the international anti—corruption court would be different than the international criminal court in someis criticised because it's prosecuted — exclusively, almost — africans. exactly. it goes after the weaker states, yeah. that would not be the case with the international anti—corruption court. i think the international criminal court is too much criticised. it's done more good than it's given credit for. but africans have been prosecuted exclusively. a, that's where the crimes within the jurisdiction of the international criminal court have largely occurred — crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide. grand corruption exists throughout the world. that's one. two, the international criminal court can have any investigation vetoed by the un security council. china vetoes investigations of north korea. mm—hm. it is our present intention to create this court outside of the united nations so there wouldn't be this opportunity for the big political powers to protect their friends and allies. so you are very closely involved in ukraine and you're obviously very distressed by what's happen

congratulations , ukraine is being reported, and not only to the fact that the international court of currently being created in gaza, and we need to explain to our viewers that at this moment, before it will be created, there is no court in the world that would try putin, when will this international court be created, and now such stars are working directly on its creation, we can directly say that philip sens, who developed and prescribed the working procedure of the international criminal court, is antoine grapon, who is the head of the french institute rights please tell me when such stars are involved, can't the process be faster, isn't it still only in a year that this international can work directly and special tribunal a-a this is indeed a very important urgent issue regarding how to bring to justice the senior leadership of the state that commits aggression. and it is precisely for this crime that the crime of aggression is not foreseen to be prosecuted even though it is recognized as a criminal offense and a crime a-a within the limits of international humanitarian law in fa

for them, there is an international criminal court in haysyn for them, but the international criminal court has our affairs, it has been investigating them on its own initiative and of its own free will since the beginning of the war and in ukraine already more than 60,000 war crimes have been recorded, they are documented by both ukrainian organizations and prosecutors of the international criminal court, and today there are a number of reasons why ukraine cannot transfer all cases only to the international court, the reason is the number of cases a more precisely, a huge number of them, in general, the international criminal court investigates episodes, that is, a number of crimes in a certain area, for example, buch, and mts is ready to take on six episodes in ukraine, and it will take just tens of years to date. is the maximum number of episodes for the countries that he took in order to well, well, to which he extended the jurisdiction of his work was three. secondly, the international court of justice works according to the princip

from the hawk, but one thing, i do not interfere, because the prosecutor 's office has the international defense courtonal crimes of the highest level and, accordingly, it is possible to create a tribunal after the victory speeding up the process in order to determine the amount of reparations and the like. and here are the questions of violation of the international right to give such international criminal dishes here, the main thing is that a-a acts with a cool head and rationally distributes jurisdiction one to another by and large it is important that these jurisdictions do not intersect because there is a principle that it is impossible to punish one and the same crime twice and judges for the same crime twice, that is, is it correct? i understand that vladimir putin can be convicted and a convicted ivan ivanov who, for example, tortured prisoners or killed women and children or dropped bombs on residential buildings, or these perpetrators cannot be convicted, only their commanders and putin, who actually started this aggression, not only the same putin can be a figurehead in both that and the s

but can this verdict continue to be the basis of decisions of international courts ? to blame him for some kind of commitment. not least because of this, ukraine transferred jurisdiction in this case to the dutch court, and directly, its conclusions can be used in international courts, but it must be understood that this is such a very delicate matter. and today, even the lawyers of the victims of the lawyer the families of the actual victims of this plane crash spoke about the fact that it is not necessary to mix warm with green and that the role of specific people in what happened in july 2014 in donbas and in other courts in particular the international court of the un and the european court of human rights consider the role of the russian state and the political military leadership, respectively, and of course these conclusions of the dutch district court of the hague, which ended today, will be used there. but will they become some kind of game changer that will completely change the situation or will there a determining factor in what other courts will accept, we

well, well, to which jurisdictions did he extend his work, there were three, secondly, the international courtthe principle of complementarity, that is, it will take into account the internal investigation of ukraine, but here we still have imperfect legislation, the ukrainian criminal code, there is no even the full concept of war crimes and crimes against humanity is a crime, a crime, genocides and crimes of aggression in general, there is no concrete example of the sentence to the first convict in ukraine, the occupier shishomarin, for the murder of an unarmed civilian of the sumy oblast at first, he went through the articles of violation of the laws and customs of war combined with the intentional killing of a civilian, the icc would not consider the category of crimes, it is clear that he killed, he is a murderer and in any case, article 115 of the criminal code is present there - this is intentional murder , moreover, it is an organized intentional murder and finally, the main thing is that the international criminal court cannot consider the fundamental and main crime of aggression, nam

