the international court of justice of lah hamadah called the zionist regime's presence in the occupied territories illegal and called for an immediate end to the occupation and payment of compensation to the palestinians. the international court of justice , referring to the resolutions of the security council of the general assembly of the united nations , declared that the acquisition of land by force is prohibited and stressed that the member states of the united nations should not make any changes in the physical characteristics of the demographic composition of the institutional structure or situation. the territories occupied by israel since the 5th of june 1967 to recognize that they have been occupied. in addition, the court emphasized that all countries are obliged not to recognize the illegal presence of israel in the occupied palestinian territories and not to provide any assistance or support to maintain the situation created by this illegal presence. the secretary general of the united nations also said that he will soon refer the opinion of the international court of just

vote the decision of the international court of justice against the zionist regime has been widely welcomed by many countries. the ministry of foreign affairs of saudi arabia, kuwait and oman welcomed the ruling of the international court of justice and emphasized the need to stop the war in gaza and the need for the international community to form an independent palestinian state and implement international resolutions. the hamas movement welcomed the verdict of the hague court and asked international organizations to take measures to stop the occupation of the zionist regime. do what is necessary. antonio guterres, the secretary general of the united nations, also said that the decision of the international court of justice about the illegality of the actions israel will refer the occupied territories to the un general assembly. the authorities of the zionist regime, while opposing this ruling, announced that they will take any action to cancel the decision of the international court of justice. the hague, the highest judicial body of the united nations, announced israel's action in a una

so general, i mean, leaders of the occupation basically rejected at the international court of justice'scto and now the international court of justice tells the the international community that this is unlawful and this is illegal and this violates the international law. well with that let's go ahead and continue. ronnie, if nasrullah speech presses you more than the fact that harzi halevi is still the chief of staff, then you have understood nothing from october 7. oran, how is naharaya different from karia or abimim? nothing will change, the concept is the same as before october 7, and we will go to an agreement. isaac, and now we will bring lebanon back to the stoneage. you and laughs at you itamar. is honest if he says he will stop attacking if israel stops the operation in gazza, then there is what will happen. said, and nasar is honest, he decides where and how million israelis live. well, general, as we saw here in these previous reports, do hezballah recent operation striking certain areas in northern occupied palestine for the first time, new phase in the lebanese israeli front

the international court of justice's decision declaring the occupation of palestinian areas includingnprecedented and it's directly directly towards is israel, violations and grave violations for international law, which means occupation, after about 50 years that the the the word got used on this occupation and even countries that united states and united kingdom, they deal it as de facto, and now the international court of justice tells the international community that this is unlawful and this is illegal, ronnie, if nasrallah speech presses you more than the fact that hivi is still the chief of staff, then you have understood nothing from october 7. oran, how is a different from or abimim, nothing will change, the concept is the same as before october, and we will go to an agreement. isaac, and now we will bring lebanon back to the stoneage. masarla mocks you and laughs at you itamar. is honest if he says he will stop at king, if israel stops the operation in gaza, then that is what will happen. said, and nasarlah is honest, he decides where and how million israelies live. well, ge

נגד ראש הממשלה. so general, mean leaders of the occupation basically rejected at the international court of justice'sdifferent from mona or abimim? nothing will change, the concept is the same as before october 7, and we will go to an agreement. isaac, and now we will bring lebanon back to the stone age. nosralla mocks you and laughs at you. itamar, now is honest, if he says he will stop attacking if israel stops the operation in gaza, then that is what will happen. said, and nasarlah is honest, he decides where and how million israelies live. well, general, as we saw here in these previous reports, do heizballah's recent operation striking certain areas in northern occupied palestine for the first time, mark a new phase in the... these israely front battles? yes, so far since october 8 when hizbillah starts this war of attrition and support for ghazza, the the hizbullah did not hit civilian targets in in targets in israel, yes, all the time they target military bases, military posts, observation posts, radars, cameras, i mean pots along the border. with israel, but it never targeted a civilian villa

