we will also share it with other countries, and we will share it with the international atomic energy agency. let me tell you the history of it. we have known for years that iran had a secret nuclear weapons program called project amad. we can prove that project amad was a comprehensive program to design, build, and test nuclear weapons. here is what the goal here is what project amad's goal was. produce nuclear weapons. this is a presentation from these files. here is the mission statement. design, produce, and test five warheads for integration on a missile. you don't have to read farsi to see 10 kilotons here, of tnt. this is the specific goal. that is like five hiroshima bombs put on ballistic missiles. an original iranian spreadsheet from the archives of project amad. look at what it has here. enrichment projects. warhead project. simulation project. tests. indeed, when we analyzed what is in these archives, we found that had all five elements, the key elements of a nuclear weapons program. i want to take them one by one. the first element is designing nuclear weapons. this is an origin

if north korea is to denuclearize it needs to also bring in not only the international atomic energy agency but also the comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty organization which is the only international entity that has the credibility to verify the closure or the north korean nuclear weapon test site just because american and south korean and diplomats or officials might visit the site is not sufficient for international credibility with regard to your question about whether north korea whatever fire a nuclear weapon i seriously doubt that i also seriously doubt that the united states would mount a preemptive attack on north korea's nuclear facilities because north korea is holding seoul hostage with conventional weapons and there is no sure way of ensuring that north korea's nuclear weapon capability could be wiped out in a preemptive attack and millions of cars and hundreds of thousands of south koreans would be killed in a retaliatory non-nuclear non nuclear attack nevertheless the nuclear to tell it card has really what hasn't hit because we've it's brought kim to the chinese the south

to come clean by the nuclear deal to come clean to the international atomic energy agency about its nuclear program this was an explicit condition for implementing the nuclear deal iran has to come clean so in december two thousand and fifteen the i.a.e.a. published its final assessment of what it called the military aspects of iran's nuclear program this is the report this was iran's chance to fully come clean to the i.a.e.a. they could tell the truth they could say that we had this program the secret program it's over and we showed that it doesn't exist we destroyed the material here's what iran actually told the. it said. iran denied the existence of a coordinated program aimed at the development of a nuclear explosive device and specifically denied that this specifically denied the existence of the amount planned. the material proves otherwise that iran authorized initiated and funded project ahmad a coordinated program aimed at the development of a nuclear explosive device here's another document from the archive this is a master plan a project a month. iran said to the i.a.e.a. . and

to come cleanred with the nuclear deal, to come clear in the international atomic energy agency about its program. this is an explicit condition for implementing the nuclear deal. iran has to come clean. in 2015, they published the final assessment of what it called the military aspects of iran's nuclear program. report.the this was iran's chance to fully come clean. here is what i ran told the iea. , iran denied the existence of they program aimed at the development of a nuclear explosive devise. the existence of the plan. the material proves otherwise. fundedf, initiated and the project. here is another document from the archives. this is a master plan. no work has been conducted. you have to forgive me. terminology is something that is necessary to understand. no work has been conducted with mpi technology. again the archives shows this is a complete fabrication. .ran conducted extensive work hundreds of documents prove it. iran said to the agency it did not conduct work specifically designed for a nuclear devices. the files again show this is a lie. iran conductive -- conducted ex

we will also share it with other countries, and we'll share it with the international atomic energy agency. so let me tell you the history of this material. we've known for years that iran had a secret nuclear weapons program called project amad. we can now prove that project amad was a comprehensive program to design, build and test nuclear weapons. we can also prove that iran is secretly storing project amad material to use at a time of its choice to develop nuclear weapons. here's what project amad's explicit goal was, creating nuclear weapons. this is an original iranian presentation from these files, and here's the mission's statement. design, produce and test five warheads, each with 10 kiloton tnt yields for integration of a missile. you don't have to read far to see 10 kilotons here, tnt. this is a specific goal of project amad. that's like five hiroshima bombs to be put on ballistic missiles. this is an original iranian spreadsheet from the archives of project amad. look what it has here. centrifuge enrichment process, warhead project, simulation project and test. when we analyzed