well, the lawsuit was considered by an international court. it is with the consent of both parties.t is, here, uh, the competence of the international court should be involved - this is the first and there should be the consent of the parties that are involved in the dispute to ensure that the international court is considered in accordance. until now, the un general assembly has not even mentioned this mechanism. well, and finally, the third. it is clear why this is done. this is done in order to bring at least some e, at least such illusory, but, nevertheless, a reference legal basis for the subsequent actions of the collective west, it is clear that it will not be about africa, abaza and latin america - this is the western hemisphere. this is the western contingent. this nato space is for those states that are going not just to block, but to confiscate russian assets in this part of the world. and then to turn them in favor of ukraine, we are talking about directly affecting the immunities of our immunities as a state, because we are talking about state assets. i will remind you

three courts are investigating five acts of genocide, among them the main one is the fact that the genocide of the ukrainian people was committed. all this evidence will be handed over to the internationalal court, and the most ridiculous thing is that the federation is committing genocide against ukrainians, and russian propagandists are helping us. your method is why you are intelligent people who write or are fictionists. and this is our method, he said that moscow was occupied and you immediately throw it directly into the river with a boom or a storm trends and in ukraine, there is no civil infrastructure that has not been liberated. there are no gaps in the ac, there are still true nodes, well, there are many different infrastructures that, in principle, can disable the functioning of this state hostile to us. before that, i am a terrorist in general, i generally said, you know, three days for everyone to leave peacefully from kharkiv, from nikolaev, from odessa, three days, if it is not done, we will demolish quarter by quarter, damn the propagandists of hatred we should not forget about another international case of genocide, the rwandan tribunal in october in ha broke up the tr

the international criminal court is considering cases of war crimes, and here the nuance is that the highest officials of russia practically cannot be brought to justice for these crimes. they are immune from the jurisdiction of judges of other countries. these are the rules of international law. in theory, putin can be brought to justice for war crimes. but for this, it is necessary to prove this the whole chain between the executors of the soldiers of the russian army who, uh, there was a puppy of torture against our ukrainian soldier. and what is this order? he received it from his commander, then from his own, from his own, and so on, putin himself, the un international court of human rights or the european court of human rights are able to prove only the responsibility of russia as a state. however, they will not punish specific people, that is why ukraine insists on the creation of a special tribunal that would directly try putin and his supporters, not specific war crimes, but the fact of military aggression which is the highest international crime according to the quote from

in the sense of the un court, this is not an international criminal court, which is also located in gaza, this is also a local court, which is by agreement the appropriate international procedure based on the activities of a joint group of investigators conducted an exhaustive study involving all possible means of proving the involvement of the russian federation in the mass murder of citizens on a civilian aircraft and not in this case it does not matter whether they are shelling a civilian object in kyiv plane in the sky 8 years ago confirms the only thing that russia is a threat, its activity is the management of one village, the consequences are not foreseeable why because any system it characterized by the processes that take place in it, and these processes can be of only two types , the world did not invent another one, there are managed processes and unmanaged processes, and what is happening with the russian federation implies that this country lacks stability and predictability of its own internal development, and it is actually dangerous itself on my own, i will tell you that

that this model is probably not the most effective and does not work as expected by the un international courtice or the european the human rights court is able to prove only the responsibility of russia as a state. however, they will not punish specific people, that is why ukraine insists on the creation of a special tribunal that would try putin and his supporters directly, not for specific war crimes, but for the fact of military aggression, which is the highest international crime according to the quote from the decision from the international tribunal in nuremberg, the closest analogue that we can talk about is the normer tribunal over nazi criminals, which took place after the victory in the second world war and it is obvious that one of the options that can be considered is an important victory over russia when the highest leadership appears before an international tribunal, but the nuremberg trial that took place in 1945-46 was of the victorious countries over the capitulating countries, it was the first example in the history of mankind when such a process took place in civilized, leg

