steinmeyer on his counterpart who kenyatta paid a visit to the institute of science and technology where kenyatta was eager to show his country's enthusiasm for vocational education star and mara praised his own country's dorji cation system that combines theoretical training with practical training at companies. he also made it clear that africa's continued economic development is in europe's own interest. as germany's hopefully if it can your encompasses about a 1000000000 euros let's talk about that with so little nico who's in robey. first of all why is germany so keen on pumping all that money into nigeria into kenya. well kenya is basically basically germany's biggest trading partner east africa and it is the biggest economy in the region so what basically became clear over the last few days is that germany seems to see kenya as a stabilizing force in the region so for one thing they are there fighting terrorism for example in somalia and in kenya as well and they also like germany a refugee hosting nation so investing in kenyans and especially young kenyans and educating them is s

contracts and all restricted and conditional gifts or contracts from all with all foreign sources to the massachusetts institute of technology such as the skolkovo institute of science and technology u.s. law state colleges must report foreign donations if the institution is not u.s. and or if the gift exceeds a quarter of a $1000000.00 which is far less than the multi-million dollar contract with skull tag. when we started in 2011 russia was an ally we had the sort of relationships between scald and then mighty that there would be between any 2 universities we exchange some scholars some professors go in and give lectures we attracted $140.00 or $150.00 professors from around the world mit has an international policy. in the school to collaboration began in 2011 with student exchanges and pooled research more than 100 projects have already been completed we heard from school tech. we did transparent our. universities called is absolutely transparent absolutely all we are completely international i'd like to emphasize that mit is not our only international didn't last 4 years we published in course. one falzon international universities so we have broadened there to

contracts and all restricted and conditional gifts or contracts from or with all foreign sources to the massachusetts institute of technology such as the skolkovo institute of science and technology u.s. laws state colleges must report foreign donations if the institution is not american owned or if the gift exceeds a quarter of a $1000000.00 which is far less than the multi-million dollar contract with skull tag it is the intent of the f.b.i. for the recipients of the bullets in about skolkovo to use the information to inform the decision making process when selecting foreign investors to protect their interests which results in safeguarding our nation's interests the collaboration began in 2011 where student exchanges and pulled research more than 100 projects have already been completed we heard from the president of caltech. we don't bet on. us it's cultic episode so it's a bit old we're completely international. you know in divorce time of cold war our relationships. of science was very cool and the same days the science is international is a little the science is absolutely international and old sanctions old sunfish is more powerful for the company which ysa

gifts contracts and all restricted unconditional gifts or contracts from all with all foreign sources to the massachusetts institute of technology such as the skolkovo institute of science and technology u.s. laws state colleges must report foreign donations if the institution is not american own or if the gift exceeds a quarter of a $1000000.00 which is far less than the multimillion dollar contract with caltech it is the intent of the f.b.i. for the recipients of the bullets in about skolkovo to use the information to inform the decision making process when selecting foreign investors to protect their interests which results in safeguarding our nation's interests. the collaboration began in 2011 where student exchanges and pooled research more than a 100 projects have already been completed we heard from the president of caltech. transparent. university. the transparent absolutely. completely international team i'd like to emphasize that mit does not only international didn't last 4 years we published in coarsening. paper. while falzon interim ational reverses so we have broad net or broad net or call for. do all i think there is been somewhat of a. mixture of politic

gifts contracts and all restricted unconditional gifts or contracts from or with all foreign sources to the massachusetts institute of technology such as the skolkovo institute of science and technology u.s. law state university is must report foreign donations if the institution is not american own or if the gift exceeds a quarter of a $1000000.00 which is far less than the multimillion dollar contract with caltech it is the intent of the f.b.i. for the recipients of the bullets in about school to use the information to inform the decision making process when selecting foreign investors to protect their interests which results in safeguarding our nation's interests that's called collaboration began in 2011 with students exchanges and pulled research more than 100 successful projects have already been completed we heard from school taken themselves. we have. our. universities is. absolutely open we are completely international. you know in the. cold war our relationships. of science was very cool and this same is the science is international law the science is absolutely international and all sanctions all sanctions more harmful for the country which e.c. to these sanc

