something like the prime minister of israel, of basically being totally dismissive of the international court of justice. and of course, they'll say the same about the international, the international criminal court. just to give you an example of a few months ago, canada, the netherlands, germany, france, made a submission to the international court of justice. in the case that's been filed against me in march and they proposed a very expensive understanding of the problem of genocide. of this, of course is going to be very helpful in terms of finding against me and more than the case. but it's also going to be very helpful to south africa. i think the probably the lawyers in those countries of those european countries in canada who prepared that are now regretting that they took that ignition of what it, it brings up the double standard speak. this is the beauty of the court, is the place where you can to some extent, i don't want to say there are no double standards or either, but you can cut through them and you can expose them. and that's, and that's the interest in these remedies. absolutely, and

security council, which is related to the international court of justice as a u.n. body? >> the south african legal team set out clearly the position of hamas in this particular matter. what they said in their submissions was that the international court of justice is there to adjudicate cases between states. hamas is not a state and therefore hamas is not part of the application. no claims have been brought against hamas and no case can be brought against hamas at this particular tribunal. there were other tribunals in which -- crimes against hamas can be brought, but this is not the appropriate tribunal for that particular issue. that deals with the issue of hamas. talking about the u.n. and their involvement in this case, the u.n., longtime friends with israel. in the event there is a final decision made by the court and the court makes findings on genocide and genocidal intent against israel, of course there's no immediate obligation on israel to act on these findings and we don't expect israel to comply with these findings which will then lead to the matter been prese

, i mean israel cannot rebellion to united nation, cannot be rebellion to international court of justicel i believe the international court of justice will do something and it will make some difference in the coming days. thanks lot sir, foreign pakistani diplomats, zamir ahmad joining us from the pakistani capital islamabad. moving on, leaders of egypt, jordan and palestinian authority have issued serious warning against any attempt by israel to reoccupy the gaza strip as the regime continues its genocide across the territory. speaking a trilateral meeting in the jordanian city of araba, the three leaders categorically rejected any plans to displace palestinians from their lands. they said the priorities of the establishment of sease fire in gaza and pushing israel to allow thousands of gazents to return to their homes in the northern part of the territory. the three heads of state also ear. the international community to take decisive stance on the need for immediate ceasefire. in gaza, israel's brutal aggression has crammed nearly half of gaza's 2.3 million residents. under extremely

dear viewers, well today, the international court of justice issued a temporary ruling regarding israel's actions in gaza . of course, if you allow me to explain to our compatriots and our audience more about this international institution, the international court of justice was established in 1945 and was established in 1946. after the second world war, it started working . it has 15 judges and they are elected for 9 years . the international court of justice has two tasks, one is to resolve international disputes and the second is to answer the questions that international institutions and organizations have. who have permission from the united nations they can raise questions . the court has its headquarters in the city of the hague and plays a role in the peace palace . it would be nice to know which countries these 15 judges are from today. from america, russia. slovakia, france , morocco, somalia, china, uganda, india, jamaica, lebanon, japan, germany, australia and brazil. it was announced in the news that there are 17 judges. if two countries that actually have a dispute or file a

seeking a criminal prosecution in power though to case brought by south africa at the international court of justice, accusing israel of genocide in gaza as the destruction escalates on the ground, mexico and she likes and of now with the both israel and thomas to the international criminal court site in consents about war crimes. while the, you and i, c, j come some traits on disputes between countries. the icpc is a criminal tribunal which can prosecute the individuals during hood soaks appearance in davos, he put forward his rails position on the war in gaza while rejecting the challenges of genocide twisting. and i'm not shy away from the human tragedy in gaza. and you want to know something we care, we care the boys, if it is paint for us. that's all neighbors. i was suffering so much. but how else can we defend ourselves in an infrastructure of the old unbelievable size? and i call upon the entire international community to stand with is running or reject this plane. in many countries around the world have expressed concerns about the disproportionality of israel's war on godsa and the human c

