the international court of justice has ordered his route to stop. it's a sold on rafa. the order is one of 3 issued by the us top court in the genocide case, brought by south africa against israel, over its war on guys. israel has long declared it plans to intensify, sold on the southern city, saying it's necessary to dismantle from us. and it appears advance to follow through with that strategy. the i, c, j is readings final and legally binding, but it doesn't have a way to enforce them. so, does this latest sort of carry any weight? and will it affect events on the ground? and how will prime it is finished now manage increased pressure at home and abroad . we'll explore these questions what i guess in just a moment. but for us this report by continental past already on the it's a significant move for the us top court. a landmark emergency of ruling ordering. israel to stop it's assault on rafa, is it must immediately hold me to open and any other accident and did also have governors which made conflict on the but assuming a group and gaza conditions of life. that could

it has been crossed at the international court of justice. it's been crossed at the international criminal court. it's being crossed around the world. and i think that itself is, you know, as a lawyer, as, as, as somebody who has, who, who is friends, who, who has worked on human rights issues around the world and who was always seen and fell. and as you who has always deplored these israel exceptions to human rights bodies to human rights activities, to human rights investigations, i think this is a positive yes, that a long it's a positive development, even in this very, very dark situation. i. mr. brody, given all of the experience that you have just mentioned, how strong do you think the international criminal court? so um, from what we know of the arrest warrant seeking a rest warren's. how strong do you think cutting, con the chief, prosecute his case against communism is nothing. yahoo and defense minister you'll have gone to well, i have not seen. nobody has seen the actual warrant. the actual request for a warrant. so from what we've

the uk is a | member of the international criminal court, _ member of the international criminal court, it's— member of the international criminal court, it's our— member of the international criminal court, it's our obligation _ member of the international criminal court, it's our obligation under- court, it's our obligation under that— court, it's our obligation under that statute _ court, it's our obligation under that statute to _ court, it's our obligation under that statute to arrest - court, it's our obligation under that statute to arrest someone court, it's our obligation under. that statute to arrest someone if they arrive — that statute to arrest someone if they arrive in _ that statute to arrest someone if they arrive in this _ that statute to arrest someone if they arrive in this country- that statute to arrest someone if they arrive in this country with l that statute to arrest someone if| they arrive in this country with an arrest _ they arrive in this country with an arrest warrant _ they arrive in this country with an arrest warrant against _ they arrive in this countr

i'm trying to do anything to the international court of justice. and so many other. busy international governments and conventions and agreement, stuff i was suppose to do late relations between depos, between countries, between states. but those are actually not applicable. and that gets to prison. okay. the space has been under try you to buy this man for its treatments. it was right and can describe the conflict, not, not only but the use, right. and now it's really a very, very bad position if it continues to use that to people. because it's going to be clear for, of the community that this move is against international law, and that gives intern. okay, let me get william thoughts about this william, how much does this heightened the costs for the bottom administration as it continues to be israel? so guarantor and defend and what are the next steps? as far as international know is concerned, i mean, they, what are the obligations of 3rd states in this case? you know, why wouldn't underestimate the ability of the united states to be hypocritical on new subjects. t

international. ready criminal court proceeding with what, what it's set up to do. okay. and yeah, is there any, is there any government likely to re evaluate its position in the face of intensifying international pressure and intensifying isolation? this is the question because i am, i don't know if this way to continue, but if it is both goals that i see and i see j waiting go with directions. if the security costs are when go all the way you are being compromised, to recognize bias on, if it will end up with the n as in don nosebleed to inc. and that is the, the junction if we do well on our international standing there for some of our security, or if we go off the 100 percent security dash because the pressure of the user name and the sign is below. now the way, thank you gentlemen, for a very interesting conversation. thank you very much for joining us mohammed dia allen leo williams to boss. thank you to all 3 of you and thank you too for watching. you can always watch this program again, any time by visiting our website at all, jessie or dot com for further discussi

and 74 of the rules of procedure and the arguments of the international court of justice can make a orary order during this main complaint . article 41 of the statute of the court says that if a series of rights and issues. if there is an emergency for one of the parties to the dispute, until the main decision is issued, those rights may be violated or destroyed in general, the parties can request the issuance of a temporary order . last week , south africa requested a temporary injunction. and well, the court is dealing with it very soon, and today, if i'm not mistaken, between one and two o'clock it is supposed to be dealt with in half of iran's time. as a rule, today we will witness a good vote in favor of palestine, because if rafah is destroyed , practically the entire situation of palestine will be destroyed and the vote of the court of time will no longer be useful. it is useful for the court to exist at all in palestine , rafah is the end of the palestinian situation and problem, and the attacks that have been carried out today have destroyed part of the solution and we had m