and gentlemen. pleased on behalf of the penn state dickinson law, penn state institute for computational and sciences, the center for democracy and technologyjustice,an center for to welcome you to what i timely, to be a very obviously a very, very important symposium. at the outset, i want to thank participants. we've got an incredible array

of facial recognition algorithms, as raised by this committee used and facial recognition systems to identify and mitigate the invisible bias. we will continue to support the collaborative relationship between the national institute of technology, the science technology director and office up by metric, and opponents such as u.s. border protection. and carrying out its mission, we advice dhs components by participating an enterprise level groups working on recognition issues, and we directly engage with component, we are regularly engaging cbp on the implementation of face recognition technology, we advice on policy implementation, for individuals wearing religious headwear or with a religious objection with, and individuals that may have the injury. even for home may percent challenges may not be possible. as the facial recognition problems evolve, they'll be collaborating directly with cbp to address additional impacts. further, they will engage communities to vote to inform, and address critical concerns. for additionally, we will evaluate alleged violations of civil rights to further inform our policy, we understand the successful recognition technology requires ongoing oversight and quality assurance. additional validation, and a clos

of data science and technology, the critical need for interdiscipline groups to come together, sharing the diversity of perspectives and opening new doors to discover is unquestionably important. i'm delighted that penn state's institute for computational and data sciences, penn state school of dickinson law are collaborating today with the brennan center for justice, the center for democracy and technology, and governor ridge to host this event, tackling this critical issue for our democracy. i ask you to take advantage of this exceptional group, to continue or initiate conversations that will lead to action in support of this grand challenge. thank you all for joining us here today, and thank you again, anne and governor ridge, for bringing us together. [applause] prof. mckenna: again, chief button pusher. i want to introduce larry norden. it's my pleasure to introduce larry, the director of the reform program. welcome, larry. i think you press the buttons , too. larry: yes, i can. which button am i pressing? [laughter] larry: this one. ok. terrific. thank you, anne. thanks to all of the groups involved in partnering with the brennan center for justice on the event today. i think it's going to be an interesting and

in silicon valley to turn left and put on too many regulations pre-we have a president cutting the's -- institute of health's budget. i want to say science and technologyhat made america great, let's embrace that again and put money in the innovation and send people to other planets and do the space industry and genetic editing. let's do these things that our conservative government now is afraid to do. >> thank you. ms. maxwell. >> imagine me sitting next to a trans-humanist. artificial intelligence is not for me. i am happy with the intelligence we have had this past eons. any changeso making to humanity but if changes are to be made, i want to know who is making and if we can talk about it to them. such things as algorithms have taken over. i don't remember anyone asking us if we wanted that to happen. thank you for the invitation. you are welcome at my home in concord. please come visit me where i will do my best to force you to sign up for the state rep job. is mr. gardner still here? present, ma'am but you are on the clock. >> 18 years is the age of? 18 you can become a candidate? >> she is asking you if the state rep is 18 years? i'm taking up h

recognition systems to identify and mitigate -- crcc will continue to support the collaborative relationship between the national institute of set -- the dhs science technology -- and dhs components including u.s. customs and border protection to that end in carrying out its mission, crcl advices the ages components and department offices by participating in enterprise level groups working on biometric and facial recognition issues. further, crcl directly engaged with dhs components. for example, crcc all is engaging with cbp in the implementation official recognition technology with biometric entry and exit programs. crcl advised an appropriate combinations for individuals wearing religious headwear, for individuals with a sincere religious objection to be photographed, and for individuals who may have a significant injury or disability, and for whom taking photographs may present challenges or not be possible. as dhs and their facial recognition programs, evolve crcl will be collaborative directly with cbp, -- further, see our ceo will engage communities with cbp and dhs snp to inform the public regarding the programs and address potential concerns. finall

of social change worldwide. and by the alfred p. sloanon foundaupporting science, technology and improved performance. and financial literacy in the 21st century. >> and with the ongoing support of these institutions of the newshour. >> this program was maderi possible by cotions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank yo >> this is pbs newshour west and from our bureau from theton walter cronkite school ofsm journarom arizona state university. ♪ >> you are watching pbs. ♪ ♪ - today on milk street, we're going to explore the cooking of north africa. i we stamarrakesh. we make a tangia, which is a meat stew with and sorts of spicesreserved lemons. and then we go to cairo and walk the streets to find two great vegetarian dishes. one is a spicy cumin and coriander potato dish, and the other is eggplant in a spicyauce. so, stay tuned as we explore the cooking of north africa. - funding for this series was provided by the following.