you had a rest of the case in the international court of justice against israel. a saying that it had breached the implications regarding the un can genocide convention. and it had also recommended the international court of justice to force israel go to over the israel to hall to oh, it's military campaign insight calls on this a step because it, it to be from the palestinian perspective as a whole rest as a completely historic event today, as they are hoping that the international court of justice will bring justice for counseling and this time to be israel, the accountability of its military acts inside the territory. and this is step palestinian c did not come within the day and lloyd to come off to load the plastic s it's and it's also as a result of the ongoing 17 meals located in over the gauze district which also completely restricted the access to food to water and medical supplies on south africa, clearly palestinian. you saw it see that it had also over viewed how much hot chips on suffering. how this thing is, what in, during, especially during 3 months

responsibility for this matter, it would not have been possible to transfer it to the international court of justiceים שלנו, להם לתת מדינה, זו העמדה שדרמר משמיע בתוך החדר, בחירים ישראלים אומרים לנו שהדברים של בלינקן, מהדברים שלא השתמע המסר, אם לא תציגו את פתרון שתי המדינות, אפילו כאיזשהו חזון רחוק, לא תשיגו שום דבר ברמה המדינית, בטח לא איזה שהיא התקדמות מול הסעודים. אמירה נוספת שעולה בתוך החדר של שר החוץ האמריקני בלינקן, הוא אומר שם, אי אפשר לחסה לחלוטין את חמאס. dr. walid muhammad ali, what is behind this extent of the dispute that emerged between blincan and the zinist officials and what will be the consequences of this american stance in the future? the disagreement is limited to a disagreement with tense people in the regime, a disagreement with the current structure, but it's not a strategic disagreement in the concept of conflict in the region. i mean, the zinius regime and the american administration agree on the necessity. of uprooting the resistance of the palestinian people and the necessity of subjecting them to the zionist project in order to control all palestinian territory in a way th

the hague international court of justice gave jurisdiction. criminal proceedings he also approved the genocide case against the zionist regime. the islamic resistance movement hamas considered the verdict of the international court of justice as an important development. sami abu zohri, one of the political officials of hamas, said: this sentence helps to isolate the zionist regime and expose its crimes in gaza. sami abu zohar. he also demanded to oblige the occupiers to implement the decisions of the hague tribunal. the minister of foreign affairs of the palestinian authority welcomed the interim measures of the hague international court of justice and said: the judges of this court voted in favor of humanity and international law . in front of the prime minister of the zionist regime cabinet ministers have asked not to comment on the decision of the international court of justice. do at the same time, netanyahu said: the court's willingness to discuss genocide claims against israel is a disgrace that will not be erased from generation to gene

affairs of the palestinian authority also welcomed the interim measures of the hague international court of justice and said: the judges of this court voted in favor of humanity and international law. on the other hand , the prime minister of the zionist regime has asked his cabinet ministers not to comment on the decision of the international court of justice. meanwhile, netanyahu said: the court's willingness to discuss genocide claims against israel is a disgrace that will not be erased from generation to generation. and: he accused and claimed whose decision proves that it does not seek justice. the palestine information center reported the martyrdom of a starving infant in the gaza strip. this baby, who was less than 6 months old , was martyred in the north of the gaza strip. the area where the zionist regime continues to prevent humanitarian aid from entering on the 111th day of attacks. the palestinian ministry of health has announced that about 600,000 palestinian citizens are in northern gaza due to the severity of the outbreak. disease and bombing are at risk of death. today, the zionist

we will also hear more from the international court of justice, the u.n.'s highest court. stay with us. ♪ [music break] amy: this is democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. the international court of justice, the u.n.'s highest court come has been a plausible risk israel is committing genocide in gaza and ordered provisional measures but stopped short of calling for an immediate ceasefire. this is the president of the court joan donoghue reading out the vote -- part of the ruling. >> by 15 votes to two, the state of israel shall in accordance with its obligations on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in relation to the palestinians in gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of article two of the convention, in particular, a, killing members as a group, b, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, c, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life cap related to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, and d, imposing