we will quickly receive a resolution of the un general assembly on the creation of a special international court, this is too optimistic, but ukraine is consistently and systematically working in this direction, and i think that in any case we will find international legal mechanisms that will ensure the creation of such an international special criminal court, an international tribunal, it can does not necessarily have to be at the level of a global global affirmation of global support, it can be some regional initiative, it can be a multilateral agreement with those partners who support the idea of ​​creating such a tribunal and i am convinced that this tribunal will still be and we will bring and bring to justice the highest political leadership of those who gave and those who carried out what are the orders, we have a moment at the end about the shelling of russia on our territories, all these crimes will be fixed and added and applied in this tribunal without any doubt. in the territory of ukraine, special joint investigative commissions with representatives of the international criminal co

of the united nations across the street from the international court, and there is also an international also, accordingly, the hague court, which was examined by the dutch court , according to the nationality, these are three different courts, three different buildings, and, accordingly, a completely different team and there are tapes of the international tribunal in the last 60-80 years. at

into a single database and the prospects of transferring cases to both ukrainian national and international courts such as the international criminal court in gaza will probably discuss the ukrainian proposal to create a special tribunal to prosecute the leadership of russia for the crime of aggression, kyiv's position in berlin will be represented by minister of justice denys maluska and prosecutor general andriy kostin, in addition to them , the ministers of simka will be joined by european commissioner for justice didier reynders and the chief prosecutor of the international criminal court karim khan international criminal law is based on a powerful promise namely war crimes can not to remain unpunished regardless of where they happened and from whoever made them to keep this promise, our duty actually in fifa today its members have already arrived in berlin, well, the official part will take place tomorrow and not at the ministry of justice, which is located literally a few hundred meters away, but here in to the ministry of foreign affairs of germany perhaps because this department has more c

the united kingdom government to the international court of justice , international court of justice,concerned with kosovo . but those submissions kosovo. but those submissions consistent with the quebec case for government submits that the right to self—determination under international law with limited to situate of a colonial type or those involving foreign occupation . that's not the occupation. that's not the position in scotland for all these reasons which are set out more fully in the judgement the courts unanimously conclude that the proposed bill does relate to reserved matters accordingly . in reserved matters accordingly. in the absence of any modification of the definition , reserved of the definition, reserved matters by an order in counsel under section of the scotland act or the scottish does not have the power to legislate for a referendum . scottish a referendum. scottish independence . the court will now . just good morning . you are watching good morning. you are watching gb news. i bev turner. we've just been watching an historic moment unravelling there. that was

, but in the un international court there isrisdiction. he has the right to consider the case only if both states have agreed to become parties to the trial , theoretically the european court of human rights could oblige the aggressor state to pay, but russia left the council of europe in september 2022 and does not comply with decisions, so for now the only option remains the seized russian money . forcibly those assets that are now arrested, we say now foreign, they will be transferred to the benefit of those applicants who won these proceedings, reparations were paid and in modern history, examples can be named monetary compensations to iraq for the occupation of kuwait in 1990-91 became the basis for the payments, the resolutions of the un security council formed a compensation commission after the conflict, and in general, cancer transferred 52 billion us dollars to kuwait dmytro didora oleksandr burlevych yehor nikitenko and andriy verstyuk espresso tv channel, i would like to thank our colleagues clearly and extremely rea

begin in ukraine, and unfortunately, it is not necessary to count on justice from the international criminal court of other politicized international institutions. ah, and one more topic. and also in the context of the situation, uh, about which i spoke, we consider the decision of the national assembly of the republic of bulgaria to provide military and military-technical support to ukraine as another an unfriendly attack on our country, which will lead to further degradation without being in a deplorable state of bilateral relations. now the responsibility for delaying the escalation of the conflict. there are thousands of victims in ukraine. among the civilian population, the destruction of civilian infrastructure and the couple's safety in europe falls to the fullest. and on sofia, we are convinced that bulgarian lawmakers are aware of the facts of illegal trafficking in weapons, including those coming from abroad in ukraine-controlled territories and cannot but be aware of the threat of it falling into the hands of tourist groups and the formation bank in numerous hot spots around the world.

