presented the positions of the parties in court. of how russian tanks crossed ukrainian borders ukraine filed a lawsuit at the international court of justice of the united nations in the east of ukraine in order to try to justify what russia called a special military operation, the case was transferred to the international court of justice. and already a month later, in march 2022 , its judges issued an interim decision in which it was said that russia should stop all covert and open hostilities, and both sides should avoid any what actions can escalate the situation so what is happening today is potentially a key moment because russia claims that the international court of justice does not have the appropriate jurisdiction to consider this case since the convention on genocide, according to which ukraine filed a lawsuit, does not refer to the use of force between states, this argument, which we heard today from russian lawyers, both countries, russia and ukraine , signed the convention on genocide. therefore, if the judge decides that they have the authority to consider this case, this will mean jurisdiction over by both countries, although according to the in

of the crime of genocide and its punishment, our state is trying to prove that russia has abused this treaty, why did ukraine file a complaint with the international court of justice of the united nations the united nations convention on the prevention of genocide dates back to 1948 and was ratified almost one and a half hundred countries, including russia and ukraine, complaints about violations of the convention between the signatories are being considered by the un international court of justice, the highest court in the world, the current case of ukraine against russia regarding the convention on genocide, how did the historical president react to the lawsuit? at first, the russian legal team ignored the process, but half a year later challenged the authority of the un court to consider the complaint of ukraine . the russian federation states that the genocide was not the reason for a full-scale invasion. legal basis, which countries are participating in the lawsuit ukraine, please, to the russian federation, but 32 more joined the lawsuit countries that signed the convention and believe that russia interprets it incorrectly, that is, in fact, this is a process of 33 countries agai

the hearings in gaza. so what kind of judgment is this? the international court of justice of the united nations is the highest judicial body in the world. only disputes are within its jurisdiction. between states and it is located in gas. ukraine filed a lawsuit against russia at the un international court of justice in the first days of the full-scale war, namely on february 26, 2022 . russia countered that the court had no jurisdiction to hear such a claim. so, the hearings, which lasted a week and a half, concerned this very issue. can the un court consider such a dispute? listening this is not essentially a matter of jurisdiction. the representatives of russia and ukraine presented their arguments. my colleague, anastasia soroka, followed the process in the hague. the case in the case of ukraine against russia is coming to an end in the un international court of justice in the hague. ukraine accuses russia of violating the international convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide. both countries have signed this convention, that is, they have the rights and duties a

of turkey , by the way, and accordingly, should work more actively. well, so that we constantly draw attention to war crimes that is committed by russia especially since the international court of justice of the united nations started a hearing on the case of improper use of the concept of genocide, and this is also an interesting moment that precedes the start of the general assembly of the united nations. they remembered erdogan's words that russia allegedly wants negotiations or an end to something, and today a meeting of the united nations security council is scheduled to take place regarding ukraine and which will be attended in particular by the minister of foreign affairs of russia sergey lavrov , he has already arrived in new york zelenskyi noted earlier that such a format where a terrorist country should be is his quote planned by the un and not by the ukrainian side, in your opinion, should ukraine participate in this event together with the representative of russia, and can there be something from russia saying that they are ready for the end of the war there, well, something in the context of what rydogan said russia will call for an end to the war, as they like to put it, taking into account th

so area of russia has owned the filed a written filing across no, to your for the hearings, but also the court. the i'm move international court of justice is the court of the united nations and russia is still a member of the united nations and even a member to the permanent security, a permanent member to the security council. so what really made to rush to change his mind to come today is not clear, but it is clear that they are expected to come to make their case, that this court has no jurisdiction. and the consequences if the court rules against russia. so then we had talking about years here, so if the court finds fetid, has jurisdiction in the case, we're just expected to take place in the next couple of months. then it will only look into the merits of the case. and as i, as i said, experts say that this might take years, but at the end of this, there could be reparations for ukraine. this would ukraine as ask for, they said that they want reparations for what came out of the false claim of genocide. and for that one flew reparations. and what about russian war crimes in ukraine which we documented day after day? you know? yeah, of course, um this is a bit anothe

and then we syrians, consider the international organizations to the security council of the united nations, the international court of justice, and the united nations human rights council to be public seen. and they can't do anything. yeah, any, uh can, you can see the love with leave of the security council. know the united nations itself and a capable of guaranteeing security for protecting the lives of innocent people. one with the called also less of the i read them to syrians few in the band and the most because the security council nations continue to fail to deliver some decisions. there are plenty of it to is that the 1st russian veto came in october 2011 by july 2020 russia cost 16. vito's lots and lots sometimes together with china on various issues. these were resolutions condemning government repression or draft schooling for the investigation of crimes against civilians, especially via the use of chemical weapons, but also humanitarian resolutions demo. calling for the opening of a border crossing. oh, you humanitarian operation when a very modern make any event. but how can one condemn bruship a member of the s

