institute of philosophy and you are trying to brush off finding the answer, let's say. ne has their own truth. about each his own view of what is true objectivity exists. please, here are the lovely ladies, give the microphone to the girl. hello , my name is mariana, i am from kabardino-balkaria. here i am interested in such a topic, we held rallies against this war, just. do you think this is due to a lack of patriotic education. and how to give this education when people come out, sometimes they just don’t understand why and why. except when they were paid and when the sleeper grid is activated, which for a long time in our country have been waiting for us, when you start talking to people, you know, i have a very close friend doctor myasnikov is a great doctor, an amazing person. he was very worried when a special military operation began. it seemed to him that, well, maybe. despite the fact that he supports the president, he is such a very patriotic, minded person, he is 10 years old older than i tell him, sasha and you go there. so he took the doctors. i'm not a tea

miss trying to check, but again, we have a journalism department, the faculty of philosophy of social sciences, the instituteer specialties came to us, things of view. ah, students. we knew specifically by sight those people who spoke literally. these were four people, four students, who later we left our university, but again, here they are all coolly talking about it, giving interviews, but at the same time, when i look at the photos on the porch. except them a bunch of unfamiliar faces of my students, namely audio visas, which i knew all the faces at that time there weren’t such situations, very interesting, when, for example, these photos appeared on the porch. including weekends. we didn't know who these people were. that is, they just came to take pictures, because the fact is. it was just the place, it was just the faculty that they really wanted to see. we blame you or someone else. we're just saying that it was her problem, for sure. need more somehow get rid of it, if bsu teachers are still loudly declaring, let it not be your department of the same journalism department, that they are coming out,

institution like yours and your customers. >> first and foremost we think regulation ought to be tailored and follow the risks of individual institutions. and i think that's consistent with the philosophyt i think we all support. additional capital and higher costs cause us to actually

institution like yours and your customers. >> first and foremost we think regulation ought to be tailored and follow the risks of individual institutions. and i think that's consistent with the philosophy that i think we all support. additional capital and higher costs cause us to actually potentially imperil lending, a slowdown are lending and other things from a competitive standpoint to cover the cost of additional capital. >> we continue to have a very simple business model. although we are larger than we were a few years ago, the capital levels since 2007 are three times what they were at that time. we've a strong capital rating reflected in a high debt rating. additional capital will increase the cost of debt. >> we spoke yesterday about additional requirements for regulatory capital and liquidity standards and the impact it would have on the marketplace. can you speak to that? >> dodd-frank accomplished a lot of what needed to be accomplished. lehman brothers did not happen again. having said that as often happens things went a bit too far. it is not just capital, liquidity requirements, those do restrict lending, raise the cost of lending, damage markets a little bit, reduce mo

institution of slavery itself. so republican ism is a philosophy which has been with us for a long time, but it hasn't always been at the forefront of kind of thinking. it's had its good moments in its bad moments, but i hope you can see how it might naturally apply to the problem of digital technology that i've just been describing. if you take a republican approach to big tech, the problem isn't mark zuckerberg or elon musk you know asking elon musk going to do with twitter back in the day back when it looked like he was actually going to buy it. the problem is the idea of mark zuckerberg, the idea of elon musk, the idea that by acquiring great wealth or even just by a company, you can have political power within a society. the idea that we have to rely on that wisdom and goodwill to make important decisions about the future of the way that we live. and one of the things that really focused my mind when i was the book was three things happening within the space of about weeks before the last presidential election here in the us. the first thing that happened was that the new published an article which was unironic

of the libertarian institute. and what is happening? well, got a great group of guys that in girls that write articles and do podcasts and we publish, too. and what's the general philosophy of your podcast and articles? well, we're individualists, libertarians, anti-government types and with a special emphasis on foreign policy. but we cover a broad of issues there. now, you've also hosted antiwar radio. what is it? that's a show i host on kpfk 90.7 f.m. in los angeles, the pacifica affiliate there. i've been on the air there since about 2011. happens to be told the most powerful fm west of the mississippi river. so we cover all of southern california every sunday morning. and you talk about issues. yes. it's an interview show, especially with the experts and that tends to be on the liberal side of the political spectrum. when you think of antiwar activists, traditionally yeah, but anti-imperialism has always been at the core of libertarian. from the very beginning it was of the main breaks in side the right after world war two as the libertarians were essentially exiled the national review for refusing to support cold war. and then later, there's a big split famously be