european commission, urson von der leyen, proposed to russia in ukraine to create a special international court to consider these crimes. it is not clear what the mechanism is and what the prospects for its creation are. the fact that the european union supports the creation of a special international court or will it be called a tribunal or something else , this is already another matter, this is a serious step as will it continue to be a problematic issue, the easiest way would be the creation of its decision by the un security council, as was the case with the special tribunal for the former yugoslavia, but it is obvious that russia, as a member of the un security council, will oppose this in moscow. it has already been made clear that russia will not agree to so, use your legal right. therefore, an international agreement will be needed . britain where did we hear favorable voices in support and it is obvious that it will be a broad international agreement for which it will be necessary to gather as much as possible support ukraine is estimated at 600 billion euros russia its oligarchs must

but together however, it provides a basis for ukrainian lawsuits against russia because the international courtf justice or a court in another country recognized russian influence on our territory , so the control of the russian federation over our territory since 2014, what does this give us in the future yes, this is not the first process, and there will be subsequent processes, the next one will most likely not concern the highest military and political leadership, but the direct perpetrators of this crime, so those persons who directly controlled the beech, who launched the rocket, and this process will be much more complicated because that he will require much more evidence, a more complicated proof procedure, we need to establish who gave the order, who pressed the button, who pointed at the targets, yes, the plane named 17 , that is, there are a lot of questions and this process will drag on for a long period of time, it will be difficult for the dutch court to hold high-ranking officials here, because in international law there is such a phenomenon as high- ranking officials and the pre

you think in court, whether an international court or a special court that's set up to, to judge these crimes, to establish a chain of command. so i really after this war started at the i c. c established proceedings that would be able to deal with that. of course, russia is not a part of g i. c c, because it withdrew a trade some, a procedural obligations. and deb, but many european countries that the americans, nato countries have been working with ukraine on collecting biometric evidence, collecting a documentary, evidence of what russian work, grimes. so these tribunals can one day be held. ukraine is also initiated proceedings against lower level russian military personnel and into resulting the state of convictions for cramps. but obviously, the big problem is that russia has got a categorical opposition to extracting its own citizens about a man who made that very clear. for example, when the buller investigation came out and there was discussions about actually jerry officers involved, rush interference or have any per goshen who was on the at the i was one of us and who was ab

that evidence could then be used in international courts to hold the government accountable.e of iran have been risking their lives since the death of 22—year—old mahsa amini in police custody. protesters here banking on world powers to support them. stephanie prentice, bbc news. well, let's get more on this story. yasmine chubin is the legal advocacy director at the clooney foundation forjustice and a former prosecutor at the international criminal court and shejoins me now from washington. entry forjoining me —— thank you forjoining me. yasmine you've followed closely the un council vote to set up this investigation into human rights abuses. are the people of iran closer to securing their human rights? i think, yes, ithink, yes, i believe i think, yes, i believe today is�*s vote of the human rights council was hugely important for the exact reason that you are saying, that the people of iran are now closer to ensuring their human rights, because there will be an investigative mechanism, so the world is now watching, and there will be an independent, fact—finding mission tha

all those who organized, carried out and sent it will be held accountable for it before the international courte continue the marathon the only news in the studio of the tv channel rada we work for you olesya nitsevich and maksym zbrovskyi contact us roman yedelev international lawyer associate professor of the department taras shevchenko university of international law, mr. roman. congratulations. good day, so let's now try to understand what russia is doing and what are the possibilities of counteracting it, legal and legal in the world civilized, and in particular, now russia is raising the stakes as much as possible when talking about nuclear weapons, how should and can the world react to it, the answer to your question is very simple, russia continues to violate international law, and today's shelling is a violation of international humanitarian law, because they were not directed against military facilities, and against civilian facilities, against the civilian population, the attacks were aimed at critical infrastructure, which, from the point of view of international law, has an unequiv

did not sign it, but since the crimes are committed on the territory of ukraine, then this international courtt has jurisdiction over these crimes, because ukraine is a country signed here , and, in principle, from the point of view of international law, any court of any country can, since there is a violation of the main principles of the organization of the united nations the principles of international law can consider these cases, too, the creation of a separate tribunal in general, how was the first separate tribunal of its kind for nazi crimes and the hungarian tribunal , or how were the tribunals in the former yugoslavia and other tribunals that were created separately a-a i too well, the evolution itself is interesting, for example, the same scholz, and also recently, the co-chairman of the social democratic party of germany, las-klingheil, gave a speech in berlin with such a program, and it was also recognized there that the previous policy was very wrong towards moscow, berlin towards moscow, at the same time we hear that, for example, the same angela merkel continues to insist that