are thinking about this danger well with that great point we are going to move on the international court of justiceagainst israel, correct? the language that they're using is unprecedented, we don't expect usually these types of international core speak against israel this unprecedented and it's directly directly towards israel and... the grave violations for international law, which means occupation, after about 50 years that the the word got used on this occupation and even countries like united states and united kingdom, they deal it as de facto, and now the international court of justice tells the international community that this is unlawful and this is is illegal and violates the international law, well with that let's go ahead and continue, the warnings issued by secretary general about expanding the range of shelling and adding new areas to the range of missiles have established a new equation according to ahiebermia. חיסול הוא ירא של בחיר שלו ירא סדר גודל של כמעט 200 שיגורים עכשיו הוא קובע קו אחר ואומר הם יהיו אזרחים שאתם תהרגו לי אף שבעבר גם הרגתם בטעות אני אני אשנה את ה מפת הטבחים וזה אי

the international court of justice says israel's practices and policies and occupied palestinian territories are all in violation of international law. the yemenese hold a fresh friday of nationwide rallies to praise the army's anti-israel operations in support of the palestinian people. hello everyone, it's 6 a.m. in the gaza strip and you're watching press tv world news. our top story, the death tool continues to sorry in gaza amid unrelenting is really genslot about the besieg trip in central gaza. israely war planes bomb to home in the newsra refugee camp, killing nine people and injuring several others, five members of a single family and two other civilians were also killed in air strike on albarace refugee camp. israeli forces also targeted a civilian vehicle and der abala killing three people there in gaza city israel air and artillery strikes to left several palestinians dead and uh many injured. to the south 12 bodies were recovered from a mass grave under alamal hospital in hanhanus. which was previously seized by israeli forces. total death toll of palestinians in gaza has now ri

and azahra towns in that area in the north part of the middle area of gaza strip. the international court of justice says israel's practices and policies in the occupied palestinian territory are in violation of international law. the state of israel's continue. presence in the occupied territory is unlawful, by 11 votes to four is of the opinion that the state of israel is under an obligation to bring an end to sorry to bring to an end its unlawful presence in occupied palestinian territory as rapidly as possible. by 14 to one is of the opinion that the state of israel is under an obligation to cease immediately all new settlement act. activities and to evacuate all settlers from the occupied palestinian territory, by 14 votes to one, is of the opinion that the state of israel has the obligation to make reparation for the damage caused to all natural or legal persons concerned in the occupied palestinian territory, by 12 votes to three is of the opinion that all states under obligation not to recognize as legal, the situation arising from the unlawful presence of the state of israel in the occupied

the international court of justice says israel's practices and policies in the occupied palestinian territory are in violation of international law. the yemenes hold a fresh friday of nationwide rallies the praised their armies anti-israel operations in support of the palestinian people. hello everyone, you're watching press tv live from the studios in teran. thank you for joining us. the deaththoll continues to rise in gaza amid the relentless israely genocidal onslaughts across the besieg strip. in central gaza, israel war planes have bombed the home in the nessevat refugee camp. killing nine people and injuring several others. five members of the same family and two more civilians were also killed in an air strike on the alb rage refugee camp. israeli forces targeted civilian vehicle in derribalah killing three people. in gaza city, israeli air and artillery strikes have left several palestinians dead and many others injured. in the south, 12 days were recovered from a mass grave at the almal hospital in khan unis, which was previously se by israeli forces, the total death sol of palestini

of the hague court meaningless and meaningless, netanyahu first the minister also read the decision of the hague court as a mistake, which he cannot do. change something, the international court of justice on friday called the continued presence of the zionist regime in the occupied territories illegal and demanded an immediate stop to the occupation and compensation to the palestinians. the international court of justice , referring to the resolutions of the security council of the united nations general assembly , has declared and emphasized the prohibition of land acquisition by the use of force by the member states of the united nations. there should be no change in the physical characteristics, demographic composition, institutional structure, or conditions of the occupied territories occupied by israel since june 5, 1967. to be recognized. in addition to this, the court emphasized that all countries are obliged not to recognize the illegal presence of israel in the occupied palestinian territories and not to provide any assistance or support to maintain the status quo by the illegal presence of this regime. the secretary general of the united nations has said that he will soon sub

