow. hello, i'm 0lly foster, here's what's coming up on sportsday tonight. the power of scotland. they're too strong for samoa, a bonus point win keeps their rugby world cup alive. dina's at the double in doha, 100 silver last night, now she's quickest in the 200 at the world athletics championships. cardiff are told by fifa that they have to pay the first installmenet of emiliano salas transfer fee. the striker who died in a plane crash shortly after joining the club. also coming up in the programme... big night at old trafford coming up, but manchester united against arsenal isn't as big as it used to be. and johnny be good. rae makes superbikes history with his fifth world title in a row. we managed to regain my composure and round by round we have come back, and to do it

the institute for fiscal studies has previously estimated that would cost {3.8 previously estimated that cuts made. was the chancellor away when drawing up his spending plans on the department for education budget as a whole has been slashed by almost £10 billion in real terms since 2010. so the reality is this, that heads will still be sending out begging letters and teachers will still be buying basic materials for their classes. and do you know, they have some front to mention childcare. after the hundreds of sure start centres closed under their watch, undermining the start in life for our children. they mentioned that £700 million was announced for children with special needs and disabilities. does the chancellor know that the local government association have found that councils already face a funding shortfall of £1.2 billion by 2021. so the reality is that these children will still be left vulnerable and in need and their injeopardy. that is what it means today. and on further education, further education coueges education, further education colleges are getting a one—off £400 mi

according to the institute for fiscal studies, in england since 2010 there has been a real terms cut%. up to now, the extra deprivation funding has helped buffer north denes, but now everyone knows job cuts are coming. myjob is at risk, yeah. at the minute, just seeing how it goes. i'm very concerned, because at the end of the day this is, this is what ijoined a school to do, if obviously i'm not here, if the other tas aren't here, it'sjust... ..some of them are challenging. so having not as many staff is going to be very difficult. i'm waiting...|‘m waiting for quiet. and i'm waiting for the boys to come and join us. well, lucas, you need to pick them up now, please. no! i don't want to! five—year—old lucas has autism. i don't want to! no! would you like a cuddle? he can't, he just can't cope being within, with all the other children at one time, doing what the other children are doing. trying to keep him involved which means that i'm not available then for the rest of the class. reception teacher christine is worried about the impact of losing a teaching assistant. when i was at sc

pauljohnson is the director of the institute for fiscal studies.ncellor has to increase spending. well, it depends how he defines his headroom, but he's probably got a bit more space to increase money on local government and social care and one or two other things. if you look at the forecasts back in the spring, they suggest he could increase spending next year by about £15 billion relative to what his plans were and that does leave a reasonable amount of money around. he's put significant money into schools and further education, he's announced some money for prisons and defence. there is more money there. he could, ithink, say, look, i really have finally ended austerity today. i'm increasing spending right across the board. the problem for him — in terms of, can he afford it? — is all of that will be based on forecasts made back in march. this is a big fiscal event with no report from his independent fiscal watchdog, and if there had been a report from that watchdog, i think they would have said, look, growth is less than we thought it was goin

what the institute for fiscal studies, the afs, reckoned todayis fiscal studies, the afs, reckoned todayllion —— ifs. those last promises were made —— £a billion or £5 billion -- ifs. on the face of it that looks like plenty to pay for these promises for school and the police and so on. but later this year, even with a smooth brexit outcome, we expect the government's fiscal watchdog, the office of budget responsibility, to downgrade its forecast for growth and that could cut down the money available to the chancellor. they may want to wait for those forecast before making big spending decisions. borrowing is one way. we heard there the economy, if the economy grows more he will have more to spend but the prospects are not as great as a lot of people would like them to be. he could raise taxes, that might be something we might hear a little bit about, but we haven't so far from the government, or they could be cuts elsewhere. they are the different ways of doing it. and the other thing about all of this is there is actually no guarantee this money is going to be spent like this, is there

we can speak now to pauljohnson, the director of the institute for fiscal studies.t is being talked about is new money? let's start with road spending, £25 billion, what is your assessment of that? i think it is worth remembering the government has already pledged some genuinely significant increases on infrastructure spending, starting with the last chancellor and going through the next several years. how much of this is new, in addition, to the total pledged? we just don't know at the moment but it is the case that spending on roads, rail and other infrastructure has been rising quite fast over the next couple of years and is planned to continue rising in the next few yea rs continue rising in the next few years to what is a historically high level by uk standards. how safe are those sorts of pledges? when it comes to meeting spending targets and needing money elsewhere, are they the sorts of projects that can be guaranteed to get them the money that was talked about initially? well, it is difficult to know how much the guarantee is. do not forget that in the 1990

political editor is back, faisal islam, the bbc‘s economics editor, pauljohnson from the institute for fiscal studiesi sunak, chief secretary to the side of treasury who was sitting beside sajid javid. the standout for you? it was the sort of rhetoric, the wrapper in which this was put. turning a page on austerity was to quote the chancellor wanted to get out there, and also that sort of, the rabbit in the hat at the end, which is amazing in a way, him saying no departments will be cut at all. because if you remember in previous spending reviews, when you protected big departments necessarily some of the smaller departments had really quite sharp cuts. none of that, he doesn't want any headlines for people to say there is a cut in any department, and that almost seems to be the aim. and if you look back at the central number around which one canjudge and if you look back at the central number around which one can judge a spending review past three, the day to day spending has been negative, 2015, 2010 as well, this one is plus 496, 2015, 2010 as well, this one is plus 4%, which is the highest figure

he was head of public policy at the institute of economic affairs for the center for policy studies in the u.k. he has written on a number of economic issues like fiscal policy, inequality, minimum wage and rent control. writes weekly columns for the daily telegraph and the london paper city a.m. dr. jean waldfogel who works for columbia university school of social work and the codirector of the columbia population reverts -- research center. she has written on the impact of public policy, the well-being of children and families. her work is focused on inequality in early childhood, childhood care and education and the black white achievement gap. she is the author of eight books and has published numerous articles in journals. rowe-finve ms. kristin kbeiner, who is the executive director and ceo of moms rising. she has been involved in public policy and grassroots engagement for over two decades and has received numerous awards for her work. she is an award-winning author of books and articles, frequent public speaker, media contributor and on the program breaking through. thank you. you for joining us today. we look forward to hearing your testimony