here relative to the top military and political leadership of russia, but this is a court that will have an international legal character. today we have a verdict, we will have a verdict more faithful to the national court of the netherlands because it was actually their subjects who died in the majority and in this sense well, we can say that the netherlands did not want to pursue the closer management or they did not have evidence today the court itself will approve the conclusions of the investigation which are final, i think that we cannot expect an additional investigation here. well simply from our time we remember how long the investigation dug, it is in particular about the downed boeing over locoby, scotland, they dug for so long, but we came to mor gaddafi, we know how he ended well, accordingly, i would like to believe that there are possibly some auxiliary additional procedures well, okay, today 's court decision will be such that it is not subject to appeal and so on, but it is possible that some parallel investigation is underway that can use the results of, for example, today's verdict and

greetings to the head, the european commission said that it is necessary to create an international courtinst russia to enlist support and the european commission proposes to create a fund to pay ukraine from frozen russian let me remind you that reserves blocked 300 billion euros of assets and the central bank, plus another 19 billion euros of private funds. this is the money the head of the european commission left vonderlein offers to invest, and direct the profits to pay him. in the short term, we could create a structure together with our partners to manage and invest these funds. when sanctions are lifted, these funds will be used to ensure that russia fully compensates for the damage caused to ukraine, we will work on an international an agreement with our partners to implement this, in order to legalize these operations, the european union intends to create an international court of justice and enlist the support of the un, according to von der. lane damage to ukraine at first a special operation amounted to 600 billion euros. at the same time, president of ukraine volodymyr zelen

later, when all the evidence is collected, they will be handed over to the international court of justice in order to bring the russian federation to justice and collect compensation. for example, chemical pollution is still dangerous, which itself is an instant danger, for example, the highly toxic rocket fuel, or it is a danger that can be prolonged in time in the action on such small particles, is going to be more well, more evidence base, analytical material, and we can then collect, understand the algorithm, what the impacts were, collect the evidence base, and then understand how nature can be restored, today we will talk about how the war affects the ecosystem of ukraine, in particular, about the damage suffered by the black sea from barbaric actions army, because it is already known that a fifth of the dolphins died in the sea because of the warships of the occupiers, the nesting places of rare birds were destroyed by bombing, and dozens of intact dolphins drowned in protected estuaries rockets, so please contact us, doctor of biological sciences, head of the research department o

we can fantasize about the numbers inside the country as much as we want, but when we go to international courts and international organizations, they will only accept international methodologies, and this must be understood from the very first day, because we know both in accounting, in expenses, and in losses , the main thing is primary documents, that is, the correct collection and filing of primary documents and further in accordance with international law international myth- method of damage assessment, this will be the basis of our reparations. unfortunately, there are other options that each country will come up with. the evaluations of the kyiv school of economics there are one story. judging by the story, the world bank calculated the amount in its own way from a completely different amount, that is, there may be different methods and different approaches to these calculations, which one should be chosen correctly and who should be involved in this process -e in this the state of ukraine and international organizations, as well as those e-e organizations and lawyers who have already had

payment to legalize the withdrawal of funds in the european commission proposed to create an international court ukraine, meanwhile, continue to recoup history odessa city council voted for the dismantling and transfer of the monuments of the russian empress catherine ii and commander alexander suvorov noted. what voted for 43 deputies or 97.7% of those present on the eve of the bronze bust. pushkin has already been dismantled in the city of ananiev, odessa region. a powerful explosion in northern afghanistan, the incident occurred in one of the religious schools in the province. during common prayer local media reported 35 people were killed, 23 more were injured most of the victims. schoolchildren did not take responsibility for the explosion, not a single radical group operating in the region details of the incident are being specified the baltic countries are beginning to realize the consequences of their policy, it turns out that lithuania cannot completely exclude china from global trade, the minister of economy and innovation of the baltic republic admitted i remind you that relations bet

up until this announcement, he worked as a war crime prosecutor at the international penal court at the- he is d.c. bound or he has about three decades of experience working in the u.s. capitol. he led the department of justice's, integrity section in the 2010s, gaining high-profile convictions of corrupt politicians who were republican and democrat. >> the first train to newly liberated kherson, has left ukraine's capital restoring the two cities. the journey is been called the train to victory and will arrive in the regional capital. workers have repaired it damage it tracks which were vandalized by russian forces. kyiv is preparing for rolling blackouts this winter. as pressure continues to target ukraine's energy facilities. the prime minister says almost half of its energy system has been disabled. poll have opened in malaysia as general elections. voters are choosing from 945 candidates. it's the tightest since. independence in 19 to of the. seventhey -- in 1957. an airplane has caught fire after hitting a fire truck. on the runway at peru's international airport. two firefighters