the world. flights tanks and businesses old affected the welcome to the front of the international court of justice, says israel, so i'm going presence of be occupied, palestinian territory is illegal and violate international the i. c. j. deliver this advisory opinion, not the hey he got to the un general assembly requested its input judge's to time. it is rallies obligated to and it's unlawful presence as quickly as possible as well. must stop old hugh settlement activity and evacuate whole settlers from the occupied territory. because the sides as it did it sort advisor of that these at healey settlements in the west bank. and these, it was a limb and video game associated with them. had been established and thought of being maintained in violation of international law decor thoughts with the great concern that the board that is it a supplement policy has been expanding since the quotes for advisory opened published any the authority of special envoy, ride by the key says the well to bestow, take action against israel, all states and the you on the autumn now under the obligation not to the good

happens now, well is real generally disregards any type of decision after you, when at the international court of justice at the i, c, c, the international criminal court as well. and we don't really see any sort of policy change. what we have seen previously with any country who is going to have policy change, our sanctions are different measure is done by leaders of allies like the united states, like other countries in europe, partners of israel. but we haven't really seen that. we've seen some sanctions on violent settlers extremist in the occupied westbank who have attacked post indians . but we have not really seen any sort of larger measure that has been done for israel to change its policy. and that's why these courts are ruling this way. that's why they're ruling the, the settlements in the occupied west bank and occupied east jerusalem or illegally or encroaching on palestinian land. and at the end of it, they will encroach on any sort of territorial continuity that would lead to a palestinian state. so with the continuation of the legal settlement project that israel is still expanding, it mak

you are welcome to the international court of justice, the judicial pillar of the united nations. it has two main missions. one is to deal with lawsuits between governments, such as south africa's complaint against the israeli regime for violating the nasdaq convention, and the other is to provide advisory opinions to international organizations that have the authority to ask the court, such as the decision that was made yesterday. it was issued in response to an inquiry by the united nations general assembly in december 2020 that requested the court this was exactly the story before the war. and he had requested the court to state the legal consequences of the long-term and prolonged occupation of the zionist regime. the reason for this inquiry was that the zionist regime had started to normalize the course of the occupation by international standardization with this the argument that if the occupation was illegal in the beginning, but since it is subject to the passage of time, a significant period of time has passed on it de facto and in practice it should be recognized as a tr

it was a landmark case for the 50 judges of the international court of justice with $52.00 countries participating. it is one of the largest the court has ever to decide on. they have to rule on the legal consequences of its wells. 57 year long occupation of the west bank garza and east jerusalem. and the impact that has on the palestinian population. this is a different case than the one south africa filed against israel for committing genocide in gaza. in this advisory opinion, most of the judges greet israel's occupation has become a permanent annexation and therefore violates international law. that was that one with respect to the policies and practices of is right. 52 in question a which was found to be unlawful. design has an obligation to put an end to those and offer lots in this respect is right and must immediately seize on you. supplement activity is right also has an obligation to repeat all legislation and measures creating or maintaining the unlawful situation. including sources discriminate against the palestinian people to the courts as, as well as imposing systematic

and the international court of justice rules israel's occupation of the west bank and -- in east jerusalem is illegal. >> israel has an obligation to repeal all legislation and measures creating or maintaining the unlawful situation, including those which discriminate against the palestinian people in the occupied palestinian territory as well as all measures aimed at modifying the democratic composition of any part of the territory. amy: we will go to brussels to speak with palestinian human rights attorney diana buttu. all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. president joe biden announced sunday he is dropping his bid to seek reelection in a move upending the presidential race just four months before election day and a month before the democratic national convention. in a letter posted sunday, biden wrote he was stepping aside "in the best interest of my party and the country." biden endorsed his vice president kamala harris, who quickly received the backing of many powerful democrats but she could still face a

the bottom line for you is top court rules. israel's decades lawn occupation of palestinian territories is unlawful. the international court of justice says it must end as rapidly as possible. so what's the impact of this non binding booley and will it change anything on the ground? this is inside story, the hello and welcome to the program. i'm how much i'm shown. illegal is rarely settlements had been steadily expanding in the palestinian territories for years now. but you ins top court says it's time for israel to stop reversed course and repair the damages. the international court of justice has ruled. israel's occupation is unlawful, and this feeling a surgeon violence. however, the court's findings are not legally binding. and these really government has ignored previous decisions. so while the i c j is advisory opinion, have any practical implications? will it increase pressure on israel's alex will explore these issues with, i guess in a moment, but 1st this report by katya lopez of the cvc says the us top court has calls on israel to end its occupational palestinian territories as rapidly as possible that says israel's polic

