intel's revenue is revving.utlookk better tha expected and it buying back billions in stocks. >>> the industrial conglomerate's outlook and explaining weakness in china. those stories and more tonigig on "nightly business report" for thursday, october 24th. >>> good evening, everyone and lcome. bill has the ening off. it was the busiest day of earning season and that's whe we begin tonight with la-day results from amazon. the company's earnings fell short of wall street expectationss its heavy investments cut into the profitability. they have been spending on one-day delivery to cloud business and advertising sales force as well. the good news is revenue grew at a healthy clip, but wasn't what analysts were looking for. josh whitman takes a closer look at amazon's quarter. >> reporter: good quarter, bad guide. that's how on lists are describing the latest earnings report, specifically of the company's g 4 forecast disappointed analysts calling for $80 billion to $86.5 billion. jeffrey says that's critical. g 4 i

. >> look, intel -- what they told you about demand last night in terms they have to beef up spli this is exactly the opposite what they told you for at least maybe one if not two quarters. so the bar going into the earnings season was extremely low. also just underpinning a lot of this this week is you had a market, services manufacturing flash update effectively slightly better than last month. efo in germany a measure of their economy. slightly better. pmis in other parts of the world slightly better. as we digested some of the geopolitics into the earnings season that was very much i think a low bar, we have a dynamic here where companies are actually giving a better outlook. we didn't think they'd give a rosy outlook that's key. the headline and revenue numbers are what they are but the eps is better. >> do you feel better about the markets today versus a week ago. >> intel numbers are one of the reasons. whenever you hear somebody coming out saying we got a surprise $1.2 million revenue beat that's meaningful they tell the story. we were surprised by how good things were. then we

the e they were put on intel committee i interviewed them. i wanted to know, do they have to be able to serve there, because these embers that serve on the intel read certain, select memos that other members can't have. they speak to members, they better have the integrity to tell the truth. we watch the chairman of the all the stand before nation and read what he hoped as in the script of that phone call. he was such a good liar that the peaker of the house believed him. speaker nancy pelosi believed him on and defended him on television with george steph nop i wills. when he looked into the cameras the nbc and was asked question, do you know who the whistleblower is? no, he wish he could. do we find out later? e knows who the whistleblower is. the staff met with him. the staff advised him to go to inspector general, the whistleblower never told the inspector general he never met with the staff. why? wasn't in the script. o the question before any democrat who supports impeachment, state where in the that there's quid pro quo. tell me what y

i think you can look to intel.he fact that they are supply constrained in their chips -- they haven't been able to deliver the supply it's not clear to me whether you really can look at intel as a picture of demand then if demand were to slow, they don't have enough supply even to meet demand if it were slacking. we will have george curry in he is feeling the pain of a slowdown >> how can you have a texan and 3m in the three week as you have intel and lamb research? >> i was thinking the same thing. >> it's very confusing, especially because when you look at goldman's call on the slowdown, a lot had to do with sentiment. we just got some news that sounds like, maybe these talks with china are going better. is that going to impact sentiment? will ceos, purchasing departments start to buy again in i.t. spending i don't know there's something going on out there, particularly with those core names like hpe, like cisco. i'm not convinced it's just sentiment quite yet. >> shares of intel are up 7.5% on the heels of this

i think it's more of the bob swan manifesto on intel growth, talking about a.i. and the need toed about build custom built chips or aiidc says in a couple of years 75% of he enterprise applications are going to incorporate ai therefore when i intel can tune chips to artificial intelligence, that makes them more valuable to customers that perhaps counters some of the supply issues and process technology issues that intel has had. also the argument that they are technology beyond process could give them an advantage that will bolster gross margins perhaps millsa. >> john fortt at headquarters we'll layer turbbob swon tomorrow at 11:30 a.m. eastern time on "squawk alley. in the meantime what's the trade here >> it's interesting- that was some bullish guidance, right. >> yeah. >> that was interesting to me they would feel comfortable being that bullish when they didn't need to because there is a lot alt of potential uncertainty in the next quarter. they must feel very good the data center -- that was really really impressive so i think -- you know we talk about -- it