well , the hague court, this is not the international court of justice. this is gaga's dutch court. expected result of the lawsuit that was started. uh, a number of countries that, uh, did, rather pretended to have done investigation of this unfortunate incident without involving, but the russian side. ah, and without tradition to this truly objective international character. well, they have a coin. by the way, speaking, to blame the authorities of the then authorities. e of the donetsk people's republic in involvement in this, it was sucked from the finger from the very beginning. moreover, the black boxes of that crashed plane. eventually, they were discovered. i will remind. ah, in the details of the situation of the fourteenth year. they were discovered precisely by the authorities of the dpr and transmitted uh officially by the representative of malaysia as a country. uh, who owned that plane and, uh, that's it. it was done in a quite, er, vowel, quite civilized manner and went unnoticed back. and therefore, uh, well, from the russian side, uh, during these eight years, uh, man

that is, it is not only in the eu pl, that is why if we take any international court, that is, it will be long-lasting and european courts, we call it the most popular, probably, in relation to the appeal to the european the court e.e. from the statement about violations of human rights and it has a very heavy load from the very beginning. that is, it is probably only in ukraine. that is, what number of complaints did it have there in general, more than 60,000 in total there against all member states of the council of europe and therefore, yes, it in some way affects the duration of the consideration of cases, but despite this, it still remains an effective mechanism because the european court can review how effectively the state has fulfilled its obligations in the context of observing human rights that is, the european court is not the fourth instance. that is, it will not review the verdict, but they will not say that there is something wrong there, there is some kind of flaw in the specific wording, that is, it is not about this, this institution considers the situation as a whole

we speak to the international criminal court chief prosecutor about war crimes and libya on the complaint by the family of journalists city in our play over for killing by is really forces. facebook's owner, metal fires $11000.00 staff worldwide, the latest tech firm to see mass layoff in sports, a huge setback for synagogue ahead of the fee for well cut with just $10.00 days to the torment, the african term, his half a pussy nelson main man, study him money because of injury. welcome to the news hour. we begin with breaking news on the war in ukraine. russia's defense minister survey showing who has ordered his troops to withdraw from the ukrainian city of her son. it's the only regional capital captured by moscow. since the invasion began. the russian military said it's to prevent more casualties as a big reports from her son. this is how the battle for her song is being fought. automobile lottery crews targeting russian forces just kilometers away. they have the coordinates, it's a quick, 2 shots, and then they have to move go get and going good. we had to get out the way really quickl

well, what kind of tribunal should we come to, or could it be an international criminal court? understand that this is a joint position of ukraine and the united states. this is the creation of an international tribunal through the un. well, bedvangak just explained how it could be. it was an interesting moment. she said that it could be a bilateral agreement between ukraine and organization of the united nations, she understands in the states that the salon won't approve it, so it can be approved through the general assembly , and she even explained that i already have huge support for this idea from certain european countries, such as the baltic countries. well, there are european countries, they are they didn't name it, we can imagine who it is, which ones are not yet ready, which ones are still inhibiting this idea , but the mechanism has already been decided dima, i'm sorry, i didn't fully understand the mechanism, but since you communicated directly with well, not the author, but as a person who understands this, that is, uh, well , an agreement. okay, ukraine is negotiati

since the 16th of march, the international court of justice have called for the suspension of russia's military operations. soon, 9 months of war will have elapsed and attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure continue. russia is now targeting power stations and hydro electric plants and heating networks, which are far behind the for line with the apparent goal of breaking the resistance of a people who is fighting for its freedom because it is losing ground. russia is looking to plunge ukraine into cold and into darkness. as winter draws near. this strategy is already a failure. it is in no way eroding the resistance of the ukrainian people. on the contrary, this strategy is bolstering its determination the liberation of care. sonya is one more illustration of that fact mister present. more, the more russia digs its heels in to make this war last, the more it worsens, the energy food and economic consequences of that war. in recent weeks, in this very chamber, we'd heard russia increase it outrageous accusations regarding the preparation of a dirty bomb by ukraine. the ins

