the international criminal court does not have universal significance. it is one of the international organizations whose jurisdiction, russia does not recognize, as well as many and all the comforts of the world regarding independence. i would not like to escalate anything here, but nevertheless, we know that the international criminal court has announced that it is going to make a decision regarding some political fi goes from the middle east. and it was charged by the united states church and it shut off and where are we now? and therefore, unfortunately, there is little respect for such an organization which a is not universal and b is not independent. since then, even they do less, which is not a member of the i c. c, but times supported the course decisions based on who was targeted of course, has gone so far as to slap sanctions on the court accused and they don't pay legitimate and baseless actions targets in america. and they're close ally, israel. what's more, they personally sanctioned the icy c chief prosecutor who issued the arrest warrant fo

court. the best solution is if an indictment can be brought before the international criminal court, the arrest warrant for war crimes which has now been issued is an important signal of determination. i expect that the icpc will quickly approach interpol and the contracting states and ask them for enforcement terminates not alone, and having double standards, its neighbour of france isn't lock step. neither seem to care or acknowledge a legit war crimes in gaza. but when it comes to ukraine, their adamant that no one should escape justice, including the russian children's rights commissioner, the icy seized decision to issue an arrest warrant against vladimir putin and maria live over biloba is a landmark one. no one responsible for crimes committed by russia and you crane, regardless of their status, should remain unpunished. a state cannot be required to act inconsistently with its obligations under international law with respect to the immunities of states, not party to the i. c. c. such immunities apply to prime minister netanyahu and the other ministers concerned, and will have to be take

here's what i would say. international human rights lawyers. at international court ofjustice in a plausibleat way and calling it that way yourself those are two different things. media organisations go out of their way to not even report how much coverage did the amnesty international report saying genocide get? that's why they're coming to places like zeteo, about stepping into the arena when you know how abrasive it is, where you know how competitive it is for attention, where you know how contentious even on a journalistic career now. me for a take on social media. i would say three things. or editing a piece. a jack of all trades, master of none. i don't have any skills. life depended on it. certain basic skills, especially technological thick skin of yours. of the israel—gaza war. "guidelines which are "publicly available. " thanks to mehdi hassan for speaking with us. bye— bye. and if you'd like to hear a longer version of today's hello there, good evening. and it's also st david's day, of course. but it's always cloudier and breezier here, for tomorrow morning. like a stone underneat

this is also why we're one of the reasons why the international court of justice found the genocide was plausible in gaza. and this is why also the families of israeli captives are expressing concern. they are condemning what, nothing yahoo and his cabinets have reached in terms of these kinds of decisions because they believe they've accused publicly nothing yahoo that he is sacrificing these really captives in order to keep his government coalition. even with these accusations, molly and we're hearing reports that the is really the government is getting ready to call up 400000 reserve us to, to active duty because 2025. and their estimation will be a year of war and that there are plans being drawn up for the resumption of war not sending you a whole once more is really captives released in exchange for humanitarian assistance. he just doesn't want to talk about and the, the war and let me come back to you in rough. uh what, uh, what is her mouse saying about these moves by israel this morning. the resumption that they will be blocking aid once again. well tell us describe this not as

it's also what pushed the international court of justice to say that there is probably a genocide going on in gauze because of this policy. so for now, israel will not allow that 8. it is using that as leverage to push from us into accepting the woodcock proposal. by which it would release half of the living and dead is really kept as on day one in exchange basically for food, water and fuel. and then later on, see if israel is willing to talk or, or reach a deal on a per minute cease fire. but we already know that that's not really on the table because take layering and then to the war would take down the is really government that this is something that nothing yahoo is not planning on, on having at his, at any time. so needs to pass the budget in march, and he's going to be able to do to do that by holding onto what would cost proposed anything so that in order all day that for us in a mind, a not speak. now to all correspondence had a couple assume standing by for us and rough and southern gaza. tired with the southern a, something with rual once again of a to golf. they must be huge

