does not will determine the amount of this compensation, the decision of the un international court of justiceill be cited by the governments of other states and in other decisions. other judicial institutions and the european court of human rights, and in international arbitrations, and a compensation mechanism, let's hope it will work as early as next year, it will justify its decisions by the decision of the un international court, that is, it is all interconnected, and this is really not a symbolic meaning, even if the russian federation refuses to comply with it now, we will receive many decisions of international courts, and the new democratic government in russia the federation will be forced to implement these decisions if they want to return to the civilized world, it's a long game, that 's for sure, but the outcome must be positive and justice will be restored. well, but even at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, the international court obliged russia to stop hostilities. do you think this court has any coercive leverage? well, look, the fact that we have an order on temporary

war against us, unfortunately, and we have several lawsuits with america itself, in the international court of justice and the court of arbitration of iran and the united states. the international court of justice handles major cases between governments. property it was the islamic republic of iran that was signed by the united states in the treaty of mudat and some of our property was produced by them, which was shut down in this case. in the previous government, due to the government , the necessary measures were taken and a good legal operation was designed, and thank god. the american government was condemned for the first time in iran for the dam in the past few months and of course the international court of justice issued 15 game stands from the 5 continents of the world in favor of iran and gave a two-year deadline for the damage caused to iran by the united states. be paid and we have to understand with them of course let's come to an understanding about the amount of damages and taking a tourist . the international court of justice has decided that it determines the amount of damages. it is

against russia then a lot will change, and there is no doubt that the decision of the international court of justice of the united nations will affect the further lawsuits of ukraine against russia as a state, as well as other legal proceedings in the international criminal court, for example , or in the international tribunal about the creation of which today ukraine negotiates with international partners. so, more specifically, it is essential for ukraine to achieve recognition in this very court, according to which 193 countries of the world , that is, countries of the un charter, that russia invaded ukraine on february 24, 2022 under on this pretext, in other words, she lied about the reasons for her invasion, they say that it was allegedly a genocide of the people of donbas or the russian-speaking population of donbas. territory of donbas , russia supposedly has relevant evidence, but very quickly , the information about it disappeared, and russia did not provide any evidence even after the start of the large-scale invasion, and accordingly, why else this is important in addition to the fact th

and the situation came before the international court of justice and the international court of justice at that time decided that the convention has nothing to do with the use of force. those are 2 different issues. so we hope that the parts of those follow experience through the song will take up a decision of the stage and the, the claims of your brand will be dismissed. the of these was at this level of the level of jurisdiction. i'm just wondering, i mean, given the unprecedented reaction to the situation do quite around the world, do that we can count on the objectivity of the international court of justice, considering the cases involving russia have been politicized. uh uh yes, we already, uh we can of course all know that. so the environment are here and everywhere is uh, is very police of size box our calls. so uh, you know, uh in that direction. that's because it does look need to take uh and just using the in favor of rock show and paper a few k, i have to take her or we hold them, they will take the decision. we just full now own to is problems. they have already decided the

to prove that russia has abused this treaty, why ukraine filed a complaint with the un international court of justicenvention on the prevention of genocide dates back to 1948. it was ratified by almost one and a half hundred countries, including russia and ukraine . it is the international court of justice of the un, the highest court in the world, that considers the current case of ukraine against russia regarding genocide convention historical precedent how russia reacted to the lawsuit at first the russian legal team ignored the process, but six months later challenged the authority of the un court to consider the complaint the russian federation of ukraine declares that genocide was not the reason for

to prove that russia has abused this treaty, why did ukraine file a complaint with the international court of justice of the united nations the united nations convention on the prevention of genocide dates back to 1948 and was ratified almost one and a half hundred countries, including russia and ukraine, complaints about violations of the convention between the signatories are being considered by the un international court of justice, the highest court in the world, the current case of ukraine against russia regarding the convention on genocide, how did the historical president react to the lawsuit? at first, the russian legal team ignored the process, but half a year later challenged the authority of the un court to consider the complaint of ukraine . the russian federation states that the genocide was not the reason for a full-scale invasion. legal basis, which countries are participating in the lawsuit ukraine, please, to the russian federation, but 32 more joined the lawsuit countries that signed the convention and believe that russia interprets it incorrectly, that is, in fact, this is a proces

so area of russia has owned the filed a written filing across no, to your for the hearings, but also the court. the i'm move international court of justice is the court of the united nations and russia is still a member of the united nations and even a member to the permanent security, a permanent member to the security council. so what really made to rush to change his mind to come today is not clear, but it is clear that they are expected to come to make their case, that this court has no jurisdiction. and the consequences if the court rules against russia. so then we had talking about years here, so if the court finds fetid, has jurisdiction in the case, we're just expected to take place in the next couple of months. then it will only look into the merits of the case. and as i, as i said, experts say that this might take years, but at the end of this, there could be reparations for ukraine. this would ukraine as ask for, they said that they want reparations for what came out of the false claim of genocide. and for that one flew reparations. and what about russian war crimes in ukraine which we documented day after day? you know? yeah,