the international court of justice says israel's ongoing presence in the occupied palestinian territories is illegal. i'm violates international law. the i c. j. deliberate. it's advisory opinion out the hey, off to the un general assembly requested it's input judge's determined as well as obligated and it's unlawful presence as quickly as possible. they went on to say that israel must also stop all new supplement activity and evacuate old settlers from the occupied territories. i'll just send you an authority. we add molly key says the world most now take action against israel. us all states under you on the autumn now under the obligation not sort of thing lies the legal it to you is rose presence and occupied for the student to retreat and to do nothing to as this is ryan in maintaining this illegal situation. they are directed by the ports to bring, as well as the legal probation to an in this means all the states and the you must immediately review the relations with this row to ensure that policies do not age in isabel's continue the collection against the policy of people, whether

the international court of justice , the international criminal court, the security council resolution ignores the western countries as if they are doing something to the international order of the institutions they created. and they don't need to carry out their orders , for example, the united nations security council issued an order to stop the war as the final pillar, even the united states approved it, but in these two or three months, there has been no change in the legal situation , taking all of this into account. do you hope that the actions of such institutions can actually bring about a change in favor of the palestinian people? no, this will not happen in the near future, because as you said , israel is proud of rejecting such votes, the votes of bigger and stronger organizations. he also rejects, so we see now well, on the one hand, groups like the party. can the palestinian people have it? we should consider the action of the international court of justice as a piece of a more general puzzle of the legal war against the zionist regime, which is being vigorously pursued at

regime continues with a... indiscriminate bombings of the palestinian territory. the international court of justice says israel's practices and policies in occupied palestine are in grave violation of international law. the yemanies hold a fresh friday of nationwide rallies to praise their army's anti-israel operations in support of the palestinian people. hello everyone, it's 9 a.m. in the besieg gozo strip and you're watching press tv world news. our top story now, it's day 288 of us israely genocide in gaza and the regime in tel aviv continues with this unrelenting air and artillery strikes. in one of those strikes at least three palestinians were killed in several. injured in israeli bombing of a palestinian home in albarage refugee camp in central gaza to the south regime air raid on a residential building in hanyes left palestinian dead and several injured. another palestinian was killed in a drone strike targeting bicycle also in khan unis. regimes also targeted several areas across gaza with heavy artillery leaving unknown number of casualties for the time israel's campaign of genocide whic

the international court of justice says israel's practices and policies in occupied palestine are in violation of international law. a yemenes hold a fresh friday of nationwide realies to praise the army's anti-israel operations and support of the palestinian people. hello everyone, it's at 8 a.m. in gaza and you're watching press tv, world news. it's a 288 now of u.s. israely genocide in gaza and the regime in tel aviv continues unrelenting air and artillery strikes. in one of those strikes at least three palestinians were killed and several injured and of palestinian home and albarage refugee camp in central gaza to the south regime airraid on residential building in the city of khans has left a palestinian dead and several others injured and another palestinian was killed in israeli drone strike targeting bicycle in khan unis. regimes also targeted several areas across casa with heavy artillery leaving in unknown number of casualties. israel's genocide began early october and since then nearly 38,900 palestinians have now killed and nearly 9000 injured. our gaza corresponder joined

do you see some implications in this finding by the international court of justice today? and there's absolutely, uh, setting up the cases on number of levels why the court did recognize that is there a vigilant through its illegal settlers and it's, and it's military physically from the across the street. but the 3 main don't keep buying power because they could still use it's a hotter, 2 quarters coerced as policies. 10 of the guys are on the guys are having basically occupied the borders and the skies and i'm on the lines and so on, so forth. so in so many ways, guys, as i said, for an as the i, c, j, mood based part and parcel dr. part there, there is, and i think one of the more important element just strictly applies is this worsted inducement. over the expulsion basically of inducing people to leave, which is another form of transport which has the courts are recognized. there's also a legal and where you're seeing the past 9 months, more of this course of inducement making, garza on livable and habitable as guys. so you can definitely say that there's a number of th