the court, the international criminal court is the court of last resort.it is not the court of first resort in the place we automatically turn to. it has to work only when any other structures are incapable, inadequate and insufficient in practice. host: drill down on the warrants of arrest. how will the officials go about getting these warrants. what is the process like? guest: the international criminal court is very complex. they have something that is almost unique in the world and in some ways it is unique. they have a pretrial chamber. and they have to go to the pretrial chamber, a group of judges, present the case. that means that even if at the warrant of arrest phase they have evidence, real evidence. more importantly, real charges so they have to go down this genocide charge among the group. this crime against humanity along that long list. this set of war crimes. and then they have to give judges almost a prima fascia case. not only can they prove the crime, but the individual connection of that person to that crime. they did it and they ordered

the end of the week was the verdict of the international court of justice. the beginning of our new week was the announcement of the prosecutor of the international criminal court, which was against prime minister esraei and the minister of defense and war. he requested that an arrest warrant be issued . it has not yet been issued. the judges should actually investigate, but this taboo is actually the responsibility of the heads of the israeli regime. for the first time in the history of international law , it has been broken, and this is a great achievement. this vote is not unrelated to it, because one of the things that have been ordered is the requirement of the regime to actually open the way for fact-finding boards , investigative commissions and teams. investigate and document the actual commission of genocide, and this is important for the court, because in any case , the prosecutor's request, although it was desirable, but it was not complete. jangi had made this request and referred it to the international court. justice to that should team go out a

the international court of justice ordered israel to stop the attack on rafah . spokesman of the un secretary general said that many countries supported the ruling of the international court of justice. stephen dujarric emphasized that the only way to facilitate the aid of the palestinian people is to stop the israeli attacks on ghaza and rafah and establish a ceasefire. the european crisis management commissioner also announced the verdict of the international court of justice for the regime. israel is binding. the international court of justice ruled to stop the military attack in rafah by the vote of 13 out of 15 judges. in addition, the international court of justice announced that israel should open the rafah crossing for humanitarian aid to enter gaza. nawaf salam, the head of the international court of justice, said in the court's decision on the need for the fact-finding committee to access the genocide accusation documents. in gaza, it was emphasized that it is necessary to start an investigation on the issue of israeli genocide, and it is necessary to r

i the international court ruling. thatj does not mean it's meaningless. he court rules for provisional- the court rules for provisional nieasures_ the court rules for provisional measures in— the court rules for provisional measures in this case, - the court rules for provisional measures in this case, then. the court rules for provisional- measures in this case, then israel will have — measures in this case, then israel will have to — measures in this case, then israel will have to make _ measures in this case, then israel will have to make a _ measures in this case, then israel will have to make a decision - will have to make a decision whether to uphold _ will have to make a decision whether to uphold those _ will have to make a decision whether to uphold those measures _ will have to make a decision whether to uphold those measures are - will have to make a decision whether. to uphold those measures are whether to become _ to uphold those measures are whether to become essentially— to uphold those measures are whether to become essentially a client- to

and i'm also as welcome to ruling by the international court of justice, but in a statement it says that expect that the court to issue in order to stop the genocide in all of gods and not just of alpha was, is there a spoke to him, aust, spokesperson osama hung down, who says the international community is failing to pressure israel to comply with international law. a chris full, it's a very was come the decision from the seizure. and we believe we chose exactly clearly that to the i. c. j. a. considered what's happening, that's the general side and decide it's comforting that you know side, because everyone knows that to the human side, there's the mer identified to create in the course. the 2nd issue, i believe, is this decision at. ringback brings the whole international community and to carry on their own responsibilities. everyone was waiting for this decision. and to understand was that a decision side or not? we believe as how message was identified from the number one, but at least now everyone in the international community has to understand it's a genocide and they have to wor

however, such a statement by the chief prosecutor of the international criminal court caused outrage both among hamas representatives and in israel. let's hear what netanyahu himself said about this. the outrageous decision of the prosecutor of the international criminal court karim khan was requested to issue arrest warrants. historical scale, it will forever remain on a stain of shame on the international court. netanyahu also added that he, i quote, was disgusted by this attempt to install democratically elected leaders from what he called the genocidal organization hamas. representatives of hamas, in turn , say that such actions equate the victim with the executioner, referring to israel. in the united states, it is the main one. israel's allies also reacted to the accusations of the icc and here is the statement of president joe biden. let me state clearly that we reject the icc's request to issue arrest warrants for israeli leaders. so that these warrants do not assumed, there is no equivalence between israel and hamas. by the way, great britain also did not support such an init