reviewing the positions of the heads of states on the last day of the 7th general assembly of the united nations . force him to implement the ruling of the international court of justice he voted that the united states should pay compensation for financing the armed attack of the nicaraguan revolutionaries, which the united states never accepted and said that this court does not have the jurisdiction to hear this case, although the united states has a long way to go in this matter. he has not accepted the actions and so far, and until now, there has been an apocalypse until the united states pays for the damage it has caused to this nation due to foreign interference in nicaragua , since 196 until now, and the last speech is also related to the world by francis the diplomat, who is the head of the public assembly. umm salal has been responsible for this the end of the series is the final part, which is based on the conversations that happened during the period , let's go see it. your ministers and representatives, and i spoke of the need to unite the nations. i made a call to action for all states to find within themselves, the will to act together, in solidarity. i a

of reform, but by itself. this is an interesting thing, because right now , probably this fall. our relations will be decided in september. that’s because today the international court of justice of the united nationse it, it will need to be revised, but it is clear that they are considering the claim of ukraine, which was filed on february 26, that is, 2 days after the start of the special operation, the claim, well, which in general, in essence affairs. mmm was presented to russia so that it would stop this special operation and generally return the territory. well, essentially, this boils down to their claims. they accept participation first. here is the day of the year to listen to us then ukraine a. then, in my opinion, there are more than 30 countries interested in the decision of this court. these are european countries, this is great britain, this is canada, this is australia, which also wants to take part and will also make certain statements. that is, with evidence. in this court it is clear that such a decision will most likely be made by this court and before us on the 26th, when this session takes place, that is, on september 26. just a little bit later. no question. a what should we d

in particular the international court of justice, one of the five main structures of the united nationsesumed hearings on the case, which was initiated by ukraine last year. what is it about. we spoke today with a member of the international legal council of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, president of the russian association of international law, anatoly kapustin. hello, thank you for taking the time , definitely follow the un general assembly, of course. our delegation is actively working there. we're just talking about this they said, and of course there are different un bodies in the organization. he uh, and there is such an international court of the united nations where but this week there were hearings, and genocide and so on. here. please tell me a few words literally. what is this dear international institution doing? and how is everything going on there? what are we talking about in general, so that it is clear to tv viewers. well, the international chest, good afternoon alexander , and once again the international chest - this is one of the main organs of the organiz

structure of society, especially the united nations, foreign minister nikkargo asked the united nations to force the united states to implement the ruling of the international court of justiceat was this ruling? america and nicaragua, which the international court of justice ruled in 1986 that the united states should pay compensation for financing the armed attack against the nicaraguan revolutionaries, which the united states never accepted and said that this court does not have jurisdiction over this case. of course, america is a long way he has not accepted this kind of actions and so far, he has taken a measure to make america pay for the damage it has caused to this nation due to foreign interference in nicaragua, under the burden since 1986 until now, and the last speech is also related to the world of francis the diplomat . he is from trinidad and tobago, who is the head of the group that he has arranged for, from the conversations that happened during the period, let's go see him too. i stood before you, your heads of state and government, your ministers and representatives, and i spoke of the need to unite. the nations. i made a call to action for all states to fi

the big analysis around it as well are to correspond to use of july. thanks. you said, no. the united nations international court of justice has begun the hearings and the case against russia. ukraine claims that most schools violated the u. n's, genocide convention when it started its military operation in february last year or 2. charlotte do been ski elaborates on what exactly is being pursued by kid. the ukraine has for this case to the i c j saying that russia is in violation of the genocide convention. that convention assigned in 1948 and both countries, all signet tree to it. ukraine says rushes allegations of the genocide was taking place in parts of eastern europe in areas like new scans. and that's all false and use those as a pretext itself. it's so cold, special military operation in 2022. ukraine says that means it's in violation of the convention. russia says, well, if you cleans entire argument, is that there was no genocide and that just the representation is made to the course in its documents. then how can russia be in violation of the genocide convention? it says it simply doesn't make sense. and as a re

international court of justice began proceedings in the bastard, working is not mousse. this is not an international criminal court. this trial is more serious. it is part of the un system , its statute is part of the charter of the united nationssidering the claim of ukraine which was filed on february 26, that is, 2 days after the start of the special operation, the claim, well, which, in general, is essentially the case. mmm was presented to russia for in order for her to stop this special operation and return the territory altogether. well, that essentially boils down their claims. they take part first. well, they will listen to us for a day , then ukraine. then, in my opinion, more than 30 countries are interested in the decision of this court. this is weird. the coffin is great britain , this is canada, this is australia, who also want to take part, will also make certain statements, that is , with the evidence in this court , it is clear what the decision will most likely be from this court and before us is the 26th, when this session will take place, that is, september 26th. just a little bit later a question will arise. what should we do with one of the parts of the un, which is a statutory component of the united nati

