but, you know, the, the, this is the, the beauty of these remedies before the international court of justice and the international criminal court. i'm, i'm, i'm not sure that they really have much influence on the united states. that was your previous question. but i think that they do put a lot of pressure on some of the many of the middle powers who are very close to is really been very supportive germany among them. perhaps 1st and foremost, but other countries of the netherlands, belgium, france, canada, where i'm coming from today. and these countries are all very loyal to israel, but they're also very loyal to the international court of justice and to the international criminal court. so taking a battle there and so to speak, puts them in a very, very difficult and uncomfortable place, especially when you have something like the prime minister of israel, of basically being totally dismissive of the international court of justice. and of course, they'll say the same about the international, the international criminal court. just to give you an example of a few months ago, canada,

so the international court of justice that these are things that they will be thinking about. and i would certainly hope so. in fact, even south africa's advocate during the oral argument said very clearly to the court that the court actually failed those people who had experience genocide and failed to deliver them justice and so called on the court to act before. it's too late in this instance. and not to fail to palestinian people and some might say that actually that's already taken place. and that there's really, in a sense, no justice, you know, that can be, attend from this point on because where do you go after already 30000 people have been killed in 3 months and, you know, gaza is creating, you know, and breaking new records every day. in terms of destruction and human suffering, it seems like every time i check my phone, i'm seeing some sort of a new super would have been used to describe the situation. it does that. so i would hope that the court will take that into account and, and recognize that they have a tremendous responsibility here not to fail another people

this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide and in fact, the international court of justicewhat happened. if this court had taken responsibility for this matter, it would not have been possible to transfer it to the international court of justice because there's conflict. over this issue, in fact, it's referral to the international court weakens the local court, but the existence of this dispute within the entity between the local court of justice and the administration, created a situation that there was no choice but to transfer the case to the international court of justice where there is no escape. let us move from the international court of justice in the hague to us secretary of state anthony blinken's recent visit, פתרון שתי המדינות. בלינקן אומר שם לשרים אנחנו יכולים עכשיו לראות אודי, כמו שלכם, לישראלים יש שאיפות, גם לפלסטינים יש שאיפות ואתם צריכים לקבל את זה. על כך משיב לו בתוך החדר בפני השרים וראש הממשלה. ביהודה ושומרון תומכים בטווח שבוצע בשבת השחורה, או במילים אחרות טודי, דרמר אומר לבלינקן, אלו הפרטנרים שלנו, להם לתת מדינה, זו העמדה שדרמר משמיע בתוך החדר. בחירים יש

but at the international court of justice, yes, while this is happening is real, does enjoy the support of by and large major chunks of the international community, the united states, the u. k. government, for instance, where there seems to be nothing that has moved the need, whether it's the killing of people, whether it's the cold killed court cases. so do you think anything is going to change? if there is a decision in favor of the south african application, everything is incremental. every time you step on the street and wait for palestinian flag and say stop the killing of palestinian people every time somebody may or anyone else speaks up in the parliament. that's an incremental difference. and the arguments about the straits, the supply of weapons to his right. in the fact the president biden sold to bypass congress because he was afraid of the reaction that in order to send more weapons to his royal, indicates a weakness in his position. and so this weekend we've got demonstrations all over the world. there's a voice of ordinary people who are just told what's going on. i don't.

a day after hearing south africa's request for urgent action by the international court of justice for the immediate stop of the military actions of the zionist regime in gaza , the hearing of the positions of the zionist regime was also held at the court in the hague. in dozens of pages of files, citing the words of zionist leaders and documents related to the targeted killing of civilians in gaza, south africa has filed a complaint against the genocide of the zionist regime to the court, a historical court, the location of the peace palace in laha, the subject of the meeting of the international court of justice for handling south africa's complaint against the occupying regime accused of genocide in gaza. but the importance of the issue that makes supporters of palestine to speak like this. south african lawyer react the zionist regime, which always saw itself above the international law, is now in alit. the world court is sitting in the place of the accused. that is the accusation of the biggest crime against humanity. genocide . 75 years after he declared himself a victim of genoc