responsibility for this matter, it would not have been possible to transfer it to the international court of justice להם לתת מדינה, זו העמדה שדרמר משמיע בתוך החדר, בחירים ישראלים אומרים לנו שהדברים של בלינקן, מהדברים שלא השתמע המסר, אם לא תציגו את פתרון שתי המדינות, אפילו כאיזשהו חזון רחוק, לא תשיגו שום דבר ברמה המדינית, בטח לא איזה שהיא התקדמות מול הסעודים. אמירה נוספת שעולה בתוך החדר של שר החוץ האמריקני בלינקן, הוא אומר שם, אי אפשר לחסה לחלוטין את חמאס. dr. walid muhammad ali, what is behind this extent of the dispute that emerged between blinken and the zinist officials and what will be the consequences of this american stance in the future? the disagreement is limited to a disagreement with tens people in the regime, a disagreement with the current structure, but it's not a strategic disagreement in the concept of conflict in the region. i mean, the zinanis regime and the american administration agree on the necessity of... uprooting the resistance of the palestinian people and the necessity of subjecting them to the zionist project in order to control all palestinian territory in a way that fac

israel's bombardment of gaza now exceeds 22,000, south africa has filed a case at the international court of justice in the hague accusing israel of genocide. we will speak with international human rights lawyer francis boyle. >> i believe also south africa will win any order from the world court against israel to cease and desist from committing all acts of genocide against the palestinians. amy: then as we enter 2024, a pivotal election year, with a look at how the powerful lobby group aipac, the american israel public affairs committee, is set to spend more than $100 million against aggressive congressmembers critical of israeli human rights violations in palestine, including the only palestinian-american member of congress rashida tlaib. >> speaking up to save lives, no matter faith, ethnicity should not be controversy in this chamber. the cries of the palestinian and israeli children sound no different to me. what i don't understand is why the cries of palestinians sound different to you all. amy: this comes as polls show a majority of u.s. voters support a in gaza. we will speak with ryan grim

responsibility for this matter, it would not have been possible to transfer it to the international court of justiceמירה נוספת שעולה בתוך החדר של שר החוץ האמריקני בלינקן, הוא אומר שם: אי אפשר לחסה לחלוטין את חמאס. ali, what is behind this extent of the dispute that emerged between blincan and the zinist officials and what will be the consequences of this american stance in the future? the disagreement is limited to a disagreement with tense people in the regime, a disagreement with the current structure, but it's not a strategic disagreement in the concept of conflict in the region. i mean, the zinus regime and the american administration agree on the necessity of uprooting the resistance of the palestinian people and the necessity of subjecting them to the zionist project in order to control all palestinian territory in a way that facilitates the establishment of a stable west asian regime under its control. this agreements over tools and equipment. but this number of actions, foolishness and zionist arrogance sabotages the skull, because the americans were determined that after the control and liq

against the genocide of the zionist regime to the court, a historical court, the location of the peace palace in laha, the subject of the meeting of the international court of justice for handling south africa's complaint against the occupying regime accused of genocide in gaza. but the importance of the issue that makes supporters of palestine to speak like this. south african lawyer react the zionist regime, which always saw itself above the international law, is now in alit. the world court is sitting in the place of the accused. that is the accusation of the biggest crime against humanity. genocide . 75 years after he declared himself a victim of genocide. if it is confirmed from this international authority to this world court that the zionist regime has committed genocide , it will play a unique role in discrediting and delegitimizing the actions of the zionist regime. the person who until today has presented himself to the public opinion of the world as a shelter for the victims of genocide, if he is accused today and if he is convicted of committing genocide, then, naturally, these words and propaganda that he started will break and will be out of his hands

