it gets people's attention so intel or, sorry. >> nvidia. >> intel intel. and to me this is a combination of a couple of things, first of all, i would be leaning more towards the value. i think some of the momentum in nvidia certainly still needs to be proven. i think the company has come way down in valuation. but i like the opportunities in 5g i think data center is a safe haven for these guys and a place they continue to show they can execute and outperform the competition. >> chris, you said equal weight semis look good which implies smaller cap semis have done well but you are recommending larger cap semis. is there thinking that they're going to catch up? >> actually when you look, for example, at the russell 2000 semi index, it has decisively made new highs so the real strength or the real alpha has come from the smaller ones we like intel longer term. i also like the yield on that one as well. i think nvidia gives you the most bang for your buck short term sky works might be one more that's washed out here starting to turn up. >> okay. >> i'm bullis

clearly, house intel wants to. or not oversight will continue down this path, it, you know, it just -- we'll have to wait and see. but very clearly, mr. schiff had said he wants to go forward with more investigations. he's doubling down, and it just continues to destroy his credibility. and i think that's why leader mccarthy, you know, kicked this off, and now the rest of us are joining in the chorus, he needs to step down. david: well, it may also be destroying their chances for a win in 2020, so, you know, i assume they think they know what they're doing, but we'll leave them to their own devices. great to see you, sir, thanks for joining us. >> thanks for having me on the show. david: for more than two years, the talking heads in the mainstream media pushed their narrative of collusion. >> this is ed of willingness -- evidence of willingness to commit collusion, that's what this is on its face. >> so let's be clear, what we are seeing and what we have been seeing is collusion in realtime. >> yes. >> the word col

if you're going to own yield stocks, focus on microsoft or intel or lowe's. that's where the value is. >> chris, come on over to the desk. >> sometimes what we like to do is vote. >> i don't think scott needs to be coached on how things go down here >> i'm just asking a question. don't give me the dagger eyes. chris is here, by the way. >> the producers were talking to me in my earpiece not from over here. >> i got a little ahead of myself i'm sorry. i'll be quiet. >> bottom line, just looking for yield is not enough. >> i don't think so. i think we're in an environment where it took it from 260 to 230. they're probably oversold here i thought the last couple days or telling that you didn't have the yield groups act that well utilities were a laggard today gold was down. so what does the market already know i think maybe starting to price in our growth expectations actually maybe starting to bottom here. are we at the point where we want to start thinking what's the next trade pete, we talked about this is a very trading environment i think that speaks to wha

joining me now is former army intel special operations soldier bret balaka veg. your last name and insulting it. i hope i didn't mess it up too badly. we have seen a situation get worse and worse virtually every day and yet no help at all from mexico no help from the central american countries who the president keeps reminding us are getting millions of dollars from the united states. what should we do? >> david based on the numbers that i'm seeing which are clearly showing we are being overwhelmed we may absolutely have to shut down the border. david we are being overrun. we are being overrun along the southern border and as a former military guy when i look at these numbers of the migrants being captured i feel like i'm on a military base overseas being overrun by the military and congressional democrats attacking the president not letting them take action and waving the white flag letting them come in and watching everything crumble around us that we have built. this is no longer about the morality of it all, the right versus wrong. this is not about protectin

sandra: there are growing calls for adam schiff to step down from his position as chairman of the intel committee in the house. i know you've made a similar call. do you think that's a reality, a possibility that that could happen? >> i made the first call as far as i know yesterday morning on your network. it could happen but he certainly is somebody who loves power and loves to be on tv. there is no doubt. for this person, given his position, to go on tv hundreds of times i'm sure, and pedal this lie and for people never to challenge him. he was on a sunday show two short days ago. and so he is saying there was, quote, evidence of collusion in plain sight that he knew of evidence of collusion. does he know something that bob mueller and a 22-month investigation that cost taxpayers over $25 million and resulted in 500 witnesses being interviewed, over a million documents being produced and taken on many different chutes and ladders. it began about collusion and conspiracy with russians, completely batted down. but it certainly went off in many different areas. if he has evidence of tha