importance, it is the backing of the international community, of course the court itself has implementationisrael has to respect the international court of justice, i mean israel cannot rebellion to united nation, cannot be rebellion to international court of justice and all the... international community, it cannot be rebellion to everybody, american might to try to protect them and but still i believe the international court of justice will do something and it will make some difference in the coming days. thanks lot sir, foreign pakistani diplomats, zamir ahmad joining us from the pakistani capital islamabad. moving on, leaders of egypt, jordan and palestinian authority have issued serious warning against any attempt by israel to reoccupy the gaza strip as the regime continues its genocide across the territory. speaking a trilateral meeting in the jordanian city of araba, the three leaders categorically rejected any plans to displace palestinians from their lands. they said the priorities of the establishment of sease fire in gaza and pushing israel to allow thousands of gazents to return

talk about the hearing in international court of justice, the international court of justice is a worldourt which adjudicates issues and cases between states. it is different from the in that way where the icj -- the icc would prosecute individuals on international criminal concerns, the international court of justice only deals with issues between state parties. this is the reason why south africa has filed this case before the international court of justice. it was a pretty remarkable hearing. you have said already about the historical significance of this hearing. there have been previous cases at the international court of justice dealing with genocide, but those previous cases have not attracted as much attention and interest as this particular case. nermeen: could you explain how often it has been the case that a case has been brought to the icj by a country that is not one of the parties involved in the conflict? one thinks most recently of the case of russia and ukraine, which ukraine brought were in fact diverse genocide case that was heard at the international court of justice

court ofjugs —— international court ofjugs —— international court ofjustice at the hague.t ofjustice at the hague. i'm joined byjeremy bowen in the studio. talk us through this ruling and the significance of it. it this ruling and the significance of it. , ,., ., , this ruling and the significance of it. ._ ._ it. it is potentially really significant _ it. it is potentially really significant because - it. it is potentially really significant because the i it. it is potentially really - significant because the overall ruling might take years to emerge from all of this, but these interim measures, starting with a call for the suspension of military operations and there are eight others that the south africans have asked for, that is something that, while they are not enforceable, they carry a lot of moral weight, and thatis carry a lot of moral weight, and that is something which israel has recognised, not least because rather than simplyjust dismissing this and saying this is all part of the un conspiracy against israel, they often say things like that, when they had the h

court. it is an international criminal case, and this is a prelude to go to the court of the international criminalcourt , where some of the palestinian judges, lawyers and lawyers of the sinai and lebanon have put forward cases for some countries to file cases against people. i thank you for directly ordering this genocide in gaza. you are very kind to be present. if there is anything left at the end , we have one minute, please. to clarify what is happening in the world. especially in the fields of international law , if we make some effort to be active and present in the field of legal diplomacy , whatever field or diplomacy , we can move there very well. special ending we have arrived at our program. after the 21st news , we will be hosting francis molloy, the ambassador of the republic of south africa , in the special discussion of the news and the world program today. this country filed a complaint against israel for killing the people of gaza. all the heads of the israeli regime in the past few decades have been accused of genocide and declared that the october 7 attack by hamas is not a goo

the occupying regime lies before the international court of justice. s he has started lying since he was slapped on the 7th of october. this regime distorts itself even more by lying and isolation. increases the international meanwhile , the voices in condemning the brutality and aggression of this regime have become louder all over the world. but south africa has the honor to ignore from the success in condemning the zionist regime to genocide in gaza, he was able to bring the occupying regime to the trial table. we are still with you today. mr. habibzadeh, there is a debate here, and that is that, as it was in the report, this honor in the name of south africa has been registered in the world . the apartheid government was the same apartheid government that existed in south africa and was overthrown . it exists in a different form now in the occupied territories and is less labeled. that the israeli regime was able to stick to south africa. because there is absolutely no side to this fight , but in any case, as a country that has supported the palesti

