other estimates by the institute for public policy research spoke of it even more dramatic reductionost 15%. resulting pressures on local public health were exacerbated by an overall 49% real term cut in central government funding for local authorities between 2010—11 and 2016-17, and authorities between 2010—11 and 2016—17, and the resulting practice of top slicing whereby authorities reallocated my ring fence public health budgets to other services and broadly impacting health and well—being, such as trading standards or parks and green spaces. in 2010 healthy lives healthy people had promised to give local government freedom and responsibility in funding to innovate and develop their own ways of improving... thank you, public health in their area. freedom and responsibility had been granted but funding was often lacking. thank you. we can take that down. dame jenny agree the ring fenced public health budget reduced over time due to austerity?— to austerity? yes. i mean, those fiuures, to austerity? yes. i mean, those figures. i — to austerity? yes. i mean, those figures, i recogni