of the court, ukraine points to the ninth article of the convention on genocide, which enshrines the right of countries to resolve disputes regarding this document precisely in to the un international court of justicewe presented all possible legal arguments based on international law and relevant facts to enable the court to consider its jurisdiction. we believe that for these almost two weeks of hearings revealed all the necessary information for the court to proceed to hearing the case on its merits. we will wait for the court's decision and hope that the case will proceed to consideration of the merits. it may take months for the court to decide on its jurisdiction. however, the ukrainian team hopes that the case will progress as quickly as it did from the very beginning, when the court issued the first decision requiring russia to withdraw its troops from ukraine 10 days after the case began. the main goal of our team in court is to prove that russia attacked ukraine for no reason. and although the court cannot force the russian federation to comply with its decision, for example, to withdraw the army from ukraine, this verdict will be extremely important for further lawsuits against the aggre

assembly on new york, ukraine against russia in the international court of justice, the ambassador withf the ministry of foreign affairs, anton korenevich, in his in his speech, he said that russia justifies the war against ukraine, referring to the terrible lie he quoted, that the goal of the invasion was to stop the kornev genocide, or called on the international court of justice to decide that it has jurisdiction to hear the case and to rule that russia must pay reparations for the invasion under false pretenses, russia is waging war against my country in the name of this terrible lie that ukraine is committing genocide against its own people, this lie is for russia an excuse for aggression and conquest, russia has not provided any it cannot provide reliable evidence, and that's why russia acted and continues to act on the basis of ukraine's false accusations of genocide. i am twisting the content of the laws that ukraine is contesting . ukraine had a say during the court session yesterday. hennadiy kuzmin's speech lasted three hours, he said that the international court of justice a

so the international court of justice is holding a hearing of a rush is invasion of ukraine. moscow attempted to justify its attack by claiming to you've had been committing genocide against russian speakers in the east. you claim rejected the allegation filing a case against moscow for abusing international. today, the code in the hague is hearing arguments from a russian representative for the 1st time. moscow argues the court has no jurisdiction to rule over the matter. the court has ordered russia to hope it's for when you try to see a shoulder and is the following. proceedings in the netherlands. explain to us more about what this case is about and see. let me try to make this as simple as possible. so in russia in rated ukraine, it said one of the reasons was an ellipse genocide and eastern ukraine. and no you cry and says that this is a violation of the genocide convention. the genocide convention is from 1948 and you cry and brought the co the case saying that russia, russ, violating this convention for that reason that i just mentioned here, to the court only 2 days after the invasio

in particular the international court of justice, one of the five main structures of the united nationsesumed hearings on the case, which was initiated by ukraine last year. what is it about. we spoke today with a member of the international legal council of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, president of the russian association of international law, anatoly kapustin. hello, thank you for taking the time , definitely follow the un general assembly, of course. our delegation is actively working there. we're just talking about this they said, and of course there are different un bodies in the organization. he uh, and there is such an international court of the united nations where but this week there were hearings, and genocide and so on. here. please tell me a few words literally. what is this dear international institution doing? and how is everything going on there? what are we talking about in general, so that it is clear to tv viewers. well, the international chest, good afternoon alexander , and once again the international chest - this is one of the main organs of the organiz

nikkargo asked the united nations to force the united states to implement the ruling of the international court of justiceat was this ruling? america and nicaragua, which the international court of justice ruled in 1986 that the united states should pay compensation for financing the armed attack against the nicaraguan revolutionaries, which the united states never accepted and said that this court does not have jurisdiction over this case. of course, america is a long way he has not accepted this kind of actions and so far, he has taken a measure to make america pay for the damage it has caused to this nation due to foreign interference in nicaragua, under the burden since 1986 until now, and the last speech is also related to the world of francis the diplomat . he is from trinidad and tobago, who is the head of the group that he has arranged for, from the conversations that happened during the period, let's go see him too. i stood before you, your heads of state and government, your ministers and representatives, and i spoke of the need to unite. the nations. i made a call to action for all states to fi