this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide, and in fact the international court of justice this dispute within the entity between the local court of justice and the administration created a situation that there was no choice but to transfer the case to the international court of justice where there is no escape. let us move from the international court of justice in the hague to us secretary of state anthony blincon's recent visit to the occupying regime of israel which revealed the existence of differences לישראלים יש שאיפות, גם לפלסטינים יש שאיפות ואתם צריכים לקבל את זה, על כך משיב לו בתוך החדר בפני השרים וראש הממשלה, שר רון דרמר, 85% מהפלסטינים ביהודה ושומרון תומכים. בטווח שבוצע בשבת השחורה, או במילים אחרות טודי דרמר אומר לבלינקן, אלו הפרטנרים שלנו, להם לתת מדינה, זו העמדה שדרמר משמיע בתוך החדר, בחירים ישראלים אומרים לנו שהדברים של בלינקן, מהדברים שלא השתמע המסר, אם לא תציגו את פתרון שתי המדינות, אפילו כאיזשהו חזון רחוק, לא תשיגו שום דבר ברמה המדינית, בטח לא איזה שהיא התקדמות מול הסעודים. אמירה נוספת שעולה בתוך החדר של שר החוץ האמריקני בלינקן, הוא אומר שם, אי אפשר לחסה ל

the hague international court of justice confirmed the jurisdiction of the criminal court to deal with the genocide case against the zionist regime. the lebanese resistance targeted the positions of the zionist soldiers in the occupied fields of sheba with eight missiles. hezbollah announced the location the gathering of zionist soldiers in a the border base has been targeted. this morning, lebanon's hezbollah targeted and destroyed a spy system of the zionist regime in the jalal alam military base in occupied palestine. the american media reports on the plans of the government of this country to withdraw its forces from syria. observers believe that the heavy military expenses caused this decision by washington. america is planning to withdraw its military forces from syria. the american media that criticized this news say: in the shadow of complex regional crises of the palace sefid intends to review his military priorities. but in damascus, observers have considered this announcement by the us as a result of the high costs of the presence of its military forces in syria. since the s

the international court of justice asked the zionist regime to guarantee immediate humanitarian needs in the gaza strip. the court, with 16 votes in favor against one vote, obliged the israeli regime to take measures to prevent incitement to genocide. supporters of palestine at the same time as the decision of the international court of justice was announced justices regarding the zionist regime committing genocide in the gaza strip from different parts of europe brought themselves to the hague, netherlands. those who came by train sat down at the same railway station to hear the verdict of the court. however, it may take several years to prove the crime of rape in the hague court. we welcome the temporary measures and measures imposed by the international court of justice against israel. this ruling is a decisive victory for the rule of law. we hoped that the court would issue a ruling to stop the war in gaza, because the orders of the international court of justice will not come to fruition without a stop to the war. for this reason at the same time, the prime minister of the zionis

the international court of justice has concluded the first day of hearings a lawsuit filed by south africa against israel's genocide in the gaza strip. at the closing south africa demand the court orders israel to immediately suspended. tslot in the beseest palestinian territory, to indicate the following provisional measures in relation to the palestinian people as a group protected by the genocide convention. these measures are directly linked to the rights that form the subject matter of south africa's disputes with israel. one, the state of israel shall immediately. to suspend its military operations in and against gaza. two, the state of israel shall ensure that any military or irregular armed units which may be directed, supported or influenced by it, as well as any organizations and persons which may be subject to its control, direction or influence, take no steps in furtherance of the military operations. referred to in point one above. point is much simple. the court devoted the first day of hearings to the arguments submitted by south africa. on friday, israel will be allowed to