head of european union's foreign policy called for more support for the rulings of the international court of justice. he said that this ruling is largely compatible with the positions of the european union. the international court of justice on friday, referring to the construction and development of zionist settlements in the west bank and east jerusalem, the presence of the regime. he called it illegal in the occupied palestinian territories and called for an end to it . the nakshi ber sang exhibition presents the works of artists from all over the world to protest against the crimes of the zionist regime in palestine. this exhibition will be held in the tehran museum of contemporary art until the end of the month of travel. these black and white images are related to this old page of kehan ​​newspaper it is the first specialized exhibition of palestinian art. the first opening of the tehran museum of contemporary art after the revolution in bahman 1958. all the paintings that lived in palestine and the arab world were brought here and displayed. now, nearly 45 years have passed, on hot days. the

the spokesperson of the us state department criticized the international court of justice's decision regarding the occupation of the west bank and east jerusalem by the zionist regime. this ruling complicates efforts to resolve disputes. the international court of justice has issued a ruling that it does not recognize any structural changes that the zionist regime has made in palestine since 1967, including east jerusalem, and all countries should cooperate with the united nations to help the palestinian nation to determine the future. the highest judicial authority of the united nations , the international court of justice in laha, after 57 years and for the first time in history , called the presence of the zionist regime in the occupied palestinian territories illegal and called for its end. since 1967, 57 years ago, the zionist regime has built about 160 residential settlements for about 700,000 jews in the west bank of east jerusalem, and now, according to the court ruling, this regime must remove all its settlements from these areas, and the amount of damage caused by this occup

the international court of justice says israel's practices and policies and occupied palestinian territory are in grave violation of international law. as cyprus observes anniversary of an operation by the turkish military, which led to the split of mediterranean island into turkish and greek ruled parts. hello everyone, it's 11 a.m. in the besige gauzo trip and you're watching press tv world news. it's now day 288 of the us really genocide in gaza and the regime in tel aviv continues with this unrelenting air and artillery strikes and one of the latest strikes at least three palestinians were killed and several injured. in israeli bombing of a palestinian home in the al-brage refugee camp in central gaza. to the south regime rate on a residential building in khan unis left a palestinian dead and several injured. another palestinian was killed his by an israeli drone strike targeting his bicycle in khan unis as well. regimes also targeted several areas throughout gaza with heavy artillery leaving an unknown number of casualties, overall really genocidal campaign against gaza which began la

of rain that moves back in on tuesday. the the you in stop court rules, israel's decades, one occupation of palestinian territories is unlawful. the international court of justice says it must end as rapidly as possible. so what's the impact of this non binding booley? and will it change anything on the ground? this is inside story, the .

is due united nations top court has ruled that israel's decades long occupation of palestinian territories violates international law. the international court of justice also shed israel's presence in the west bank and in east jerusalem must. and as rapidly as possible, the advisory opinion is non binding. but comes as pressure grows on israel over the war in garza, in 2022, the un general assembly as the i c j to assess israel's occupation settlements an annexation of palestinian lance to deliver dw. so lucy are schultz and has more on the i. c, j booley, the international court of justice. and the hate said that east trades continued presence in the occupied palestinian territories unlawful. and that it has to bring an end to it as rapidly as possible. use red shut, also sees immediately new settlement activities and evacuate all it's headless. the court also said that all other states and international organizations are under no obligation to not treat that situation as legal states also shouldn't during the age to maintain it. finally, calls on the united nations to consider modalities to bring an end to what the court qualified as an unlawfully p

now some 39 palestinians have been killed and over 90,00 woundeds. so far, the international court of justice has declared israely presence and occupy palestinian territories as illegal, it's demanding the regime end its occupation as soon as possible, and in our explainer program, we examine how the ruling represents devastating indictment against israel, it's worth mentioning that the israeli military announced the onset of that military operation against the eastern parts of conunist. over the last night demanding roughly 400 thousand palestinian civilians to evacuate immediately, the current situation is indescribable and it is over tragic for the palestinian people, because the palestinian people who have been residing in the eastern part of kanunis city have been displaced for multiple times and after they return to their devastated and destroyed zental areas, the israel incubation forces demanded them to evacuate once again, they have no place to go to after the israeli occupation forces this... the vast majority of areas of gaza strip, the only thing, the only place that they have is

