and then any international courts. these are simply hegemonic courts and no, nothing, but new. for us, these are just analogues of intranational courts. uh, since a world united under a hegemon is just an analogue of a sovereign state, extended to the entire global globe the second variant of such an order is, for example , if there is, relatively speaking, a certain extended situation with the un general assembly where there will be no world hegemon, and the world hegemot will be represented, as it were, by some kind of world parliament. uh, this is the second uh, the second option that was offered there in the middle of the 2000s in the mid-10s. this is considered such a european version of global international law, and not under the leadership of any particular state. e. well, then, in fact, the situation doesn't change at all. simply conditionally, this is not some specific state. they are, well, a certain number of subjects. not only, by the way, it was proposed to turn off the states there. and representatives of

court? well , which considers various such international cases ? the london court the high court in london and so on it's not a simple story. it seems to me that it's so complicated. you're absolutely right. it's really not a simple, very complicated story . we still can't say with any certainty that the mechanisms are not only in ukraine, but in any country. confiscation, they will not insist on this appeal, cassation in international courts, no one can be sure, the most i can tell you is that some of us are already appealing the decision , for example, we had a decision on the nationalization of the so-called russian banks , maybe you remember zberbank and the web bank of course, the representatives of these banks turned to arbitration almost immediately, there is still no decision , but it is not known how the court will decide because those assets were also confiscated according to a new , unprecedented procedure. do you understand that there is such a problem here that we are essentially looking for a legal solution to a very political problem

therefore, i want to emphasize that the international criminal court cannot force them to do this, butexert pressure at the level of the international community and in particular, the arrest warrants issued by the international criminal court - this exerts significant pressure on yelovova-beylova and on putin, forcing and calling on them to return the children and also to stop the policy of deportation, so there is hope that this will happen and this is precisely why the prosecutors brought this issue to public consideration. this publicity is additional pressure exerted on russia, in particular, regarding such a policy of deportation, but the most important goal of the international criminal court is actually to bring people to justice for such actions, guys, mr. putin is currently wanted internationally from the point of view of international law , according to the judge, what other problems can putin face because of this arrest warrant? you are right that now that such an arrest warrant has been issued now it will be much more difficult for him to move abroad, in particular, and of

putin , if he comes to them, will not fulfill it this order, this arrest warrant, and the international criminal courthe vienna convention so differently. somehow, politically, she is drawing out that she can refuse this , how can she be forced to go to the international criminal court , there is no international police, this is completely different audit mechanisms, so many nuances are involved, you mentioned about the resources we need to carry out a full investigation of these criminal proceedings , now there are 70,000 of them and the number is increasing, and the case is not yet closed, they are still investigating whether we have the human resource a professional resource in order to quickly investigate this and not to turn these investigations, well, i'm sorry, how uh, we have an example of the maidan cases, when we all wait, we wait for years, the term of imprisonment comes up, there are a lot of questions about these investigations, but this uh, here we are we want to quickly understand and close these cases in order to bring human rights organizations to justice. they are often in such a pos

comes to them, it will not fulfill it this is an order, this is an arrest warrant from the international criminal court, they interpret the vienna convention in such a different way. somehow, politically, she is drawing out that she can refuse this, how can she be forced to go to the international criminal court, there is no international police , this is already completely different mechanisms , so many nuances will be involved. they mentioned the resources we need to carry out a full investigation of these criminal proceedings, now there are 70,000 of them and the number is increasing, and the case is not yet closed , they are still investigating whether we have a human a resource, a professional resource in order to quickly investigate this and not to turn these investigations, well, excuse me, we have an example of the maidan case when we are all waiting, waiting for years, the time limit for the arrest is coming up, there are a large number of questions regarding these investigations, but this is where we want to quickly understand and close these cases in order to bring human rights organizations