well, this has happened one day after the international court of justice released its initial findings regarding israeli genocide as if to show the world once and for all that there is no international law, might makes right? well, i'd like to welcome my guest to this program. craig murray, former british ambassador to uzbekistan out of edinburg, and robert fatina, author and journalist out of kishner, ontario. well, thank you both. for being with me, i'd like to start it off with craig, how do you explain these countries defunding unrah now? well, i think in part um, it's a coordinated reaction to the uh international court of justice ruling, and it's important to note vedinit's findings of fact on the uh genocide, what it the icj said was plausibly. a genocide in in gaza, unra was quoted quite extensively for giving facts on the ground, so obviously that gives them a motive to discret. under before future icj hearings and also of course it adds to the genocide, it increases the genocidal pressure and speeds up the genocide by potentially denying incredibly needed food, water and sust

we are international lawyers in article 34 of the statute of the criminal court. the judiciary has allowed public international institutions such as these unions to interpret statements and present their own evidence and evidence, so that if a country violates international law, such as the israeli regime, to defend them and evaluate justice correctly. collect the reasons, document them , you will do these things, so this can happen.

-- of the international criminal court for palestine, which he did. gret to report that the international criminal court has not done one darn thing to help the palestinians since two thousand nine. the international criminal part has all the blood of the palestinian people on its hands since 2009. juan, that is why we set up a campaign to find a state willing to file a lawsuit at the international court of justice, the world court. the icc basically operates at the behest of its funders and founders and masters, which is the u.s., the nato states, the european states, etc. until they are expedited -- indictment of president putin as u.s. nato l'affaire aiken's russia, the international record has not indicted one american, one european, one brit, one nato citizen and one israeli, and one white person. we have a campaign now to support the republic of south africa at the international court of justice. we are starting this campaign today, i am part of a coalition -- we are starting this campaign today to get members of the genocide convention to file d

today the international court of justice has vindicated us. the court has concluded that passwords to articulate 9 of the convention. it has jurisdiction to educate our application, to the effects of the order that the i c j has grunted today. is that there is a possible case of genocide. this marks an important 1st in our quest to secure a justice for the people of guys. some have told us that we should mind our own business and not to get involved in the office of other countries. others have said it was not our place and yet it is very much our place. as the people who know too well the pain of disposition discrimination states one said violence. we are also a people who are the victims of the crime of our pottage. we know what a potted looks like we experienced and lived through it said the many people. busy who died and were anxiety like our beloved leader, only about tumble and many of us. oh, that's what i do. like the father of 5 democracy, nelson mandela, and many others. that for us, was the face of our party. we saw the africans whet

such a project would have been preferable for arable muslim countries to present it, to the international court, to condemn israel globally. them and international a be a lot of, i mean like the war and gunfire and gaza in the people of gauze and suffer from war and destruction. i hope people show compassion towards the people of garza. surely this decision by the international court of justice will impact israel regardless of the cost as it claims to be a democratic state with knowledge. so we'll definitely have some effect of the, i don't believe is a palestinian, but much whole lives in today's decision from the a court. because we've grown that custom to a world where justice, especially concerning israel and the united states, is up, send it to you in the pollen world, dominated solely by the united states. if there were to be a decision, it would have come from the start as the genocide of the people of gauze that has been ongoing for over a $110.00 days a year for the south africa. is that the case of a headache? has that prompted a strong reaction, and israel people hit the streets dema

israel at the international court of justice, welcome to the show. david, do you think israel's history in supporting apartide in south africa had role in this move? well, as it says at the end of the film there, this is the revenge of history, and you can see in the the demeaner and the the the cheers that went up when the south african legal legal team came back from the hague, that this is seen as being a kind of an atonement for the sins of apartide and... of course the hand held out to the palestinian resistance and to the palestinian people is a is a mark of of how the the south africans see that their struggle intertwined with that of the palestinians as of course you said at the beginning from that famous quote from nelson mandela you who is you who whatever else you might say about mandela you he's seen this as big you know uh saint in a way and of course you can criticize his his views but whatever else you see about him he was sold in the palestinians absolutely and there's pressure on him and not to be so when he was released and and he s