the determination by the international court of justice would necessarily have finding value in the other courts. not least because there's plenty of evidence that they will have gather that are relying on and they might not require the detail decision of a civil courses effectively. it is, but of course the deals with breaches of treaty in support of its criminal procedures. but that i'm afraid is also something we must put on hold because you cry and was very inventive in turning to the quote in its application to have it's right, not to be falsely accused of you, of genocide, as you explained in your helpful opening, have to have it litigated, that is cooled, and so imagine that to lower ingle imaginative use of little by lawyers know something we often see, but really welcome when we do see it as just may lead to this decision being of wider implication than i suggest by a lot to keep our eyes on them, thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and analysis on the a little too. my pleasure to livia now, where rescue workers are struggling to identify decomposing bodies in the city of

organization, achieve the and putin and lavrov and other war criminals were on the bench of the international court of justiceench of the international tribunal , this international tribunal must be launched, vote at this general assembly, issue a mandate to the international court of justice and start a process against the russian aggressor and against russia as an aggressor country, this is the solution here question and this is a question of justice already international prosecution of the aggressor and putin his henchmen and this and at the same time the question must be resolved compensation payment of damages compensation and so on, a million injured ukrainians and those who are forced, forced refugees, migrants and families of the dead from the wounded and many, many other horrors of the war on our territory, who should be compensated by whom, well , it is obvious that the aggressor state, that is, russia , spoke about russia in the world at the general of the un assembly and the chancellor of the federal republic of germany, olaf scholz, let's listen to what the mayor said, without freedom is called o

the international court of justice has today holding a hearing over russia's invasion of ukraine. moscow attempting to justify its attack by claiming keith was committing genocide against the russians because in the east ukraine has rejected this allegation and filed a case against russia for abusing international. today, the course in the hague is here in arguments from a russian representative for the 1st time. moscow is arguing that the court has no jurisdiction to rule over the mass of the court has already ordered russia to cease its military operations in ukraine. a. c, a shelton is following the proceeding in proceedings in the netherlands and she explained the case that's currently before the course of, in russia in rated ukraine. it said one of the reasons was an ellipse genocide and eastern ukraine. and no ukraine says that this is a violation of the genocide convention. the genocide convention is from 1948 and you cry and brought the co, the case saying that russia ross violating this convention for that reason that i just mentioned to here to the court only 2 days after the i

i mean, what did you all for the us talk about the international court of justice or any of these uh, you know, pay per law mechanisms that they themselves don't subscribe to all or respect. but right now there's been as well as have the right to search for any type of uh, balance. so any type of defense of their sovereignty. because this as the cube you region, it is the s report that the us is trying to to use to really do open opportunistically use and manipulate the guy in each nation. we saw of the, the us or the western states, donnelly, before go after the leader of venice way live by a human rights concerns, etc. but it's hard enough to see a pattern here when we talk about dennis wheeler, oil rich, and perhaps to a certain degree on stable because of many reasons we could throw in libya, syria, as you mentioned, there is the layer of block goal there under there's copious amounts of invents will, is it just too hard for some to ignore? so yeah, been as well as one of these oil producers in the, in the world in terms of its reserves is right. it was so i hear radio and mexico

ukraine, daria pugacheva, arranged a performance city ​​of war near the building of the un international court of justicehague, ukriinform reports. according to the artist, upon arriving in the netherlands , she had a strong feeling of losing her home. public hearings are now being held at the un international court of justice. regarding whether to recognize russia's actions in ukraine as genocide. that was the news for this time, i am iryna koval, i say goodbye to you and see you tomorrow, you can read more on our site espresso tv, also subscribe to us in telegram and watch on youtube, well, literally in a few minutes the big broadcast will begin in the winter, so wait and stay with the espresso channel. antwerp miner on mego. in the matches against the belgian champion, the miners must score maximum points. on october 4 at 19:45, cheer for the victory of shakhtar. turn on the champions league, exclusively. we, my dear, waited for you in the garden, but something hurts in the back, you have a hamstring, and you will help me like a young man. dr. tice's mai with comfrey. german ointment for joint and mus

ukraine daria pohacheva staged a performance of the city of war near the building of the un international court of justicethe hague, reports ukrainform. according to the artist, before coming to holland , she had a strong feeling of losing her home. public hearings are currently being held at the un international court of justice on whether to recognize russia's actions in ukraine as genocide. and i decided to make this parfon right here and at this very moment so that to strengthen our message about how we are going through this suffering, because of which the ukrainians come, and this cube, it is empty now, but it will be completely black at the end, i will write many times, the war in ukraine is still going on, to show that the war is going on and to show this... that we 're going through. 10 aerial bombs daily. russian terror in zaporozhye is gaining momentum. muscovites almost destroyed the city of nuts with powerful guided aerial bombs, you can't escape from them in the basement, let alone behind two walls indoors. the invaders are coming on civilian objects, places of population gathering and commu