probably, the fact that the talk about the creation of another special court on human rights. of the internal courtthe russian federation well, it is clear that from a theoretical and practical point of view, the problem of a multi-layered intersection would immediately arise, and so on. as a matter of fact, what do all the courts do if they are not engaged in the protection of human rights, starting from the lowest instance of the magistrates' courts and including the supreme court and the constitutional court one of in this regard. i would like to point out one more problem. they have already said vladimir vladimirovich this is a complete effective judicial protection. eh, this strictly speaking, this is the main goal or purpose of the function of the court, and it should be noted in this regard, first of all, that the court in this case, the judicial system of justice, is based on the principle of constitutional legality. and even i would say, because if we speak with the eye of the institution, as in the basic law. which equips and all this pyramid uh hmm why did i specifically decide to touch

the international criminal court took it upon itself to a wide judgment to the d. r. c and the, the ordered, the, that you london government is responsible for that economy malays, as well as infliction of harm on persons and ordered the london government to pay that the r c some 320 $5000000.00 in 6 installments of $65000000.00 each. the ugandan government made the 1st installment of their payment in september the 1st earlier this year. but you can understand the trepidation and the hesitance of people on the ground with regards to the involvement back in the area and mind you, me would complicate the story even further that you got under already has troops in the eastern part of the d. r. c. as part of the contingency that's there to fight the influence of iso in the region. now this agreement, part of what's surprising about it, is that it's made between the d r c and was hosted by the president and the african union mediator, or the president of angola, unless they shall ankle. it was also attended by the president of burgundy, who is also the chair of the east af

yes , therefore, the international criminal court.ur judge pursues. we will be against these judges of sans and look everywhere. this is how we should try to do the same. still , orthodox resistance. or rather, you know the absence of it, and after all, the destruction is precisely the destruction, orthodoxy was the main goal of the americans on the territory of ukraine and they did it. they do it very systematically methodically, but carefully every time, just fearing this resistance, because there were religious processions and there was a period when these attacks on temples would be beaten off. all this was. well, every time the screws were tightened and think about these institutions of sectarian churches, the kiev patriarchate. the security service of ukraine was engaged in their creation, their control was carried out by the special service. these are not random things. in 2014 , i found a report from one sbu officer in donetsk and am reading it. he reports in one of the temples. we managed to consolidate the leadership of the

the international court in the hague has decided to resume investigations into afghanistan. war forces. he is following a 2 year hiatus as a prosecuted mouth, as he would focus on the u. s. and it's nato allies. human rights once however, has taken issue at the statement, saying all sides must be sufficiently examined. this investigation needs to address serious crimes by all sides in the conflict, including us forces to bring justice even when the most powerful nations are involved. in regulation, i will focus on, i pay a $1000.00 taliban government, and a local branch of the stream is good islamic state. the lead prosecutor british lawyer could, in con, has said his office would quote, deep prioritize inquiries into us forces and their allies during the 2 decade occupation. i have decided to focus my offices investigations in afghanistan on crime, allegedly committed by the taliban and his long state course and province and to de prioritize other aspects of this investigation. the u. s. a favors the admissions. it's a, using internationally condemned phosphorus, bombs and outcast on

well, if someone wants to hold someone accountable legally, that is, the international court of justice, but for the west, which pours every day billions to ukraine, this path is too long. in addition, with an unpredictable ending, money was needed yesterday, when one of the main european mouthpieces of american foreign policy. poland spoke the language of the greedy troll leprechaun from irish folklore. there is a huge pot of gold that you need to pick up in your pocket with someone else’s idea for the west, there are not new examples of mass and recent precedent with the transfer of venezuelan reserves stored in the usa and britain to juan guido simply because it was beneficial for the west to recognize it as legal president and for k 9 billion afghanistan after the fall of kabul, which the americans, in fact, provoked themselves, and then shamefully fled, leaving their yesterday's allies, even the former president. khamid karrzaev, begged washington to return the funds that belong to the wrong afghan people in the accounts of western banks. tens of billions of libyan assets hung. the