international mechanisms. and i think it's really important, particularly for honorable community to when the members of parliament, to recognize that if we cannot get justice in the courts of kenya, then it is inevitable that people will start to look back at the international criminal court. i don't know what you have to say to that on the most to is it, is it inevitable that you end up back at the i c c. if kenyon justice is not working? i mean you have a president who was indicted not long ago. are you worried that he might end up back at the international, comfortable? but the, let me say, uh, agree with the wrong little fast that the mazda bill all and institutional didn't make them walk off to the 2024 demonstrations in the infiltration by just on last cleaning. most of those demonstrations investigate the walk and the able to identify a particular political cause will mobilize the criminals to come and visit the one from destruction that you saw out on the city. as when the particular politicians was arrested and not to be touched upon. the rental court and getting deputy nor can some authority orders against the prosecution in those on the 1st special letters yo

definitely the international court of justice mentioned a few months ago. here in the occupied the was the best to be alex here. there's no other bishop from the store. and then one of alex they sent an ethic lives and okay, good to get your perspective. have you ever eat speaking just from best with him in the occupied westbank? thank you. thank you to a within the us state of illinois, a landlord has been found guilty of murdering a palestinian boy during an attack on his home, joseph kazoo, but it stopped the 6 year old 26 times and wounded his mother. in 2023 authorities said he talked to them because if that is let me face and it's a response to israel's for on gaza. attacks on most lives in palestinians in the united states have increased since the war began. this coverage media is reporting that the coast on work is pa t o p k. k says it will heat a cold, but it's joe lee that to declare receipts 5 with the texas government and laid down at toms on says day after the autoland made the appeal in the latter that was read out by pro kurdish politicians.

this, really for a minister with a red carpet. impressive a why peace boss this one, but in international court of justice when palestinians go to the best organization, some type of make points to diplomacy, en, eh, and legal organizations. they're looking just, we're not supported. it we have you appear in countries welcoming. been so mean that the media who allow him to go through their artist phase like from like you tell you like greece. so from that perspective, i think kind of thing. you'll see how the professional community they are in this crisis. only see crisis that you'll see some, an old formulas that have faded completely normally say so it has to be a disaster. it for the palestine easterly left documents positions as you have been going way more radical after normalization, with a few out of countries. that's the only people can i can leave it there. but thank you very much indeed for, for joining us. and thanks to all our gas have you all, boyd defrances or something they can guess on basket. i'm thanks to you too. for watching you can see the program again, any time by visitin

towards the committing of war crimes, towards the you know, this is a genocide being tried at the international courteansing in that environment. he has thrown this in. and so what he has done is he has empowered the most extreme forces, and he has totally undermined the realists that did remain in that system. and that, i think, is extremely dangerous. and it carries over, as you know, to what we're seeing happening now in the west bank, where you also have this story of destruction of infrastructure, displacement, depopulation. >> do you see, you know, and some observers have noticed this. i'm wondering your thoughts that there's this kind of good cop, bad cop routine that has emerged between donald trump and his envoy, steve witkoff. trump promises israel everything they want and more. that gets all of the attention. he's posting videos. he's saying israel is going to have the right to do whatever they want, but then the kind of lower profile witkoff quietly goes into israel, says things like, he wants to visit gaza, he wants to talk to hamas directly. the ceasefire deal must go on. apparently ton

months because of what they are doing to this, their leader is or criminal wanted by the international criminal court. that's what we're dealing with here. they have breach an agreement that they have signed, and part of that the claimant was to provide aid to the tune of $600.00 trucks. they have violated disagreements in every part. so it's not clear on what's going on here, except that's what it's in the i was trying to get through this political pressure what they couldn't get through military means. yeah. and you say that it's a hill climb, not just a webinar possession of a because regardless of whether there was a seas file or not, as well has obligations under international law to provide the basic humanitarian supplies to a population that is on the siege. moss has said that it's not going to give into the suppression, but what option does i'm also negotiations have now to break this and pause and how much of that comes down to the us position. and how much pressure they decide to put on all the policies right now. but how much doesn't have many options. they have signed an agreement, they h