logic. he said that now everyone is waiting for immediate and decisive decision. by the international court of justice to stop the genocide in gaza. of earlier joined us with more details on palestinian's reactions to the lawsuit against israel at the international court of justice. let's take a listen. for the palestinian, of course, they appraised this move and they are really hoping that the court would reject. all the pressure, pressure being imposed it in order to let's say find israel guilty, and they are hoping palestinians and mainly palestinians in the goja strap that this will lead to ending the israeli genocidal war, despite the fact that palestinians have so long known that such such moves by the international criminal court. court or the the international court of justice were not able in in in previous issues to to criminalize israel for committing crimes against the palestinians and war crimes mainly because of the american non-stop support for the israeli regime and for the united states ability to use the vedo in previous of course we speak about to previous cases, the situation now i

court of justice, where there is no escape, let us move from the international court of justice subjecting them to the zionist project in order to control all palestinian territory in a way that facilitates the establishment of a stable west asian regime under its control. this agreements over tools and equipment, but this number of actions, foolishness and zionist arrogance sabotages the skull, because the americans were determined that after the control and liquidation of the... palestinian resistance, the policy of normalization of relations between israel and arab countries will be immediately followed. in that case, everyone will agree on what the americans and zionists want, that is referring to iran and the axis of resistance as enemies. blincan wants to unite this region in the service for its goal in which israel gives priority to its own role in this region and does not give priority to the american strategic goal. אז באמת סיל עבר לשלב השלישי, אבל מה שקורה בחניונס רחוק מאוד ממעבר מדילוג לשלב הבא, גם בגלל שעדיין ההיסגים הנדרשים שם זה חיסול בחירים ושחרור חטופים בעסקה או

controlling the, the borders and all the actors point to the got strip will be addressed in the international court of justice. that a so far was everything on the ground. so just and fit within the allegations of board crimes. it could move submitted by south africa out to the international court of justice. and what we're talking about is the ongoing constant killings in the meaning of civilians and the, the force displacement and the failure of these really military and it's government to provide safe place for displaced for the 1.5. millions is displaced, palestinian edition be intentional and attacks on e honor while united nations for positive review facilities including factors in centers and schools and the opposite. the ration of civic life old fits the characterization and the definition of word crimes committed so far in the gaza. strip county, thank you very much for that honey muscles. joining us live from the dolphin and southern gaza and it's cross live now to stephanie deca. she is an occupied east, jerusalem, and stephanie israel denying the allegations as we expect, but it is taking them ver

genocide. we all know that the international criminal court is a is a western tool, the international criminal court of course is not the same as the international court of justice where the genocide cases being heard, individual cases should be built before the international criminal court and and that" simply a tool of nato, so i don't expect anything to happen there unless things radically change, but most countries have domestic legislation, outlawing participation in genocide, certainly both the uk and the us to, um, and following determination by the icj, i think we may find politicians held individually liable, i think that's one of the things that might be, might be a game changer here, but sadly that's not. going to kick in very quickly, well crek, let me just stay with you, because you you talked about the courts and the possibility of what can happen, and of course that it's un supported or nato, the other court, so is this the the what we're looking at, basically um, the collapse of the international um rules-based order in general, as more and more people realize that so much of the jargon, the slogans, was basically a farse, the protection of human

a state laid out such a details. expensive and gruesome genocide case in front of the international court of justice. south africa has made a compelling argument that the world's highest court tooth or israel to stop its military campaign in gaza as soon as possible. urgent injunctions by the international court of justice of binding. but the world's highest court has no power to enforce them. it will establish something very important that 3rd state countries cannot escape. this is the crime of old crimes genocide. and once the court establishes that, this is the good thing guys, at least plus the states will find it very hard to escape that as possibilities on friday is round. we'll respond to the genocide accusations. it supports us already gearing up at the bees palace to backup its defense. step 5 and l g 0 the he a 100 south who joins us now from occupied east jerusalem. so i am the, what's been the reaction in israel to today's events of the hey, reactions across the aisle coming from is really officials. let's begin with the prime minister benjamin netanyahu, who said that what's being broug