to come clean by the nuclear deal to come clean to the international atomic energy agency about its nuclear program this was an explicit condition for implementing the nuclear deal iran has to come clean so in december two thousand and fifteen the i.a.e.a. published its final assessment of what it called the military aspects of iran's nuclear program this is the report. this was iran's chance to fully come clean to the i.a.e.a. they could tell the truth they could say we had this program the secret program it's over we shelved it it doesn't exist we destroyed the material here's what iran actually told the. it said. iran denied the existence of a coordinated program aimed at the development of a nuclear explosive device and specifically denied that this specifically denied the existence of the plan. the material proves otherwise that iran authorized initiated and funded project ahmad a coordinated program aimed at the development of a nuclear explosive device there's another document on the archive this is a master plan of project the month. iran said to the i.a.e.a. . no work has been cond

authenticity we will also share it with other countries and we'll share it with the international atomic energy agency so let me tell you the history of this material we've known for years that iran had a secret nuclear weapons program called project ahmad we cannot prove that project on ma was a comprehensive program to design build and test nuclear weapons we can also prove . that iran is secretly storing project ahmad material to use at a time of its choice to develop nuclear weapons here is what project ahmad's explicit goal was creating nuclear weapons this is an original iranian presentation from these files and here's the mission statement design produce and test five warheads each with ten kiloton tiant. for integration and a missile you don't have to read farsi to see ten kiloton here. this is the specific goal of project ahmad that's like five hiroshima bombs to be put on ballistic missiles.

iran described the claims as a rehash of old allegations already dealt with by the international atomic energy agency mr netanyahu of baseless accusations and propaganda. britain‘s second— and third—biggest supermarkets, sainsbury‘s and asda, have confirmed they are to merge. management says the deal would benefit both shareholders and customers. they also promised that no stores would close. the deal, worth £10 billion pounds, needs approval from the competition and markets authority before it can go ahead. our business editor simon jack takes a closer look. lower prices for everyday items — that is the promise on offer to customers of both sainsbury‘s and asda, as they laid out their plans for one of the biggest retail mergers in decades. the prospective boss of the new giant said its increased buying power would mean a better deal for customers. ultimately, we'll pass those benefits back to our customers, in the form of lower prices, and what we're talking about today is that we'd expect the price of everyday items, not all items, but everyday items, in the round to fall by 10%, and that's what we

and that he will now share with the international atomic energy agency.et's bring back in bloomberg views eli lake and still with us, bloomberg's national security editor, bill ferries. bill, how much ammunition does the prime minister offer president trump to actually withdrawal from the nuclear deal that he has been wanting to do since day one? bill: at a general level, we don't know much about the background of the substance of these documents. i think it is the kind of thing the white house would be very andrested in looking at perhaps weighing into their decision on may 12. slewresentation raises a of questions about the veracity of the documents, how they were obtained, whether documents searching allegedly program in the late 1990's through 2003 has really any relevance on the 2015 nuclear agreement. it raises more questions than answers, just in my mind, as a reporter. i don't think those are the quite -- the kind of questions that can get answered with the 11 or 12 days remaining before trump has to make a decision whether to stay in this deal. h

it is under full scope monitoring by the international atomic energy agency, and that agency says thatran is in full compliance with the agreement. and if the president has problems with other aspects of iran conduct, ballistic missiles, human rights, adventurerism in other countries in the middle east, he already has authority to sanction iran or russia or anyone which is partnering with iran or he can come to contact and ask for additional legal authority to do that. but it is hard to understand a strategy that would burn down the house in order to remodel the kitchen. if he feels there are some problems with iran, bring those problems to us, and we will try to work with him on a bipartisan basis to deal with those issues. but the deal itself is working, it is monitored, it has rolled back the iranian program. >> emmanuel macron has said, as he was heading into all of this, he wants to convince donald trump to stay in the deal. do you think that the french president can do that? >> well, my hope is that macron and later on this week merkel, along with other countries persuade donald