intel. >> this stock is up some 6% after hours. a beat on the top and bottom line intel turning in revenue of 19.1 billion versus 18.05 expected. turning in nongap earnings per share of 1.42 versus 1.24 expected also on the guide, q4 of 19.2 billion. it's about the same as this quarter. better than expected also earnings per share of versus $1.21 expected. intel also raises its full year outlook to $71 billion on revenue. that's up 1.5 billion from where they were in july. raising to a $4.60 nongap eps. intel's board approving $20 billion additional to set aside for stock repurchase in the quarter that they are reporting now, they did use $4.5 billion for repurchase i know stephanie link was looking at the data center group to see how they would do pretty much every group i could see outperformed the data center especially, $6.4 billion in revenue for data center here and the client executing group personal executing also slightly higher but data center we only expected maybe or our analysts did about $5.6 billion from that group d

there are two members today that are sitting on the intel committee . before they were put on the intel committee i interviewed them i wanted to know do they have the integrity to be able to serve therebecause these members user , they read certain selected secretmemos that others cannot have . so when they members, they better have the integrity to tell the truth. we watched the chairman of the committee stand before all the nation and read what he hoped was inthe script of that phone call . he was such a good liar at the speaker of the house believed him. speaker nancy pelosi believed him and defended her normal national television . and when he looked into the cameras on msnbc and was asked the question do you know who the whistleblower is, he said he wished he could and what do we find out later? he knows who the whistleblower is. staff met with him. the staff advised him to go to the inspector general and the whistleblower never told the inspector general he met with the staff because it wasn't in the script . so the question before any democrat wh

why was it included in the intel assessment? did brennan have anything to do with that because it is selacious garbage. so we're going to find out about all of this, and barr should be going to italy and the uk and australia, trying to find out if their intelligence services were working with the cia or the fbi, to investigate the trump campaign. i'm glad he's doing that. he should be doing that. maria: so no wonder the president brings this up to the leaders of these countries to try to find out, you know, how this information started and given that it was the first two and a half years of his presidency that people were up in arms over collusion. very quickly, sir, my viewers are frustrated. they want some subpoenas. they want to see you do that deep dive into what took place, when can we expect your subpoena in people and who are you going to get to come down and testify? >> well i'm going to tell you i'll do it the way i think i need to do it. i'm not going to get ahead of horowitz. this man is independent of politics, is ap

intel up 7% after guiding investors higher. a lot of companies giving positive guidance.ohawk, charter, liberty. we've seen all of these names really push investors, and say 20/20 is going to be a lot better than you thought. however, people are still staying defensive, still holding around that 1.78 level on the tenure. level on the tenure. guy: in europe, struggling to make headway. the stoxx 600 still can't get through the 400 mark. we are absolutely flat. some stocks having a great day. great gucci numbers coming through. anheuser-busch really suffering. and are suffering in china the united states. the pound is down by around 0.1%. we will talk about that at a moment. the ruble also on the move today. the governor cutting by 50 basis points, a bit of a surprise when it came to the size of that cut, and hints that we are going to see more to come as well at governor tries to help turn the russian economy around and get it on a stronger growth trajectory. let's talk a bit about what is happening with the brexit story in a little more detail. brusselsension in about how

that was intel. were looking at the russian investigation. ller.was all about mue ken starr spent almost five years looking at clinton. he came before the committee. we had an impeachment inquiry vote. ken starr put forth to the senate judiciary committee allegations against president clinton. passed four articles of impeachment based on the starr report. it was transparent and subject to cross examination. two of those articles past the house. mueller investigated for two years and did not recommend any action. that is the difference. ? >> when it comes to impeachment messaging, it seems like the white house has changed course multiple times. you confident that you guys are on the same page? is that the hill now leading this messaging strategy? >> i spoke to mick mulvaney. getting theking on messaging team together. in thenvolved impeachment of president clinton. look what he did. team that was organized, had legal minds that could understand what was being said versus the legal proceedings in question. and they were on message everyday. pre

so when you speak from an intel committee perspective, members listen a little longer. hey ask do you know who this whistleblower is? no, we do not. they spent two years spending millions of dollars to find out that person lied. that person then looked in american's eyes again, said there's a whistleblower. quid pro quo. the whistleblower is being with held from even coming to committee. they asked, do you know who this whistleblower is? no, we do not. now we find out from the american public that he lied one more time. not only did he know who the whistleblower was, the staff met with him. the staff then sent him to the inspector general. you know what the whistleblower did not say? that he met with the congressional member staff. in the judicial system in america, that would make you a act witness. nowhere in american judicial system a fact witness ever allowed to be the prosecutor, but only in this house they are. could you imagine a chairman of the intel committee that has all this information, that told the american public and lied to them they do not know who the

