. >> sounds like intental misrepresentation i don't want of the multiple levels of conduct. >> but i still want to see it resolved. >> it can be resolved though by taking down what they on the wrong and waiting a major. >> i wouldn't impose a year it's beyond the defect. >> we have to deal with the 4 and 4 and 3 and 3. >> that's my motion. >> can you repeat that. >> (laughter). >> i can i mean. >> so revoke the permit on the basis or finding of the misrepresentation of the permit application with the diversify for the dbi to work with the permit holder and that the one year bar should not apply. >> that's my motion. >> you didn't rise that. >> no, we were having a discussion. >> a debate. >> and a persuade unsuccessfully. >> did he need to repeat any of that. >> on that most to revoke this permit with that finding derivative. commissioner fung. commissioner wong. president lazarus and commissioner honda >> thank you. the vote is 5 to zero this permit is restraining order hi revoked. there's no further business. before the board. we're - >> good afternoon. welcome. >> good afternoon.

bishop: when i learned of intentional misrepresentations of wait times which may have caused 40 deaths at the phoenix v.a., i was deeply disapointed and downright disgusted. i'm pleased to see a bipartisan approach and i believe that this amendment will provide additional resources to the v.a. office of inspector general to improve oversight and accountability at the v.a. i agree with my colleagues from arizona that this situation requires answers and a thorough nvestigation. i believe that they should allow the i.g. to complete its investigation so the congress can take appropriate action if it's needed. the last thing i want is a knee jerk reaction that can cause additional problems. i believe this amendment is the right approach and i fully support it and i urge all members to do the same. i believe that a thorough investigation on the matter is the only way to restore our veterans' trust and the public trust in the v.a. health care system. we owe it to our veterans to ensure that the v.a. is providing the best possible care and that care is timely and accessible. i think this amend

. >> and more broadly with regard to your intentions as far as ukraine is concerned, is there misrepresentation going on, do you believe? >> translator: i think there is some prejudice against russia, but we need to talk to the media to clarify our position. as you might know, recently our president has sent a letter to the european leaders clarifying our stance on ukraine and making some suggestions as to the peaceful resolution of the crisis. >> what prejudice? where is that prejudice coming from? >> translator: i think this prejudice is generated by some countries that still believe that we need to further subsidize the ukraine an economy. if you look at the trade balance of ukraine, we see that the eu share and the customs union share are pretty much the same. they are actually equal. and while the ukraine sells to the u.s. raw materials and buys machinery and equipment with russia, it's quite different because ukraine sells the machinery and equipment to russia while receiving raw materials. it is very complicated, but we still are ready to continue working in terms of trade with the ukrai