of the ukrainian institute of national memory in the 14th and 16th years, and i would like to finally say that you can propose your topics to of our program, it's more history , philosophye, we talk about it, that's why there is my telegram channel, evening cotton, go there, write, you can search on facebook, vasyl winter in latin, subscribe, write your wishes, i will take them into account, because on our own, we still have to work in the interests of the audience, but also offer the audience what we think is necessary right now, that's why please consider writing and also e-e like share it with the press in social networks subscribe comment it's important now there should be ukrainian content and we should still look at it from a ukrainian point of view, this is our world, i will say goodbye to you until the 19th 15th in the great etarium, we will meet now, stay with the press, my colleagues will work after me and it will be interesting, for sure you will be interesting with us today take care, bye, see this week in the collaborators program, a list of miklushka traitors, handcuffs, for which crimes the kremlin's posipaks will have to answer, she sold him information

think that regulation ought to be tailored and followed the risk of individual institutions and i think that's consistent with a philosophy that we all support. additional capital at higher cost causes us to actually potentially impair lending or slow down lending. it may cause us to do other things from a competitive standpoint to cover the cost of additional capital. >> is that what u.s. bank thinks >> thank you we continue to have a very simple business model and although we are larger than we were a few years ago, the businesses we're in are substantially the same our capital levels since 2007 are actually 3x what they were at that time so we believe we have a strong capital rating which is reflected in our high debt rating. additional capital will increase the cost of debt. >> mr. dimon, you spoke yesterday about additional requirements for regulatory capital and liquidity standards and the impact it would have in the marketplace, will you speak to that? >> yes, sir. i give credit where credit is due. dodd frank accomplished a lot. i think the regulators should take a victory lap for that. having said that, things we

goes to an institution of higher education in soviet times, for example, i entered from the fourth time i was not a member of the communist party and i could not enter either history or philosophye fourth time after the army to the preparatory department, well, i am such a person that i focused on higher education and then on the academic field, yes, if i , although i studied, i also studied at a vocational school, but let's say if you went to a vocational school and then went to a factory, the factory provided such a certain social security. i hope that with the development of our economy of course, we will have the fact that fewer people will go to higher education, but these requirements will be much greater, and more will go to the labor market, to the labor market, and to professional training. you will enlighten me and enlighten me a where did this disdainful attitude come from? i still remember that at school the teacher said that if you don't study, you will go to vocational school. well, that's how it was. where did it all come from here? i'll tell you that we have many people who left in our class and and from the eighth grade and then even after the tenth, they went

institution like yours? and your customers? >> ranking member thank you for that question. first and foremost regulation ought to be tailored and following the risk of individual institutions. that is consistent with the philosophyhat we all support. additional capitol at higher costs costs us to potentially impair lending or slow down our lending. it may cause us to do other things from a competitive standpoint to cover the cost of additional capitol. >> is that what u.s. bank thanks? >> thank you. we continue to have very simple business model for although wefa are larger than we were a few years ago, businesses are substantially the same bird capitol level since 2007 are actually 3x what they were that time. i do believe you have very strong capitol rating which is reflected in her high debt rating for additional capitol will increase the cost of debt. >> mr. diamond, we spoke yesterday about additional cleaning standards the impact would have in the marketplace. we speak to that? >> yes, sir. i give credit where credit is due. dodd frank law that it needed. having said that, things went a little bit too far. it was not just capitol liquidity requirements international requirements, to restrict lending, raise

institute classes, it opens, uh, before you new possibilities in theory. you learn a lot by studying all these basics. here is the engineering support of all disciplines philosophycs physics. biology chemistry military engineers of the troops of the national guard perform many difficult and dangerous tasks provide the conditions for maintaining the constant combat readiness of the troops. for their advancement , deployment and maneuvers. they protect troops and facilities from weapons of destruction stop the actions of offenders and the enemy soldiers engineers of the russian guard participate in ensuring the security of mass events make an invaluable contribution to the fight against terrorism and extremism only one of their many functions, they protect and block, build and destroy, use multi-ton equipment and modern electronics, but by tradition these specialists are called sappers. for those who do not have the right to make a mistake, the training of such officers is an extremely difficult task. an engineer, accordingly, the task is very much, starting there with engineering reconnaissance, verification of reconnaissance of the area. all our military roads a

of individual institutions. i think that it's consistent with a philosophy that we all support.nal capital at a higher cost caused us to actually potentially impair lending or slow down lending, it may cause us to do other things from a competitive standpoint to cover the cost of additional capital. >> is that what u.s. bank thinks, mr. cecere? >> thank you. we continue to have a very simple business model. although we are larger than we were a few years ago, the businesses that we are in our substantially the same. our capital levels since 2007 are actually three times what they were at that time. we believe we have a very strong capital rating, which is a identified in art that rating. additional capital will increase the cost of debt. >> mr. dimon, we spoke yesterday about additional requirements for regulatory capital and liquidity standards and the impact would have on the marketplace. would you speak to that? >> yes, sir. to give credit where credit is due, dodd-frank accomplished a lot of what needed to be accomplished. lehman brothers will not happen again, i think they