the international court of justice, the u.n.'highest court come has been a plausible risk israel is committing genocide in gaza and ordered provisional measures but stopped short of calling for an immediate ceasefire. this is the president of the court joan donoghue reading out the vote -- part of the ruling. >> by 15 votes to two, the state of israel shall in accordance with its obligations on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in relation to the palestinians in gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of article two of the convention, in particular, a, killing members as a group, b, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, c, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life cap related to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, and d, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group. amy: over a one-hour ruling, the international court of justice president joan donoghue in the hague quoted israe

speedy death, dear compatriots, greetings to you , welcome to the 24 hour news section, the international court of justice requested the zionist regime to provide ensure urgent humanitarian needs in the gaza strip . this court obliged the israeli regime with 16 votes in favor against one vote against. kashi in the tape of justice regarding the zionist regime's perpetration to the generation of gaza from different parts of europe brought themselves to the hague, netherlands. those who came by train to hear the verdict of the court at the same station. the railway sit-in is announced a few kilometers away in the courtroom of the hague. israel must commit to refraining from anything related to killing, destructive attacks against the residents of qadz. the supreme court of the united nations obliged the zionist regime by issuing a ruling to stop the actions leading to genocide in gaza . palestinian people. they are under the protection of the non-genocide convention. israel must comply with the requirements of the non-genocide convention. however , it may take several years to prove the crime of r

well, this has happened one day after the international court of justice released its initial findings regarding israeli generation. side as if to show the world once and for all that there is no international law, might makes right? well, i'd like to welcome my guests to this program. craig murray, former british ambassador to uzbekistan out edinburg, and robert fatina, author and journalist out of kishner on... here, well, thank you both for being with me. i'd like to start it off uh with craig. how do you explain these countries defending unra now? well, i think in part, um, it's a coordinated reaction to the uh international court of justice ruling, and it's important to note within its findings of fact, um, on the uh, genocide, what it the, icj said was plausibly a genocide in in gaza, um unra was quoted quite extensively for giving facts on the ground, so obviously that gives them a motive to discredit uh unra before future icj hearings and also of course it adds to the genocide, it increases the genocidal pressure and speeds up the genocide by potentially. denying a incredibly n

the zionist regime, which always saw itself above international law, is now sitting in the highest court of the world as the accused , accused of the biggest crime against humanity. sharia genocide 75 years after he identified himself as a victim of genocide. if it is confirmed by this international authority and this world court that the zionist regime has committed murder, it is valid the delegitimization of the actions of the zionist regime will play a unique role. the person who has presented himself to the public opinion of the world as a shelter for the victims of genocide, if he is accused and convicted of committing genocide, then naturally he will break the words and propaganda that he started and get out of his hands. yesterday, south african lawyers presented their documents line by line before the 17 judges of the court. from the role of the regime leaders in encouraging genocide to the cases of mass killings and the happiness of the killers. in the second session of today's proceedings of the representatives tel aviv defended the actions of the zionist regime. the defense, w

palestine welcomes the provisional measures ordered by the international court of justice today. the icj judges assess the facts. and the law, they ruled in favor of humanity and international law. we call in all states to ensure that all provisional measures ordered by the court are implemented, including by israel, the occuping power. this is abiding legal obligation. states now have a clear legal obligations to stop israel's genocidal war on the palestinian people in gaza and to make sure that they are not complicit. riyad al-maliki said the icj ruling is an important reminder that no one is above the law, he said the order serves as a wake-up call for israel and all its allies who enabled the regime's entrenched impunity. israeli prime minister on the other hand called the order of disgrace that won't be erased for generations. benyamin netanyahu vowed to continue the onslot until what he called the elimination of all threats and the release of all captives in gaza: han correspondent joins us now from cape town to uh bring us uh more details about today's icj ruling and of cou