they obviously ought to turn that over to the international atomic energy agency and the u.s. and other countries that negotiated with iran. secondly, no surprise that the iranian bes were thinking about nuclear weapon in the past. that's why the bush and obama administration focused intently on trying to deny them that. there was a strong expectation that the iranians were troo tro build a weapon. third, this is obviously an attempt by president netanyahu to convince the trump administration to pull out of a deal by may 12th, the iran nuclear deal. i think we ought to stay in. all the evidence so far from the iaea is that iran is complying with this deal. it makes sense for the united states to stay in our. national interests would be advanced by that, but we have to guard against iranian extremism in the middle east and over the weekend there was a, an altercation between the israelis and iranians. i think that's the greater threat right now. the conventional possibility, conventional threat between israel and iran. >> ambassador nick burns, a pleasure. thank you so much. an

he added that the would also be shared with the international atomic energy agency.minating presentations, in creating blueprints, including photos, including videos and more. more on that later this evening and ina more on that later this evening and in a moment it will be time for sportsday but first a look at what else is coming up this evening. at seven, beyond 100 days looks into those claims by israel's prime minister who says his country has prove that iran has developed a secret nuclear weapons programme. more secret nuclear weapons programme. more reaction to the appointment of sirjude that it is the new home secretary as he vows to address the fallout from the windrush scandal. at 1040, all of the stories making the headlines in the papers with tonight ‘s guests. that's all ahead on bbc news but now it's time for sportsday. hello and welcome to sportsday. coming up, the fa ‘s technical director says england could win the world cup this summer but while is no specific targets, he says an early exit would be disappointing. he is the favourite and he is throug

mass destruction as the main problem they have tried to manipulate these international agencies and beat the international atomic energy agency which is a nuclear watchdog of the the o.p.c. w. the united states is trying to pressure are going to try to more meet ask but it's just a matter all vested interests so we have seen the scene up on the out not interested really in any multilateral body east conducting any serious investigation because their logic and in fact trump the spirit that he's opposed to monday institutions in general and he believes that unity of purpose and what they call a coalition frankly britain and france is not really a coalition the germans have said they're not going to be part of this so it's clear that they don't really have a big support of the international community therefore they want to weaken o.p.c. the wooden stool and do as starvation. a fait accompli and to spin the same thing again and again in the form of a propaganda that the assad regime is the only one using chemical weapons and in the process they just want to get ahead with the job because this is what we see that we as an o

away however it's important to note that a the international atomic energy agency has verified that iran is in full compliance with the agreement as recently as march and be iran's bill istic missiles aren't capable of carrying nuclear warheads according to its foreign mr minister now trump argues the opposite but mccrone and trump reaching consensus came as somewhat of a surprise to the other signatories especially considering that five hundred of french british and german m.p.'s wrote a letter to u.s. congress asking them to support the deal saying that the concerns should be addressed separately and not within the context of the j c p a way this is crucial because it's in direct conflict with mccollum's view so check out what the e.u. and russia have to say about it. and what can happen in the future will seen the future but there is one deal existing it's working it needs to be preserved we are against the revision of these agreements and believe it's very counterproductive to de ro the longstanding international efforts will make sure that these agreements and shrines in the u.n. se

security council years ago he worked at the un security council showing iran lying to the international atomic energy agency so a lot of people in iran trump also john bolton his new security adviser also mike pump a always new secretary of state hard liners when it comes to iran so basically this just reinforces supports their position that is of course bad news for the europeans trying to save the iran nuclear deal and donald trump currently is meeting with the nigerian president in washington and i guess the colleagues at the white house will definitely i ask him about this new revelations from the israeli prime minister so i think we'll have reactions from the u.s. president very soon absolutely and as your reference to please stand by carsten because after over a year in office u.s. president donald trump as carsten alluded to is welcoming his first african head of state to the white house as we speak during their talks nigerian that presents a more modern and trump are expected to focus on tightening economic ties and fighting terrorism and i'm sure he has been battling extremist group boko haram for