they are using intel parts that don't have 5g's yet. they won't have it until the beginning or middle of next year. from that perspective, qualcomm is winning. apple has not banned any phones at this point. they are not losing, they are in a draw at this point. emily: tamlin, would you agree with that? tamlin: this is a pressure point that can force apple to the table. what qualcomm wants is a settlement. they want to begin paying royalties. i think this is a potential sales been. enough for anhave upcoming trial in april that will be huge. qualcomm, it is definitely good for them ruling in that favor. emily: what is the company sang about the most recent ruling? have we heard from them? mark: q3 is when they come out with new iphones anyways. the iphone 7 and seven plus. this came out in 2016. those are due to be cut -- to be discontinued. they could expand to other devices. it won't have a wide-ranging impact. qualcomm was praising the judge's decision that we have yet to hear from either side on the second going. -- ruling. emily: wh

eli elijah cummings is asking about dirt that might have prompted intel officials to warn against gra granting him clearance. our correspondents and analysts are standing by. let's go to pamela brown and shimon pr shimon. >> manafort's team says he apologizes. these crimes were serious. they claim that the proposal of 24 years, which is what mueller's team is asking the judge for, is disproportionate to the crimes. they are saying the punishment that's proposed does not fit the crimes. they are claiming in this latest filing that because mueller couldn't find any evidence of collusion, that paul manafort was involved in, that they were so intent on charging him they are charging him for bank and tax fraud that goes back decade. he worked hard and was proud of what he achieved. mr. manafort's career culminated in serving as an adviser and campaign chairman for then candidate donald trump's successful presidential campaign. shortly after mr. trump's election, the acting attorney general appointed the special counsel to investigate allegations that mr. trump's campaign colluded with the

i want to get all of your reactions to some of the worst wreckless accusations from our former intel chief. >> do you still believe the president could be a russian asset? >> i think it's possible. i think that's why we started our investigation. and i'm really anxious to see where director mueller concludes that. >> more and more, i come to the conclusion that after the performance and since, that i really do wonder whether the russians have something on him. >> i used the term that this is nothing short of treasonous because it is the betrayal of the nation. he is giving comfort to the enemy. >> laura: ken, aid and comfort to the enemy, treasonous. we had renowned historians saying the same thing. any repercussions here? >> on the deep state, we shall see. i do have great confidence in michael horowitz, the inspector general. we'll see what his report -- and i know there have been comments, why don't we see that report? but it's very simple. i didn't expect any report about possible wrongdoing within the deep state until after bob mueller had finished his work. i really think this

>> it signifies they wanted more than intel did.was not just intel, but a number of other companies interested which may have prompted the deal to be announced when it was, regardless of whether it will be an easy process in approval or not. emily: what else could be in the pipeline? >> in terms of tech, the big thing we have got our eye on is ipo's and those could go down the m and a root. -- m&a route. maybe we look for intel to do something as an alternative. india is coming online at annex financial rate, growing users into 500 million just a few years and investors are jumping at the opportunity to be part. this partner has raised to new funds, and with six partners across its offices, it has become one of the largest in india. indianer at light speed joined us tuesday to talk about growth. indiastarted investing in at light speed about 12 years ago. opportunity opened up, we decided we would start dedicated fund this for the reason -- funds for the season. emily: the growth in india has been astounding. it might be 700 million

week including more than seven hours behind closed doors today, he's going to return to the house intel committee next wednesday. more on that in a moment. i'm going to explain it all to you. >>> there's also the news that the president reportedly ordered his then-chief of staff john kelly to grant his son-in-law, jared kushner, top secret security clearance in spite of concerns from intelligence officials. that is according to "the new york times". we've got more coming up on that as well. i'll explain it to you. but there's something else that we have got to talk about tonight. okay. i think it is really important that we discuss this. so go with me, all right? gather around the tv sets, or if you are listening on sirius, turn the volume up. tonight of all nights, the last night of black history month, what may be the worst black history month ever. we have blackface, we've got the "n" word, the call for the return of the kkk. yes, all of that happened just this month. listen, it is not a surprise. you don't have to have grown up in the deep south, like i did, to know that racism is v

and the house intel, senate intel committees, he is in congress, still claiming to have the smoking gun evidence that the investigations did not find. president trump, well, he is calling out the cowardly schiff. take a look. >> president trump: little pencil neck adam schiff. he has got the smallest, thinnest neck i've ever seen. he is not a long ball hitter. but i saw him today. "well, we don't really know. there could still have been some russia collusion." sick, sick. these are sick people. and there has to be accountability because it's all lies. and they know it's lies. >> sean: there has to be accountability. the president is right. he was on fire tonight. we have invited many times the cowardly schiff on this program to present his damning evidence, the one that the f.b.i., the house intel, the senate committee and robert mueller didn't find about russia collusion. come make your case. he has always declined coming on the program. i offered three hours of radio. that is because he has been lying to you, the american people for political gain. guess what? we are announcing tonigh