international court of justice is hearing arguments from russia and ukraine. about most goes claims. that is most, it's invasion to prevent genocide. cubic cues as most go of abusing international more falsely alleging genocides a risky work is in libya, struggling to identify decomposing bodies in the city of done to the city was devastated a week ago off to, to dan's collapse following heavy ryans, there are growing concerns about the spread of disease, child strength, it has more over a week since thousands of people were killed when 2 dams burst and sent a wall of water and mud, crushing through the eastern libyan city of thermal. the search for bodies goes on . many people still missing and fed dead, many bodies a. so decompose that, identifying them is proving difficult and disturbing the search and rescue teams the to then so the, the muscles are the libyan. when i put on the bodies, i swear i cry, i can handle it, but it is god swell. so you have to hold up and put out the body. there was a body that was cut into 2 parts right before us. there is nothin

think, but i could be wrong, but i don't think at this stage that a determination by international court of justice would necessarily have finding value in the other quotes, not least because there's plenty of evidence that they will have gathered in our line on and they might not require the detail decision of the civil courses effectively. it is, but of course the deals with breaches of treaty in support of its criminal procedures. but that i'm afraid is also with them. something name is put it on hold because you crying was very inventive in turning to the quote in its application to have it's right, not to be falsely accused of you, of genocide, as you explained in your health for the opening up to have it litigated at the schools and so imagine that to lower ingle imaginative use of little by lawyers know something we often see, but really welcome. when we do see it just may lead to this decision being of wider application than i suggest the to libya now with rescue it because they're struggling to identify the composing bodies and the city of deadman. the city was devastated a week ago also t

the general assembly today, along with a high level officials from other countries the international court of justice is holding public hearings on the case ukraine, bulls against russia, days off, in the winter of russia's especial military operation. last year, most goes cold for the case to be thrown out saying the operation was starting to prevent a genocide didn't don't bus t of denies. the accusations aren't in loans, reparations. the hearings are set to run until september 27th. i will focus on legal arguments as to whether they are c, j has a jurisdiction to fully hear the case versus deputy permanent representative to the united nations. maria, as i followed sky has broken down the ongoing process for us. it all they saw saw these hearings were ready for the match, so the be expected that so he would include the police, decide that key real use those hearings in order to propagate, let's call narratives and they are holding doing so they're using the platform all day i subsea and to quote for certain stories regarding of course uh the quote will come down to the show. me tried to say it was

court. the continent of europe traveled to europe on march 11, 2021 and talked about iran's nuclear program and, of course, about the decision of the international court of justice about the zionists. the prosecution of the court of justice has done the investigation about the situation in palestine, the severity of this regime's attacks on gaza forced the irish foreign minister simon to protest , and the german people responded to the gaza war to ray street. the leaders of the zionist regime in europe are getting away from the zionist regime, they are consulting and throwing money, and germany is reduced to an excuse, but in the end, polls show that the general view of the world's people towards the occupying regime, my friend, people believe what i said that whenever you take a fish out of the water, it is fresh we have the image of creating a new job , starting exercise and diet from saturday, and the same reforms of electricity consumption management in a small part of the people. horse sleeping mode, coffee maker, microwave, chargers, computer, tv , electrical devices also consume electricity when they are off, and we don't have time. take it out and look a

funds will be spent on goods, which when the in, in, in uh, people the judges of the international court of justice, a hearing arguments from russia and ukraine. about most goes claims. it launched its invasion to prevent genocide. ukraine brought the case to the united nations highest cold days off to russia. invaded last year, he is accused as moscow of abusing international law by full sway, alleging genocide denise, to new crime, russia once the case to be thrown out and objects to the quotes jurisdiction. your creed is not accusing russia of committing genocide. ukraine is also not accusing or russia or failing to prevent or punish each other. so on the contrary, as your crane cease, no genocide has occurred that too long should been not to reject the keys. because according to the courts, you are is brothers. there was no genocide they cannot be at violation of the engine side much jeffrey nice is the former lead prosecutor of the some of them the loss of each trial for the united nations of the international criminal tribunal for you to solve you. he says, ukraine made a wise move by approac

the judges of the international court of justice, a hearing arguments from russia and ukraine about claims by most go that it launched its invasion to prevent genocide. ukraine brought the case to utilize the nation's highest court days off to russia. invaded last year. cuba cases must go with abusing international law by falsely alleging genocide, an eastern new crime. russia wants the case to be for announcing objects to the court's jurisdiction. but us ministry is asking for the public's help in finding an f 35 fight to jet. that's missing in the state of south carolina. upon it was forced to object over the city of north charleston of to what the ministry called a mishap. the jet was on a pallet and was thought to be in stealth mode when the pond it aborted us. some of the she believes that the $100000000.00 fonts of jet is somewhere near lakes. moultrie. marian. okay, there's a headline state and witness coming up next with global leaders gathering in new york, the ongoing war and ukraine is likely to dominate to events. but is the international community able to unite this thing with