grove former head of the verification and security policy coordination office at the international atomic energy agency and in seoul was skype peter ward a rise of and k. news who researches. what it's like and what you're probably now to take it to jordan's capital amman where this dinner. just take my pompei out it's making alongside jordan's foreign minister i'm on safari let's listen to what they have to say man know what. love the appeal by now know that i'm not a man with a. thank you sir. talks today offered a tremendous opportunity to go over and over a of the issues many of the challenges that we face again the conversation was focused on how we can continue to work together to bring about peace and stability to the region and do we continue to coordinate and cooperate as we try to resolve many of the conflicts and crises that have denied the peoples of the region to peace and stability and opportunity that that is deserved key to that as you know for us in jordan is the palestinian israeli conflict this is we believe the main cause of stability in the region and its resolution is the key to a

trump says that iran is not in compliance with the agreement, that is incorrect, as the international atomic energy agencyy certified. one mp suggested the uk should have adopted a different approach to president trump. the country has scored an own goal by refusing to deal with president trump in the way that president macron has. difficult though it may be, it would have been better had we extended more of a hand of friendship and a welcome to president trump, given the need to influence him regardless of personal feelings. but he said the uk continually engaged with the us and would continue to do so. the academic of the facebook data harvesting row, dr alexander kogan, has told the culture committee that facebook has betrayed him as a rogue agent as part of a pr crisis mode. dr kogan came to public attention when it was claimed that information gathered from facebook for political consultancy cambridge analytica, also known as sco, was used for purposes. cambridge analytical has denied that data was used in the united states elections without people's consent. i think based on the evidence we received

s consider the details of netanyahu is claims and get the assessment of the international atomic energy agency she also noted the agency has published ten reports certifying that iran has fully complied with its commitments political science professor dr magid bhatt trust says the claims of the israeli prime minister are unjustified it must be sure by who and this is not the first one. in no position to take and criticize any country. planning to have. with the proliferation treaty he declined he refused to sign it repeated leak germany has responded immediately the person released saying that it's going to examine those documents they are assured that iran is. the only one is trump who is not convinced or wants to pull out and. put. forth a well known reason. south korea's president has reportedly said donald trump deserves a nobel peace prize for his efforts to deescalate the situation in the korean peninsula follows an historic meeting between the leaders of the north and south which saw both sides pledge to rid the potential of nuclear weapons before the end of the year the states also agr

he added that the would also be shared with the international atomic energy agency.. more on that later this evening and ina more on that later this evening and in a moment it will be time for sportsday but first a look at what else is coming up this

iran described the claims as a rehash of old allegations, already dealt with by the international atomic energy agencytain, and it's melting at an increased rate, causing sea levels to rise. britain and america are sending a hundred scientists to assess the state of the glacier. they say that if it were to collapse entirely, the rise in sea levels would be rapid and could have dramatic consequences globally, as our science editor, david shukman, reports. antarctica is changing. scientists capture the moment that vast chunks of ice break into the ocean. there's so much ice here, that even ifjust some of it melts, sea levels will rise around the world. so the urgent question is how rapidly the glaciers, the great streams of ice, are moving. satellite pictures already reveal that one of the biggest of them, thwaites, is shedding huge blocks of ice. if the whole lot went, the sea would end up nearly a metre higher. this matters for the millions of people who depend on sea defences to keep them safe, from the thames barrier in london, to walls of mud in bangladesh. the key is predicting how fast the sea wi