of course, the international criminal court and the international court of justice all separate. but can they influence what the other is doing? and so i have no doubt i, i don't know how much the, the, this court has been influenced by the i c. c. but i, i do feel like the i c, c has been, the prosecutor has been influenced. i mean, we have, you know, the, the, the, the question of palestine has been on the desk of 3 successive icbc, prosecutors for 15 years. and no one wanted to really bite the bullet and do something even this prosecutor who came in there was a lot of speculation. i was with him at the i c c assembly. and in december, i've seen his body, his, his, his rhetoric and all that, many people felt he would not do anything. but this was a red line in the eyes big, but the political constellation at the i, c, c and the i, c, j is different. and it, we always assume that that there was a red line that the prosecutor of the i, c, c would not cross and that was inciting, and it was rarely official. and i think it's the, the, the, the continued honest lot by israel, the int

, sanctions against the international criminal court, this is something that ukraine cannot support. this will lead to the discrediting of the international criminal court, to the annulment of its decision, in that among the war crimes committed by russia in ukraine, and this leads to such a negative foreign policy image of the united states, because many countries that do not have a clear position, or are inclined to sympathize with russia, can say that here the united states ... supports ukraine and claim that russia is committing crimes in ukraine, here the united states supports israel, which from the point of view of the international criminal court itself commits war crimes, that is, the united states is not interested in justice, only in support its own partners on the geopolitical map, that is, i believe that the decision of the united states at the moment to ... aimed at conflict with the international criminal court is wrong, and ukraine cannot support it, but the degree of condemnation and publicity of our concern about this, of course, it should deciding how much it is t

first, let's hear from the president of the international court of justice. the wife saw the court consider that in conformity with the obligation under the genocide convention, is that it must immediately hold. it's mindy to offense and any other action instead of a government which may inflict on the but assuming a group and gaza conditions of life that would bring about its physical destruction in hold or input. mary ellen o'connell as professor of law and profess of international peace studies at the university of notre dame in the united states, or numerous books as self defense against non state actors. she joins us from rio de janeiro and present a welcome to dw professor. this rolling sounds pretty unequivocal. not a lot of wiggle room for israel, as there is no wiggle room in this order. remember, it's the 3rd order issued by the international court of john s, as in this case, the 2 prior orders have been defied. people are still dying in large numbers, especially civilians, especially children. the court, like everyone in the world including presiden

how much is welcome to ruling by the international court of justice. however, it released the statement saying it expected the court to issue in order to stop the genocide and all of guys are not just in your office. i just spoke to it and spoke to i'm a spokesman or someone from the besides, the international community is failing to pressure israel to comply with international law. a chris full, it's a very was come the decision from the seizure and we believe the tools existed. it can be that the i c j a considered what's happening. this is a genocide. and so i just continue to genocide because everyone knows that to the human side business they're identified to create in the costs. the 2nd issue, i believe, is this decision. it brings the whole international community and to kenny on their own responsibilities. everyone was waiting for this decision to understand was that a decision side or not? we believe as how about 6 was identified from the number one, but at least now everyone in the intellectual community has to understand that set genocide, t

on monday, the international criminal court, not to be confused with the international court of justice of the united nations, issued an arrest warrant for israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity. in general, this is the first time that the international criminal court has issued an arrest warrant for a us ally. the united states and israel received another blow on wednesday when norway, ireland and spain announced they would recognize palestine as a state. these days it sounded like a sensation, like a demarche in favor of what, in the opinion of many, israel changes ariol from the holocaust victim to the role of executioner. in fact, it is rarely mentioned that more than 140 countries have already recognized the territory of palestine within the 1967 borders as a separate state. but in any case, the move by norway, ireland and spain brought attention to the problem. the massacre in palestine has already caused quite a stir in american society and has become an important factor in the presidential campaign. from the usa, our corres

can the verdict that the international court of justice issued against israel's genocide in gaza, as as the effort made by the international criminal court to issue an arrest warrant for netanyahu , make this regime more isolated and alone in the world? of course, these decrees and decisions of israel and whatever. in fact, america is afraid that with the end of this war, american hegemony will be endangered and it will end . biden and his team do not want it. america also lost this war along with netanyahu. america actually lost the war in ukraine. this is the end of american hegemony. regarding israel , i must say that there is no doubt that the current situation will have no end at all for the israeli cabinet. in fact, the powers are actually in the hands of the government in israel, which is not logical. thank you for our final question. in the latest survey of the occupied territories published by the israeli newspaper maarif, the majority of zionists said that hamas they know the winner of the war. meanwhile, all the israeli authorities at the beginning of the war aimed to dest