intel is 8% of the semiconductor's index.low guidance was strong for the rest of the year. that's a good sign for the overall space. semiconductors a little bit of a bellwether for tech demand regional banks have been doing well since the earnings season started. amazon, as carl mentioned, is the big mover. was down 6% in the preopen now down a little bit less than that just about 4%. but we're 15% off of the old highs for amazon, which we hit back here, as you can see. and it does move the indexes when you have these big, big market cap companies let me just show you here. amazon's 3% of the weighting in the s&p 500. but look, it's almost 23% of the consumer discretionary weighting. in the nasdaq 100, triple qs, it's almost 10% of the nasdaq 100. you can see when these things start moving a little bit that they tend to affect the overall indices. just put up here how the s&p 5 00 is against the consumer discretionary. you see just flat here consumer discretionary much weaker that's because of amazon you see the difference th

. >> let's have a quick look at intel. at $71 billionue at $71 your revenue billion, beating market expectations. this is a company worried about market shelter share, now perhaps benefiting from a rebound in the third quarter. texashad that instruments print a couple of days ago, also not bad. >> let's get back to taylor. take it away. luke. ?our perspective consumert where the and business sentiment are? we going to get any reflection of that? >> that is one thing highlighted, this idea that if you are saying the consumer is strong and there is no recession risk, and yet industrial is not doing too well, at a certain point, that filters into all points of business and should also hit software. been pretty resilient. >> amazon down 6%. they have never been interested in playing the street game of guiding. what is your take away on that and the earnings we are seeing after the bell right now? >> unfortunately i don't follow individual companies. in the world that has been more ,riven by macro, the past year winners and los

clean house at the intel agencies that are actively undermining a duly-elected president.hy are republican leaders not demanding this, at this point? no longer should they rubber-stamp the bloated budgets that allow deep state renegades to run right over the president's agenda, or at least try to throw roadblocks in front of it. and for those who claim the deep state to some, you know, just an unhinged conspiracy, well, former intel leaders are out in the open and mitigate it. take former cia director john brennan, who tweeted today, as in previous times of national peril, we rely on our military, diplomats, intel officials, law enforcement officers, and other courageous patriots to protect our liberties, freedom, and democracy. may they stay resolute and strong, despite corrupt political headwinds they face. joining me now is chris swecker, former assistant fbi director and tom fitton, president of judicial watch. tom, brandon and his ilk are dropping their masks, right? it's obvious they are in charge. >> the illegal spying on president trump, you see this in the unhinge

and pope flee we will have a logo up that says questions @intel summit.org. by the miracle of technology they are going to appear on an ipad with vince. vince, if you didn't get the word at some point larry is going to tell you last question. okay? so it is now my pleasure to introduce the moderator of our defense intelligence plenary, lieutenant general vincent stewart, u.s. marine corps -- come on, come on [ applause ] retired. >> that's the part i was waiting for. [ laughter ] >> and vince is the founder and ceo of stewart global solutions, an international consulting firm. general stewart retired from the u.s. marine corps in april of this year after more than 38 years of service to the nation. join me in thanking vince for his service. [ applause ] a career intelligence officer, vince served as the 20th director of the defense intelligence agency where he was the first african-american, the first jamaican-american, and the first marine to hold the position of director dia. [ applause ] general stewart earned masters degrees in national security and strat

. -- what we have is amazon, intel and visa. waytake a look at the market ended the regular session. what we have is a market that was swinging between gains and losses, even though a lot of earnings were positive. let's get to some of the big movers. what you see is tesla, microsoft, twitter, 3m, different directions for them. microsoft and tesla, very positive after hours yesterday. twitter and 3m, disappointing. twitter, their fourth quarter revenue outlook missed even the average estimate. 3m, continuing to blame it. the disappointing line is on a global industrial slowdown. that is what is of interest there. look, teslatake a was the big story here. 24% year to date loss. the head of the earnings was fascinating when you go into the bloomberg and look at what we are seeing now. an eight month high in the latest session. the tactical analysts are agains surprise profit earnings report. shery: a disappointment for amazon. we are seeing a plunge there. su: this is what paul was talking about. amazon, disappointing in a big way