of the libertarian institute. and what is happening? well, got a great group of guys that in girls that write articles and do podcasts and we publish, too. and what's the general philosophyof your podcast and articles? well, we're individualists, libertarians, anti-government types and with a special emphasis on foreign

of the ukrainian institute of national memory in the years 14-16, and i want to say at the very end that you can propose your topics to our world program , it is more history, philosophybout it, that's why there is my telegram channel evening cotton go there write, you can search on facebook. and vasyl winter in latin. subscribe, write your wishes, i will consider them, take them into account, because we still have to work in the interests of the audience, but also offer the audience what we consider necessary right now, that's why, take care, write, and also , like, spread espresso in social networks, subscribe, comment, it's important now, there should be ukrainian content, and we should still look at this, uh, our world, i'll say goodbye until 7:15 p.m. we will meet on the big airwaves now stay with the press my colleagues will work after me and it will be interesting for sure you will be interesting with us today take care goodbye thank you nine-year-old anastasia mihno about the fate of this girl for more than four months nothing unfortunately, the details of the route of the disappearance are also unknown. i am also lying. i only know that the child lived in the

think that regulation ought to be tailored and followed the risk of individual institutions and i think that's consistent with a philosophyt. additional capital at higher cost causes us to actually potentially impair lending or slow down lending. it may cause us to do other things from a competitive standpoint to cover the cost of additional capital. >> is that what u.s. bank thinks >> thank you we continue to have a very simple business model and although we are larger than we were a few years ago, the businesses we're in are substantially the same our capita

the queen's essential philosophy has beamed that her personality, or even the personalities of those surrounding her and her family are of secondary importance to the institution of monarchy itself. and that the institution of monarchy is essential to the well being of the united kingdom and that therefore as long as the marquis itself remains fable, then the u. k. can remain stable as well. while if you are just joining us, i think it's worth another recap. we are getting news from the united kingdom in the last are coming out to half an hour. so the queen of england is on well, we understand she's on that medical supervision at our moral. that's her home in scotland after doctors became concerned for her health. we received a statement or buckingham palace issued a statement saying that's a following father evaluation this morning. the queen's doctors have been concerned for her majesty's health and have recommended that she remain at bell moral. we've also had from the new british prime minister list trust her, of course just met with the queen just a few days ago as her home in scotland. or when she was officially appointed. as the new prime minister. she

philosophy. but we need to look at it beyond just units themselves and really start talking about how do we help people stabilize off the streets, out of institutions, with the support services they need to live the best lives they can. there is a group of people, about 40% of folks coming to our shelters every day, that are not self-resolving, and do not have that access even if we had enough vouchers, they are not qualifying. that is why, when we talk about models that can bring in the public, and also have other benefits to the community. the reason something like work works can benefit is because it creates better quality of life for the whole community, which gets more people involved in wanting to solve this issue. that is an important point we need to remember, we need a communitywide approach, not just one that is focused on cap -- focused on government or service providers. >> i'm going to wrap up in just a moment but i want to see if ms. monet would like to add anything more to this question about housing and health, and what do we do to break down the barriers around those two issues. ms. monet? >> there is a great deal of housing resour

at it as a category of philosophy, but we need to look at it beyond units themselves and really start talking about how do we help people stabilize off the streets, outed institutions, with the support services they need to live the best life that they can. and there is a group of people, as i mentioned, about 40% of folks who are coming into our shelters every day that are not self resolving, and indeed, do not have those access. even if we had enough units in, even if we hadn't vouchers, they are not qualifying. so, that is why, i think, when we talk about model second bring in the public, and also other benefits to the community, the reasons why something like work works can really add value was community is the business community. it creates better conditions for quality of life for the whole community, which gets more people involved in wanting to solve this issue. i think that is an important point that we have to remember. we need a community wide approach, not just one that is focus just on governments or service providers. thank. you >> thank you. i want to wrap up in just a moment, i will see if miss monet warmest ten broke the connection between housing

of individual institutions. i think that it's consistent with a philosophy that we all support. additional capital at a higher cost caused us to actually potentially impair lending or slow down lending, it may cause us to do other things from a competitive standpoint to cover the cost of additional capital. >> is that what u.s. bank thinks, mr. cecere? >> thank you. we continue to have a very simple business model. although we are larger than we were a few years ago, the businesses that we are in our substantially the same. our capital levels since 2007 are actually three times what they were at that time. we believe we have a very strong capital rating, which is a identified in art that rating. additional capital will increase the cost of debt. >> mr. dimon, we spoke yesterday about additional requirements for regulatory capital and liquidity standards and the impact would have on the marketplace. would you speak to that? >> yes, sir. to give credit where credit is due, dodd-frank accomplished a lot of what needed to be accomplished. lehman brothers will not happen again, i thi