they are simply incorporated into the structure of the international criminal court. very easy. in doing that, you expand the punitive authority of that treaty and international criminal court based on the pre-existing treaty arrangement. that is a beautiful thing. for our purposes, eight to be goes on to list a series of crimes. mentioned don't come from eight -- don't come from 8s2. they come from 82b. but are found in the body of the law of war. that is all the crimes that are committed during an international armed conflict. article cd and eat deal with crimes committed in non-international armed conflicts. ars, insurgencies, terrorist acts etc.. that is the division. that is why the statute is wonderful in the article eight were crimes provisions because in my view it is the most comprehensive listing of war crimes anywhere in the world. it serves a really important function for consolidating and clarifying and explaining exactly what is criminal and then in those elements of crimes giving great detail in terms of what a prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable d

and this palestinian people for whom the introduction, this set of hearings is the 4th, the international court of justice or i. c. j has held on his wells, treatment of palestinians. since the start of it's one garza in october, the 1st was in january, also launched by south africa. the court had ordered provisional measures, demanding israel do everything and it's power to prevent genocide lots. but as well says it's operation in the alpha isn't genocide. and the city is a strong hold it to the south africa of operating on behalf of the palestinian group. because a clear anterior motive, we need to ask you to order is ready to stay away from where i find it does. so in order to obtain military advantage for each spotlight from us, which it does not wish to see defeated. south africa also accuses as well of blocking aid from entering garza un official say. only a few a trucks have entered through the cut them up. we sell in crossing in several days, and the us has admitted supplies starting to enter through floating peer. it's military spelt, i'm guys this coast can't make up for what could be

orders, while this verdict will add to increasing international pressure, is where else dismissive response. the recent rulings handed down by this court suggests that for the people in gaza phase and the international justice system is fading by the day. step 5 from l. g sierra, the hate and is really prime minister benjamin netanyahu has criticized the i. c. j . roland has office issued a joint statement with a foreign ministry saying the charges of genocide brought by south africa against israel at the international court of justice and the hague. are false regions and morally repugnant. it goes on to say israel has not and will not conduct to military actions that off that creates conditions that could lead to the destruction of a palestinian civilian population. well, as you know where israel has bound l g 0 from a reporting from the country, so a set of higher ups uh reports on israel's reaction to the ice. if you're willing from richard cheney and capital m on this is randy consensus amongst ministers as well. as the prime minister is that the i, c, j is and c symmetric and that they will continue with the goals they will contin

the welcome to the program, the international court of justice and the hey has ordered as well to stop its military offensive. and the city of rafa and southern gaza. the you and the top court described the humanitarian situation there as disastrous, an ordered, as well to allow on hindered access as 8. but is really politicians have rejected the ruling saying that operations against him off a group considered a terrorist organization by multiple countries, will continue fall from the front lines of the war in gaza. is rails military campaign suffered a major legal blow? it must immediately hold. it's mindy to offense and any other accident instead of a governor, which may inflict on but assuming a group and gaza conditions of life that would bring about its physical destruction in hold or input. but at the latest icy j rolling unequivocal about the need for is round to protect the palestinians and do more to provide vital aid. the decision welcomed by south africa, which brought the case and his accused israel of commission genocide. this order is groundbreaking, as it is the 1st time

court. it insisted that israel acted in accordance with international law and its humanitarian obligations. h african lawyers told the court in the hague that israel had intended from the beginning to destroy palestinian life. they said palestinians needed protection from genocide. joining me now from jerusalem, dan johnson. bring us up to date with events in gaza and tell us about the new pier. events in gaza and tell us about the new ier. , , ., , events in gaza and tell us about the new ier. , , , , new pier. yes, this has been built b the us new pier. yes, this has been built by the us military _ new pier. yes, this has been built by the us military and _ new pier. yes, this has been built by the us military and has - new pier. yes, this has been built by the us military and has been l by the us military and has been operationaljust for a by the us military and has been operational just for a few by the us military and has been operationaljust for a few hours this morning. it enables larger ships to dock with aid consignments that are being shipped from cyprus and they are ferried to the