maria: congressman you said you have not had a briefing on these issues in the intel committee.hen was the last time the intel committee had a briefing with regard to the threat of terrorism? >> its been well over a month. i don't know the exact time. all i can remember is one ambassador after another that i've never heard of before. that's where we've been spending our time unfortunately and hopefully we can get past that and get on to obviously things like this, the world is moving around regardless of this impeachment inquiry that i've been spending far too much time on. these are the things that we should be focusing on. i'm grateful that president trump hasn't been distracted by all of this and that our forces who deserve so much credit have continued to keep their eye on the target to keep the american people safe, and we're going to continue to do that despite the distractions that the democrats, the shenanigans they are engaged into try and win an election instead of keeping america safe. maria: so just to be clear with the democrats in the majority, adam schiff is the c

when you read this portrait of our attorney general talking with intel folks overseas about intel folks on the home team, that's not a great look, is it? >> if you want to be an isolated country with no allies and not see what's coming, this is the way to handle your business. how confusing would it be for any other country around the world right now to have an attorney general come to you when you're normally dealing with the cia or envoys or the dni in terms of international intelligence, in terms of sharing information, it has to be baffling to them. and there is a complete erosion of trust whether it's australia we've talked about today, ukraine, all of our five eyes partners, germany, the uk. they all maybe helped or supplied information during the mueller report and the mueller investigation. what is the purpose of this? and what really is shocking is the government seems to be run by basically three people -- pompeo, barr, and giuliani, who i can't figure out is even part of the government or not. >> without portfolio. >> without portfolio. so it's very confusing, i think, to any

that was pretty much intel. reporter: this is the judiciary committee. senator graham: yes. is not a formal. we are looking at the russia investigation. mueller testified. this was all about mueller. so here's what happened. ken starr spent almost five looking at clinton. he came before the committee. impeachment inquiry vote. en starr put forth to the senate judiciary committee the 11 allegations against president clinton. we passed four articles of mpeachment based on the starr report that was transparent, cross-examination in public. it was a public hearing. and two of those articles passed house. what mueller did was investigate years, ident for two spent $25 million, and did not action.d any that's the difference. reporter: when it comes to it seems t messaging, like the white house's team -- enator graham: have you noticed? reporter: at this point, are you confident you guys are on the same page? s it the hill now leading this messaging strategy? senator graham: so, i talked to staff mulvaney. i think they're working on etting omessaging -- getting a messaging team tog

when you even have some good news out of intel that has really struggled mightily. talk about a stock that has gone side ways for quite a while, this is the poster child for that. they're breaking to the highs that we've seen in a while out of this one for good reason. i mean, the numbers were great. we'll talk about those. i think amazon, the fact that people were able to even when it was down early today, down over 6.5% and made this furious comeback, still dismissing a lot of that spending increase that besos put through. i think if we were in a vulnerable time in the market, we would have seen the market hit on that. >> what if the other side is maybe it's false optimism. how many headlines have we gotten fromtrade and then we fall right back where we were? earnings growth still negative. the bar came down so low going into this season. we walked over it. you didn't have to hurdle it. so is there really all this party going on as we go back towards these new highs. >> the good news is that 100% of the trade is not yet priced in. heading into the election year, i

taylor: that was intel ceo bob swan. another ceo is aiming to take its popular music stream is -- he spoke toer us from the new york stock exchange. >> at a time when the management team is mature and the company has a leading advantage on the market, then we can make the decision whether or not it should go public. taylor: despite the trade tension, they still chose to go public in the u.s. following in the footsteps of its parent, which went public on the nasdaq in 2000. bloomberg caught up with the ceo following the company's debut on the new york stock exchange. >> our parent company has always been a u.s. listed company and we really like the markets because they have treated us well. there has been a lot of return for u.s. and chinese investors all over the world, and for us, we think at least we are not doing trade related business and education -- i would expect it to be a very good way to connecting the u.s. and chinese people. >> one of my last questions, what was your reaction to the opening price, about 20% l

speaking of intel, credit suisse raised the price target on intel from $65 to 68, saying growth marginsonly blemish on the report. it says it provides more positives than negatives. analysts at bmo raised alphabet's price target to $12.45 to $12.25 a share. credit raise the price target to $2700 a share. the products are driving strong growth of search and youtube. those were a look at the top tech calls. and now, for our conversation with susan lyne, former abc entertainment president. lyne massar sat down with for a wide-ranging conversation on the upcoming streaming wars, big tex antitrust, and investing in female founding startups. susan: i do believe there is too platforms in too few at this moment. that is always dangerous. whether they get regulated, whether they get broken up, that is for other people to decide, but i don't think you could leave things the way they are where a single platform like facebook has the power that it does. carol: bbg ventures, are you finding all the opportunities you want? we talked before we got started about there is so much capital out there with