of social change worldwide. >> and by the alfred p. sloan foundation. supporting science, technology, and improved economicperformancl literacy in the 21st century. >> and with the ongoing support of these institutions and friends of the newshour. >> this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting.d contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. captioning sponsored by newshour productions, llc captioned by media access group at wgbh access.wgbh.org >>> hello, everyone, and welcome to "amanpour & co." here's what's coming up. >> this victory here is the beginning of the end for donald ump. >> bernie sanders wins in ne hampshire with moderates hot on his heels, but can his populism beat donald trump's? we'll speak to congressman ro khanna. >>> and then, why e global climate change movement could reshape finance. we talk to blackrock's brian deese as the loudest voice on ll treet takes a stand on coal. >>> plus, as the battle to contain the coronavirus intensifies, we look at another of its side effects, racism.

of social change worldwide. >> and by the alfred p. sloan foundation. supporting science, technology, and improvor economic pence and financial literacy in the 21st century. >> and with the ongoing support of these institutions and friends of the newshour. >> this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting. and by contributions to ur pbs station fromiewers like you. thank you. captioning sponsored by newshour productions, llc captioned by media access group awgbh access.wgbh.org to "amanpour." here's what's coming up. soaring, poverty is plummeting. >> trump touts a boomi economy his state of the union address. responding for the democrats, the governor of michigan tells me that is not what she's seeing in her swing state. >>> then a different take. ♪ >> david byrne's "american utopia." i speak to theheormer talking s front man about his brdway hit and his incredible career. plus -- >> we're coming out as broke. >> we're here, we're bke, get us to it. >> america's favorite nanny, fran drescher, returns in the new sitcom "indebted".

and by the alfred. sloan foundation supportin science, technology and improved financial performance and econom century.y in the 21st these institutions --upport ofriends of "newshour." this program was made possiblehe byorporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs statn fromiewers like you. thank you. this is "pbs newshour" west from ta studios in washington and our bureau from the waer cronkite bureau of journalism at arizona state university. ♪ [captioning performed ap the nationaloning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy.] ♪ ♪ - the cooking of thailand is very much like the cooking of the philippines or cambodia or china, at least in terms of the south versus the north. the southern part of the country has more spices and the northern part of the , brighter recipes. so we're going to start in southern thailand with two recipes-- a cumin- coriander fried chicken and also a braised pork dish with cloves ancinnamon. and then we go to the northern part of thailand to make larb, which is a minced beef salad, which is light and bright ju with cilantro, lime, and mint.

and university in the united states. folks at those institutions are concerned because they're typically not subject to this kind of enforcement scrutiny. reporter: the office of science and technologyinside of the white house believes countries like china and others see that universities as soft target. the director says that they want to make sure that this money does not buy influence to get to the research. he agrees. >> china trying to influence what's happening in the united states. china trying to steal trade secrets and this to me is a whole of government response from the united states government. we don't expect this kind of thing from the department of education and that's why this is so unique. reporter: the department of education found that from 2014 to 201815 u.s. schools received more than $15 billion from hand ban alone, a propaganda arm of the chinese government. last july the office of science and technology policy created a hub for all departments as well as universities to try to track this kind of thing as well as cut down on the fact that this money could open doors to get that research. back to you. charles: edward, thank you very much. so what can we do abou

and save taxpayer dollars. congress has been described as an 18th century institution using 20th technology. we recommend re-establishing the office of technology assessment to dress modern science technology challenges. all proceedings and functions of the house shall be made accessible to all americans. we sell bait the 30th anniversary of the signing of the americans with disabilities act. there is still a lot of work to do to ensure that americans with disabilities do not face discrimination. we address the equal challenges when working for, visiting or sbrling acting with congress. before i continue and dive into the other work, i want to invite my colleague and vice chair, tom graves, to say a few words. tom has been a terrific partner and i value the way he has approached this committee approaching these as problems to be solved, not working to score political points and like every member of this committee has had his oar in the water trying to move this forward. i yield to mr. graves. mr. graves: let me thank you for your great work and your work has been remarkable and thank you for that example. i rise today not only to commend my good friend from washington state but