court, the continent of europe has traveled to europe on march 11, 2021 to talk with the leaders of the european union about iran's nuclear program and of course about the decision of the international court of justicearding the zionists . it has started an investigation into the situation in palestine. the severity of the attacks of this regime forced the minister of foreign affairs of ireland, simon kabuli, to protest . in response to the gaza war, the german people went to ray street. the survey of the reflex man institute showed that more than 60% of germans had a negative opinion. relative to the diet the zionists are the leaders of the zionist regime in europe, their angles are consulting and throwing money, and germany is being reduced to an excuse, but finally, polls show that the public view of the world's people towards the occupying regime is that twenty people believe what they see. a lot of people say things, but it was not with the people, it was good with self-reports, mutual medicine , recycled food in the field, there is research in the field of energy, the most important area of ​​change and strategies, and afghan , the most free region, let us consume free ceramics . first page ev

president is not the international court of justice. the international court of justice is that. >> harris: john bolton's reaction. >> he reminds me an awful lot of donald trump. he has very firm opinions on subjects he knows absolutely nothing about like trump said, he would put zelensky and putin in a room and have it solved. he will go to moscow and convince putin to break the alliance with china and -- they might as well be in kindergarten talking about a complex situation. >> harris: fellow gop contenders echoed that. will hurd called your foreign policy approach always wrong, never in doubt. you faced previous attacks from former vp mike pence and former u.n. ambassador nikki haley on this issue. how do you defend against those attacks? >> i have think it's a fundamental divide in the gop and we should have an open debate about it. karl rove, john bolton, nikki haley wing of the party has one set of views. i respect their views and not distort what they say. i'm disappointed they would distort what i say instead of having an open d

of the ahvaz parade terrorist incident in 2017 will be held by three official courts . now the case of this terrorist incident has been put on the table of hosseinzadeh in the tehran international court of justice to sue the families of 32 and the united states to support terrorists should be dealt with the present party considers itself competent and worthy to handle the present case because according to article 44 of the constitution , every person has the inalienable right to litigate, and all persons can claim iran's immunity from litigating in the tehran court due to the actions of the warring governments. to file a lawsuit and article 11 and 2 of article 6 of the law on jurisdiction of the courts of the government of the islamic republic of iran, an iranian citizen can file a lawsuit against governments and high officials who attempt to violate the executive order and food of iran and the government of iran. and considering that the government of the united states of america to as a result of this law, the court has the possibility to file a lawsuit against the government, based on paragraph 10 of article one of the law, which is required to pursue compensation for damages caused by the a

of ahvaz will be held in 2017. three official courts have decided to resolve the case of this terrorist incident in tehran's international court of justice. hosseinzadeh has been placed on the table to deal with the complaints of the families of 32 and the united states for supporting terrorists. handling he knows about the present lawsuit because according to article 44 of the constitution, it is the indisputable right of every person to litigate, and all persons can file a lawsuit in the tehran law court regarding the continuation of the warring governments' departure in the name of iran's sovereignty , article 11 and 2 of article 6 of the jurisdiction law of the courts of the government of the islamic republic of iran, iranian nationals can file a lawsuit against governments and high officials who attempt to violate the qajaria executive gift and food of iran and the government of iran, and note that the government of the united states the united states of america is often immune based on this law, the government of the court has the possibility to file a lawsuit against the government , based on paragraph 10 of article one of the law

court. the continent of europe has traveled to europe on march 11, 2021. talk to the heads of the european union about iran's nuclear program and of course about the decision of the international court of justicearding the zionists . forced to protest and that also, in response to the gaza war, a survey by my reflex institute showed that more than 60% of germans have a negative opinion of the zionist regime. the leaders of the zionist regime in europe are far away , their angles are consulted and money is thrown, and germany is reduced to an excuse, but finally, the polls show that the general view of the people of the world towards the occupying regime, my friend, the people believe what they see with their eyes . the compressors of the oil and gas industries are effective in compressing the gases. basian reciprocating compressor with unique production features this compressor has an advantage that it has a reciprocating compressor that compresses the gas to gas, of course hydrocarbon, twice and ten times. one of the competitive advantages of this oil-free compressor is that without the presence of oil in the chamber, it actually compresses and with today's knowledge of the world is produced

the cooperation between the 2 countries and the international court of justice holds hearings to decide whether it has jurisdiction a ukrainian legal case against russia. we have for most goes dead.