>> in the early agreements we also had surveillance monitoring by the international atomic energy agencywell as u.s. monitors, but i think what is that,ent now frankly is is the intensity here. we have had negotiations before, but we have not had a sitting engaging withelf the north korean leader. this is significant. it is risky. if it fails, things could go quickly in the wrong direction, but it is a formula we have not tried before. you may recall bill clinton clinton to north korea, sort of different. the world would be different if bill clinton had made the visit. i was part of the preparations for the potential visit. so we are doing this from the different level at a different time with a greater sense of urgency. secondly we do have very obviously a different north korean leader. i think i would not call him an honorable man, you know, given domestic record of repression and cruelty, but quite clearly he doesn't want to train about a change. skilled seems to be a actor and he seems to have a good sense of how to move public opinion. what is clear is i don't for a moment think he

iran was required by the iea to come clean by the nuclear deal, to come clean to the international atomic energy agency about the nuclear program. this was a condition for implementing the nuclear deal. iran has to come clean. sue on december 2015 ia ea published the nuclear aspect. this is the report. this was iran's chance to fully come clean. and they could tell the truth and we have a secret program and it is over and we shelved it and it doesn't exist and we destr destroyed the material. iran said iran denied the existence of a coordinated program aimed a specific nuclear device and denied the existence of the amad plan. and the material proves otherwise. that iran authorized and initiated and funded project amad. and aimed at a development of a nuclear device and this is another document from the archives and it was a master plan of project amad. iran said to the iaea, no work was conducted with multipoint initiation. this scientific terminology is something that is necessary to understand the production of nuclear weapons. this is what they say. no work has been conducted with mpi technology in

compliance has been certified repeatedly by the international atomic energy agency and both israeli and u.s. intelligence agencies, one of which you oversee. yet you have said that, and i quote here, iran will have the freedom to build an arsenal of nuclear weapons at the end of the commitment, end quote. however, even when the joint comprehensive plan of action sunsets under the current deal, iran will still remain a signatory of the non-proliferation treaty and a party to the iaea's additional protocol. iaea inspectors are not going anywhere, and if they did, the united states and the global community would have ample time to react to any breakout. in fact, the international community, through the secretary general, spoke out as to the importance of the jcpoa very recently. in view of this position in light of your apparent support of u.s. policy of regime change in iran, really the contrast there really upsets me. in 2014, you said you would have preferred military strikes to the jcpoa. and i quote here, this is your quote, it is under 2,000 sorties to destroy the iranian nuclear cap

. >> the international atomic energy agency, the five other countries involves, the u.k. and france, germany, china, russia, they all say that the iranians are honoring what they lived up to. they're honoring the commitment to freeze the nuclear program, the other aspects of it. they are not cheating. so why would you support ripping up the deal? >> two points. number one all of the allies who i have a great deal of respect for said president trump was being to angry with kim jong-un and with north korea. secondly, as we found out from the israelis today and i would love to be able to read all of the information that the prime minister had, iran has lied. they lied to the iaea and been pursuing ballistic missile capability and even though the premise of the deal was based on the fact it was for peaceful atomic energy. so if the president decides to stay in the deal, i trust him on that because i think he'll have a fall follow-on strategy and if he decided to get out i believe there is a follow on strategy that we are walking away and see you later. >> would pulling out of

could be the united nations or officials from the iaea, international atomic energy agency.ny inspections would require trust that the north korean regime isn't still hiding weapons or production faciliti s facilities. sometimes that includes surprise visits so they can't hide stuff. irreversible means total dismantlement of the country's nuclear energy program to prevent any future foray into nuclear weapons testing. it is not clear if the ballistic missile program would be part of the cvid. these are part of the issues that need to be worked out before a meeting between the regime and the u.s. president. and complicating things, the president insisted that the north koreans agreed to denuclearization. but they didn't agree to it. they just agreed to parts of things. we're going to be talking about that. the north is looking for denuclearization of the entire peninsula, the entire korean peninsula. since the u.s. hasn't stationed weapons in south korea since the cold war, despite a drop in demand for the condition of the talks, the north likely still sees any american milit