the 8th of january of this year, south africa submitted an 84 -page complaint to the international court of justicein the hague in the netherlands , accusing israel of genocide, and requested an immediate hearing by the international court of justice. mr. south hopes that with the hague court ruling in favor of the palestinians, he will be able to prevent the continuation of israeli air and ground attacks on the gaza strip and the killing of palestinians. to be i am very proud of the action that south africa has taken. south africa has done what the whole world wanted, i.e. the immediate implementation of the ceasefire in gaza and the handling of the israeli massacre case. messen, who is the vice president of the supreme court. south africa, who is the senior representative of his country at the meeting of the hague tribunal, emphasized: south africa recognizes the palestinian state and therefore believes that israel has committed genocide for decades. roland lamola, the minister of justice of south africa, also said in the hague: no attack, no matter how severe, can stop the violence that israel a

now in today's top story, the international court of justice has concluded the first day of hearings a lawsuit filed by south africa against israel's genocide in the gaza strip. at the closing, south africa demanded the court orders israel to immediately suspend this onslaught in the besieged palestinian territory. to indicate the following provisional measures in relation to the palestinian people as a group protected by the genocide convention. these measures are directly linked to the rights that form the subject matter of south africa's disputes with israel: one, the state of israel shall immediately suspend its military operations in and against c two, the state of israel shall ensure that any military or irregular armed units which may be directed, supported or influenced by it, as well as any organizations and persons which may be subject to its control, direction or influence, take no steps in furtherance of the military operations referred to in point one above. point is much simpler: the court devoted the first day of the hearings to the arguments submitted by south africa.

africa has taken the step to invoke the genocide convention and charge israel in the international court of justice. while there are severe limitations to this process, it is on. iably momentous to see israel brought before the highest international court to answer for its crime of genocide against the palestinians. the relationship between south africa and palestine is deep and cannot be underestimated. it was forged through oppression and racial subjugation. israel was key player in the development and later the malignancy of apartite rule in south africa. south africa's apothy prime minister daniel molan was the first foreign prime. minister to visit tel aviv following the nakba. hendrick vevad, a south african apartide architect and prime minister, even claimed in 1961 that israel, like south africa, is an apart state. that was six decades before amnesty international said the same. in order to improve the image of apartite in south africa, israel and the apartide authorities established a joint secretariat for political and psychological warfare in 1975. by 1981, the apartidade army in south a

state laid out such a detailed, expensive, and gruesome genocide case in front of the international court of justice. south africa has made a compelling argument that the world's highest court shoot or israel to stop its military campaign in gaza as soon as possible. urgent injunctions by the international court of justice of binding, the wills highest court, has no power to enforce them. it will establish something very important that 3rd state countries cannot escape. this is the crime of all crimes to the site and wants to the court establishes that this is being go with. the thing goes at least plus the states will find it very hard to escape. the responsibilities on friday is round. will respond to the genocide accusations. it supports us already gearing up at the beast palace to back up its defense steadfast and l g 0. the hate to the u. s. highest legal body has been hearing international disputes. the $7080.00 is alex bed takes a closer look at the role. the i c. j has played the international court of justice or i c, j as being the united nations main judicial body. since 1946. its main rol

the international court of justice, instructing israel to take all necessary measures to prevent genocide in gaza. hundreds of pro palestinian protests as in front of the un. it's top code for the deliberate since verdict on emergency provisions have bonded by south africa as gods. that stuff has continued bombings. we've lost contact with regular contributor amounts of treatment. it's been 5 days. we spoke to his mother who says his son was unwilling to leave cause a despite all the dangerous sometimes i think the class with mt isn't leave. these are the, he's upset. if i told him like this, he said my, my men come not leave. okay. and i'm not in need of the situation. people need me here. somebody can take it to the office or to con you. and if i want to for my son, i work for him. as rushing out to the ray and drones take aim or do crating. anybody system that don't have to go public, key of that tend to stabilize the front lines of folding showed the the just have to hope you have luck lead here at most good. this is all the international. a lot of developments talk to you about today