ali: chief prosecutor for the international criminal court says azerbaijan uses starvation as a weapon, even after the international court of justicehe blockade may have a serious touch of mental impact. which he says proves his genocidal intent. >> he took the position to fully blockade the corridor after the international court of justice said to him that blocking the corridor created risk of death. so he knew, and he did it willingly. ali: today's crisis is not new. nagorno-karabakh first declared its autonomy within azerbaijan during the soviet union. but for the past 30 years, intermittent violence plagued the region. >> what did happen in the breakup of the soviet union was that you had a group of armenian nationalists who wanted to make it in independent entity. ali: when the soviet union collapsed the enclave was ceased by armenian separatist forces in a war that ended in 1994. then in 2020, azerbaijan launched a brutal 44 day war and regained most of its previously lost territory. the fighting left tens of thousands of armenians living in the region without a plan for peace, but under the protection of 2000 russian peaceke

constantly draw attention to war crimes that is committed by russia especially since the international court of justicethe united nations has started a hearing on the case of improper use of the concept of genocide, and this is also an interesting moment that precedes the start of the general assembly of the united nations. they remembered erdogan's words that russia allegedly wants negotiations or an end to something, and today a meeting of the united nations security council is scheduled to take place regarding ukraine and which will be attended in particular by the minister of foreign affairs of russia sergey lavrov , he has already arrived in new york zelenskyi noted earlier that such a format where a terrorist country should be is his quote planned by the un and not by the ukrainian side, in your opinion, should ukraine participate in this event together with the representative of russia, and can there be something from russia saying that they are ready for the end of the war there, well, something in the context of what rydogan said russia will call for an end to the war, as they like to put it,

i would like to say a few words about the hearings at the un international court of justice in the frameworkvention of 1948. on september 25, at the un international court in the hague, oral hearings within the framework of the russian-ukrainian proceedings under this convention. we have already commented on the beginning of the hearings, and we will definitely duplicate the link in the text of today’s brief. this week , the russian side responded to the speech of ukraine and 32 states supporting it, which the court admitted to the case as third parties. russian representative maria zabolotskaya drew the court's attention to the political declaration of the group of friends adopted on september 23 in defense of the charter. the group warns against undermining. authority and independence of the international court, including including by abusing the right to enter into the case as third parties, by the way, the countries admitted into the case, well , of course, mostly nato members, not only put pressure on the court, but also deceive the judges, promoting positions contrary to what these sam

well, strictly speaking, it is worth distinguishing between the international court of justice of thenternational criminal court, because many people confuse us, the international criminal court is about natural persons, criminals. we are talking about this one right now , so when we talk about genocide, we are actually talking about a procedural issue. ukraine demands to recognize that russia arbitrarily interprets or does not arbitrarily interpret the convention on overrunning. this is a purely procedural political issue, there is no such thing as respectively responsible and some such substantive punishment, this is a political mechanism, the resolution of contradictions between states, this is when one state sues another state, but this opens up the possibility if russia, when more precisely, russia loses this court, and it must lose this court, and it will be recognized that the convention, that it is manipulating, the convention on genocide, justifying its invasion , accordingly, the next step should be that ukraine accuses russia of genocide, and then proves the facts of this g

court to determine that it has jurisdiction. alleging that russia abused the genocide convention to provide a pretext for its invasion of ukraine. ukraine brought the case to the international court of justicethe highest human court. days after russia launched its full-scale war, going back to february 24 last year. king charles the third is in paris, the star-studded real dinner is in its final stages. it comes after a day full of engagements around the french capital. the tomb of the unknown soldier, a position along the champs-elysees a, the versailles, the visit is seen as underlining a close bond that exists between britain and france in spite of issues raised by exit. -- brexit. >> electorate and british history at the -- she joins us live. thank you for being with us. king charles and paris, what do you think this signifies? >> it is actually laura. >> excuse me, laura. >> as you outlined in your introduction, this is a soft power moment. a moment to underline that we are moving into a post brexit era. there has been a new prime minister in the u.k. with rishi sunak. for franco british relations, the end of the distrust is probably a good one. this visit is all about culture. if we l

foreign minister called for a change in the structure of the un security council and the international court of justice in the hague, anabar, referring to the reform of the security council structure 60 years ago. since then, dozens of countries have gained independence and want to play a serious role in international organizations . most of the russian foreign ministers have also called for a change in the structure of the security council . the heavy rain in this country killed two people and disappeared three people in the streets of the capital and several cities of spain. many train lines in madrid were also blocked. many tunnels, parks and stadiums in the capital were also closed. danesh banyan succeeded in industrializing hydrophobic paints with the aim of developing them in the construction industry . the hydrophobic paints are waterproof and self-cleaning and have entered the market at a third of the price of foreign samples . based on nano and hydrophobic, which does not absorb water and mud, the production of hydrophobic paints in nama company the building may get dirty due to rain or enviro

