year's massive protests on the island nation of haiti with brian concannon from the institute for justice and democracy in haiti. you can see the protesters have flooded that the departure area if you can see they are all standing in front of the ticket counter right there would never see anything like this hundreds of protesters now we arrived a little over an hour ago and we were actually detained by police after the customs we were not able to get out of through customs and come to ground transportation now there were hundreds more protesters who were being copper sprayed by police and that made the protesters disperse so now they're gathered here again at the ticket counters you could see the american flag the u.s. flag right over there these protesters are protesting wanting a voice for democracy which is interestingly. enough because chinese officials have said that the u.s. is behind these protests saying that they are seller of a color revolutions sort of speak like we've seen in the past but these protesters that doesn't look like they're going away any time soon this is day 2 of cancellations

institution and to our democracy. >> thank you, mr. manager. >> chief justice? >> senator from alabama. >> i sent a question to the desk. >> thank you. the question from senator shelby is for counsel for the president. though not charged in the articles of impeachment, house managers and others have stated the president's actions constituted criminal bribery. can this claim be reconciled with the supreme court's unanimous decision in mcdonald versus united states? >> mr. chief justice, senator, thank you for that question. and i think the answer is no, it can't be reconciled with the mcdonald case. and let me make a couple of points in my answer. the first is, of course, because there is no bribery or extortion charged in the articles of impeachment, the managers can't rely on that now to try to establish their case. i pointed out yesterday, i believe, that that is a due process violation of the most fundamental sort, to have a charging document, and then -- and leave out certain charges in the charging document, then come to trial and say, well it's not in the indictment, it's not in charge, but, actually, what we have shown you is he did something else wrong, it was this

institution and to our democracy. >> thank you, mr. manager. >> chief justice? >> senator from alabama. >> i send a question to the desk. >> thank you. >> the question from senator shelby is fordent. not charged in the articles of impeachment, house managers and others have state d the president's actions constituted criminal bribery. can this claim be reconciled with the supreme court's unanimous decision in mcdonald v. united states? >> thank you for that question. the answer is, to, it can't be reconciled with the ms. speaker donald case. let me make a couple points in my answer. the first is, of course, because there were no bribery or extortion charged in the articles of impeachment, the managers can't rely on that now to try to establish their case. that's due process violation to have a charging document and then leave out certain charges in the charging document. then come to try and say, well, it's not in the indictment, it's not in the charge, but actually what we have shown you is he did something else wrong. it was this crime. is the house managers well know, that would result in an automatic mistrial than any actual trial in this country. the case made clear that