the international criminal court in the he is contemplating issue in the russ once again senior was really government and military officials as war crimes. this would be an outrage of a star for portions international bodies like the i see a rose in the wake of the holocaust committed against the jewish people. so they was set up to present so chars to present future genocides. you know, the international court is trying to put is well in the dock is real is not even subject to the court's jurisdiction. and it has an independent legal system that rigorously investigates all violations of the law. rather, this isis, the attempt is an attempt to paralyze is very ability to defend itself. the houses here as honey my who joins us now from central gaza. so honey, you heard the news. the prosecutor and the international criminal court in the hague has presented accusations that may lead to arrest warrants against not only the israeli prime minister and defense ministers, but also against 3 senior hamas leaders, including yeah, you know, send war the head of a mouse in the gaza strip and his numb

yahoo has criticized the ruling by the international court of justice. his office has issued a joint statement with the foreign minister saying the charges of genocide brought by south africa against israel at the international court of justice and the hague . are false outrageous and bodily repugnant. it goes on to say israel has not and will not conduct to military actions in rough or the create conditions that could lead to the destruction of the palestinian civilian population. israel has also called the i c j order to stop its assault on wi fi. outrageous and disgusting. now it's bind, i'll just data. so our correspondent income has this update from the jordanian capital. i'm on a lot reaction from prime minister benjamin netanyahu, who came as a direct result of an emergency meeting that he called with. the foreign minister is ro cancel also with benny guns, who's a member of the won't cabinets. and the government's top uh, judicial advisor. that's how seriously they taking this. i c j ruling. oh, so we heard from the finance, but it's a bit to the

now we will return to the international court ofjustice, but international court ofjustice, but i wanting news. the slovakian government says that robert fico remains in intensive care, that is the latest update on his condition. earlier it was said that the prime minister was able to speak again after being shot several times on wednesday. police have charged a side spiked with attempted murder in what was the first major assassination attempt on a european political leaderfor more than 20 years. ministers have said that the gunman acted alone and have described the attack as politically motivated, so once again, just to give you that update from the slovakian government. the prime minister robert fico remains in intensive care. now, let's return to their case in the international court ofjustice. lawyers acting for israel have been responding at the un's top quote to south africa's call to end israeli operation in rafah and across gaza. israel has complained that the international court ofjustice is being exploited by south africa. it says it did not want the gaza war and it is under

so that is a situation and offer and the international court of justice will soon on weather as well, should seize its military operation. there, the court has no way to enforce its orders, but the case has put increasing international pressure on israel to show more was trained and it's one gossip since october. the 7th does where the forces have killed more than $35800.00 palestinians. and january, the court issued provisional measures ordering as well to do everything and as a pallet to prevent accident could amount to genocide all that and selling to genocide and to allow she monitoring aid and to gaza. in march, south africa filed another appeal saying israel had largely ignored the area of opening. the humanitarian situation and gaza had worsened and the un warm palestinians on the brink of famine, lakes and much the court ordered additional meshes, telling israel to ensure basic services and open more land crossings to allow urgently needed humanitarian aid and to gaza. earlier this month, south africa approached the course again, it once as well to immediately and some other t

yesterday, the international court of justice ordered the cessation of hostilities against rafe. w days ago, the prosecutor of the international criminal court also requested it. at the same time, benny gans, a member of the zionist regime's war cabinet , gave an ultimatum to netanyahu that if he does not present a plan for the future of the war, he will soon leave the war cabinet. can you pay attention to whether netanyahu is close to the finish line considering all these events. it is difficult to predict the reaction of netanyahu and his cabinet, because since the beginning of this conflict , netanyahu has not listened to any advice or advice, even to the advice given by america, the biden government and mr. blinken to netanyahu . in fact, there has been an overthrow and an infiltration of the army in the israeli army, which claims to be the best and the biggest army that israel has always been famous for. in violation of them, mr. koros, you mentioned that the zionist regime is fighting this war both in the field and in the world arena and narratives. losing, can the verdict i

the international court of justice has met full time since as well launched as one, gaza and up to the 3 at the request of south africa and its latest appeal pretoria has cooled urgent measures to order a hold on the assault on java. since early this month is really forces have been pounding the southern city with more than 1500000 palestinians had taken shelter, also escaping from other parts of gaza. hundreds of thousands of now being forced to flee again into refugee camps in central gaza. as well says it's operation is limited and aimed at targeting the last stronghold of moss and java, south africa, close as a genocidal act. the i. c. j has ordered some provisional measures since pretoria 1st fall the case in january. but israel has largely ignored them to so count the cost and souls as old as and one that's decisions make any difference apart from effect and will depend in we'll discuss these questions with our panel of experts in a few moments. but 1st, this report flight up to some denford, preparing a symbol of peace outside the international court of justice. well inside isra