it wants to help the international criminal court with evidence and, of course, it's got a lot of it,ntagon is concerned that support for the international criminal court may one day involve indicting an american. so, yes, there are problems within even supporters of human rights, to the extent that... you talk about the united states... ..you find the pentagon in this particular obstructive phase. the democracy you know best, that you've worked in for many decades, is the united kingdom. sure. you have just written a book — here it is, lawfare: how russians, the rich and the government try to prevent free speech. and what you appear to be saying here is that the uk system, which british politicians proclaim as absolutely enshrining freedoms, including freedom of expression, you say it's somewhat of a myth, that actually the british legal system doesn't guarantee freedoms at all. it doesn't. this is the problem. we don't have free speech in this country. we have expensive speech. if you want to write an expose of a russian oligarch, or of british defence, or of wealthy individuals, th

therefore, the purpose of the international criminal court is precisely that they cannot force russia to return the children, they can simply bring mr. putin and ms. lvova belyova to justice for such actions. so, i want to emphasize that the international criminal court cannot force them to do this to do, but they can exert pressure at the level of the international community and, in particular , the arrest warrants issued by the international criminal court - this exerts significant pressure on lvova beylova and putin, forcing and urging them to return the children and also to stop the deportation policy, therefore there is hope that this will happen and this is precisely why the prosecutors brought this issue to public consideration. this publicity is additional pressure exerted on russia, in particular, regarding such a deportation policy, but the most important goal of the international criminal court is actually to bring people to justice for such actions , do you understand football, mr. putin, is currently wanted internationally from the point of view of international justice,

court. speaking of the next steps, the couple also called on the international criminal court to consider the possibility of criminal prosecution for this is a crime. how quickly can this happen ? recently, a warrant was issued for putin and moskalkova can still get into this list of international criminals , in your opinion, i will say right away that the international court of justice works effectively and we saw a whole series of decisions in march and we thank you for the fact that such unprecedented historical uh, the decision uh, regarding the number of persons, i cannot tell you affirmatively because this is already a matter of competence and of the international criminal court. but i think that it is definitely not limited to only two persons because we are also talking about putin and the entire regime and their by the way, the resolution clearly states that it is necessary to continue to record these crimes. actually, not only those related to the deportation of children and other civilians, but in general , it concerns a whole series of crimes that cannot be qualified as genocide,

ready to say right here and now that many of these priests will end up on the dock in the international criminal courttherefore, where will they have time to think that they are not real christians but political agents of putin in general, the investigation of cases in international criminal tribunals continues, in particular, how long does it take to collect the evidence base, how long does it take for all the materials to be qualified and checked, well , the key story is that we understand that the case can be investigated for a year or two , and it can be extended for five or 10 years, i think trials will last quite a long time. as for the individual trials of individual criminals, it is difficult to say because there are lawyers who will try to get these criminals out of prison. it may take a long time, but i think that ukraine is doing very wisely by collecting documentation right now. ukraine is not waiting for the end of the war until all the atrocities are committed, it is already collecting documentation . the international court of justice is currently collecting documentation and this shoul

the countries are thinking about whether to execute them warrant for the arrest of the international criminal courtor not, we definitely mean those countries that are members of the rome statute, that is, that have this obligation. well, i would like to say the following if the politicians of these countries will not arrest putin in accordance with the warrant of the international criminal court. this means that for them, putin is more important than the law , well, for them, putin is more important than the law, and this should also be a signal for them, well, the population of these countries, that is, if their politicians respect putin, who is a suspect in war crimes crime and i suspect at the level of the international criminal court and that putin is more important to them than respect for the law, then i guess they will treat their people in these countries that way, so for me it is not a choice at all if there is if the country is part of the rome statute she has a duty to execute this warrant for his arrest or he will be there you know i will answer you in this way once again we as lawyers

the international court upheld the u. s. objection to iran's jurisdiction over the funds, which is amounted to almost $2000000000.00 and bonds and cumulative interest. but it conceded washington's seizure of the reign assets breached in 1955 treaty between those countries. and so it must provide a degree of compensation, but less the amount to be determined later on. iran initially appealed to the hague base court in 2016. after the u. s. supreme court ruled the money should good victims of legit terrorist attacks. we heard from tara university professor, said mohammed mirandi, he agreed with certain aspects of the ruling. the said, the court is biased in favor of western powers. the court to be fair, did expose the fact that the u. s. case was irrational, it was not justified. and that the right in position was reasonable and within the framework of law. and in that sense, it was a positive ruling. united states has exposed itself to be a country that steals it, steals iranian ships as steals iranian oil. it feels wild f