semiconductors, intel lost out here.be we look for them to do something different as an alternative. emily: elizabeth and ian, thank you so much for bringing your reporting on this. elizabeth warren continues targeting big tech. why she thinks breaking up u.s. tech giants could sustain competition. that is next. this is bloomberg. ♪ emily: this is "bloomberg technology." i'm emily chang. democratic presidential hopeful senator elizabeth warren is going after big tech. after laying out her proposal to break up big tech last week, she took her arguments to the annual sxsw festival. she made the argument to an audience of many tech entrepreneurs that breaking of companies like amazon and google would keep the marketplace competitive. sen. warren: there's opportunity to do what you do best, to come up with a great idea, to work your heart out to make it happen. to be able to compete on a level playing field is taken away by these platform giants. my view is break those things apart and we will have a much more competitive, r

indictments and dozens of russians intel officers and russian nationals.e pleaded guilty. we learned at least 16 trump associates have had contact with russians along the way. back with us, jeremy bash, joyce vance and frank figluzzi. it's an odd question to ask. this is the biggest security investigation of the modern era. are we better off for the fact that mueller's folks were digging into it. and we have these documents and now the troll and bot farms half a world away now we're at least on to them? >> yeah, i think so. i think the indictments of the intelligence officers from last year sent a shot across the bough. what's troubling at this hour, is that usually in a national security investigation, you would brief the commander in chief, the president. but what do you do when you suspect that the president himself is the national security threat. we don't have a playbook for that. we don't have a playbook for the national security investigation is the target of the president. this is going to have to go to congress and congress is going to have to eva

house intel member jackie speier. it's good to have you. thank you. >> thank you, chris. >> now, the difficult part of the interview. i know it was in a closed session. without me poking at you with a bunch of things that you're going to say, i can't tell you, what can you tell us? >> i can tell you that he was very compelling, that his testimony was both revealing and explosive on yet another level that was different from what it was during the oversight and government reform hearing last week. >> all right. so, different. so, congresswoman speier, put a little bit of the meat on the bones if you can for us. why different? >> well, because he talked about other issue areas. and i think that what we will find over the long term is that we have someone who is sitting in the white house right now who has a record that we have seen frankly from the time he was feigning bone spurs, that he's always been on the edge and acting in a manner that could be argued to be fraudulent. >> mm-hmm. >> could be argued that he has evaded taxes and has conduc

to bring the confidence back to the intel committee. you cannot have a chair of a committee that misled the american public, misled their conference, in a moment that we now have an answer. it is a time to turn the page and let america trust the committee again. with that, i'll take your questions. reporter: do you think the president is owed an apology and if so, from whom? mr. mccarthy: i think he's owed an apology from every individual that stood there and said they had proof. if they said they knew of collusion, if they said, and went on the american public, and misled, that took us down this th, that we spent 22 months, $25 million, 40 f.b.i. agents, 19 attorneys, went to 13 foreign countries, 2,800 subpoenas, 500 witnesses, and no collusion, i do believe he's owed an apoll jifment from anyone -- an apology. from anyone that put their politics of disease like before the american public. look, i understand a disagreement with each other when it comes to philosophical positions. but to go so far just because you're upset that somebod

the credibility of the house intel committee.efully she will do it but they haven't acted that way so far in this session of congress. >> bill: last point on all this, 500 witnesses. 675 days. senator kennedy was describing why it took so long. once he saw the list of subpoenas, the amount of interviews conducted he figured this is why. and now when you see the conclusion and the summary report by bill barr, do you stop and ask yourself what in the world was this all about? and furthermore, what was the original sin? where did this start? >> well, it sounds like it started at the dnc and them creating some dossiers and things like that to justify the fisa warrants. we probably need some investigation into the other side and what happened there. i don't know that will happen in this congress. >> bill: you are getting that already at the i.g. two probes are underway at d.o.j. >> that's right. that's excellent. we look forward to hearing from them. >> bill: mark green, thank you for your time today. maybe in a month or two we'll see