they create what the international court of justice has just ruled is a course of environment and to displace palestinians and antics their territory. friday's i c. j ruling was groundbreaking, but it has not changed the violent reality on the ground, nor, or the reports from one of my law. armed with buttons and the confidence of entrenched impunity is really settler's attack, a palestinian family in the southern hebron hills. a young man shields himself from the blows his aunt isn't as lucky when relatives tried to pull her away and is rarely sold or confront from firing in the year to protect the settler's walk, how was sent to hospital where she received 7 stitches to the head this is not the 1st time well wishers have visited the family after an attack. 20 years ago is rarely settlers killed with his brother. and the assaults have not stopped since the shooting and there no one helped us. i was beaten on my head and shoulders. my nephew could have died. they don't spare any one. they don't want any public opinion here. elsewhere and the occupied westbank is really subtler set fi

occupied territory is discussed. so ladies and gentlemen, that was live from the hague, the international court of justice the icj was delivering its advisory opinion on israel's occupation of the palestinian territories, the top un court convening at the hague, has just announced its opinion, let's quickly go over some of the addendums that were mentioned. there the top court has assured uh initially that it has a jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion on the israeli occupation uh israel's uh settlement policies are in breach of the fourth geneva convention, israel's use of natural resources and occupied palestinian territories is in violation of international law. the top un court also stated that the settlement policy has contributed to the rise of violence perpetrated by illegal settlers in the occupied territories. also uh the of course said that israel's excessive use of force against palestinians is at odds with its alligations under international law as uh and occupy also uh the west bank settlements maintained and established in violation of international law are the established maintained sta

into whether, in this case , won’s court decision could influence the outcome of the palestinian-israeli conflict? the decision of the international court of justicean perhaps be called a turning point in the confrontation between israel and palestine, after recognizing that tel arif illegally occupying the territory of a neighboring state, the united nations. apparently he is trying to reduce the tension in this conflict and is counting on a quick ceasefire. israel regularly legalizes outposts established in violation of domestic israeli law. israeli settlement construction is accompanied by specially created civilian infrastructure on the west bank in east jerusalem, which integrates the settlement into israeli territory. the court finds that israel's transfer of settlers to west bank to east jerusalem. in jerusalem, however, tel aviv, apparently, holds different views; israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu, while in rafah, where there is active fighting in the city, makes it clear that the military operation will continue. the military pressure they are putting on hamas here is helping us move forward with the hostage deal, including. polod

i think a little this is just the last thing does a slip all assign the international court of justice is due to present and advisory opinion on weather as well as occupation of palestinian territories violates international and february. the court heard from 52 states and international organizations on the issue, as well as voice, strong opposition to the case palestinians believe the vote, and could result in significant pressure on israel. noodle that explains the ruling of the international court of justice. some of the legal status of the israeli occupation comes after 5 months of deliberation. this is what the 9 judges of the world's highest court heard from more than 4 dozen states and international organizations back in february. but the is the really occupation of the west bank including east jerusalem and gaza is illegal because it's become permanent. it amounts to annexation. it's maintained by apartheid. and it aims to deny palestinians their freedom. israel's policies have caught on eyes they shouldn't land grab as well as the government's program. a full annexation or ref

just some of the findings being read out by the 27th presiding judge of the international court of justice. he went on to say that the court considers israel is the use of natural resources of occupied tote treat, incompatible with international law. and the court finds all the quote is not convinced that the extension of is really loyal to the westbank in east jerusalem is justified. well, no, i said i am is continuing now to read out those findings. but in french, this is all part of the case that was submitted in 2022 concerning the legality of israel's occupation of the palestinian parent tree. i think we've got now step voss and so step just to put everything into context. we've heard a lot of findings so far, but this is not over yet. writes was do we still need to get to the final conclusion? is that right? just exactly. yeah, we're still waiting for that, but meanwhile, we've heard of course that the president of the court has basically said all the arguments that were brought forward by these $52.00 states including swede international organizations during the hearings were valid.