against or receive such a resolution because, well, the facts are on the face of it, the international criminal court initiates relevant cases specifically a for genocide, which is carried out against ukrainian children for the deportation of ukrainian children by the russian federation and violated it against putin and there uh, there are some women out there, yes, i hope that this daddy will grow just after this resolution and there will be not only two subjects, but still these countries that did not vote for them and cannot publicly express their position, but still hope for any relations with the russian federation, we have to remember this well, and accordingly strengthen our diplomacy and promote our messages , including in european institutions , including a-and in the un and which today is absolutely so inactive yes where is it -is for some reason, the russian federation is the head of the council of ministers, well, this is just a disaster, well, there are no such stories regarding this resolution. well, of course, it has important consequences, because it can be used as one of the pieces o

and while the international court upheld the us, keeping a key to those funds, which amounts to much $2000000000.00 and bonds with accumulated interest, they did concede that a washington seizure of the assets breaches in 1955 treaty between the countries and it must provide one called a degree of compensation, but less that amount undetermined for now. iran initially appealed to the hague based court in 2016 off of the u. s. supreme court ruled that the money should go to the victims of alleged terror attacks. we heard from her on university professor side mohammed mirandi. he agreed with certain aspects of the ruling, but also said the court is biased. the court to be fair did expose the fact that the u. s. case was irrational, it was not justified. and that the iranian position was reasonable and within the framework of law. and in that sense, it was a positive ruling. united states has exposed itself to be a country that steals it, steals the iranian ships as steals iranian oil. it feels while from iranian bank accounts, on the other hand, the i c. c shows itself to be toothless

ah ah, in south africa decided to quit the international criminal court according to the country's president, where now the decision after the i see issued an arrest warrant for the russian president vladimir putin. a warning you may find the following. images disturbing. dozens of dead to promote fighters in the streets. falling reports of 1st battle with the sudanese army as violence in the country. just in 3 day thousands of food in these people and foreign nationals are still struggling to leave the country with defense minister jose turkish radiant and syrian count spots in moscow. discuss steps to preserve the territorial integrity of syria. with by welcome to r t international, wanting to speak to scott to bring you all of the latest news from our headquarters here in moscow. thanks for joining us. now we start with breaking news. this, our because south africa has announced that it will withdraw from the international criminal court, as, according to the nations president. and it comes after the court issued an arrest warrant for russian president vladimir putin. a move that the sout

the rome statute, that’s why it exists and from the international criminal court of ukraine, that when crimes, they don’t distinguish between who is the victim and who is the aggressor. there is an absolute concrete evidence of war crimes is absolutely obvious to me the fact and this process proves enough of the international criminal court in the former yugoslavia, there are docks of serbs, croats and bosnian muslims and kosovar albanians and for no one there are no exceptions and no one says, you know, we will not judge the croatian general because serbia attacked them, there is a simple approach, yes, you were attacked, this does not mean that you have the right to commit war crimes , so countries whose armies are involved in some wars are not they do not ratify the roman statute of their own will, this applies to the united states, this applies to israel, because everyone perfectly understands that when military operations take place , in one way or another, there are people who go beyond the acceptable format, they are not necessary pretend that they do not exist we always want to

michael gerrard is a law professor at columbia university. >> a decision from the international courte would be the most definitive, authoritative statement to date about what international law and human rights law havto say about climate change. william: it's the first time the international court of justice will consider climate change. vanuatu's prime minister alatoi ishmael kalsakau hailed the historic resolution. >> this is not a silver bullet, but it can make an important contribution to climate change, climate action, including by catalyzing much higher ambition under the paris agreement. william: an opinion from the international court would not be binding or enforceable. still, experts say it will set an important precedent. >> they have a strong influence on the decisions of domestic cour which do issue enforceable opinions. we've seen several of these domestic courts issue decisions telling their governments that they have to act and those governments have acted. william: the measu passed by consensus, meaning none of the human's -- the u.n.'s 193 member states including th