but long as for israel have told the international court of justice. it has the right to move ahead with a full scale offensive on the roof or to defend itself against thomas on thursday, south africa aust, the court to order israel to stop it's offensive and the city saying it's violating the genocide convention. so it's not for a couple of parts to describe the process or the last refute for civilians. and guys why the many civilians have indeed evacuated to rough over the past few months. the fact remains that the safety of for us also serves as the military, strong, cold, full hum us, which continues to pose a significant threat to the state of israel and its citizens. all the court has given israel until saturday to demonstrate how that to the court, how to ensure the safety of palestinians, same from proffer to the so called safe zones. can israel provide information about the existing humanitarian conditions in the designated evacuation zones? in particular? and my wasi and how it would ensure a safe passage to these phones as well as the provisi

well how mos how's welcome to ruling by the international court of justice. but in the statement, it says that expect that the court to issue in order to stop the genocide in all of gaza, not just out of i don't use it or spoke to him. i spoke sports in the summer. i'm don, who says the international community is failing to pressure is real to comply with international law take it was a chris full. it's a very was come the decision from the i see here. and we believe we chose exactly clearly that to the i c j a considered what's happening. this is the general side. and it's right, it's comforting that you know side, because everyone knows that to the human side business there are going to try to create in the costs. the 2nd issue, i believe, is this decision. it brings the whole international community and to carry on their own responsibilities. everyone was waiting for this decision to understand was that a decision side or not? we believe as how message was identified from the number one, but at least now everyone in the international community has to unders

so i was and was just explaining to the international criminal court or international court of justice. i should say issues. it's morning to israel and yet the fighting continues . talk to us about what's been going on. yes, and what, what looks like more of a public defiance to the international court of justice ruling requiring israel to address the what's going on in the ground. now there's a bit of report on all of us. i guess a request to involve facilities, particularly in rough estimate, is really military just intensified the talks across the city olds. at the same time, the court was in session is really military bombed in the area with at least 9 bombs were dropped in one residential lock. and what does really matter describe as a targeted killing. however, in later statement describe that the results were not clear, but it did destroyed the infrastructure, the particular role that was destroyed then the surrounding buildings and further civilian casualties were reported from this massive attack. these as of the past a half an hour, renewed, fresh artillery showing at the vic

ofjustice, and international court of justice, and just international court ofjustice, and justw and cease its military offensive in rafah, to take all effective measures to allow access to gaza for humanitarian aid, and it also wants the court to ensure that israel reports back on its measures. those are the three key demands from south africa. it is not the first time that south africa has come to the icj, asking for the court to order israel to stop its military offensive. let me also tell you that tomorrow we will hear from israel, israel's response to what south africa is saying here at the international court ofjustice today. and if you want to carry on watching what is happening at the international court ofjustice, you can go to the live page on the bbc news website and app, where you will get all the latest developments therefrom the hague. and while we were watching developments at the international court ofjustice, we were seeing that a news conference or update was happening outside the hospital in slovakia where the prime minister is being treated after he was shot

but the international court of justice that's existed since the stats of the united nations . in fact, it's actually a we named devotion of a court that existed in the print assessor the league of nations there in the peace process building in the, in the hey, it's the justices that you saw on the bench that they are elected by the un security council and the un general assembly is a single chain. usually they have to majority and both bodies in order to get on that court. they are renowned legal, so it goes, eliciting on that cold, it's going to be very, very hard for the bite and administration. i think to say that this is in some way biased because the vitamin ministration. remember when it comes to ukraine says you've got to trust the rules based international load or will this is the top of the tree of the rules based international mold. yeah. and we have seen them say those sorts of things at different un officials. i'm thinking of, you know, the un special reputable for the occupied palestinian territories. and the kinds of things that the by that and ministration have s

about justice and the supremacy of international law, yes, about the impartiality of the un international courts, and international law exists, it works normally, the oron international court, but homework should be done if last year the people of mezhlivska taran officially surrendered in july, according to the law approved by president zelensky in the 21st year, signed. yes, according to the resolution, we won't be speaking according to the resolution, we don't have time counting that it is important, and he turned to the government of ukraine with a simple legal request to provide legalization, that is, to confirm his status, and here it was last year, just in time, i apologize, boris babin, ex-representative of the president in the autonomous republic of crimea, our topic continues, a small plot and... the anniversary of the deportation of the crimean tatar people on may 18 every year ukraine celebrates it without a doubt and the crimean tatar people celebrate it as a day of remembrance of the victims of the genocide. it happened in the 44th year, by order of stalin, this began a deportatio