adam schiff calling for him to step aside as intel chair.hi and one of those members areha here to react replace new detail from "the hill" we begin with a fox news alert. president trump on is way to florida after a raucous rally. the president is rightfully basking in the glory after the mueller report exoneration and hitting the democrat fanatics in the process. i >> the economy is roaring! the isis caliphate is defeated! 100%! after three years of lies and smears and slander, the russia hoax is finally dead! the collusion delusion is over! the special counsel completed its report and found no collusion! no obstruction! all of the current and former officials who paid for promoted, and perpetuated the single greatest hoax in the history of politics in our country. they have to be -- i'm sorry. they have to be accountable. the russia hoax proves more than ever that we need to finish exactly what we came here to do. drain.y the. swamp. we defeated a very corrupt establishment. and we kept our promise to the american people and it's driving them crazy. in the last two years, we've embark

so, there's a way to be critical of the intel community and a way not to. i do think that there was a lot of redemption on the part of the intelligence community that just happened recently, and that's a meeting with kim jong-un. clearly the dni-led intelligence community found these instances of violation of what kim said he was going to do within north korea. and the president walked in there with all the allegations that he needed substantiated by the intelligence community. and, you know, thank goodness the president has recognized that. so, you know, it's evolving, and i hope that positive step leads to more positive comments coming out of the white house. >> i hope there's an -- i believe that there is an extra obligation on the part of the leadership of the intelligence committees to rise above the partisanship in working with the intelligence community when there is a disconnect with the white house. and i think you see character when that happens. >> mike? >> i just don't think it's helpful to any degree. i think it's healthy for the intelligence o

they oversee the intel community. how can they get away with saying that?e learn it is not true and they keep their seats. how does that work exactly? >> how did they do that when the republicans were investigating hillary clinton and the benghazi and the e-mails? >> okay. the republicans are bad. you won't get -- >> i don't hear people camming for them to resign. >> tucker: i didn't have the show then. >> thank god but none of us called for them to resign. >> tucker: i'm now asking you a simple question. i'm not here to defend republicans. i attack them all the time. trust me. i mean it when i do. i want to know how anybody of any party who stood up and alleged a crime, especially some with access to the highest level of the classified information on the house intel committee proven wrong, proven a liar can hold his seat after that? i don't understand. how can you do that? you lied. that is caught. >> that is up to the people, to the american people who put them in their seats and that is something for their opponent to challenge them in election. that is

it's great intel, it's great information.great intel until it's actioned and we have a chief executive who appears not to be actioning that information. so the question is, if you have all of this great findings -- the question is what are we doing about it? there are reports already, brian, that russian bots are already on social media trying to get us thinking in a certain direction toward the 2020 election. what have we done to shore up resources and security around our next election? what are states doing about it? is anybody listening? and until we have a chief executive who says this can't happen again, we're still in a national security risk. >> joyce vance, i have to say that with this new vocabulary we all have, it was the speaking indictments that laid out the story of the extent of the russian attempt to ram up against our defenses electronically. turns out we opened the door for them and they came right in. that was kind of an extraordinary early part of the story we all got to read. >> it was. and i think people

how can he have that -- >> hold on. >> tucker: how can he have the role of the chairman of the intelmittee? i'm serious! >> you are suggesting that everything he suggested was a criminal action that required an indictment. that is not necessarily what he said. there are a lot of things that need to be understood by the american people and that is what this report might show us. >> tucker: i believe -- we'll see. thank you very much, chris, good to see you. michael tracy is an independent journalist who is already on the road covering the presidential race and he joins us tonight from an undisclosed location. michael tracy, you are one of the very few people who has noted this weird nexus between news outlets and retired intelligence officials. it seems like a very unhealthy arrangement to me. do you think it is? >> i think it's unhealthy and i think it will contribute to a fundamental inability for the media to self reflect on what it got so horrendously wrong throughout this episode. johnt brennan, a colleague of yours in a different network, that my dis- incentivize you to do a tho