the internal court of justice has rejected aaron's request to regain control of about $2000000000.00 of it. central bank assets frozen by the us. but the court has ordered the us to provide compensation to run these law. mac republic of iran believes that the ruling issued by the international court of justice shows the solidity of rounds arguments in the righteousness of iran's request. in this important verdict, the icy j correctly rejected all the fake defences of the us. international court, i've held the earth objection to roz jurisdiction over the font, which have amounted to almost $2000000000.00 in bonds and accumulated interest. but it can see that washington seizure of the iranian assets breach 81955 treaty between the 2 countries. and so it must provide a degree of compensation but left the amount to be determined later on. iran initially appeal to the hague base court in 2016 off the u. s. supreme court ruled that the money should good, the victims of legit terrorist attacks. we heard a frontier royal university professor, said mohammed by monday he agreed with certain as

quarter fairly long because there is this piece agreement in place and almost universally, international criminal courts have has, but there can be no amnesty for international crimes. so there's the tension there, i guess, between the in scholar said the called the piece versus justice debase. and, but the legal physician seems to be pretty clear that, that you can't sign away and accountability french in atlanta crimes. i could, we just have a very, a brief word on, on the, the notion of crime scene war. what is for thinking that underpins v i v v i v of what is and isn't acceptable in a war when it's against blizzard purpose is to kill as many people as you can to achieve your political go. well, i can, i can contest the idea that that's the purpose of war to kill this many people as you can. i mean, the laws of war are hundreds of years old. and the idea is that, and they, the actions of the parties, general conflict, should be limited to those actions that offer a concrete indefinite military advantage. and so, yeah, so war crimes essentially are serious breaches of the law as a barn contact. we ha

the united nations international court of justice. >> we said why don't we take on this initiative.et's choose the most ambitious one. we have our governments in the pacific open to climate solutions. >> their pitch convinced the tiny island nation of vanuatu to take this issue to the u.n. vanuatu has felt the impacts of climate change head-on. just last month, two category four cyclones swept through the island, forcing 10% of its population to flee to evacuation shelters. vanuatu's diplomatic efforts led to this moment on the floor of the u.n. general assembly two weeks ago. passage of a resolution formally asking the icj to specify what states legal obligations are to address climate change and what the consequences should be for those who fail to act. michael gerrard is a law professor at columbia university. >> a decision from the international court of justice would be the most finitive authority of statement to date about what law and human rights law have to say about climate change. >> it's the first time the international court of justice will consider climate change. vanu

and there was even a lawsuit from china to the international court of justice. the international court of justice then rejected it, and china was very offended by what happened. both sides called it provocation. and this territory is really important. and sea routes and how the situation in this south china sea will develop is also worth attention and analysis and the fact that in the philippine direction china claims parts of the spratly islands, they are called this this is such a long-standing conflict and we know that the territory of the philippines is used in an alliance with the united states to prevent the future, as they say, of the seizure of taiwan by force. that is, it is generally a zone of tension that should be followed further, but these provocations , as they say, are repeated, it is not the first time they are repeated periodically what is the security situation around the island of taiwan now this is such a historical question i don't think if you are hinting at a military takeover then i don't think it will happen in the near future, china is

at the moment when the international criminal court has already clearly issued an arrest warrant forigation thus, for the head of the russian federation, this means that they no longer have an irrefutable evidence base on the basis of which they can take appropriate decisive steps, that is, simply an investigation for the sake of finding out why the moscow mechanism is not an investigative body. that is, it is a data verification mission that will not be to have access to the places, and even if the russian federation gives them access to the places where these children are staying. i am sure that this will be a demonstration performance where the children will run with russian flags and say thank you, uncle yura, that we will evacuate you from mariupol that is, it will simply be a distortion of the information, which in fact can only later harm rather than help, so we will have something like a report of the un monitoring mission , so this step is very twofold. it is possible that the organization for security and cooperation in europe seeks to become a so-called mediator in the pro