and rafa the international court of justice convened to hear a case filed by south africa, accusing israel of intensifying what it's called a genocide and gaza is urging the world courts to order a host. israel's assault on rafa, south africans legal team are presenting their case today. and israel will speak tomorrow. the hearings are part of a broader chase against israel sion of the front of the team. and they've been taking place as israel forces is really forces pushed into raffle where many of gauze us displaced, people happen sheltering of the rough, fine southern gaza, a shelter for more than a 1000000 palestinians. and now the focus of these rails military assaults, his troops portion to the city, displaced the palestinians, flee again, while the allies abroad hope to prevent further disaster. south africa has petitions, the international court of justice, israel to immediately withdrawal from rafa, and ceased. that's military offensive. it will, sir, aust, israel to take full effective measures to facilitate unimpeded access to aid these measures, a part of an ongoing case filed

israel is fighting a just war for survival, and the international criminal court is trying to equate ober 7 massacre. it's obvious that. the international criminal court's decision comes amid the biden administration's pressure campaign against israel and the state department's deco investigations. in the absence of leadership from the white house , congress is considering all options, including sanctions, to punish the international criminal court to ensure that its leadership faces consequences if they act. if the international criminal court is allowed to threaten israeli leaders, we could become next. at the same time, double standards in... now it’s unclear what will happen with this reception, how the clooneys can even prepare and carry it out, because there is an obvious conflict of interest here, colleagues, well, i hope the clooneys don’t get divorced after this, although who knows , why, well, just spouses with a very active political position in life, but by the way, now the latest messages are coming in with american threats against the white house court. and state debt sa

this our, the international court of justice has ordered israel to immediately end its military offensive and the southern gaza city of the world. courts also ordered israel to open the crossing and allow humanitarian aid into gaza. is really army continues to attack it off on despite the icing. j wing missiles target is the l should for refugee camp and central prime minister benjamin netanyahu criticized the ice age and says the military operation will continue. this really forces are surrounding the community hospital. the air strikes at the facility of a hospital, w h o has documented 450 is really a tax on health care facilities since the war began. i mean, once we say in the united states have arrested a teenager for attacking palestinian solidarity protesters at the university of california in los angeles. last month they say he was seen in video beating victims with a wooden pool. local media reports, the suspect is an 18 year old, high school student supporters of israel, a tank protesters on april 30th, as they called for the university to cut ties with companies that do busines

that was the order from the u. n's top called the international court of justice to these right, the government is late. these daughter adds to a growing list of diplomatic and legal moves against age row and have undermined its international standing. and comes days after prosecutors that another international tribunal, the international criminal code called for the rest of israel's prime, minnesota. and in the same week, that's 3 european countries to be coordinated, step of recognizing the state of palestine. we'll have expert legal analysis of today's ruling in a moment. first, let's hear from the president of the international court of justice. the wife saw the court consider that in conformity with the obligation under the genocide convention, is that it must immediately hold. it's mindy to offense and any other action instead of a government which may inflict on the by assuming a group and gaza conditions of life that would bring about its physical destruction in whole or info. mary ellen o'connell as professor of law and profess of international peace that is at the university

the possibility of a warrant for his arrest, saying a move would be an outrage or the international criminal court in the he is contemplating issue in the russ once again. senior is really government and military officials as war crimes. this would be an outrage of historic proportions. international bodies like the, i see a rose in the wake of the holocaust committed against the jewish people. they were set up to present so chars to prevent future genocides. you know, the international court is trying to put as well in the dock as well as not even subject to the court's jurisdiction. and it has an independent legal system that rigorously investigates all violations of the law. rather, this isis, the attempt is an attempt to paralyze is very ability to defend itself corresponding and wrong con joins us live now from the to damian. capital, amman, your cold at benjamin netanyahu. his cabinet has bound altar 0 from israel. so we are now reporting from outside the country, and one went on surprisingly, saying pushed back already and israel can you talk us through the reactions, sorry, fathers from th