court behind me with this, the international court of justice is in charge of the case or not russia abroad in a procedure claiming that the court has no jurisdiction. let me also remind you that this as the united nations court and russia is a member of the united nations, just as ukraine is. and russia is also a permanent member of the security council. that's a good night's nations, which is a very important organ. also, united nations. all right, we've got some support for you now and. and for being a one ferrari is carlos fine, says one, the single pull ground pri ending red bulls 15 race winning street, defending champion mux or stepan, who had won or reco 10 races in a row. only finished 5th off the struggling in qualifying on saturday. you know ras sides? no rental car is where it to be seen in the front row under the lights of singapore, ferries, posted a couple of signs with a perfect start and didn't even better and useful for robert you his teammate child . so the class over to the mercy, this is george russell. to make it an early february 12. and the race continued to go into res. favor logan sergeant cost the 1st safety car to come out in the next $16.00. allowing an early change of tires

of the international court of justice, a hearing arguments from russia and ukraine. about most goes claims. it launched its invasion to prevent genocide. ukraine brought the case to the united nations highest cold days off to russia. invaded last year, he is accused as moscow of abusing international law by full sway, alleging genocide denise, to new crime, russia once the case to be thrown out and objects to the quotes jurisdiction. your creed is not accusing russia of committing genocide. ukraine is also not accusing or russia or failing to prevent or punish each other. so on the contrary, as your crane cease, no genocide has occurred that too long should been not to reject the keys. because according to the courts, you are is brothers. there was no genocide they cannot be at violation of the engine side much jeffrey nice is the former lead prosecutor of the some of them the loss of each trial for the united nations of the international criminal tribunal for you to solve you. he says, ukraine made a wise move by approaching the quote, you know that ukraine is pursuing and successfully pursuing it, turn criminal proceedings, and to go into any of those proceedings. a favorable dec

the international court of justice, hearing arguments from russia and ukraine about claims by moscow that it launched its invasion to prevent genocide. you kind of brought the case to the united nations highest quotes dies off to russia invited last year. cubic uses must go on the abusing international more by falsely religion, genocide, and east a new crime. russia, once the case will be thrown out and objects to the court's jurisdiction. you agree is not accusing russia of commission. jennifer ukraine is also not accusing or russia or failing to prevent a punch in general. so on the contrary, your crane cease. no genocide has occurred that long should been not to reject the keys because according to the courts do or is brothers. if there was no genocide, they cannot be at violation of the engine side much which every nice is the former lead prosecutor of slipping on the loss of which for the united nations at the international criminal tribunal for you can slot via he says your crime made a wise move by approaching the course, we know that ukraine is pursuing and successfully pursuing it, turned criminal proceedings, and to go into any of those proceedings. a favorable decision by

in this situation and in this united nations organization, achieve the and putin and lavrov and other war criminals were on the bench of the international court of justiceench of the international tribunal , this international tribunal must be launched, vote at this general assembly, issue a mandate to the international court of justice and start a process against the russian aggressor and against russia as an aggressor country, this is the solution here question and this is a question of justice already international prosecution of the aggressor and putin his henchmen and this and at the same time the question must be resolved compensation payment of damages compensation and so on, a million injured ukrainians and those who are forced, forced refugees, migrants and families of the dead from the wounded and many, many other horrors of the war on our territory, who should be compensated by whom, well , it is obvious that the aggressor state, that is, russia , spoke about russia in the world at the general of the un assembly and the chancellor of the federal republic of germany, olaf scholz, let's listen to what the mayor said, without freedom is called o

international court of justice. hearing arguments from russia and ukraine, about most goes claims that had launched its invasion to prevent the genocide you're trying to prove because to the united nations highest court days of to rush it and cited last june. t accused as most go on abusing international law or by falsely alleging genocide and eastern new crime. russia wants the case to be thrown out and objects to the court's jurisdiction. your creed is not accusing russia of commission genocide. ukraine is also not accusing or russia or failing to prevent a bunch of stuff. on the contrary, ukraine cease, no genocide has occurred too long should been not to reject the keys. because according to the courts do or is brothers. if there was no genocide, they can not be at violation of the engine side. much which jeffrey nice as the former lead prosecutor of slip it on. the last of which for the united nations at the international criminal tribunal for you slot of you. he says, you kind made a wise move by approaching the court. we know that ukraine is pursuing and successfully pursuing it, turned criminal proceedings. and to go into any of those proceedings. a favorable decision by this court might be prayed in