you can use this the a show that has more on the i c, j rolling as the international court of justice. and the hate said that each res continued presence in the occupied palestinian territories unlawful. and that it has to bring an end to it as rapidly as possible. use read should also sees immediately new settlement activities and evacuate all settlers. the court also said that all of the states and international organizations run done with the gauge and to not treat that situation as legal states. also, shouldn't brenda age to maintain it. finally, of calls on the united nations to consider modalities to bring an end to what the court qualified as an unlawfully presence of the state destroyer in the occupied palestinian territories. this decision is not binding, but has moto socrates and great legal rate? according to the court. i haven't gemini, chancellor, what of souls has launched his social democrats campaign for regional the elections and the eastern states have section 8, the fall rights alternative for germany. policy is heads in the post deb, but the lead is narrowing. the

but it seems that if the amount of segregation or type while the international court of justice has ruled that israel's policies in the west bank of east jerusalem har in breach of the international law and deprive palestinians of their rightful self determination that is real. by far exceeded its role of the administrator hand the occupied territories and its settlement policy amounts to an illegal unexcused sion, the cold has stated that israel has an obligation to end its presence in those areas as soon as possible, as well as these all supplements, activities it has also owed the un general assembly and the un security council to develop ways to end does rarely occupation of the west bank and east jerusalem. the judges have considered numerous factories, including the duration of the occupation, of course, almost 60 years since 1967 active and aggressive expansion. it was really supplements in the west bank, which includes construction of thousands of units. relocation of a big number was really separate to the palestinian territories under protection of israel, of course, applying hi

prime minister. benjamin netanyahu has criticized the laws or your opinion issued by the international court of justice on the occupation of palestinian territory, calling it absurd that he wants top court found that as well as ongoing presents and the occupied territory is illegal. i'm violates international law judges dependent israel is obligated to end unlawful presence as quickly as possible and must all new settlement activity step boston reports from the hague. it was a landmark case for the 50 judges of the international court of justice with $52.00 countries participating. it is one of the largest the court has ever to decide on. they have to rule on the legal consequences of its wells 57 year long occupation of the west bank garza and east jerusalem. and the impact that has on the palestinian population. this is a different case than the one south africa filed against israel for committing genocide in gaza. in this advisory opinion, most of the judges, great israel's occupation, has become a permanent annexation and therefore violates international law. that was that one with respect to the p

the un general assembly of the international court of justice to assess as far as occupation sacraments and next ation of palestinian loans to deliver it. do you have any, is this the shows and has more on the i c, j rolling or the international court of justice. and the hague said that each res continued presence in the occupied palestinian territories unlawful. and that it has to bring an end to it as rapidly as possible. use red shut, also sees immediately new settlement activities and evacuate all settlers. the court also said that all other states and international organizations run down with the gauge and to not treat that situation as legal states also shouldn't during the age to maintain it. find a lead causing the united nations to consider modalities to bring an end to what the court qualified as an unlawfully presence of the state destroyer in the occupied palestinian territories. this decision is not binding but has more. oh, sorry, and great legal rate according to the court this, it shows that reporting from the hey, you know, let's take a quick look at some of the stories

but then the effect is not the other way around many hours by this time gays, in the international court of justice, in the international criminal court at the united nations, amongst the international public opinion, or in the cost of public opinion that has. 8 the changing the situation on the ground, right. on the contrary. so the, but that it's a good thing for palestine interest and i really know the worse, it's good for them in the occupied territories. and as i was saying a little earlier, we've already had a reaction from the is rarely a prime minister. netanyahu was saying that the jewish people on nursing occupied and it's like no false decision in the hague, will distort this historical truth. so like they have in the past with all the decisions from the i, c j, is it most likely that they will just ignore it or what i was i hoped without going into a mode of wishful thinking. that the route this was to provide a very important grounds for the movement say to sanctions. it was very supplements such exactly and they are committed to the agree to continues to trade with. is there a link co