of aggression and ukraine today initiates the creation of a tribunal regarding the aggression committed by the russian federation, i will remind you that already on february 26, 22 ukraine appealed to the international court of justice of the united nations with an appeal to initiate a case on the commission of genocide, and the international court of justice of the united nations made a preliminary decision. it appealed to the russian federation through the means of diplomatic communication to refrain from the use of weapons by the military on civilian objects, the use of weapons on civilians, but we see that even at the level of this institution, which proactively applies to the russian federation in advance, we have bucha, we have irpin, we have those atrocities that are currently being investigated on the territory that has been released that is, russia does not listen to the rights, russia does not listen to the best practices and provide opportunities for joint development, and according to another option, i will put it in its place and reach the moment when it will be pacified . that the world is already developing the principles of russia's pacification, which will include the first definition of the international legal status. i

the troops of uganda were occupying parts of the d. r. c in the ninety's. and following that tamia, which they have been accused by the united nations international court of justice, of pillaging minerals of really causing human rights abuses, administering raids, and as well as conscription of child soldiers, they were ordered to pay reparation as to the dfcs for that period. of occupation and following long ends in winded negotiate between the d r. c. and uganda. the international criminal court took it upon itself to a wide judgment to the d. r. c and the, the ordered, the, that you london government is responsible for that economy malays, as well as infliction of harm on persons and ordered the london government to pay that the r c some 320 $5000000.00 in 6 installments of $65000000.00 each. the ugandan government made the 1st installment of their payment in september the 1st earlier this year. but you can understand the trepidation and the hesitance of people on the ground with regards to the involvement back in the area and mind you, me would complicate the story even further that you got under already has troops in the eastern part of the d. r. c. as part

this is the international court of justice, as it is, it is recognized by all state members of the united nations, of course, appropriate appeals should go to it. i remind you that let's say, uh, there was a consideration of esca nicaragua v. usa and by the way, the americans lost this risk. well, the lawsuit was considered by an international court. it is with the consent of both parties. that is, here, uh, the competence of the international court should be involved - this is the first and there should be the consent of the parties that are involved in the dispute to ensure that the international court is considered in accordance. until now, the un general assembly has not even mentioned this mechanism. well, and finally, the third. it is clear why this is done. this is done in order to bring at least some e, at least such illusory, but, nevertheless, a reference legal basis for the subsequent actions of the collective west, it is clear that it will not be about africa, abaza and latin america - this is the western hemisphere. this is the western contingent. this nato space is for those states

is deliberately violating the united nations charter and namely, the principle of ukraine's territorial integrity. since the 16th of march, the international court of justice have called for the suspension of russia's military operations. soon, 9 months of war will have elapsed and attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure continue. russia is now targeting power stations and hydro electric plants and heating networks, which are far behind the for line with the apparent goal of breaking the resistance of a people who is fighting for its freedom because it is losing ground. russia is looking to plunge ukraine into cold and into darkness. as winter draws near. this strategy is already a failure. it is in no way eroding the resistance of the ukrainian people. on the contrary, this strategy is bolstering its determination the liberation of care. sonya is one more illustration of that fact mister present. more, the more russia digs its heels in to make this war last, the more it worsens, the energy food and economic consequences of that war. in recent weeks, in this very chamber, we'd heard russia increase it outrageous accusations regarding the prep

court. the rome statute system of international criminal justice and the rule of law more generally. now, it's not shocking to hear the u. s. ambassador to the united nations talking this way, but we know that much of the world is rolling their eyes and laughing as they hear these words noting the utter hypocrisy of what's being said. but yet mainstream media just keeps nodding along as if there's nothing wrong with what she's saying. it's yet another case of the emperor has no clothes. have to say that the hypocrisy shown there was absolutely staggering because just since world war 2, the entire 70 years since that time has been a litany of american aggression and invasions and brutality and savagery. unprecedented in the world in world history since the 2nd world war, they tried to dominate the world through absolute terror. we have to remember when they attacked iraq in 23. what they call that 1st day of attack was shock and awe. and we all watched on television, the cruise missiles plowing into baghdad that night, explosions, hundreds of explosions, thousands of people incinerated. and then the staggering brutality of the occupation after the world has

nutshell, what is meant in this way and the first general assembly of the united nations are not bodies of international justice. this is not a court, two, yes, if something happens through court tribunal of a similar plan. there, some kind of reparations are discussed, and so on, this is always discussed after a fight, strictly none. and the fight isn't over yet. it's still so much alive and , uh, kind of a very moving process, that of course, and that's not just premature. and i repeat this in general. in no framework, but another question does not fit, what if this is an attempt, but which could be described as conditional legitimization of a raider seizure in this sense . yes, of course, but i will resolve. it looks good, but what i want to say and officially appeal to everyone who stores, and i mean the state's money, there is no house under the bed or somewhere in a stocking, and somewhere in some foreign bank, state assets. i mean, well, your assets are in great danger, because such resolutions can now be adopted, but simply in a format put on stream, so we will now simply come to such cruel protectionism, when everyone will