israel is not on trial here, what's on trial is actually the international court itself. david, i mean they say that one of the hardest aspects to to prove in in cases like this at the icj is is intent, but i mean there's been a plethera hasn't there of uh of statements from from zinist leaders that that... that do justify the the accusation of genocide, wouldn't you agree? well, you say a plethera, mean what's what's the plural of plethera, there have been so many, and we've talked about this in the program before, you listing statement after statement netanyahu talking about amalec, the people be smited by, and of course that that that passage is from scripture, and and you of course is atheist, and the zionist by large secularis, there's a religious zionist. yeah uh um fringe uh and but what they're talking about there is in that passage in the bible is uh when he say smiting the amalet we're talking about killing everybody and everything, the goats, the chickens, the hens, the men, the women and the children, every single one, and that's of course incitement to to gen

and that means by doing a is this called international court of justice. so if the court decides its still a big if to issue a professional measures, it could be a game changer in terms of what's been going on here at the united nations in new york. on friday is going to be the 2nd day of proceedings at the international court of justice. as we've been talking about is what was expected to defend itself against accusations of genocide made by south africa. both countries are allowed to appoint one judge to the panel. let's see if in the case it was chosen is former supreme court president. i'll hold on buck. 87 year old was born in the fairway and here is a survivor of the holocaust. his parents moved to the british mandate of palestine and 1947 a year before the creation of the state of israel. mark showed support for israel's walton garza and his claim. do you see no evidence that israel's violated international humanitarian law? in an interview with the canadian newspaper, the globe and mail, he said, quote, it may be proportional to kill 5 n as in kids

the international court of justice also rejected the zionist regime's request to reject the south african case and required the zionist regime to submit a report to this court within one month of its commitment to emergency measures in gaza. the south african government welcomed the temporary measures. the hague international court against the zionist regime announced that this verdict is a decisive victory for the rule of law and an important milestone in establishing justice for the palestinian people. the south african government meanwhile implemented the interim measures of the hague tribunal considered it impossible without stopping the war in gaza and emphasized that we expected the hague court of justice to issue a ruling to stop the war in gaza. see this evening, the hague court of justice voted in its ruling on a series of temporary measures regarding the case of the accusation of genocide by the zionist regime in the gaza war. in this ruling, the zionist regime is required to take all measures to prevent any act that can be considered genocide. also, the zionist regime must take

israel is not on trial here, what's on trial is actually the international court itself. david, i mean they say that one of the hardest aspects to to prove in in cases like this at the icj is is intent, but i mean there's been a plethera hasn't there of uh of statements from from zine. leaders that that do justify the the accusation of uh genocide, wouldn't you agree? well, you see a plethra, i mean was the plural of plithora, there have been so many, and we've talked about this in the program before, listing statement after statement netanyahu talking about amalek, the people of amalek be spited by, and of course that that passages from scripture and and you netanyahu of course is atheist and design is by and large secularis, just zionist yeah uh um fringe uh but and but what they're talking about there is in that passage in the bible is uh when they say smiting the amalet we're talking about killing everybody and everything the goats the chickens the hens the men the women and the children every single one and that's of course incitement to to genocide of course what th

accusations this fix here as a piece palace and they hate a high because the un court is the highest body, the un has to uphold international law. south africa has asked the court for an urgent injunction to stop is for health, military campaign, but case is a d i. c, j usually take years. a decision, unprofessional measures is expected within weeks. south africa hopes that if they win, it will further increase international pressure on countries like the united states who are backing is for out to do more to stop the fighting stuff fast and l just sierra to take. well, the hearings of the hague are scheduled to last 2 days with both parties laying out their arguments ourselves. individual takes a closer look at the evidence of africa will be presenting at the united nations highest court. the israel stands accused of carrying out genocide in gaza. south africa has filed a $84.00 page document with the international court of justice and the hague is claims. israel has killed more than $17000.00 palestinians from october until december last year. just on december 7th, approximately one. palestinian was killed in gauze up eve