international court of the united nations there should be informational materials, testimonies of victims of russian aggression, children and so on, including in english and french, that is, the languages ​​of this of the un international court of justices one example of why this is so important. mr. valentin, today there was another... important statement from the university of the president of kazakhstan tokayev, who was in germany, met with olaform scholzem, he said that kazakhstan supports western sanctions against the russian federation imposed due to its invasion of ukraine, and germany should not be afraid that astana will try to help moscow to circumvent them. during the year and a half of the great war, there was a lot of information in the mass media about the fact that , including through kazakhstan, some components were sent to the russian federation, since russia is not supplied directly, and iran was called, and kazakhstan was called, other countries, which are part of the csto, which are partners of russia federation on this, the military structure, the organization of the treaty on collective security, that is what the statement of kasym zhomart tokayev means, it means that china in this situation, which has an influenc

russia is not protecting, the opening of the corridor has been issued a ruling by the international court of justicethe corridor is a linchpin to a peace process that can be institutionalized, that can provide predictability, transparency, security and dignity to the ethnic group. on one hand, this is a massive humanitarian crisis. the blockade, subjecting community to hunger. from a political perspective, he is using that to avoid political accommodation which -- with -- which has enjoyed self-governance. >> is he avoiding political accommodation deliberately? >> when we speak about unilaterally the rights of armenians, we should also speak about the security of azerbaijanis. remember the whole armenia was ethnically cleansed from azerbaijanis, even the territory which is under control of russian peacekeepers. armenians had autonomy. azerbaijan offered during the years of occupation highest degree of autonomy for armenians within azerbaijan, but it's all declined. now azerbaijan offering the reintegration of armenians into azerbaijan's jurisdiction. i have to make comments because two of my colleag

that is my mood up to why he'd for us in fact, as the judges at the international court of justice, hearing arguments from russia and ukraine about claims by moscow that it launched its invasion to prevent genocide. you kind of brought the case to the united nations highest quotes dies off to russia invited last year. cubic uses must go on the abusing international more by falsely religion, genocide, and east a new crime. russia, once the case will be thrown out and objects to the court's jurisdiction. you agree is not accusing russia of commission. jennifer ukraine is also not accusing or russia or failing to prevent a punch in general. so on the contrary, your crane cease. no genocide has occurred that long should been not to reject the keys because according to the courts do or is brothers. if there was no genocide, they cannot be at violation of the engine side much which every nice is the former lead prosecutor of slipping on the loss of which for the united nations at the international criminal tribunal for you can slot via he says your crime made a wise move by approaching the course

7th general assembly of the united nations . force him to implement the ruling of the international court of justice he voted that the united states should pay compensation for financing the armed attack of the nicaraguan revolutionaries, which the united states never accepted and said that this court does not have the jurisdiction to hear this case, although the united states has a long way to go in this matter. he has not accepted the actions and so far, and until now, there has been an apocalypse until the united states pays for the damage it has caused to this nation due to foreign interference in nicaragua , since 196 until now, and the last speech is also related to the world by francis the diplomat, who is the head of the public assembly. umm salal has been responsible for this the end of the series is the final part, which is based on the conversations that happened during the period , let's go see it. your ministers and representatives, and i spoke of the need to unite the nations. i made a call to action for all states to find within themselves, the will to act together, in solidarity. i a

thoughts about supposedly i brought up prospects to corp between the 2 countries. funds the international court of justice pulled savings to decide whether it has jurisdiction of ukrainian legal case against russia. we have for most of the.

take literally one and a half minutes, what is the power of international courts, given all these statements of russia, can we actually hope for justiceo be established? considering that, that russia has already ignored the initial, so to speak, decision of the un international court of justice in this case says a lot, but on the other hand, russia is forced to participate in this process because times are changing, and for example, for more than a year and a half, on the side of ukraine, which is unprecedented, in this... case, more than 32 countries of the world have come forward, presenting their arguments, in fact, supporting ukraine, not now at this stage, no one expects that, say, russian officials, russian leaders, someone will come to moscow there and will arrest, but there are such issues as reparations, compensation, there are generally international issues that are developing and developing ukraine hopes in the direction that is needed for justice. thank you, bohdan, for your internship on this topic, my colleague, bohdan tsyupin, was on the phone from london. and on other topics, official baku plans to return ethnic azerba