he said that now everyone is waiting for immediate and decisive decision by the international court of justice to stop the genocide in gaza. people meanwile have taken to the streets in the dutch city of the hag in support of palestinians in the gaza strip as the international. court of justice holds hearings a genocide law suit against israel revolution revolution revolution revolutiones pro palestine protesters chanted free palestine. and demanded an end to the israeli aggression on gaza. they held banners reading stop the genocide while waving palestinian flags. demonstration was also held in south africa's cape town, where people called for immediate ceasefire in the besieg territory. the south african protesters hailed their government for filing the lawsuit against israel at the top un court for committing genocide in gaza. they also called for the boycott of the israely regime as follow-up measure. well israel has launched fresh air strikes on the gaza strip on the 97th day of the genocidal war. the latest attacks targeted the city of raffa and the maghazi refugee camp in southern gaza.

the occupying regime lies before the international court of justice. s he has started lying since he was slapped on the 7th of october. this regime distorts itself even more by lying and isolation. increases the international meanwhile , the voices in condemning the brutality and aggression of this regime have become louder all over the world. but south africa has the honor to ignore from the success in condemning the zionist regime to genocide in gaza, he was able to bring the occupying regime to the trial table. we are still with you today. mr. habibzadeh, there is a debate here, and that is that, as it was in the report, this honor in the name of south africa has been registered in the world . the apartheid government was the same apartheid government that existed in south africa and was overthrown . it exists in a different form now in the occupied territories and is less labeled. that the israeli regime was able to stick to south africa. because there is absolutely no side to this fight , but in any case, as a country that has supported the palesti

today the international court of justice has vindicated us. the court has concluded that passwords to articulate 9 of the convention. it has jurisdiction to educate our application, to the effects of the order that the i c j has grunted today. is that there is a possible case of genocide. this marks an important 1st in our quest to secure a justice for the people of guys. some have told us that we should mind our own business and not to get involved in the office of other countries. others have said it was not our place and yet it is very much our place. as the people who know too well the pain of disposition discrimination states one said violence. we are also a people who are the victims of the crime of our pottage. we know what a potted looks like we experienced and lived through it said the many people. busy who died and were anxiety like our beloved leader, only about tumble and many of us. oh, that's what i do. like the father of 5 democracy, nelson mandela, and many others. that for us, was the face of our party. we saw the africans whet

home of the international court of justice. it's the only major oregon of united nations, which is not based in new york, but what happens in the cold in the coming days is being keenly watched here on the other side of the atlantic at un headquarters. i already the ambassador of israel, whose diplomats have been activity low being other un members, has angrily denounced the case in a speech in the un general assembly. perhaps an indication of how word his country is in south africa's basements and libelous cases. a d i g i c j. prove this exactly. how can it be remembered that the convention on the prevention of genocide adopted following the hollow clothes, the general side of the jewish people is now being weaponized against the jew estate. delores normally supposed to be above politics, but when it comes to international law, things get more complicated candidates to be judges at the international court of justice, nominated by their own countries, which then campaign for them and lots of inherently political process. the el

it says release the stipend, welcoming, and the decision of the international court of justice. the group says it's urging the international community to force israel to implement the court's decisions and stop the ongoing crime of genocide against palestinians. alma says the court's decision opens the way for is really latest to be held accountable for their crimes . and to or from the rights to palestinian people to self determination. the group also says that appreciates the genuine possession of the republic of south africa, its support for power steering and people. and it's believe from the justice of the palestinian calls. meanwhile, and guys of the situations becomingly increasingly desperate, it is around all, all of them all are not sore hospitals and the size of under heavy fire. the facilities are close to be coming in. no trouble from palestine. insight, extreme hunger is beginning to tip into finding these are the military is open, fight on displaced people in the all the regional fun eunice, local sources say a number have been injured. and the fears of an arrest c