yes, we know it's already there certain actions in the international criminal court against putin andfficials of the russian federation and the other way is the application of the principle of international juridicity when cases are considered in the courts of other countries that are subject to these principles, in fact , we are collecting evidence now and, let's say , will be transferred in the future in that organization or in that structure that can actually conduct investigations and open cases, but i want to note an important point that well, over the last decades, and in general, during all this time , in fact, there has not been a single court verdict for e a crime against medicine there is conditional for an attack that will achieve this verdict. i thank you very much, mrs. diana, for your comments, for your work, the most important thing, and diana rusnak , even such a day of the ukrainian health care center. and we wish them a good day, we have a guest of this now, he will join us and we will talk about the african topic, especially the topic of the great sudan. by the way

and in terms of nicaragua, the international court of justice in 1986 found the u. s. government guilty of war crimes and crimes of aggression against the people, nicaragua, and still to this day since 986. the u. s. government has refused to acknowledge that court case in the international court of justice and washington has refused to pay nicaragua, the billions of dollars. reparations that it. oh, is the people in the garage when the european union claims falsely that the nicaraguan government supposedly killed protesters and all of this, what they're actually covering up is the role of brussels and washington in supporting these very violent insurgents tried to overthrow the government. like in syria, like in libya like in venezuela, in so many other places the president of uganda supervise the commissioning of the 1st over hold russian made helicopter on the african continent side of the sahara. during the event, he spoke about the productive bilateral cooperation between the 2 countries, noting that there is no limit for the partnership between moscow and come

president of the national union of architects, yuriy verbovetskyi, to raise this issue in international courtscesses, of course, such a status will help, of course , it will strengthen our positions, it is clear and that's why the fact that odesa was brought in now is a big, big shift, and maybe there is an opinion on this that maybe just the war events they somehow accelerated this process because they have been working on it for many years so that odesa would enter the list of its neighboring cultural heritage recently said the director general of unesco in kyiv opened the office of the unesco organization ready to help cultural monuments will soon be given the status of world heritage by unesco to the center of chernigov, the president of ukraine informed that eight objects across the country are now under the protection of the organization, in particular, among the places of lviv, the cathedral of st. sophia and the kyiv-pechersk lavra in the capital and on podgorodetska vladyslav nagornyi social news for this hour all the next news release watch at 10:00 p.m. have a good time in the eveni

in fact, and in terms of nicaragua, the international court of justice in 1986 found the u. s. government guilty of war crimes and crimes of aggression against the people, nicaragua. and still to this day since 1986, the u. s. government has refused to acknowledge that court case in the international court of justice and washington has refused pay nicaragua, the billions of dollars. reparations that it. oh, is the people of nicaragua, when the european union claims falsely that the nicaraguan government supposedly killed protesters and all of this, what they're actually covering up is the role of brussels and washington in supporting these very violent insurgents tried to overthrow the government like in syria like in libya like in venezuela, in so many other places the british government's decision to supply ukraine with depleted uranium shells. having people protesting in london demonstrators or to the streets calling for the government to reverse this decision. the ammunition, which has been linked to numerous health issues, is designed to be used by the challenger tank o

warrant finally perform only in relation to these two people, if we are talking about the international criminal court , if we are talking about those whom ukraine is investigating and bringing official charges, then for this there are international legal bilateral agreements between countries and there is the interpol system, and the interpol system in we have had big problems for a long time, i remember how they couldn't bring igor strilkov there, he is a zhehirkin because they said that there could be political motives and well , in general, this is an organization that, let's be honest , is managed in chinese and russian the leaders impose their order and influence, and it is quite difficult to interpolate. the interpolator was often used to persecute precisely the opposition from authoritarian countries, they gave them a red card and detained them in european countries and caused her a lot of trouble, because until they figure out that this is actually a political motive , but it does not work so easily in the other direction when it is really necessary to detain war crime suspects, do you rememb