and gentlemen. pleased on behalf of the penn state dickinson law, penn state institute for computational and sciences, the center for democracy and technology, and justice,an center for to welcome you to what i timely, to be a very obviously a very, very important symposium. at the outset, i want to thank participants. we've got an incredible array of in thes, participanting forum. i want to thank the guests that have taken the time to join us morning, to discuss this subject. and i also want to reach out and to c-span for covering something that i think us think is critically important. undisputed that there are people that have been hacking into our elections for a long, long time. evidence is indisputable. start with 2016. but i think if we look back have seent, we might there were some people playing around in that arena, even before that time. so when we decided to get together to these organizations symposium toher a keel with hacking in u.s. thetions and how to make 2020 election more secure. so we're grateful that you joined us this morning. from the view in the audience -- the audience will probably remember but i did happen to tal

of social chang worldwide. >> andy the alfred p. sloan foundation. supporting science, technology, anproved economic performance and financial literacy in the 21st century. >> and with the ongoing support of these institutions and friends of the newshour. >> this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting. and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. ca ioning sponsored by newshour productions, llc captioned by media access group at wgbh acce.wgbh.org >> you're watching pbs. >>> hello,veryone, and welcomeur to "aman co." here's what's coming up. >>> change is coming and it's going to be president -- presidt bernie sanders. >> confidence from the sanders camp heading into the south carolina primary. i speak to campaign co-chair nina turner. >>> then fighting for truth and justice and against sexism, prosecutor jill wine-banks, the author of watergate girl. >>> plus -- t >> i wre because i knew and understood if i didn't fight them there, they would have the time andpace to plan another 9/11. >> he speaks to afan war

of black female institutions. would end at the men. still he went from view. it would crush the notion that faster than sound flight. was it physical impossibility. they would amplify the power of the science and technology to unthinkable dimensions. no one anticipated that millions of wartime women would refuse to lead the american workplace. or that american negroes would persist in their demand for full access to the founding ideals of their country and not be moved. the mathematicians who walked in in 1943 would find themselves at the intersection of the great transformations. they contribute to what the united states would consider one of the greatest victories. in 1943 america existed in the urgent present. responding to the needs of the here and now butler took the next step making a note to add another item to sherwood a metal bathroom sign spearing the words colored girls. >> that oscar awards are this sunday and we are taking the opportunity to show you some of the authors from the archives. up next they describe a secret wing of the u.s. military that was formed in 1979. the film starring george clooney. in 1995 the cia declassified the fact they sounded incredibly glamorous. it was half a doz

of paper ballots. georgetown law's institute for technology, law and policy, hosted this series. >> hi, welcome. so i'm mac, a professor here at georgetown, in the law school and computer science department. i welcome you to our after lunch panel. thank you for sticking around. on digital technologies and coding. we have on our panel who i will introduce very briefly, four very distinguished experts at various parts of the digital elections landscape, and the technology and the risks of some of the underlying technology that is inherent there. and we'll be talking about this subject for, from a very wide range of different perspectives, but all with a very technological bias. so i'm going to very briefly introduce these people and i want to apologize now for being extremely incomplete in my introductions because they would take up the entire panel. andrew appel is a profess her of computer science at princeton, where he served since 1986, and in fact, he was one of the members of my doctoral committee at princeton. his research focuses on software verification, security programming languages, and technology policy, and in the case of the latter, particularly with a focus on el

of paper ballots. georgetown law's institute for technology law and policy hosted this series. >> hi. welcome. so i'm matt blaze. i'm a professor here at georgetown in both the law school and computer sciencedepartment. i want to welcome you to our after-lunch panel. thank you for sticking around. on digital technologies and voting. we have, on our panel, who i will introduce very briefly, four very distinguished experts at various parts of the digital elections landscape. and -- and the technology and the risks of some of the underlying technology that is inherent there. and we'll be talking about this subject for -- from a very wide range of different perspectives. but all with a very technological bias. so i'm going to very briefly introduce these people. and i'm going to apologize now for being extremely incomplete in my introductions because they would take up the entire panel. andrew apel is the higgins professor of science at princeton where he served since 1986. and, in fact, he was one of the members of my doctoral coit