one of the key dates in how do we conduct integ gageses, what's the responsibility of the intelligencecommunity, military, and law enforcement in the war on terror going after to protect us from terrorists and to identify them. the 1% doctrine of vice president cheney was the operating guidance for many of us which is that if there's any possibility at all that somebody's guilty, you'll treat him as such. that's a wildly expansive approach that it justifies any action of any person and it's 1984. it's shocking really. it's an error in a practical sense saying there's a mushroom cloud, so we have to inspect every car coming into manhattan. one does not write a law or develop a doctrine, intelligence officer or military i'd imagine, on the one theoretical example that's ten standard deviations from war, that might happen one time out of ten. what you do is develop your doctrine on the 9, 999, 999 more likely case that is does not call for stopping every car that comes in even if the theoretical harm is a mushroom cloud destroying manhattan. you have to make critical judgments and not be