israel has complained that the international court ofjustice is being exploited by south africa. says biased and false claims that relied on hamas sources had been presented to the court. it insisted that israel acted in accordance with international law and its humanitarian obligations. south african lawyers told the court in the hague that israel had intended from the beginning to destroy palestinian life. they said palestinians needed protection from genocide. meanwhile, us concern over the amount of aid getting into rafah has been echoed by the un. their aid chief warned that famine is now an immediate threat and that un staff were struggling to help people displaced by the israeli offensive on rafah. the facts on the ground tell us, we don't need to be scientists to see the consequence of the removal of food. also, forfamine, particularly the removal of medical care and nutritional care, which is the precursor to... famine kills through disease, as well as hunger. the israeli prime minister has doubled down on the importance of a military campaign in rafah. benjamin netanyah

that is the cause of palestine. meanwhile, a mass as well comes of running by the international court of justice. but in this statement, it did say that it expected the court to issue in order to stop genocide and all of gaza. not just and rasa, or they are out. and we spoke to last spokesman a summer home done as, as the international communities, failing to pressure israel to comply with international a chris full, it's a very was come the decision from the seizure. and we believe we chose exactly clearly that to the i c j a. consider what's happening, that's the general side. and it's right, it's comforting that you know side because everyone knows that to the general side business, they're going to try to create in the costs. the 2nd issue, i believe, is this decision. it brings the whole international community and to kenny on their own responsibilities. everyone was waiting for this decision. and to understand was that a decision side or not? we believe as how message was identified from the number one. but at least now everyone in the international community has to understand t

the window when it comes to these rarely governments, genocide and gaza and navigating the international court of justice, affirming that these really government is committed war crimes and must stop committing those work crimes. it puts president biden in a very difficult situation. does he really believe in international law? does he really believe in human rights? does he really believe in democracy in the value of all human life? if so, he should support this ruling and take steps to enforce it. for the promises ministration doesn't really believe in international rules based order, otherwise they would have stopped funding this genocide, 30000 palestinians ago. what about the issue of the complicity here? i mean, countries like the united states actually continue arming as well, knowing that they, the width is that they are supplying, are used to kill innocent civilians and gaza. i don't underestimate the ability of certain political leaders to completely ignore the suffering of the palestinian people. and to palestinian races and is a very real problem around the world, including sadly a

no warrants can be issued unless a panel ofjudges at the international criminal court agree. ster, yoav gallant, has described a request by the international criminal court prosecutor for arrest warrants as a "disgraceful" bid to interfere in the gaza war. 0ur correspondent, danjohnson, has been giving us the latest reaction from jerusalem. a strong response, a furious response and it is in the main a united response, whereas in the last week we have been seeing divisions opening up between benjamin netanyahu, his defence secretary yoav gallant and another member of his war cabinet, that we are now seeing them uniting in condemnation of this move by the chief prosecutor of the international criminal court to press charges, to issue arrest warrants for benjamin netanyahu and the defence minister. the prime minister last night described this as moral outrage of historic proportions. he said it would cast an everlasting mark of shame on the international court, describing the prosecutor, he said he creates a twisted and false moral equivalence between the leaders of israel and th

i feel great welcome to the program, the international court of justice in the hey, cause order, israel to stop it's ministry offensive in the city of rafa and southern gaza. the you and top court describe the humanitarian humanitarian situation as disastrous and the owner of israel to allow on him to access of aid. these rel rejected the ruling and says it's the operations against hamas and group considers. and terrorist organizations by multiple countries will continue fall from the front lines of the war. and gaza is rails. military campaign suffered a major legal blow. it must immediately hold. it's mindy to offense and any other accident and did also have government which may inflict on the by the city and group and gaza conditions of life that would bring about its physical destruction in hold or input. the latest icy j, rolling unequivocal about the need is round to protect the palestinians and do more to provide vital age the and the pro vision at scale by or concern of us. and we need the basic services and to maintain the assistance. and of course, mississippi space that the r

the international court of justice, open. the international court of justice. is _ open.nternational court of justice, is well again _ open. the international court of justice, is well again has - open. the international court of. justice, is well again has defended its conduct in the war, responding to further claims by south africa its latest military action in rafah amounts to genocide.— amounts to genocide. israel is eniiaed amounts to genocide. israel is engaged in — amounts to genocide. israel is engaged in a _ amounts to genocide. israel is engaged in a difficult - amounts to genocide. israel is engaged in a difficult and - amounts to genocide. israel is| engaged in a difficult and tragic armed conflict. south africa ignores this factual context. it is essential in order to comprehend the situation. and also ignores the applicable legal framework of international humanitarian law. it makes a mockery of the heinous charge of genocide.— makes a mockery of the heinous charge of genocide. military actions built in rafah _ charge of genocide. military actions built in r