of humanity and international law. palestine welcomes the provisional measures ordered by the international court of justice today. the icj judges assessed the facts and the law, they ruled in favor of humanity and international law. we call in all states to ensure that all provisional measures ordered by the court are implemented including by israel, the occuping power. this is abiding legal obligation. "states now have clear legal obligations to stop israel's genocidal war on the palestinian people in gaza and to make sure that they are not complicit. the icj order is an important reminderki said the icj ruling is an important reminder that no one is above the law. he said the order serves as a wake up call for israel and all its allies who enable the regime's eentrenched impunity. the israeli prime minister. on the other hand called the order a disgrace that won't be raised for generations. benjamin netanyahu vowed to continue the onslot until what he called the elimination of all threats and the release of all captives in gaza. meanwhile reactions are pouring into the interim ruling by the international court o

south africa has taken the step to invoke the genocide convention in charge israel in the international court of justice. while there are severe limitations to this process. "it is undeniably momentous to see israel brought before the highest international court to answer for its crime of genocide against the palestinians. the relationship between south africa and palestine is deep and cannot be underestimated. it was forged through oppression and racial subjugation. israel was key player in the development and later the malignancy of apartite rule in south africa. south africa's aparthy prime minister daniel molan was the..." first foreign prime minister to visit tel aviv following the nakba. hendrick vevad, a south african apartide architect in prime minister, even claimed in 1961 that israel, like south africa, is apartite state. that was six decades before amnesty international said the same. in order to improve the image of apathide in south africa, israel and the apathite authorities established a joint secretariat for political and psychological warfare in. in 1975. by 1981, the apartide army in

do you think that the international court of justice isn't rolling on friday? both is your case. yeah, absolutely, absolutely. you see the state of missouri and has enjoy uh, basically the complicity of the official media, the corporate media, everybody from c and had to m. s. nbc to fox news. they all follow the as really line that somehow how math is apps and you keybo and whatever israel does a to destroy you have asked, is somehow just if i but hold literally people don't feel that we have to or, or the people see that this has gone way beyond, but let's review share, we'd be on revenge way beyond self defense. that this is just at the destruction of people who are basically defenseless in the face of aerial bombardment, and 10 bombardments must have caught up with thank you very much for joining us. on al jazeera, that is jonathan cut that live in washington dc. a you're welcome. thank you. still ahead on i'll just say about a new york joy, what is former us president donald trump, to pay more than $83000000.00 to rise it aging town and a defamation trial. and molly's militar

um, theresa israel, it presents its case today at the international court of justice. what are people in guns are expecting that? yes, uh palestinians generally have pets and i fell it yesterday. the hearings that brings a message by south africa in the international court of justice, accusing israel preaching and also violating the united nation genocide conventions . and today, the waiting for the s value of respond starts to this case and to read to the 8. tell us these accusations, they clearly believe that israel will do, especially in order to completely correct donald if it's made by south africa to criminalize as well. and as power city is c as well. this time, as this is down thing of the codes, all of the international court of justice has affected traits at this time. and this is quite prove used throughout the statements released by these very military . and also political officials as rep in hearing from the is very prime minister benjamin netanyahu, that the accusations that had been made by south africa yesterday, they weren't clear baseless, and they wer

what he called the elimination of all threats and release of all captives in gaza. the international court of justice today. now reactions are pouring into the interrum ruling by the international court of justice on the genocide case against israel. the european union said it wanted quote full, immediate and effective and implementation of the un court ruling, eu emphasized that the icj orders are binding and israel must comply with them. scotland's prime minister said the court order is clear and must be abided by. he reiterated this country's call for immediate ceasefire urging israel to stop his wide scale killing and destruction in gaza. spain also welcomed the court's decision calling for the implementation of the interim measures it has decreed. turkish president. described the order as valuable demanding an end to the israeli attacks against civilians in gaza, especially women and children. since mid november 2023, the yemen-based ansera movement has attacked dozens of commercial ships destined to the occupied territories. the tags have practically halted commercial activities in the port of