for someone, because today the international court of justice began proceedings in the bastard, workingem , its statute is part of the charter of the united nations, that is , you cannot easily leave it. here it will be necessary to reconsider, but it is clear that they are considering the claim of ukraine which was filed on february 26, that is, 2 days after the start of the special operation, the claim, well, which, in general, is essentially the case. mmm was presented to russia for in order for her to stop this special operation and return the territory altogether. well, that essentially boils down their claims. they take part first. well, they will listen to us for a day , then ukraine. then, in my opinion, more than 30 countries are interested in the decision of this court. this is weird. the coffin is great britain , this is canada, this is australia, who also want to take part, will also make certain statements, that is , with the evidence in this court , it is clear what the decision will most likely be from this court and before us is the 26th, when this session will take plac

international court of the un is the highest judicial instance of this organization, in fact, it considers issues of disputes between states, interstate disputes, on various topics, this time ukraine filed this lawsuit with the international court of justicethat it was initiated by ukraine, with the aim that, first of all, it was determined that ukraine is not committing an act of genocide and, accordingly, the so-called the russian-speaking population, or the population of donbas, as defined by the russians, and in fact, there was no, there were no grounds for committing armed aggression, what russia emphasizes, and accordingly, this will be an arbitrary action by russia, which will be further qualified as aggression , which requires prosecution and subsequent legal proceedings. at this stage, there were actually four days of hearings each. two days for each side and yesterday ended these open cases, this is the preparatory stage of gathering evidence and arguments for the court to decide that it will open the case and that this case falls under its jurisdiction, the hope that it will happen and the court will take the case into consideration, which will be considered in less than a month. because then there will be a consideration of th

. >> judges at the international court of justice are hearing arguments from russia and ukraine aboutcow that it launched its invasion to prevent genocide. ukraine brought the case to the u.n. highest court days after russia invaded last year. kyiv accuses moscow of abusing international law by falsely alleging genocide in eastern ukraine. russia wants the case to be thrown out and objects the court's jurisdiction. farmers and you -- farmers in ukraine's northern region are working on the constant threat of attack, they say artillery and aircraft across the border have hit agricultural lands hundreds of time. residents describe a systemic campaign of fear. we have more from the village. reporter: harvesting season in wartime ukraine. navigating open fields near the russian border means risking landmines and unexploded bombs. always keeping one eye on the sky. for drones, missiles, and russian artillery. it could just be one of the most dangerous jobs in the world. >>'s people lives -- >> people's lives are a priority. we only work one it is safe -- when it is safe and there is no thre

executive director of the economic discussion club. genocide ukraine appealed to the un international court of justicet the beginning of the full-scale invasion with a complaint that distorts the interpretation of the genocide convention, we will learn more from our colleague olena abramovich, she is live with us already on the connection from the hague. i congratulate olena, what is the essence of this lawsuit? congratulations, colleagues. congratulations, colleagues . ukraine filed this lawsuit on the third day of the full-scale invasion on february 26, and the reason for this was that russian president putin, announcing his so-called a special military operation said that genocide was committed in ukraine 8 years ago. the fact is that both russia and ukraine are signatories of the convention on the prevention of genocide, which requires the restraint of persians and the prevention of genocide and karate for its commission, so kyiv appealed to gaga insists that moscow is excessively using force and that there was no genocide against the population of donbas in ukraine, and the court then urgently co

what he thought, along with the genocide, for which we now want to bring him to the un international court of justice, for the fact that he abused this concept and lied about some kind of genocide there in donbas, in fact in donetsk or luhansk regions, and even more so no genocide, but returning to canada, i will say that i am so excited and as a person who opened all the archives of the kgb when he was in charge of the security service of ukraine, i will tell you that these lies about the ukrainian soldiers of the upa, about the ukrainian liberation the movement was distorted and you know artificially created by the inkadists themselves, there were whole divisions in the nkvd, whole divisions in the kgb, then those that were engaged in only one thing, were falsified and artificially created. the indication that the ukrainian liberation movement, or ukrainian soldiers who fought during the second world war for the liberation of ukraine, and they, it is clear that even in soviet times, moscow, the kgb and so on, were attributed to the nazis, mr. valentin, forgive the time of our program is limited, i

general antonio terrace, is due to speak in the next few minutes or so with judges at the international court of justice. hearing arguments from russia and ukraine, about most goes claims that had launched its invasion to prevent the genocide you're trying to prove because to the united nations highest court days of to rush it and cited last june. t accused as most go on abusing international law or by falsely alleging genocide and eastern new crime. russia wants the case to be thrown out and objects to the court's jurisdiction. your creed is not accusing russia of commission genocide. ukraine is also not accusing or russia or failing to prevent a bunch of stuff. on the contrary, ukraine cease, no genocide has occurred too long should been not to reject the keys. because according to the courts do or is brothers. if there was no genocide, they can not be at violation of the engine side. much which jeffrey nice as the former lead prosecutor of slip it on. the last of which for the united nations at the international criminal tribunal for you slot of you. he says, you kind made a wise move by approaching