then later he said it was bad intel. the former head of the cia had bad intel? any part of brennan that's worried about himself in all of this? it's very clear that there was a bias within many, many parts of the administration and i just wonder how much of that is going to come out as general -- forgive me, as bill barr looks into all this. >> there is no doubt john brennan has an interest in anybody looking into the 2016 election and how this investigation got started. i think everybody throws around the charge of traitor and treason to flippantly and easily. i think it does discredit our political discourse. we ought to step back from using that kind of language. but i think john brennan, particularly given his former position, he has got a right to say these things, but he has been so over the top and come tell to youous of th to -- conte president, it threatens the credibility the organization has to have. they are supposed to be above politician and d above politics. trish: he's down in the dirt now. including the msnbc contributorship. coming up. >> i thi

for intel purposes, that was there any foreign intel which helped you along the way?didn't need much help. we have some incredible people. we use our intelligence correctly, what we can do is incredible. we waste our time with intelligence that hurts our country, because we had poor leadership at the top, that is not good. but i have gotte n the top, that is not good. but i have gotten to know much of the intel people, and i will say that they are spectacular. they are not going to want to talk about it, they will want to keep it quiet. the last thing they want, because these are great patriots. but the people that i have been dealing with our incredible people. and it is really a deserving name, intelligence. i have dealt with some people that aren't very intelligent. having to do with intel. but this is the top people, and it was incredible. it was flawless. and it was very competitive. so i do appreciate russia and turkey, iraq, and syria to an extent. because we are flying into syria, a lot of syrian people with lots of guns. so we had good coverfor with lots of g

leland: we will wait for intel that will come from the mission., back to you when your sources have more, gillian. gillian: more insight on the intelligence gathered overnight during the raid, we will bring hudson institute former fellow, michael, you say that there's not just value here, intelligence and information that the u.s. now gets a peek at. >> should give intel community nsa; cia any information on eminent attacks and also the networks, facilitation networks for travel of high-value targets and also the signal's intelligence network, the problem is because everyone knows that al-baghdadi has been killed, a lot of high-value targets are changing locations. gillian: harder to track. >> sets the intelligence community back 6 weeks or 6 months, we saw this in osama bin laden raid. president obama said 4 hours after the raid that osama bin laden was killed and the networks went quiet and that's probably what is happening now. gillian: what kind of calculation does the president need to make in the aftermath of a raid like this when you kill o

reporter: that needs to be a loor vote, not an intel committee vote. has that been determined? r. jeffries: it seems to me that that makes sense in terms of having a floor vote because are ple committees involved. specifically, as it relates to resolution, which we haven't seen the text of yet because it hasn't been released by chairman and the rules committee, but as i understand involve laying out the process for transferring the intel from committee to the judiciary committee. regard, seems to me that it makes sense that the house will weigh in on hat question and that procedure. reporter: [inaudible] process protection for the president, does that mean they'll be able to call witnesses or subpoena witnesses? what are the due processes? mr. jeffries: it will have to be nswered by chairman mcgovern, chairman schiff, chairman nadler. as speaker pelosi indicated from he very beginning, we're going to proceed expeditiously. we are going to proceed fairly, nd we're going to proceed comprehensively. we will continue to give every nt trump pportunity to present exculpatory evidence. g

the next step will be the intel committee. this document authorizes two things in the short term that are notable. first, the release of the transcripts of the depositions that have been happening behind closed door. they'll be released in electronic form. it doesn't specify how broadly but presumably that means all the way to the public. it also authorizes open hearings to be conducted by the intel committee. if there's one thing in here that republicans would like and one thing missing that i suspect will be upset about, the resolution does allow republicans to request witnesses. the minority can request to call witnesses. they have to submit detailed reasons why they would want these specific witnesses to be called and the majority could still push back or put this up to the full committee event at least republicans will have an opportunity to testify in the president's defense. what is not in here is anything that would allow for the president's counsel to come in and question some of these witnesses. that is something tha