to have no story called context by the, by the question that you're asking me then that the international court of justice and human rights. now don't either. i'm only quite, you know, all the recognized institution international, proven to be an anti semitic and corrupt organization. so i'm not going to answer any questions when you're using them as a credible source for your information. okay, is rupert coverlet spokesman for the un office of the high commissioner for refugees also an anti semitic corrupt person when he said quinn. unfortunately, 7th worry. i do need to finish the question, may 7th, 2021. we wish to emphasize that east jerusalem remains part of the occupied palestinian territory in which international humanitarian law applies. not as ray the law as well unless you can answer that one to view as well. festival, unfortunately on rush is recorded as being an organ. i did not one last. how is it? let me just close that because you missed a thinking about the, you know, you know, it offers your eyes, you know, for refugees. that is not on ra. that's well the only thing i ration th

who issued the warrant for putin's arrest in the international criminal court? s the prosecutor of the karimha international criminal court. do you know who he is? he is the brother and darkness of akhmat khan, who was convicted in may 2022 by the uk for sexual abuse of minors normally, and on 21 february 23. imran ahmat khan was released early from prison exactly three weeks before this court issued a warrant for the arrest of the president of the russian federation, the commissioner for children's rights in russia was gaakov. this is gogol and i don't know how. just imagine that the people who saved the children are condemned for allegedly stealing and deporting them and for the occupied countries. and this warrant is issued by the pedophile's brother, who received time in the uk for paedophilia. and look at this photo. here on the left is the dispatch of kherson children. in artek, this is a war crime. according to the decision of the hague court, and on the right is a photo of the massacre of vietnamese peasants psongmi in 1968 by us army fighters for this ma

exactly as john bolton said at the time when the international court of justice wanted to investigatell not cooperate with the international criminal court. we won't give him any help, and we certainly won't join him. we will let the die a natural death, after all. for us. he is already dead, our answer will affect. the muz itself and its employees, to the extent that us laws allow, we will ban its judges to researchers. entering the united states we will sanction their money in the us financial system we will sue them in our court. we will also deal with any organization and company that decides to help investigate the mousse against the americans, but they did just that. by the way, they imposed sanctions on the court and denied entry. so this is the situation for the united states in in general, uh, typical, because. they recognize the track as their right. no international structures. they do not recognize more than that, they consider their right to be extraterritorial. and as we know, not just one president, even several presidents, right? it has already been stated many times t

use them in real combat, memories and public testimonies will one day become evidence in an international courtoday they are carefully collected, recorded and kept by everyone who can, our next story about the marine roman horodensky, who was among the defenders of mariupol, the fighter wants as many people as possible around the world to know about the price he personally paid and his comrades, that is why he participated in the creation of the film mariupol the defender brigade of roman gorodensky held the defense of pavlo pole after several days of fierce fighting with the occupier, the marines were forced to retreat to mariupol and hold the defense there at the local factories, but the enemy forces were overwhelmingly superior and the city was increasingly surrounded. you have the most difficult and most difficult thing in your hands, the guys there did everything so that they did not come further, the main thing is to remember them and remember them and say that they are heroes, those who died for our state, the destruction of ukrainian mariupol began with the russian bombardment of fabs a

have now all taken on the obligation of practically a people's criminal court, a little bit of an institution for an internationalriminal court. we took all obliged to ourselves but we did not join the registered russian statute and that is, if we have all the obligations but do not have an amendment, that is why it will need to be ratified when that happens, this is a matter of dialogue before dialogue everything between e-e, between society, between those who demand from society and artification, for example, there are e-e those people who are e-e engaged in correspondence, experts, some certifications, also human rights defenders and so on , the international community on the one hand and the military on the other, nothing because they are military some caveats to this they are tired of this, well, they understood the warning, and now, after all, there is a war going on, and at least the president and the office of the president think that we need the military without the consent of us. we cannot do such things . that is, we need a dialogue with with them, we need to convince them, if it succeeds, yes, no, so