compliance has been recertified repeatedly by the international atomic energy agency. you have said that, and i quote here, iran will have the freedom to build an arsenal of nuclear weapons at the end of the commitment, end quote. however, even when the joint comprehensive plan of action sunsets under the current deal, iran will still remain a signatoiry and part of the ieae inspect erors are not going anywhere. the international community through the secretary general spoke out as to the importance of the the jcpoa. >>> view this position in light of support for regime change in iran, really the contrast there upsets me. it's under 2,000 to desdrtroy t iranian capacity. this is not an insurmountable task. end quote. is this your current position and are you for a first military strike. i know a bit more about what it could take today. i think i'm still pretty close. there is no doubt that this administration's policy and my view that preventing iran from getting a nuclear weapon. finding ourselves in the same place in north korea in iran is through diplomacy. >> do yo

test the ballistic missiles but in fact over the past two years inspectors from the international atomic energy agency have filed a report saying iran is sticking to its side of the agreement that nuclear deal between iran and six world powers lifted crippling economic sanctions in exchange of were strict sions on iran's nuclear program that speak to any say about syria top uneasy she's a research fellow at the royal united services institute joining us from london thanks for speaking to us so at the time of his last waiver in january president trump said that would be his last and the next sanction waiver is scheduled for may the twelfth what will the president do then. question up until that couple of weeks ago i think it brought expectational was that. that line was a way through or it trumpets. you were incorrect originally congress to find a way to six what are to perceive their weaknesses namely at least the size that they actually and it's so cool santa clause and i think the impression was that there was progress made to buy the rights in discussing issues and some sort of fire agreement would

and a former head of the verification and security policy coordination office of the international atomic energy agency he says closing the nuclear site will not make a difference it's not exactly clear whether north korea is going to close down the entire nuclear site or one of the connell's where apparently there was some collapse but closing down the nuclear test site at the moment will not have a significant impact because kim jungleland already stated last september after the last test that the nuclear weapon development program was complete and that therefore they did not need to test any more closing the nuclear weapon test site is only one part of the nuclearization so north korea would need to declare how many nuclear bombs they have there would need to be dismantled and the infrastructure for enriching uranium or separating plutonium and making the high explosives and other components of a nuclear warhead would also need to be dismantled but what is not clear is what is meant by the denuclearization of the korean peninsula whether it is just dismantlement by north korea or also the removal of

as well you know just over the border in iran we have weapons inspectors through the international atomic energy agency looking at iran's nuclear program verifying that they are complying with the nuclear agreement that they made several years ago if we lose faith in those inspectors in their ability to give sound judgments we undermine the ability to have confidence in that kind of a deal and that really puts a lot of pressure on governments including russia and clearly the united states to look for alternative options to diplomacy and verifiable agreements and that is a very dangerous slippery slope we do not want to be involved in general and thank you very much indeed let me just briefly remind you we are getting reports according to syrian state t.v. that a missile attack has been targeted on the share that air base in homs province that was the air base that was targeted by the u.s. back in two thousand and fifteen seventeen of the suspected chemical attack in qana that washington that the time blamed on the syrian government. ok the u.s. and the u.k. are warning that hackers backed by russia are

an iranian nuclear weapons program, compliance has been certified repeatedly by the international atomic energy agency and both israeli and u.s. intelligence agencies, one which you oversee. yet, you have said that and i quote here "iran will have the freedom to build an arsenal of nuclear weapons at the end of the commitment". however, even when the joint comprehensive plan of action sunsets under the current deal, iran will still remain a signatory of the nonproliferation treaty and a party to the iaea additional protocol. inspectors aren't going anywhere and if they did, the united states and the global community would have ample time to react to any breakout. and in fact, the international community through the secretary general spoke out as to the importance of the jcpoa very recently and do you view this position in light of apparent support for u.s. policy for regime change in iran, really the contrast there upsets me. in 2014, you said you would have preferred military strikes to the jcpoa. i quote here. this is your quote. it is under 2,000 sorties to destroy the iranian nuclear capacity. thi