some are being tried in international courts.s is a group of people, remnants of people who committed genocide in rwanda. they fled to drc, and continue to attack communities. for my colleague's statement, they are committed to working with them. this is the primary quarrel rwanda has with the drc. using the support of the drc -- rwanda keeps asking the drc to stop collaborating with fdlr as a genocidal organization. >> our guest in london -- >> you are telling congo what to do. you have the audacity to say this. that's a very serious allegation. people who are seeking protection in our country. you speak as an international community, to our lawyer. you have the density in the international community to devalue another nation by imposing what you want them to do. that is a serious allegation. this people do not want to go back to your country because you are targeting them, killing them. rwanda has a track record of killing those people. we welcome you. we accepted you. how many years congolese people have to be killed because w

legalize the withdrawal of funds and the top of the european commission proposed to create international courtstice v. russia the troops of belarus received another batch of modern means and communication systems, a solemn transfer took place in osipovichi among the handed over equipment, samples of modernized combined radio stations, command vehicles and much more. all otechestvennaya equipment is manufactured taking into account the latest scientific and technological achievements in the field of military communications. our kvpk belarusian is fully loaded with the production of the entire line of digital with communication technology, which will ensure the management of the general staff, the soldiers are completing large volumes, but our colleagues from the gvpk are successfully coping with the troops, new and modernized communication models are the basis for the progressive development of the armed forces and the key to ensuring their high readiness. vladimir makei was a great and sincere friend of russia and a true patriot of his homeland; his sudden death was a real tragedy for everyone

in other words, accusing the west, accusing investigators and the international court of anti-russian, complaining that rush is not part of the investigation, and trying to dismiss the process as illegitimate. after a painstaking inteational investigation into this disaster and a two year cryo, these russian arguments will convince a few in the international community, but they are aimed principally at a domestic audience. two of the three men who were convicted birth russian citizens -- igor girkin and sergei du binsky, they are not court. they are at large and there is virtually no prospect of moscow handing them over to serve their sentences. >> lesson four months ago, neighbored air its finale. fans, who are in the millions, and the cast thought the soap opera was over, but today>> hav? >> we are coming back. >> nice to see you, too. >> we are back on amazon. how does the second half of next year sound? >> kit is confirmation that the show will resume filming next year. -- that is confirmation that the show will resume filming next year. among the former cast and fans. donovan twe

the ukrainian military will have to answer in an international court for their atrocities. reported by the new york times. they confirmed the fact of the murder of russian prisoners of war in makeyevka video too the authentic series of videos with footage of massacres of soldiers turned out to be reliable, experts of the russian military said, in their opinion, it was the militants who beat them with their own hands, thereby committing a terrible war crime. it seems that most of them died from gunshots to the head, the author of the article concluded, the study of personnel began at the un the shelling of the zaporozhye nuclear power plant must be urgently stopped, and a security zone must be created around the nuclear plant, said the director general of the international atomic energy agency rafael groissy, in an interview with an american television company, urged himself to stop the attack on the zaporozhye nuclear power plant. however, for some reason he did not indicate who exactly was shelling the plant, the iaea director general called the situation around it unprece

, the international court of justice and also prosecutions in national courts of universal jurisdictiondo you see the human rights councils role in supporting these accountability efforts and specifically if there's any insight that you can share on that. do you think that the establishment of a ukraine specific investigative mechanism can help gap, patches some gaps withth respect accountability, r how do you see that role were accountability is concern? >> the important thing is to think that there are several efforts on accountability on the ground. but the commission of inquiry created by the main international body created by the international community human rights is the one that is acting on behalf of of the international community. appointed in the body like the hrc. what i think is that we should take advantage of such a commission in order to maximize the different efforts on the ground. because as you say we have national prosecutions on the ground. we have ngos come for important ngos, international, on the ground.ea we have the european union and we have the icc, but the s

, but there is a problem of jurisdiction in the un international courthe has the right to consider the case only if both states behaved to become parties to the court proceedings, theoretically the european court of human rights could oblige the aggressor state to pay, however in september 2022, russia left the council of europe and does not comply with its decisions, so for now the only option is to seize russian money . well, if the international arbitration accepts the demands of the municipality or the state of ukraine as a whole, then the assets that are currently seized, we say, are now foreign they will be transferred to the benefit of those applicants who won these proceedings, reparations were paid , and in modern history, examples include monetary compensation to iraq for the occupation of kuwait in in 1990-91, the basis for the payments were the resolutions of the un security council. after the conflict, a compensation commission was formed and, in general, the cancer transferred 52 billion us dollars to kuwait. of school buses for ukraine, th