than 330, she monitoring work as to what account, there's already an investigation by the international criminal court. they already have an arrest warrants, get against a prime minister benjamin netanyahu. would you appeal to the prosecutor of the court to start investigating those tests? so the prosecutors, i yeah, those are questions now that rest with the, with the lawyers and ultimately, we'll also arrest with historians. so you will, one of the most important officials of the un that employed these people has a duty of task for them. and the family is, i mean if you're the employer and someone has been killed, do you not know past then the prosecutor to gets involved and, and get to the bottom of it. oh no, no, no, i'm not saying that you, you do bring a rest florence, but you investigate. so the it is so the heads of those agencies have lost colleagues to take those decisions. and i think they will be taking those decisions in a very robust way. my job is a chief military is to keep the trucks lying to keep the moving through. of course, i have very difficult conversations. intel of the, as i s

a court order that upheld the internment of japanese civilians.ed for years, was it not? >> and i just wonder whether some historians might think we'd be better off if it hadn't been followed. >> he just wonders. it's a long way from japanese internment to refusing court orders regarding, say, trying to rewrite birthright citizenship, which is in the constitution or these budget cuts. but but walk us through for our viewers what was happening there. because if he's confirmed, he's the guy who will be the first person on the front line of any big supreme court clashes over the trump musk power grabs. >> yeah. >> so, ari, what we're really talking about is whether we, in fact, have the separation of powers. who does what in our three branches of government. and if we have a president who decides that he decides who the law is, he's a king. he's not a president. and we for throughout our history, have had the separation with the court, decides what the law is. and yes, korematsu was a shameful decision. but the law when a court decides or court decid

from occupied areas and have been taken to other areas in russia that forms part of the international criminal court's war crimes complaint against vladimir putin and one other of his officials. so a potential indication, perhaps there, of what might be being mooted at this stage. but there's also on the downside, growing noise amongst trump's upper circle, the cabinet, other allies questioning zelenskyy's position, whether he is the guy to lead ukraine forward. we heard from scott bessent, the treasury secretary, that the rare earth minerals deal, which was at the heart of all of this, supposed to be the signing ceremony in the white house on friday that is now off the table, where it is no longer on the table. i should say, to quote him. exactly. and we also, of course, hearing suggestions that maybe zelenskyy isn't the guy to lead ukraine into this peace deal. i just have to tell you, the practical aspect of some kind of leadership change here in ukraine in wartime. absolutely impossible to imagine or conceive and would simply feed the russian narrative, false as it is, of the legitimacy of ukraine

remember, that's something vladimir putin has been accused of a war crime by the international criminal court for being involved in, and a larger return of prisoners of war or exchange of those. so lots of ideas being floated here, but frankly, none of them will get traction without support from the united states. we know that keir starmer has on saturday and friday, after the blowup in the oval office, spoken to president trump, zelenskyy himself giving a wide ranging press conference in london after that substantial meeting with european leaders and indeed king charles the third, in which he said he was still willing to sign the rare earth minerals deal, i should point out, trump administration said it's not at present on the table. he also refuted the idea that, you know, he could somehow just step aside. he said, look, if you want to have elections here, then you've got to persuade me to not run in them. and i have to then be negotiated with. and my price for that is ukraine joining nato. and that would mean my mission is complete and i don't mind stepping aside. so obfuscating the matter