things look up for intel.ourse, who is the dean of financial services other than jamie dimon. of course, he got another vote of confidence in terms of warren buffett backing up the truck to buy more jpmorgan shares. they are down 15%, 20% from their all-time highs. charles: i'm looking at resistance of 26,191. once we close above there we will automatically hit a new all-time high. should we still be looking fourth the potential of the market hitting a new all-time high? >> i would like to see us consolidate and go sideways for awhile. we have been hitting top valuations, first quarter earnings expectations are definitely concerning. i would like to really see how this year starts playing out once we get the trade wars behind us. i don't see any big gains just yet. charles: we have had big gains but you are saying we need to consolidate. >> that would be healthy right now. charles: that's what we will call today's session. liz, down 250 points to the dow. we will call that consolidation. liz: that's a fancy wo

even from the intel committee, even though it's closed testimony.in turn the congress are getting a real sense of what the stakes are. what the scope of questions that congress can no longer avoid are going to be. and with democratic control of congress, they have an absolute obligation, as did the last congress, but the democrats are more likely to take it seriously, to investigate and find out exactly what is going on. credible evidence of a crime committed by a sitting president is not something that congress can walk away from. >> errol louis, thank you for the perspective. >> surreal is the world errol was looking for. >>> spacex launching a new rocket into orbit this morning. how this could change the future of space travel, coming up, next. this is a very difficult job. failure is not an option.a. more than half of employees across the country bring financial stress to work. if you're stressed out financially at home, you're going to be too worried to be able to do a good job. i want to be able to offer all of the benefits that keep them sati

people have real doubt about him, but now there is no way that he could lead the intel committee.should step back. >> dana: are you calling on him to resign from the committee? >> kevin: i'm calling for him to leave the committee as chairman. because adam schiff left for so many others, so many questions, one who paid for the dossier. we had to go to court and number two, glenn simpson, when the committee was looking at it and 33 -- two years ago he had more than circumstantial proof and evidence of a problem going for. and mueller report came through improved he lied. he should apologize to the american public and step back from being chair of the intel committee. >> dana: all right, thanks for coming on kevin mccarthy, welcome back to washington. >> kevin: thank you. >> dana: final thoughts on today's events from the political panel oh! oh! oh! ♪ ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than seven and maintained i

ian: that signifies they wanted it more than intel did. it was not just intel.ding to our reports, a number of other countries were interested, which may have prompted the deal to be announced when it was, regardless of whether it will be an easy process in approval or not. emily: what else could be in the pipeline that you are watching? elizabeth: in terms of tech, the big thing we have got our eye on is ipos, and a lot of those can go down the m&a route. but in semi conductors, intel was a name that lost out. maybe we look for them to do something different as an alternative. emily: bloomberg's ian king and elizabeth fournier. well, india is coming online at exponential rate, growing from 200 million to 500 million users in just three years. and investors are jumping at the opportunity to be part of that growth. lightspeed india partners has raised two new funds, and with six partners across its offices, it has become one of the largest beast -- vc teams in india. a partner at lightspeed india joined us tuesday to talk about growth there. >> we started investi

adam schiff the only one left standing facing urgent calls to resign from his position atop the hous intel committee. take a look. >> the willingness to the findings of the special counsel conclusively refute their past and present and expose you of having abused her position to only promote false information. as such we have no faith in you ability nto discharge her dutie and ran consistent with your constitutional responsibility and large your immediate resignation as chairman of the committee. >> i think it's immoral, unethical, i think it's unpatriotic, and yes, i think it's corrupt and evidence of collusion. o i don't think it's okay that is an attorney to our committee there is a different word for that conclusion. it is called compromise. i will not yield mr. master. remember, it was adam schiff, w call him the cowardly schiff on this program who claimed to hav clear evidence of trump russia collusion he was promising that. now that robert moeller $25 million probe found a thing as did the nine-month investigation of the fbi and th house intel committees, he is i congress still clai

to think adam schiff should resign as the house intel chair? you know, we presented that to him yesterday. >> harris: would you forgive me customer guy need to cut in because the president of the united states speaking. let's watch together. >> president trump: this is lake okeechobee, which i have known for a long time. lake okeechobee. it's an incredible lake, it's got a lot of problems. it wasn't properly funded for years. i want to introduce some of the folks here. we all know governor desantis, and mrs. desantis. thank you very much for being here. you've done a fantastic job. ron took over from a governor that a couple of you know. rick scott. who has been bugging me about getting this done for a long time. no sooner did rick go to the senate than ron started booking me the same way. [laughter] and we got it done. we have the funding and we are doing it. i just want to think the army corps of engineers, they've been fantastic. i said, "let's go, we need a wall also on the border." you know that, right? looking at all these balls. don't fo