for a stronger quarter next quarter that was intel that's why i think intel trades up towards the 56umber because it's had positive guyedens and they win in data center right now because if you look at the contracts with amazon and microsoft, they seem to be positioned better right now in my opinion especially after the run amd had. >> and the valuation story is intel more compelling than amd at these levels. go back last year. if you want to play stock market the name in amd went from 159 the levels now in a straight line over three months and thn cratered gave it back in a month. here we are a similar move from 20 to 34 a we're into the quarter. guidance okay. but do you want to play stock market here at 32 times nextier's numbers when this is a resistance level my instincts say take profits in amd. >> for more on the earnings from amd to amgen head over to cnbc.com. here is what else is coming up this hour. >>> investors have lost appetite for grub hub with shares notching the biggest one-day decline ever we will break down the future of the food delivery business >>> plus the mos

my understanding talking to democrats, a lot of these procedural questions can be answered with the intel committee and voted in there. so why would you take to to the floor, in such a tough spot and fueled by republican talking points? >> the majority of democrats are already publicly on record in support of the ongoing impeachment inquiry. as katherine clark eloquently outlined, we're in a phase right now where we are moving from information gathering primarily through deposition into the public presentation of facts and the truth to the american people. and consistent with that process moving forward, it's been determined that it is appropriate to outline how the transition will take place from the investigation that's ongoing now into the public presentation of witnesses, documents, information, and the truth to the american people. >> that needs to be a floor vote, not an intel committee vote. has that been determined? >> it seems to me that that make sense in terms of having a floor vote, because multiple committees are involved. specifically as it relates to the resolution, which w

. >> as far as intel purposes, was there any foreign intel that proved useful? >> we had our own intel, we got very little help and did not need much help. we have some incredible people. when we use our intelligence correctly what we can do is incredible. when we waste our time with intelligence that hurts our country, because we had poor leadership at the top that is not good. i have gotten to know many of the intel people and i will say that they are spectacular. they will not want to talk about it, they will keep it quiet. the people i have been dealing with are incredible people. it is really a deserving name, intelligence. i have dealt with some people who aren't very intelligent. having to do with intel. this is the top people and it was incredible. it was flawless. it was very complicated. i do appreciate russia, turkey, iraq, and syria to an extent. we are flying into syria, a lot of syrian people with lots of guns. we had good cover for probably the most dangerous part. when you are flying unit does not sound like that would be the most dangerous when

mike, quick question on intel.very positive for the broader corporate sector >> well, the semis bounced a little bit and i think that essentially it gave a little bit of reassurance after we did have the miss on texas instruments. i think in general, it was positive although with intel itself, it brings it right up to an area where it's kind of stalled out a couple of times. so see if it can get through >> shares of vfcorp. are sinking on an earnings miss. >> hey, there, contessa. vfcorp.'s earnings and revenue did come in short of expectations as the parent company. it also left its full-year forecast unchanged and that disappointed investors shares are down 7.5% sales from vans, the popular streetwear shoe and apparel brand looks to be slowing. those sales were up 14%. sounds good, but not so good when you compare it to growth of 26% last year. sales of dickeys and timberland brand, that whole segment fell about 4% the company then cut its full-year profit forecast for that work segment. currently, vfcorp. says a

shares of intel are higher.d third-quarter results that were better than expected. it gave a fourth-quarter outlook that was seen a strong. still, intel's gross margins are a concern. they are also worried about competition with advanced micro devices. amazon showing third-quarter profit growth -- verizon showing third-quarter profit growth. it is expanding its 5g service to 13 cities. softbank's vision fun plans to take a right down of at least $5 billion to reflect the plunge in the value of some of its biggest holdings. this includes uber and wework. softbank agreed to bailout wework in exchange for 80% of the company. that is your bloomberg business flash. alix: thanks so much. one of my favorite quotes that manager,from that softbank brought wework to its senses. that comes from chris gaffney. i don't know if i believe that. romaine: it is interesting. since they had been a public company -- if they had been a public company already when this broke, would that have shifted sentiment in the public market? ge

he's on the intel and oversight committees, and he's next. ah! come on! let's hide in the attic. no. in the basement. why can't we just get in the running car? are you crazy? let's hide behind the chainsaws. smart. yeah. ok. if you're in a horror movie, you make poor decisions. it's what you do. this was a good idea. shhhh. i'm being quiet. you're breathing on me! if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. let's go to the cemetery! - in the last year, of cybercrime every second. when a criminal has your personal information, they can do all sorts of things in your name. criminals can use ransomware, spyware, or malware to gain access to information like your name, your birthday, and even your social security number. - [announcer] that's why norton and lifelock are now part of one company, providing an all in one membership for your cyber safety that gives you identify theft protection, device security, a vpn for online privacy, and more. and if you have an identity theft problem, we'll work to fix it with our million dolla

