well, on the other hand , there is an llc or the principle of territorial integrity in the charter. and it is hardly worth considering such a pure, refined reaction to referendums, since this is another step within the framework of the conflict, and each country, depending on its economic political ties with moscow or washington, is developing its own strategy of behavior in these conditions. well, look at one of the markers - it was a vote. in the security council he of the resolution, which implied the condemnation of the referendums, russia, of course, immediately announced that they were using the right, veto and from the permanent five members of the security council, the united states voted for the condemning resolution france and great britain there is nothing unexpected here china abstained and the main wording of the chinese position was such all countries, but should be serious. it is necessary to treat the legitimate security interests of the states of the representatives of the ministry of china, china in the past days only once commented on the new configuration of the