he will make the decision. >> he's not even getting the intel or advise he needs it would seem. know his president doesn't read his pdb, relying solely on verbal briefings. "the new york times" revealed just how far oral briefings are catering to his likings at the expense of valuable information from that report, quote, intelligence officers steeped in how mr. trump views the world now work to answer his repeated question. this is real from the report. who is winning? what the president wants to know, according to former officials, is what country is making more money or gaining a financial advantage? while the professionals do not criticize mr. trump's focus, they do question whether those interests are crowding out intelligence on threats like terrorism. maneuvers of traditional adversary, developments of forenaries with implications. no big deal, guys. jeremy bash? >> nicolle, states have motivation and finances are one of them but they certainly aren't the only one. to overly focus on them as if he were making the decisions from trump tower, ahead of the trump organization,

maria: welcome back and i am back with congressman devon nunes the ranking member on the house intelid that you want to get these people a list of 32 people down so that you can interview them. what happens next? our audience wants to see accountability. what are you expecting in terms of accountability, how will bill barr stand to this letter that meadows and jordan just sent him , and do you think, i mean, when you say criminal charges what does that mean criminal referrals? >> let me start with this. all of us want to see justice equal under the law right? so we want to see everyone held accountable. i believe that if the new attorney general and the department of justice if they don't take all of this on, into a full scrub and have full accountability and transparencies for the american people, you're going to see generations of conservatives who will not trust department of justice, they will not trust the fbi, and they for sure will not trust the fisa process, so i mention this in things that we have left to do earlier and i don't want to gloss over it because it's very importa

what is jared kushner privy to now that the intel committee thought he shouldn't see? >> we don't know the details but he has access to top security issues with other countries, deals with trade, but it is stuff that fbi and cia officials have voiced concern about. he still does not have an sci clearance which is the one that's attached to a cia review. >> maggie hashman, thank yberma for all your reporting and sharing it with us. >> have a good weekend. >>> i want to bring in joe lockhart, former white house secretary, and margaret tala from bloomberg news who just got back from vietnam flying on air force one on that flight. thank you for waking up. i don't know when the last time you slept was. >> i don't even know what day it is so we're all good. >> we'll give you a second to rest up, i'm going to joe first with this question since you worked in the white house. a few issues raised by this story. number one, why did intelligence want jared kushner to have the clearance. number two, why did the president say, man, had all of his officials are telling him don't do t

they won't give up the intel to congress. democrats led by elijah cummings, fresh off much watched michael cohen hearings, they say they're not taking no for an answer. this is what it looks like. the white house says the request for documents on the security clearance was overly intrusive, while they would brief congress, they won't give up the documents that they're demanding. "new york times" reported what you know was a bombshell that donald trump lied and had overruled his own intelligence professionals and ordered them to give jared kushner a security clearance, despite serious concerns about national security. chairman cummings firing back, says the white house is stonewalling a legitimate probe and adds there's a key difference between a president who exercises his authority under the constitution and a president that overrules career experts and top advisers to benefit his family members and then conceals, congressional for lie, conceals his actions from the american people. this is a developing story. i want to begi

news today the president's son-in-law, jared kushner, is back on capitol hill meeting with the senate intel committee as part of its russia investigation. and the big news today about the actual mueller report, which no one outside of the barr justice department had seen is it is at least 300 pages long. "the new york times" today reporting, quote, the total of 300-plus pages suggests mr. mueller went well beyond the kind of bare bones summary required about the justice department regulation governing his appointment and detailed his conclusions at length. it raises questions about what mr. barr might have left out of the four dense pages he sent to congress. this news comes as adam schiff, top democrat on the house intel committee, presses on with his investigation into whether the president has been compromised by russia, despite an orchestrated smear campaign from the white house and congressional republican. trump tweeting this morning that schiff should be forced to resign from congress. hours later trump's lawyer rubly called for schiff's resignation at a public committee hearing. sch