the headlines the international court of justice is set to its first hearing in a case brought against israel for committing genocide in the sieged gaza strip. israel intensifies its air strikes and ground incursions in the gaza strip as a un agency issues a fresh warning about the humanitarian situation in ghaza. and yeman slams a un security council resolution on anti-israeli operations in the red sea saying all its actions fall within the framework of... legitimate defense, hello and welcome everybody, it's 11:30 am here in the iranian capital tehran, you're watching press tv's world news, our top story for this half hour, the international court of justice in the hague will hold its first hearing to consider its provisional measures a lawsuit filed by south africa. against israeli genocide in the gaza strip, both the plaintif and the defendant will face each other at the top un court today. judges will hear the case that accuses uh the tel aviv regime of genocide against palestinians and also requests an emergency suspension of israel's war on gaza. the icj will have two days of he

this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide, and in fact the international court of justiceppened. if this court had taken responsibility for this matter, it would not have been possible to transfer it to the international court of justice, because there's conflict over this issue. in fact, it's referral to the international court. weakens the local court, but the existence of this dispute within the entity between the local court of justice and the administration created a situation that there was no choice but to transfer the case to the international court of justice where there is no escape, let us move from the international court of justice in the hague to us secretary of state anthony blincan's recent visit to the occupying regime of israel which revealed the existence of differences לישראלים יש שאיפות, גם לפלסטינים יש שאיפות ואתם צריכים לקבל את זה. על כך משיב לו בתוך החדר בפני השרים וראש הממשלה השר רון דרמר. 85% מהפלסטינים ביהודה ושומרון תומכים. טווח שבוצע בשבת השחורה, או במילים אחרות טודי דרמר אומר לבלינקן, אלו הפרטנרים שלנו, להם לתת מדינה, זו העמדה שדרמר משמיע בתוך

and of course, the international court of justice is the top court in that international rules based order and data. plenty of stake. james, thanks a lot transfers in your it's not a funeral for a man killed by is ready for it, isn't your name has been taking place. he was killed when the military rated several areas in the occupied west bank. currently on thursday, at least 10 palestinians were arrested, is ready forces of step. then like the searches in the wake of the war on garza, the architecture of state has left egypt and see final stop of his latest diplomatic tourism, at least as the blinking hell talks with president of the photo cc and kyra blanket said, offering a pos way to a palestinian state is the best way to stabilize the white region, as well as isolating around and is proxies. washington continues to support as well as offensive and gaza and has refused to cool for a cease fire. escalating tensions along the level and israel border prompted west, in different months to meet and pay route to discuss potential solutions. one of the proposals reportedly involves his b

gaza strip with an air strike during the international court of justice session. clearly unashamed of israel's warmungering ways, israeli lawyers took to the international court of justice the following day to further attempt to justify the unjustifiable. israel's lawyer malcolm shaw from leicester university in britain came across as unorganized and arrogant. "someone has shuffled my papers," he grumbled as he staggered through his address. a widely criticized move took place when western news channels that ignored south africa's presentation at the international court of justice, live streamed israel's response to it an act of censorship. by omission, the german government has announced that it will seek to intervene in the international court of justice to support israel, possibly out of dread for its own fate as german armament sales to israel soored 100% in 2023 with fast tracking system established in october. as a result, germany not only continued to arm israel throughout its murderous war in gaza, but even increase sales to boost israel's. ability to kill

we thank the international court of justice for upholding its role of achieving justice, promoting peaceountable. it is our earnest hope and wish that this court order paves the way for an end to this crisis. and this painful experience that palestinians are going through. and we hope for an end to the terrible loss of life and hardship, and for the crucial first step is to be taken the crucial first step is to be ta ken towards the crucial first step is to be taken towards reconciliation and a just, lasting peace. lastly, iwould like to extend my gratitude to our lawyers, the lawyers who presented our case to the international court, and of course gratitude to our minister ofjustice and minister of justice and constitutional affairs, and minister ofjustice and constitutional affairs, and also our minister of international relations, who is currently at the hague. i thank you. that was south africa's cyril ramaphosa giving his immediate response to what we have had at the rq response to what we have had at the icj just a little earlier at the hague. welcoming what we heard, and we've bee