. >>> is it a case of religious persecution or employee insubordination. we will take a look at both sides. >>> a small plane missing along the border of virginia and west virginia for four days has been located as well as the three bodies of the people on board. police will only say all three of the individuals are from pennsylvania. the crash site was spotted in hardy county, west virginia. >>> dozens of saying they are outraged claiming the rental car company suspended them from work. 34 muslim shuttle drivers at the seattle tacoma airport are under suspension. >> it was understood that the muslim employees would not be required to clock in and out for their breaks. they just take what are called intermittent breaks and they go pray and get a cup of tea and would not be required to log out. >> hertz say this is about following the rules laid out in the worker's collective bargaining agreement. that 2009 document says employees do need to clock out during their two 10-minute breaks each day. hertz said it suspended the workers because they were not follo

shortly after that the school informed her she had been fired for insubordination. she went to the equal employment opportunity commission and claimed she was being retaliated against for filing... for threatening to file a discrimination charge. the e.e.o.c. took it to court. the church claimed she wasn't being retaliated against, she was insubordinate because she violated a tenet of the church's religion that disputes should be handled internally, not going to court. >> woodruff: so what's the question before the justices and how did they question the sflaurz >> well, the case got to the court because the church lost in the federal appellate court which said that the ministerial exception that the church wanted to apply here didn't apply. that she was not a minister. >> woodruff: meaning the church would not have to abide by the rules of the equal employment? >> exactly. so the supreme court today heard arguments on what is the ministerial exception? who is a minister and should it apply to cheryl parrish? >> woodruff: and in the questioning, what sense did you ge

it twas for insubordination. i said the claim was correct but the punishment was incorrect. i got tenure the following year. what it has meant is that i could speak freely. i have often taken issue with things that my own institution has done. some administrators to not like me very much. others think when i disagree with my own institution it is because i care about what the future is. they have given me the freedom to speak freely. it has given me the freedom to challenge my students which is essential. i teach courses that students find upsetting. i have to work carefully with them to be able to deal with the material. i teach a course on the holocaust regularly. it places a lot of strain on students. tenure has let me work hard to bring out the best in most students and challenge them. give me the job protection i need. >> do you think you still have a job if you did not have tenure? >> i gave it up a few years ago. >> what? >> tenure. >> how does that work? >> i wanted to teach less so that i could do more national work. it has enabled me to do a lot of rot and visit a

perhaps discourage further insubordination and otis recalled lawton and took charge of the campaign top up the residual resistance around the capital. somewhat less than glorious duty for one of the highest-ranking journals in the army. he led to san mateo village 18 miles northeast of manila. in a driving rain the u.s. forces encountered an insurgent force awaiting them entrance is near the manichaean or river. lawton pace back-and-forth behind the firing line personally ordering his soldiers on her. the filipino general likely searching for it clear reference point by which to direct fire for the downpour directed his -- death shooters to concentrate their fire on the tall figure wearing a brilliant white helmet and bright yellow rain slicker. one of the a's was hit surely thereafter. lawton carried him to shelter and despite his promise to retire to a safer position returned to the firing line. suddenly he made an awkward move in front of his face. >> i am shot lawton replied. where? to the lungs. with blood pouring from his mouth his tall frame flung to the wet ground and within mi

this is the law insubordination. just one sentence. says you can't do it. >> my recollection but i will refer to counsel to. >> trace: congressional democrats dismissing the hearing as a kangaroo court saying that house republicans only allowed treasury officials to testify today. nobody from the doe. >> instead of helping america lead the world in clean energy. the republic controlled house is doing everything possible to maintain our addiction to fossil fuels. >> trace: all this the day after relearned solyndra's ceo had stepped down. mike emanuel with the news. is he live on capitol hill tonight. mike, we're just now hearing about the white house's refusal to handover documents. >> that's right, trace. a letter sent late afternoon from the white house counsel, the top lawmakers in the house energy and commerce committee. in it she writes, quote: there is nothing in the documents produced by doe, department of energy, omb, the office of manage and budget. treasury or the white house that the white house intervened in the solyndra loa

i don't know how you view that but that seems like insubordination of a high degree and at worst disobedience of orders from his commander in chief. so you asked for evidence of that or look for evidence of that, one of the details that impressed me greatly and i decode an entire chapter to this is what westmoreland did or did not do with respect to arming the south vietnamese as well as the enemy was armed, look at the m-16 rifle as an example of that. he never did anything until abrams came on the scene as the deputy in may of 1967 that the vietnamese began to get any help at all. so i think lyndon johnson was persuaded and i don't know by what sources that pacification was important. after abrams took command we had a magnificent team. the ambassador in charge of the embassy and abrams in charge of the military and will mm-hmm -- william colby in charge of pacification and they agreed it had to be one work of combat operations but much changed and pacification and upgrading south vietnam's are forces. only then they said we could succeed. >> can i ask one more? short question. besides john