the discussion we have had, your assumption that your fellow professionals in the intel community puteads down and did the job trained to do, even orders haven't come from the top? >> that's right. truth to power, their tradition and training, called out russian interference, as the president refused to. >> frank, how long ground in your screw, have we lost in what that another country reached into our country, and to a degree, how much have we lost in a daily fight against him? >> the dev fig of intelligence that most people use is inactionable information as jeremy said, that is great information. >> it doesn't until it is actioned. the question is, if you have all the great findings, what are we doing about it? there are reports that russian bots are on social media, trying to get us thinking in a certain direction toward the 20, 20 election. what are we doing to secure up our next election, until we have a chief executive to say, this could not happen again, we are in a national security risk. >> with this new vo cab laerl, it was the speaking indictments. turns out we opened the

intel got a good result. it took a long time.pper court said something is wrong because the european commission did not consider whether there was a foreclosure defect and whether there was a harmful effect on the market and this needs to be reconsidered. this has given hope to google, to qualcomm, who are all appealing similar fines from the european commission. david: it is not just google. we have reports spotify has filed a complaint with the competition authorities saying it is not fair for us because apple has its own streaming music service and if you want to use ours you cannot go through the app store. it is much more difficult to do. jame: it will play out the same way. you will have the eu which has a much broader policy for antitrust enforcement, different law it can use, and you will see an intensive investigation of that. over here, whether it is private litigation or the antitrust agencies, that will be more of an uphill battle. the law does not accommodate looking at these downstream markets so the platform here i

he also testified for two days in the intel committee about various matters. i can't get into the specific testimony however i would strongly urge people to review that testimony once it comes out, once he publishes it before they jump to any conclusions about this controversy. >> can you tell us that may have been released and confidential at this point, can you tells who is more credible on this issue of whether michael cohen asked personally f personally for a pardon? >> i think your previous guess would be correct. there needing to be cooberation. michael cohen brought a lot of documents to the hearings and in the intel committee. i think people should look at documents and the interview transcript. i think schiff is trying to weigh two things. one trying to publish the interview transcript so that the public can see it but ton the other hand making sure he doesn't inadvertently shape, alter or taint the testimony of future witnesses that are coming before the intel committee. >> did michael cohen have documents that cooberate his testimony that he never a

the senate intel committee by contrast is very, very private.now virtually anything about their investigation, about how its unfolded and when it might end. there is a lot here in terms of what congress knows that we don't and the fact alone that the president was engaging in talks with the russians in 2016 while they were attacking our election to pursue a multimillion business deal in moscow, something that he had wanted for decades, something that he had been chasing his entire real estate career pretty much is enough to say look, the president was clearly compromised here especially because he was lying about it to the american public when he said he had no business ties to russia. this is an extremely large flag and i think schiff is completely right to make note. >> democrats are looking for an explanation for the president's cozy relationship with russia. what you said there, the president's per pseudofor deurs, is that going to be within mueller's report? is that the exec popectation or analysis of that? >> that's hard to predict what wi

lawyers, former intel folks and ghosts of watergate past were everywhere.all pushed the same boring anti-trump and russia hysteria. the attacks at this network, the likes of donald and don lemones were more than happy to expend tall tales that kept the audience watching, if only temporarily. they also took a backseat to maddow. it is important to know thatci during this process she didn't just unpack the dossier or the nonexistent trip to prague. she went full red scare. >> what would happen if russia killed the power in fargo today? what would happen if all the natural gas lines that service sioux falls just on the coldest day in recent memory, and it wasn't in our power to turn it back on? what would you do if you lost heat indefinitely as the actor of foreign power, on the same day as your temperature in your front yard matched the temperature in antarctica? what would you and your family do? >> laura: get a coat or a down blanket. not enough tinfoil in the world for that hat. and then the trump brigade, they spent the last two years spinning the eric tr

at the most levered part of technology there's a trade to be had. >> how about the performance of inteli think you had it >> farmer jim had it >> it's pushing 54 bucks now it's looking like it's turning into 54, 57. >> grow get great dividend yields height not be the one we wanted -- >> or maybe it is. >> it might be the right guy >> it's the cfo elevated in there. he set the stable for where intel is today >> let's talk about yum brands they have downgraded the shares to underperform. 84 bucks is the price target it is our call of the day. they say they believe the bull case of top line growth. it's already entirely priced into stock they believe the company's aggressive taco bell targets over the next five years are likely to underwhelm >> this is a stock that a couple of days ago was at an all time high if i'm going to make this downgrade, tell me what i'm going to be doing with that money. am i going to take the money am i going to put the money elsewhere? am i going to look at domino's that's trading awfully in the last six months? i'm okay with the call just a straight sell out of