and former head of the verification and security policy coordination office at the international atomic energy agency is very good to have you with us on al-jazeera so what impact do you think closing the sites where they test nuclear bombs have on the nuclear program. well first of all it's not exactly clear whether north korea is going to close down the entire nuclear site or one of the tunnels where apparently there was a collapse closing down the nuclear side at the moment will not hurt significant work because you're going already stated last september after the last year of the nuclear weapon development program was complete and therefore they did not anymore and we've had the white house say that president trump and president moon emphasize that a peaceful future for north korea is contingent upon that is complete verifiable and irreversible denuclearization but are we going to see i mean if we don't if we're not even sure if they're going to close down the test site for nuclear bombs could we see north korea get rid of all of its nuclear weapons. yes closing the nuclear weapons test site is o

traveled to very enthat where we discovered and revealed iran's secret side deals with the international atomic energy agency. in 2016, after a trip to norway and sweden, we wrote an op-ed in "the wall street journal" drawing attention to europe's growing challenges with mass migration and what it means for our own country. mike has gone from one success to another because he's a consummate professional, a man who treats everyone with respect but who doesn't pull a punch or shade a view to please his audience. democrats don't deny his professionalism. the senior senator from montana has said he's led and exemplary career in public service. the junior senator from delaware said he'd be a good advocate for the career professionals at the state department and usaid. even former secretaries of state hillary clinton and madeleine albright have expressed their hope that he'd reinvigorate the state department. and nonpartisan experts agree. mike pohl's -- mike pompeo can't be denied. mike is a solid, thoughtful and accomplished leader. it's why 30 national security professional, including former n.s.a. director kei

iran was require by the iaea to come clean, by the nuclear deal, to come clean to the international atomic energy agencyts nuclear program. this was an explicit condition for implementing the nuclear deal. iran has to come clean. so in december 2015, the iaea published its final assessment of what it called the -- neil: if you're just tuning in here, on the left of your screen israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu is addressing his nation -- a very unusual request he made of the broadcast agencies there to take to the nation's airwaves. it's about 8:23 p.m. israeli time. to the right of your screen, the president of the united states ready for a joint presser with the president of nigeria. but what's causing great concern is proof, the israelis say, of iran not only cheating on that nuclear agreement, but never honoring it in the first place. of course, this comes only a couple of weeks ahead of the president deciding yea or nay on whether he's going to be part of that nuclear deal. apparently, the prime minister discussed a lot of this intelligence with the president over the weekend. he was briefi

number one, the international atomic energy agency to make the inspections more intense with iran.onnell: right. >> and, so that they could go to all nuclear sites. second, this is where macron and president trump have a lot of common ground, we have not addressed the ballistic missile threat from iran. that is of concern it europeans. i would not be surprised to see movement toward a supplemental agreement on that. connell, look at ballistic miss ail capability of iran, compare it, that is basically the shad missile, to the type of missile from north korea, what do we see? surprise, surprise the same missile. they have been working hand-in-glove for years. i think this president, talking about may 12th. that is when the 90-day certification will be up. there will be a another 90-day period after that. i think president will deal with the north korean threat first. let's see what he gets out of that summit. if north korea is on pathway to denuclearization then he will make a decision long term on iran. connell: what i notice, market continues to sell off, news swirling around and t

compliance has been certified repeatedly by the international atomic energy agency and both israeli and u.s. intelligence agencies, one which you oversee. yet you have said that, and i quote here, iran will have the an arsenal ofld nuclear weapons at the end of that time. even when the joint comprehensive plan of action sunsets under the current deal, iran will still remain a signatory of the nonproliferation treaty and a party to the iaea's additional protocol. iaea inspectors are not going anywhere, and if they did, the united states and the global community would have ample time to react to any breakout. and in fact, the international community through the secretary general spoke out as to the importance of the jcpoa very recently. in view -- in this position in light of your apparent support for u.s. policy of regime change in iran, really the contrast there really upsets me. in 2014 you said you would have preferred military strikes to the jcpoa. and i quote here, this is your quote, it is under 2000 sorties to destroy the iranian nuclear capacity. this is not an insurmountable tas