now i don't know how you view that, but that seems like vast insubordination of a higher degree and at worst as commander-in-chief. so, you've asked for evidence of that or we look for evidence of that. one of the details that impressed me greatly and i devote an entire chapter to this is what westmoreland did or did not do with respect to arming the south vietnamese as well as the enemy was armed. look at the m-16 and the fact is he never did anything before that. he was seen as deputy in may of 1967 that the vietnamese began to get any help at all. so i think lyndon johnson was persuaded and i don't know by what's worse is that the pacification after abrams took command, we had the ambassador ellsworth and then charged of support for pacification and they agreed it had to be one war or combat operations, but much change from the big cities. and pacification and upgrading south vietnam's armed forces. and only that way they said could we succeed. >> thank you. could i ask one more? >> to we have time for one more or no? >> short question. in the book, besides johnson mcnamara and whee

or not the department of energy follow the law when it agreed to loan restructuring including insubordination clause meaning taxpayers would be paid after investors, it solyndra filed for bankruptcy. republicans say, that is illegal. >> you cannot ignore the law. is very clear! >>reporter: officials see skepticism. >>pam: new at 5:00 p.m., an american catholic bishops facing criminal charges. a high-ranking official is being accused of not protecting the safety of children. >>pam: caught on tape, fronting mollet's or people in a car as eight tornados lease into traffic. new information about home sales in the bay area, there is a report of more people buying homes, that is not exactly a good thing. >>stanley: coming out, in two weeks, an illegal dump site comes into a possible toxic wasteland. that is in the next edition of people behaving @ [people chatting] everyone, it's $37 a piece. paying with your smart phone instead of cash. that's a step forward. with chase person-to-person quickpay, you can send money directly to your friend's checking account. all you need is their email address or

tell her that they're going to recommend recission of her call, they say, because -- because of insubordination and because you threatened to sue us. justice breyer: i mean, does anyone explain to her, which she might not have known, that this is a religious doctrine that you are supposed to go to the synod or whatever, and you're not supposed to go to court? mr. laycock: she -- justice breyer: of course, they wanted to fire her because she threatened to sue them. but what i'm wondering is, is there anywhere before the motion for summary judgment where someone explains to her, our motivation here is due to our religious tenet? mr. laycock: you don't assess the importance of a doctrine by asking the person -- justice breyer: no, no. i understand that. but i went on a different piece of -- matter, that the people who were involved in this were doing it for religious rather than civil reasons. i'm just wondering what the evidence is that they knew there was such a doctrine, that they were motivated by the religious doctrine, and that they expressed that to her. i just -- i'll look at page . is the

they say because of insubordination and because you threatened to sue us. >> i mean, does anyone explainto her which she might not have known that this is a religious doctrine that you are supposed to go to the sigh not or whatever and you're not supposed to go to court? of course they wanted to fire her because she threatened to sue them. but what i'm wondering is, is there anywhere before the motion for summary judgment where someone explains to her our motivation here is due to our religious tenet? >> you don't assess the importance of a doctrine by asking the person -- >> no, no, i understand that. but a different piece of matter, that the people who were involved in this were doing it for religious rather than civil reasons. i'm just wondering what the evidence is that they knew there was such a doctrine, that they were motivated by the religious doctrine and that they expressed that to her. i'll look at page 55. is there anything else i should look at? >> if it's in the handbook, i mean, one of the objections, if this is a rule that's going to bind the teachers, then you would expe

this is a lot insubordination, just on sentences you can't do it in the what a legal opinion anyway? i want to know who else was involved in the decision to subordinate. with such a susan richerson or was she directed to someone else to come up with this opinion because they wanted to get to learn anyway. we found that most of the white house they get this thing done. we want the vice president to be involved in the ribbon cutting. they were concerned about a photo out. in order to do that they led $585 million of taxpayer money to be put in the back of the line of some private venture capital firm based on a phony legal memo from the in-house counsel and we could even get this information so we forced a subpoena that everyone on the minority side voted against. those are the facts and were trying to get more facts. we need this to come out, we need more hearings because we haven't gotten facts from the people involved in this. >> i thank the gentleman. the chairs repaired to role as the gentleman from texas no longer has a reservation. >> mr. chairman, i reserve my reservation. i do

experience plus being the chief financial officer, can -- have you ever heard of taxpayers' money be insubordinatebe 33 years -- >> i'm involved in limited supply but -- its 28 total. >> in 28 years, total, you have never seen the taxpayers' money subordinated? >> no sir. >> has your experience been if they do it against the wall? >> i am not aware of -- i can't give you a legal interpretation on that, sir. >> mr. grippo, you think it's against the law for them to subordinate based on the -- >> it's up for a legal interpretation. i'm not a lawyer. >> mr. grippo, the energy policy act of 2005 and regulations require the secretary of energy to consult with the secretary of treasury regarding the terms and conditions of the loan guarantees; is that correct? >> yes. >> what must doe due to satisfy the consulting requirement? >> the department of energy must come to the treasury, at a minimum, with the terms and conditions in a term sheet prior to issuing a conditional commitment to offer a loan guarantee. -- basically doe must seek approval to go through loan guarantees; is that fair to say? >> that w