we want to hear more from intel. charles: intel reports after the close. lam research.umber one market is china. 27%. korea 21%. china 18%. more after proxy for global trade war. millenials purchasing out of this world. paypal through the roof. a billion transactions. venmo is just hot. is this just a good sign not just for the overall consumer but for the millenial consumer? >> absolutely. this is where the future is. everyone, you know, who is, my kids, so far are using venmo. this shows indeed, you know, the, that the younger people, the millenials are traps transacting. they want to do it that their way. don't want a lot of bureaucracy or banks. charles: getting wrap, twitter or stay away down there. >> i need to know more what the short fall was. average daily users was advancing nicely. there were tech problems. >> inability to monetize then. 145 million daily activity users wall street estimates. they can't monetize it. if you can't monetize it. you're in trouble. >> same story, privacy issues. charles: david, thank you very much. fox news alert. british prime mi

he's on the intel and oversight committees, and he's next. ♪ ♪ you name it. ford f-150 will tow up to 13,200 pounds of it. ♪ asbut when your team is always dealing with device setups, app updates, and support calls... you can never seem to get anywhere. that's why dell technologies created unified workspace, powered by vmware. ♪ a revolutionary solution that lets you deploy, manage, support and secure all your devices from the cloud. so you can stop going in circles, and start moving forward. come on! let's hide in the attic. no. in the basement. why can't we just get in the running car? are you crazy? let's hide behind the chainsaws. smart. yeah. ok. if you're in a horror movie, you make poor decisions. it's what you do. this was a good idea. shhhh. i'm being quiet. you're breathing on me! if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. let's go to the cemetery! o♪ ozempic®! ♪ oh! oh! (announcer) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®,

he was working with the intel community to hurt president trump's campaign.his theory for the time was pushed hard by allies of president trump who believes in a deep deep state conspiracy against the president. >> martha: thank you very much jillian. joining is not, fox news analyst, the story of the greatest mass collusion in america's history, based on your work and your writing, i'm guessing you believe there is more to this. >> i think bill barr believes there is enough to investigate and john drown, who is his chief investor. you travel to italy and meet in a secure room at the embassy of joseph massoud, you have reason to believe that something had been going on. and there is some evidence. i mean you've talked to george papadopoulos. but massoud was part of this ops organization, to feed disinformation into the trump campaign so that the fbi could use it as a pretext to launch their investigation of trump. we don't know the answers to that but it seems bill barr wants the answers. >> martha: is also strikes me that obviously none of these countries ar

so we had our own intel we got very little help we didn't need very much help we have some incredible people when we use our intelligence correctly what we can do is incredible when we waste our time with intelligence that hurts our country because we had poor leadership at the top that's not good but i've gotten to know many of the intel people and i will say that they are spectacular another are not going to want to talk about it they want to keep it quiet the last thing they want because these are these are great patriots but the people that i've been dealing with are incredible people and it's really a deserving name intelligence i've dealt with some people that aren't very intelligent. having to do with intel but this is the top people and it was incredible it was flawless and it was very complicated but so i do appreciate russia turkey iraq and syria to an extent because you know we're flying into syria a lot of syrian people with lots of guns so we had. a good cover for probably the most dangerous part it would not sound to you know when you fly and it doesn't sound like that w

as intel purposes, was there any foreign intel that proved useful? intel, we gotown very little help and did not need much help. we have some incredible people. when we use our intelligence correctly what we can do is incredible. when we waste our time with intelligence that hurts our country, because we had poor leadership at the top that is not good. i have gotten to know many of the intel people and i will say that they are spectacular. they will not want to talk about it, they will keep it quiet. the people i have been dealing with our incredible people. it is really a deserving name, intelligence. i have dealt with some people who aren't very intelligent. having to do with intel. this is the top people and it was incredible. it was flawless. it was very complicated. i do appreciate russia, turkey, iraq, and syria to an extent. , a lotflying into syria of syrian people with lots of guns. we had good cover for probably the most dangerous part. when you are flying unit does not sound like that would be the you go intous when shooting all the things