as a reminder, using starvation as a weapon is a war crime, and the international criminal court recentlyan arrest warrant for benjamin netanyahu for that very crime. professor jeffrey sachs is still with me. professor sachs, donald trump says and posts a lot of wild things. we try to focus on what he does and not as much on what he says or he posts. but i do want to ask him, because i do want to ask you, because in january, he actually posted a video that made international headlines like this. trump shares inflammatory video with crude reference to netanyahu. that crude reference about netanyahu was made by you. so trump clearly is familiar with your work and values your insights at least. what would you be advising him tonight on this latest move by netanyahu? >> netanyahu does not want a cease fire. netanyahu does not want peace. the reason is very simple. netanyahu is part of a political movement that goes back decades, five decades, that is aimed to prevent a state of palestine, a state of palestine, next door to a state of israel is the only way to peace. this is the whole point. n

internment camp. it's the same old story of you're guilty because you're looking like the enemy. how his daughter is working to make sure his supreme court battle is remembered today. those stories right now on matter of fact. identical twin sisters, joe and joy banner live in a region of louisiana between baton rouge and new orleans that's known as cancer alley. residents have a significantly higher risk than the average american of developing cancers from air toxins. that's according to the environmental protection agency. the area is home to more than 150 oil and gas and other chemical factories. the banner family has been there for generations, but joe and joy worried about their heritage and their health, came up with a creative strategy. our correspondent, alexis clark traveled to louisiana to find out more about the descendants project. woodland will be in a museum exhibit space. joe banner takes me on a tour of woodland, one of two plantations purchased by the descendants project, a nonprofit she and her sister started in 1811. the largest uprising of enslaved people started here. the freedom fighters came through this door, into

internal correspondence with musk and doge administrators? >> one of the very interesting things in both that case in san francisco and the federal court orderingloyees was illegal. and in our case today is both judges talked about how important it is to get these basic documentary records. that's all discovery is saying to the government, turn over basic information about what happened here. who authorized this? who had the power to take these actions? where's the delegation? we call them the memos that give the power. how is this done? according to law. and it was missing in my case, saying elon musk is acting unconstitutionally at usaid. as you know, i'm suing him. both in this and in other cases, in his official capacity as an individual government worker. and in the san francisco case, the judge ordered the production of discovery information. so very important aspect of achieving accountability against trump, musk, doge and the rest. >> we're looking forward, norm, for you to come back and tell us what's going on with those cases. and we're also appreciative that there's still some judges out there that believe in the rule of law. norm ei

international commercial routes for argentina state airline. miriam and giancarlo's investigation figured prominently in the largest and perhaps most sensational trial in the country's history, in 2017, decades after the pack, an argentine courtst humanity. the pilots who flew the skyvan pa-51 death flights were sentenced to life in prison. [ cheering ] for miriam and giancarlo, there was one last assignment, binging the skyvan back from the united states to argentina, where it would be a source of truth, irrefutable evidence of the horrors of the past. >> questioning, denying, or even vindicating what happened in those years will lead us into darkness again. we always said, never again. >> reporter: so, it was on a misty morning in june 2023, the skyvan pa-51 arrived at its final destination. giancarlo was there taking the last pictures of this personal odyssey, this 20-year investigation. the families and friends of the victims were there, as well. >> you have to consider that i could have been a passenger on one of those flights. so, i always ask myself, why i survived? >> reporter: i wonder if this investigation helped provide an answer? >> yes. now, i know definitely that there was a goal. there was a purpose, of my surv

get asked to stand down after a 25-year-old intern working for elon musk tried to access the code for the system? thankfully, they were shut down in the court system. but elon musk installed, with the president's blessing, one of his silicone valley buddies, that i want to point out, and the media has not paid a lot of attention to, is the ceo of a private i.t. company that has millions of dollars in i.t. contracts with the federal government. not only is he still operating as the installed doge person at treasury he is still actively the ceo of this private company. how is that even legal? is it legal? i don't think it is legal. because a federal court is trying to shut it down. and we also know that 25-year-old software engineer, in violation of the court order, was actually given access to modify the code. what's going on here? why is this such a threat to the american people. why are thousands of people calling us. because of the size and significance of the payments. because it is an invasion of the privacy and security of the american people. because it could threaten our ability as a country, if there was a default in the debt ceilin