who issued the warrant for putin's arrest in the international criminal court? is the prosecutor of the international criminal court karimkhan. a know who he is. he is the brother and bran of ahmat khan, who was convicted in may 2022 by the uk for sexual abuse of minors, on february 21, 23. imran ahmat khan was released from prison exactly three weeks before the same court issued a warrant for the arrest of the president of the russian federation to the commissioner for children's rights in russia, it was gavhov. this is google i don't know. well , just imagine that people who saved children are condemned for allegedly stealing and deporting them, and for occupied countries. and this order is issued by the brother of a pedophile, who received a term in the uk for pedophilia. and look at this photo. here on the left is the dispatch of kherson children. in artek, this is a war crime. according to the decision of the hague court, and on the right is a photo of the massacre of vietnamese peasants in song my in 1968 by us army soldiers for this massacre, where 504 pe

second, there is the international criminal court, it has nojurisdiction international criminal courttion over the crime of aggression. and the crime of aggression. and the crime of aggression is the mother of all war crimes. and it seems like now that if a leader of any country will start an aggressive war, in other country, there will be no mechanism to bring him to accountability. and this i think it is not a good situation.— think it is not a good situation. ., situation. so you are saying ou situation. so you are saying you have — situation. so you are saying you have no _ situation. so you are saying you have no avenue, - situation. so you are saying you have no avenue, no - you have no avenue, no international body you can turn to? ., �* , international body you can turn to? . �*, ., �*, , to? that's right, that's why we need to create _ to? that's right, that's why we need to create a _ to? that's right, that's why we need to create a special- to? that's right, that's why we need to create a special ad - to? that's right, that's why we | need to create a special ad hoc tribuna

the other international venue could be international court of justice. nd and very carefully examine all previous experience of cases of genocide and making perpetrators liable or accountable for genocide on an international level. previous cases and former international tribunal. we have a great team of experts at the moment help us to build the case of genocide. my personal understanding is prosecutor general we have no right to lose such a case. we need to be 150% prepared for such case. for that we will need extensional support. for spell we all understand we are talking about crime which is a legal issue. we are talking about evidence which is a legal issue and you can help us with collecting this evidence and your experts are working with us and they'll have the support of your agencies. what we will need his political support. because for many lawyers it's important to feel they are not alone they're backed by politicians. not only by their words but the you've already mentioned. so political support on the level of parliament is extremely importan

let it become an evidence base for international courts, how it will work in one of the most closed laboratoriesksandra mitina visited thick glass for which without genetic knowledge there is not even a speck of dust, we have a number of laboratories, all of them are responsible for dna testing the hague is one of the most closed of the world's laboratories belongs to the international commission on missing persons, before getting inside the employees pass a dna test so that there is not even a chance of error, these are bones for analysis, the contents of such containers are delivered here from places of mass hiding and war crimes, the bones are processed in a special way, or you can get one like this the yellow powder from which the dna is extracted, the difference between the processes of obtaining dna in the usual way after the covid pandemic and from the bones of a deceased giant, this process can take several weeks for donors in our database with with the postmortem samples that we examine in the laboratory, the donors are the relatives of the dead or disappeared, they take blood or saliva

south africa announced that it is no longer going to recognize the jurisdiction of the international criminal courtse of its bias, the president of the country announced this. also decided this. that's it, the ruling party, the international criminal court. repeatedly accused of politicization of processes and illegal decisions, his verdicts do not recognize many countries of the world, including russia usa israel china india ruling party african national congress makes a reasonable decision that south africa withdraw from international criminal court. including because of the way the video of the case many people feel that this court is treating them unfairly, the ruling decided to repeat that we should get out of it. to repel an enemy attack from the air to rescue the hostages of a captured ship of a hospital all these are the stages of the exercise the arctic patrol, which took place in the barents sea, as observers there was a delegation from china on how they managed to cope with the task in harsh conditions sergey shiryaev this exercise can rightly be called historical watchdog set border gua